Case: Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University v. Office of Management and Budget

1:26-cv-07040 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Filed Date: Aug. 18, 2026

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This lawsuit, filed by the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, challenges the government’s failure to disclose information under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) regarding its approval and rejection of social media disclosure requirements for immigrants and travelers to the United States. On August 18, 2026, the Knight Institute filed this suit in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) and the Offic…

This lawsuit, filed by the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, challenges the government’s failure to disclose information under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) regarding its approval and rejection of social media disclosure requirements for immigrants and travelers to the United States. On August 18, 2026, the Knight Institute filed this suit in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) and the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (“OIRA”). OIRA is a sub-department of OMB tasked with reviewing executive proposals involving collections of information from the public. The complaint alleged that OIRA and OMB failed to comply with FOIA requests within the statute's time limits and to grant the Knight Institute's request for a fee waiver across three requests filed between 2024 and 2026. The Knight Institute sought injunctive relief, asking the court to compel both agencies to search and produce the requested records and enjoin any fees charged relating to the requests. The three FOIA requests at issue — filed between August 2, 2024, and December 9, 2025 — went to Customs and Border Protection ("CBP"), the Department of State ("DOS"), and the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services ("USCIS"). OMB acknowledged receipt of the requests but has not released any of the requested records to date. This case was assigned to Judge Denise L. Cote.

The social media disclosure requirements at the center of this litigation stem from a series of agency proposals by DOS, CBP, DHS, and USCIS from 2020 to 2025, which all similarly sought to add requirements to key immigration and travel forms. Since the Obama Administration, the federal government has collected social media information on a voluntary basis from travelers and immigrants. In 2020, DHS sought to add a mandatory social media disclosure on twelve different immigration forms, including applications for asylum, naturalization, and registration for classification as a refugee. In 2022, CBP requested permission for a similar requirement for individuals who enter the country pursuant to the Visa Waiver Program. OIRA denied both proposals and, regarding the 2020 DHS proposal, concluded that DHS had failed to demonstrate "the practical utility" of collecting the information.

This case is ongoing as of October 1, 2026.

Summary Authors

Spencer Wang (10/1/2026)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

1:26-cv-07040

Complaint for Injunctive Relief

Knight First Amendment at Columbia University v. Office of Management and Budger

Aug. 18, 2026

Aug. 18, 2026

Complaint

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/74663721/knight-first-amendment-institute-at-columbia-university-v-office-of/

Last updated Oct. 4, 2026, 3:08 a.m.

Docket for: Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University v. Office of Management and Budget
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Aug. 18, 2026

COMPLAINT against Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-33305979)Document filed by Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. (Attachments: (1) Exhibit Exhibit A, (2) Exhibit Exhibit B, (3) Exhibit Exhibit C, (4) Exhibit Exhibit D, (5) Exhibit Exhibit E, (6) Exhibit Exhibit F).(Diakun, Anna)

1 Exhibit Exhibit A

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit Exhibit B

View on RECAP

3 Exhibit Exhibit C

View on RECAP

4 Exhibit Exhibit D

View on RECAP

5 Exhibit Exhibit E

View on RECAP

6 Exhibit Exhibit F

View on RECAP

Clearinghouse
2 Aug. 18, 2026

CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Diakun, Anna)

RECAP
3 Aug. 18, 2026

RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University..(Diakun, Anna)

RECAP
4 Aug. 18, 2026

REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Office of Management and Budget, re: [1] Complaint,. Document filed by Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University..(Diakun, Anna)

RECAP
5 Aug. 18, 2026

REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, re: [1] Complaint,. Document filed by Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University..(Diakun, Anna)

RECAP
6 Aug. 19, 2026

ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Office of Management and Budget. (sj)

RECAP
7 Aug. 19, 2026

ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. (sj)

RECAP
Aug. 19, 2026

CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Denise L. Cote. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions.

Aug. 19, 2026

Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), and Local Civil Rule 73.1, parties are notified that they may, with the approval of the assigned District Judge, consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj)

Aug. 19, 2026

Case Designated ECF. (sj)

8 Aug. 27, 2026

NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 10/16/2026 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 18B, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Denise L. Cote. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 8/27/2026) (vfr)

RECAP
9 Sept. 3, 2026

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jessica F. Rosenbaum on behalf of Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget..(Rosenbaum, Jessica)

RECAP
10 Sept. 3, 2026

LETTER addressed to Judge Denise L. Cote from Anna Diakun dated September 3, 2026 re: Proof of Service. Document filed by Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University..(Diakun, Anna)

RECAP
11 Sept. 16, 2026

SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED (FOIA CASE). Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs served on 8/27/2026, answer due 9/28/2026. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University..(Diakun, Anna)

RECAP
12 Sept. 16, 2026

SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED (FOIA CASE). Office of Management and Budget served on 8/27/2026, answer due 9/28/2026. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University..(Diakun, Anna)

RECAP
13 Sept. 16, 2026

SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED (FOIA CASE). All Defendants. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University..(Diakun, Anna)

RECAP
14 Sept. 28, 2026

ANSWER to [1] Complaint,. Document filed by Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget..(Rosenbaum, Jessica)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

New York

Case Type(s):

Immigration and/or the Border

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government

Key Dates

Filing Date: Aug. 18, 2026

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

The Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University is a New York not-for-profit corporation whose mission centers on freedom of speech and press advocacy. The organization is based at Columbia University.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Non-profit NON-religious organization

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

FOIA (Freedom of Information Act), 5 U.S.C. § 552

Other Dockets:

Southern District of New York 1:26-cv-07040

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Relief Sought:

Attorneys fees

Injunction

Relief Granted:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

General/Misc.:

Records Disclosure

Transportation

Immigration/Border:

Admission - procedure

Visas - procedures

Recommended Citation