Case: Democracy Defenders Fund v DOJ

1:25-cv-02791 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: Aug. 21, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case challenges the Department of Justice’s failure to respond to a Freedom of Information Act request for records linking President Trump or Mar-a-Lago to the Jeffrey Epstein investigations. On August 21, 2025, Democracy Defenders Fund (DDF) filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) for failing to produce records connecting President Trump or Mar-a-Lago to the investigations into Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwe…

This case challenges the Department of Justice’s failure to respond to a Freedom of Information Act request for records linking President Trump or Mar-a-Lago to the Jeffrey Epstein investigations.

On August 21, 2025, Democracy Defenders Fund (DDF) filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) for failing to produce records connecting President Trump or Mar-a-Lago to the investigations into Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Plaintiff alleged that it had submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to DOJ’s Criminal Division requesting these records on July 22, 2025, and that DOJ failed to respond within the statutory deadline, denied expedited processing, and withheld all documents. The complaint further alleged that the DOJ had previously reviewed the files in May 2025 and flagged mentions of President Trump. DDF alleged that the DOJ’s noncompliance violated multiple FOIA provisions, and argued that the DOJ’s refusal to produce the requested documents raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest and obstruction of public access to information of national significance. DDF asserted that all of its attempts to secure an administrative remedy had failed, and sought injunctive relief in the form of orders compelling the DOJ to conduct a reasonable search for records, produce non-exempt records, grant a fee waiver, and expedite proceedings. The case was assigned to U.S. District Judge Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly.

On September 11, 2025, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint noting that it had submitted a second FOIA request for records on July 28, 2025, and that the DOJ had also failed to fulfill this request. Through a Second Amended Complaint filed on October 8, 2025, and a Third Amended Complaint filed two months later, the lawsuit was significantly expanded to cover several FOIA requests pertaining to DOJ's handling of its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The factual record was updated to note that DOJ’s responses were marked by delays, denials of expedited processing, and failures to produce documents within statutory deadlines, with some components citing "unusual circumstances" or providing no response at all.

On April 15, 2026, Plaintiff filed a notice with the court regarding the Epstein Files Transparency Act (EFTA) (signed into law on November 19, 2025), which mandated that several records relating to the DOJ investigation into Jeffrey Epstein be released to the public. Plaintiff clarified that while "[t]here [was] overlap between the documents requested by DDF in the FOIA requests at issue in this lawsuit and the documents publicly released pursuant to EFTA," it was also true "that many records requested in the FOIA requests underlying this action were not provided in response to the Defendant’s obligations under EFTA." Plaintiff pointed to the DOJ's continued withholding of "three million pages of records from the Epstein Files, some of which may be responsive to DDF’s FOIA requests."

On September 30, 2026, the court granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment seeking expedited processing of their FOIA requests. Judge Kollar-Kotelly held that Plaintiff was entitled to expedited processing under a certain provision of FOIA, 28 C.F.R. § 16.5(e)(1)(iv), because it had demonstrated "widespread and exceptional media interest" and "possible questions about government integrity" with respect to records relating to the July 22, 2025 request, a narrowed subset of the July 28, 2025 request,  and communications among specified DOJ officials. 2026 WL 2938866. The court denied the motion for expedited processing under FOIA’s "compelling need" prong, 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)(E), finding that Plaintiff had not met the statutory criteria because it was not "primarily engaged in disseminating information". 2026 WL 2938866. The ruling resolved Plaintiff’s claims for expedited processing while limiting the scope of certain requests.

As of October 2026, this case is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Talia Richland (10/14/2026)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71168739/parties/democracy-defenders-fund-v-us-department-of-justice/


Judge(s)

Kollar-Kotelly, Colleen (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Chaudhuri, Pooja (District of Columbia)

Eisen, Norman Larry (District of Columbia)

Kovacs-Goodman, Jacob (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Defendant

Altabet, Jason (District of Columbia)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

