Case: Martinez v. United States

3:26-cv-00949 | U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut

Filed Date: June 15, 2026

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case challenges the conduct of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, alleging that they committed multiple state law torts when they arrested the plaintiff in front of her minor children and subsequently deported her to Mexico.  On June 15, 2026, the plaintiff, a long-time resident of Connecticut, filed suit on behalf of herself and her minor children against the United States in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut. The plaintiff alleged that on June 9, 2025…

This case challenges the conduct of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, alleging that they committed multiple state law torts when they arrested the plaintiff in front of her minor children and subsequently deported her to Mexico. 

On June 15, 2026, the plaintiff, a long-time resident of Connecticut, filed suit on behalf of herself and her minor children against the United States in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut. The plaintiff alleged that on June 9, 2025, masked ICE agents unlawfully arrested her after pulling her out of her car, placing her in handcuffs, and driving away, leaving her children alone. The plaintiff was detained for more than a month before being deported to Mexico. Represented by law student interns and their supervising attorneys at the Worker and Immigrant Rights Advocacy Clinic at Yale Law School, the plaintiff brought eight state tort claims under the Federal Torts Claim Act (FTCA): intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment and false arrest, assault, abuse of process, recklessness, negligence, and loss of consortium. The plaintiff sought compensatory damages and attorneys' fees. The case was assigned to District Judge Kari A. Dooley and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Spector. 

On that same day, District Judge Dooley signed a standing protective order to ensure that sensitive documents exchanged during discovery remain secure and that confidential information is not improperly disclosed. The court set multiple deadlines: amended pleadings are due by August 18, 2026; discovery is due by December 15, 2026; and dispositive motions are due by January 29, 2027. 

As of July 23, 2026, this case is ongoing. 

Summary Authors

Kara Wilczynski (7/24/2026)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73482593/parties/martinez-v-united-states/


Judge(s)

Dooley, Kari Anne (Connecticut)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Finucane, Madelyn (Connecticut)

Wishnie, Michael J. (Connecticut)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

3:26-cv-00949

Complaint

June 15, 2026

June 15, 2026

Complaint

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73482593/martinez-v-united-states/

Last updated July 23, 2026, 10:25 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against USA ( Filing fee $405 receipt number ACTDC-8644007.), filed by Nancy Martinez.(Wishnie, Michael) Modified party name on 6/15/2026 (tm). (Entered: 06/15/2026)

June 15, 2026

June 15, 2026

Clearinghouse
2

Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(b), a disclosure statement required under Rule 7.1(a) must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 6/15/2026.(tm) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

June 15, 2026

June 15, 2026

3

Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 8/14/2026, Discovery due by 12/15/2026, Dispositive Motions due by 1/19/2027. Signed by Clerk on 06/15/2026. (ll) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

June 15, 2026

June 15, 2026

4

ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 6/15/2026 (ll) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

June 15, 2026

June 15, 2026

5

Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 6/15/2026.(ll) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

June 15, 2026

June 15, 2026

RECAP
6

Notice to Counsel and Litigants Regarding AI-Assisted Research: Attorneys and pro se litigants alike should exercise great caution in submitting any AI-generated language in filings before the Court. Use of AI without verification of the accuracy of the information it generates like any other shoddy research method from other sources or tools implicates Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, the central purpose of which is to deter baseless filings in district court and thus to streamline the administration and procedure of the federal courts. Rule 11 applies fully to actions filed by pro se litigants.Therefore, all parties are on notice that the Court has a no-tolerance policy for any briefing (AI-assisted or not) that hallucinates legal propositions or otherwise severely misstates the law. Such filings will often result in sanctions absent reasonable excuse. See generally Willis v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n et al, No. 3:25-CV-516-BN, 2025 WL 1408897 (N.D. Tex. May 15, 2025).(ll) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

June 15, 2026

June 15, 2026

7

Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction to conduct all proceedings in this civil action (including presiding over a jury or non-jury trial) and to order the entry of final judgment.(ll) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

June 15, 2026

June 15, 2026

8

NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of 4 Electronic Filing Order, 1 Complaint filed by Nancy Martinez, 7 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, 5 Standing Protective Order, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, 6 Notice re: AI-Assisted Research,,,, 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines Signed by Clerk on 6/15/2026.(ll) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

June 15, 2026

June 15, 2026

Notice re: Disclosure Statement

June 15, 2026

June 15, 2026

NEW Case Assignment

June 15, 2026

June 15, 2026

Notice re: AI-Assisted Research

June 15, 2026

June 15, 2026

CASE ASSIGNMENT: District Judge Kari A. Dooley assigned to the case. If the District Judge issues an Order of Referral to a Magistrate Judge for any matter other than settlement, the matter will be referred to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Spector. (bf)

June 15, 2026

June 15, 2026

9

NOTICE of Appearance by Madelyn Finucane on behalf of M. A.M., U. A.M., Nancy Martinez (Finucane, Madelyn) (Entered: 06/17/2026)

June 17, 2026

June 17, 2026

Request for Clerk to issue summons as to USA. (Wishnie, Michael)

June 17, 2026

June 17, 2026

Request to Issue Summons

June 17, 2026

June 17, 2026

10

ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *USA* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Michael J. Wishnie* *Michael J. Wishnie Jerome N. Frank Legal Services - Wall St* *127 Wall Street* *New Haven, CT 06511*. (ll) (Entered: 06/18/2026)

June 18, 2026

June 18, 2026

11

MOTION FOR LEAVE FOR LAW STUDENT INTERNS TO APPEAR by Nancy Martinez.Responses due by 7/14/2026 (Wishnie, Michael) (Entered: 06/23/2026)

June 23, 2026

June 23, 2026

12

ORDER granting 11 Motion for Law Student Appearance. Plaintiffs' law student interns are permitted to appear in this matter. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 6/25/2026. (AL) (Entered: 06/25/2026)

June 25, 2026

June 25, 2026

13

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Nancy Martinez (Wishnie, Michael) (Entered: 06/25/2026)

June 25, 2026

June 25, 2026

Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief

June 25, 2026

June 25, 2026

Case Details

State / Territory:

Connecticut

Case Type(s):

Immigration and/or the Border

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government

Key Dates

Filing Date: June 15, 2026

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Plaintiff is an individual suing on behalf of herself and her minor children

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Federal

The United States

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. § 2674

Other Dockets:

District of Connecticut 3:26-cv-00949

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Relief Sought:

Attorneys fees

Damages

Relief Granted:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

General/Misc.:

Aggressive behavior

Juveniles

Immigration/Border:

Deportation - procedure

Detention - procedures

Family Separation

Recommended Citation