1:25-cv-02791

Complaint

Democracy Defenders Fund v. U.S. Department of Justice

Aug. 21, 2025

Aug. 21, 2025

Complaint
9

1:25-cv-02791

Amended Complaint

Democracy Defenders Fund v. U.S. Department of Justice

Sept. 11, 2025

Sept. 11, 2025

Complaint
14

1:25-cv-02791

Second Amended Complaint

Democracy Defenders Fund v. U.S. Department of Justice

Oct. 8, 2025

Oct. 8, 2025

Complaint
22

1:25-cv-02791

Third Amended Complaint

Democracy Defenders Fund v. U.S. Department of Justice

Dec. 30, 2025

Dec. 30, 2025

Complaint
23

1:25-cv-02791

Notice Regarding DOJ Compliance with Epstein Files Transparency Act

Democracy Defenders Fund v. U.S. Department of Justice

April 15, 2026

April 15, 2026

Other
28

1:25-cv-02791

Memorandum Opinion

Democracy Defenders Fund v. U.S. Department of Justice

Sept. 30, 2026

Sept. 30, 2026

Order/Opinion

2026 WL 2938866

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71168739/democracy-defenders-fund-v-us-department-of-justice/

Last updated Nov. 5, 2026, 3:11 a.m.

Docket for: DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Aug. 21, 2025

COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-11904731) filed by DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit Exhibits A-E, # 3 Summons DOJ Summons, # 4 Summons AG Summons, # 5 Summons USAO Summons)(Null, Taryn) (Entered: 08/21/2025)

1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

2 Exhibit Exhibits A-E

View on PACER

3 Summons DOJ Summons

View on PACER

4 Summons AG Summons

View on PACER

5 Summons USAO Summons

View on PACER

Clearinghouse
2 Aug. 25, 2025

REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND. (Attachments: # 1 Summons USAO Summons, # 2 Summons AG Summons)(Null, Taryn) (Entered: 08/25/2025)

RECAP
3 Aug. 25, 2025

SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: # 1 Notice and Consent)(zmbs) (Entered: 08/25/2025)

RECAP
4 Aug. 25, 2025

ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 8/25/2025. (lcckk3) (Entered: 08/25/2025)

RECAP
Aug. 25, 2025

Notice of Error- New Case

Aug. 25, 2025

Case Assigned/Reassigned

Aug. 25, 2025

Case Assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. (zmbs)

Aug. 25, 2025

NOTICE OF NEW CASE ERROR regarding 1 Complaint,. The following error(s) need correction: Incorrect summonses. Please locate the summons applicable to your case at www.dcd.uscourts.gov/new-case-forms and file using the event Request for Summons to issue. (zmbs)

5 Aug. 27, 2025

NOTICE of Appearance by Tianna Jade Mays on behalf of DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND (Mays, Tianna) (Entered: 08/27/2025)

RECAP
6 Aug. 27, 2025

NOTICE of Appearance by Norman Larry Eisen on behalf of DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND (Eisen, Norman) (Entered: 08/27/2025)

RECAP
7 Aug. 27, 2025

NOTICE of Appearance by Pooja Chaudhuri on behalf of DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND (Chaudhuri, Pooja) (Entered: 08/27/2025)

RECAP
8 Aug. 27, 2025

NOTICE of Appearance by Jacob Kovacs-Goodman on behalf of DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND (Kovacs-Goodman, Jacob) (Entered: 08/27/2025)

RECAP
9 Sept. 11, 2025

AMENDED COMPLAINT against U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE filed by DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit Exhibits A - G)(Null, Taryn) (Entered: 09/11/2025)

Clearinghouse
10 Sept. 22, 2025

NOTICE of Appearance by Jason Altabet on behalf of U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (Altabet, Jason) (Entered: 09/22/2025)

RECAP
11 Sept. 22, 2025

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 9 Amended Complaint by 30 Days by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Altabet, Jason) (Entered: 09/22/2025)

RECAP
12 Sept. 25, 2025

NOTICE In Support of Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer the Amended Complaint by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE re 11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer (Altabet, Jason) (Entered: 09/25/2025)

RECAP
Sept. 25, 2025

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer

Sept. 25, 2025

Set/Reset Deadlines

Sept. 25, 2025

ORDER granting 11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE answer due 10/27/2025. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 9/25/2025. (lcckk3)

Sept. 25, 2025

Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 10/27/2025. (dot)

13 Oct. 3, 2025

MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint by DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Second Amended Complaint with Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit Comparison Second Amended and Amended Complaints, # 3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order on Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint)(Null, Taryn) (Entered: 10/03/2025)

1

View on RECAP

2

View on RECAP

3

View on RECAP

RECAP
14 Oct. 8, 2025

AMENDED COMPLAINT DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND against U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE filed by DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND.(Null, Taryn) (Entered: 10/08/2025)

Clearinghouse
Oct. 8, 2025

Order on Motion for Leave to File

Oct. 8, 2025

MINUTE ORDER granting 13 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 10/8/2025. (lcckk3)

15 Oct. 21, 2025

MOTION for Summary Judgment by DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, # 2 Supplement Brief, # 3 Declaration Declarations and Exhibits, # 4 Statement of Facts Statement of Facts)(Null, Taryn) (Entered: 10/21/2025)

1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order

View on PACER

2 Supplement Brief

View on PACER

3 Declaration Declarations and Exhibits

View on PACER

4 Statement of Facts Statement of Facts

View on PACER

RECAP
16 Nov. 17, 2025

Unopposed MOTION to Expedite Consideration, Joint MOTION for Briefing Schedule by DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Null, Taryn) (Entered: 11/17/2025)

1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order

View on PACER

RECAP
17 Nov. 17, 2025

ENTERED IN ERROR.....MOTION for Leave to File Supplement Complaint by DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Supplemental Complaint, # 2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Null, Taryn) Modified on 11/18/2025, pursuant to Counsel (mg). (Entered: 11/17/2025)

RECAP
18 Nov. 19, 2025

ORDER granting 16 Motion to Expedite; granting 16 Motion for Briefing Schedule. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 11/18/2025. (lcckk3) (Entered: 11/19/2025)

RECAP
Nov. 19, 2025

Set/Reset Deadlines: Defendant's Cross Motion due by 12/11/2025. Defendant's Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment due by 12/11/2025. Plaintiff's Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment due by 12/22/2025. (dot)

19 Dec. 4, 2025

MOTION for Leave to File THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT by DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Third Amended Complaint with Exhibits, # 2 Supplement Exhibit Comparison Third Amended and Amended Complaints, # 3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Oder)(Null, Taryn) (Entered: 12/04/2025)

1 Supplement Third Amended Complaint with Exhibits

View on PACER

2 Supplement Exhibit Comparison Third Amended and Amended Complaints

View on PACER

3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Oder

View on PACER

RECAP
Dec. 5, 2025

Set/Reset Deadlines

20 Dec. 11, 2025

Memorandum in opposition to re 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Facts, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Altabet, Jason) (Entered: 12/11/2025)

1 Statement of Facts

View on PACER

2 Text of Proposed Order

View on RECAP

RECAP
21 Dec. 22, 2025

REPLY to opposition to motion re 15 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND. (Null, Taryn) (Entered: 12/22/2025)

RECAP
22 Dec. 30, 2025

AMENDED COMPLAINT against U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE filed by DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND.(Null, Taryn) (Entered: 12/30/2025)

Clearinghouse
Dec. 30, 2025

Order on Motion for Leave to File

Dec. 30, 2025

MINUTE ORDER: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's 19 Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint. Defendant consents to portions of Plaintiff's proposed amendments and objects to others. For the reasons that follow, the Court shall GRANT Plaintiff's 19 Motion. Plaintiff's Motion implicates the following three FOIA requests made by Plaintiff to various components of DOJ: (i) a July 22, 2025, request to the Criminal Division of DOJ ("CRM"), the Executive Office for United States Attorneys for DOJ ("EOUSA"), and the FBI for investigative files regarding Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell that mention President Trump or his home in Mar-a-Lago; (ii) a July 28, 2025, request to the CRM, the EOUSA, the FBI, the Office of Attorney General ("OAG"), and the Office of the Deputy Attorney General ("DAG") for documents relating to DOJ's dissemination of information regarding Epstein and Maxwell; and (iii) an August 6, 2025, request to ODAG, OAG, and the Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") for documents relating to Maxwell's transfer to Federal Prison Camp Bryan. The operative Complaint in this matter---Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint---already contains factual allegations regarding Plaintiff's July 22, 2025, request to CRM and Plaintiff's July 28, 2025, request to CRM, OAG, and DAG. In other words, the operative Complaint contains allegations against all the DOJ components involved in the July 22 and July 28 requests except the EOUSA and the FBI. Plaintiff's proposed Third Amended Complaint would amend Plaintiff's factual allegations to include Plaintiff's July 22 July 28 requests to the EOUSA and the FBI. Plaintiff has conferred with Defendant regarding these amendments and represents that Defendant consents to these amendments. Accordingly, the Court shall GRANT Plaintiff's 19 Motion with respect to the amendments concerning the July 22, 2025, request and the July 28, 2025, request. Plaintiff also seeks to amend its Complaint to include factual allegations regarding its August 6, 2025, request to ODAG, OAG, and BOP for documents relating to Maxwell's transfer to Federal Prison Camp Bryan. Plaintiff represents that Defendant objects to this amendment because it involves a request that is not identical to the requests already in the case. The Court shall GRANT Plaintiff's 19 Motion with respect to the amendment concerning the August 6, 2025, request. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure instruct courts to "freely give leave [to amend] when justice so requires." Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). This Rule "is to be construed liberally." Belizan v. Hershon, 434 F.3d 579, 582 (D.C. Cir. 2006). "In the absence of any apparent or declared reason---such as undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment, futility of amendment, etc.---the leave sought should, as the rules require, be freely given." Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962). Defendant has not provided any reason to support its opposition to Plaintiff's proposed amendment. Furthermore, Plaintiff has shown that Defendant would not be unduly prejudiced by the addition of the August 6 request because the August 6 request is closely related to the requests already being litigated in this case. Accordingly, the Court shall GRANT Plaintiff's 19 Motion with respect to the amendment involving the August 6, 2025, request, as well. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's 19 Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint is GRANTED . Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 12/30/2025. (lcckk3)

23 April 15, 2026

NOTICE REGARDING DOJ COMPLIANCE WITH EPSTEIN FILES TRANSPARENCY ACT by DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS FUND (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Final DOJ Response Letter)(Null, Taryn) (Entered: 04/15/2026)

1 Supplement Final DOJ Response Letter

View on RECAP

Clearinghouse
24 April 16, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by James D. Todd, Jr on behalf of All Defendants (Todd, James) (Entered: 04/16/2026)

RECAP
25 April 29, 2026

RESPONSE re 23 Notice (Other) filed by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. (Todd, James) (Entered: 04/29/2026)

RECAP
26 April 30, 2026

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE as to U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. Attorney Jason Altabet terminated. (Altabet, Jason) (Entered: 04/30/2026)

RECAP
27 Sept. 30, 2026

ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 15 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 9/30/2026. (lcckk3) (Entered: 09/30/2026)

Clearinghouse
28 Sept. 30, 2026

MEMORANDUM OPINION accompanying 27 Order. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 9/30/2026. (lcckk3)

Clearinghouse
29 Oct. 14, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Steven Chasin on behalf of U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (Chasin, Steven) (Entered: 10/14/2026)

RECAP
30 Oct. 14, 2026

ANSWER to 22 Amended Complaint (Third Amended Complaint) by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.(Chasin, Steven) (Entered: 10/14/2026)

RECAP
Nov. 3, 2026

.Order

Nov. 3, 2026

MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of Defendant's 30 Answer to Plaintiff's 22 Third Amended Complaint, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall MEET AND CONFER and file a Joint Status Report proposing a schedule for proceeding in this matter. This report should address the status of the Plaintiff's FOIA request, the anticipated number of documents responsive to the Plaintiff's FOIA request, the anticipated date(s) for release of the documents requested by Plaintiff, whether a motion for an Open America stay is likely in this case, whether a Vaughn index will be required in this case, and any other matters necessary to bring to the Court's attention. The parties shall file this report on or before December 4, 2026. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 11/3/2026. (lcckk3)

Nov. 3, 2026

Set/Reset Deadlines

Nov. 3, 2026

Set/Reset Deadlines: Joint Meet & Confer Statement due by 12/4/2026. (dot)

Case Details

State / Territory:

District of Columbia

Case Type(s):

Criminal Justice (Other)

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government

Key Dates

Filing Date: Aug. 21, 2025

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Democracy Defenders Fund, a nonpartisan, non-profit section 501(c)(3) organization committed to defending and strengthening democracy

Plaintiff Type(s):

Non-profit NON-religious organization

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Federal

U.S. Department of Justice

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

FOIA (Freedom of Information Act), 5 U.S.C. § 552

Other Dockets:

District of District of Columbia 1:25-cv-02791

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Sought:

Attorneys fees

Document/Information

Stay of government action

Injunction

Relief Granted:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Issues

General/Misc.:

Confidentiality

Record-keeping

Recommended Citation