Case: Jane Doe v. District of Columbia

1:92-cv-00635 | U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Filed Date: March 11, 1992

Closed Date: Aug. 31, 1993

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In March 1992, inmates infected with HIV in the District of Columbia's Lorton Prison filed suit in the District of DC against the District of Columbia, represented by an attorney from the Open Society Initiative. Plaintiffs sued using pseudonyms under section 1983 for violation of their Fifth Amendment right to privacy and Eighth Amendment right to be free of cruel and unusual punishment. In addition, certain plaintiffs sued for violation of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. section 794, for …

In March 1992, inmates infected with HIV in the District of Columbia's Lorton Prison filed suit in the District of DC against the District of Columbia, represented by an attorney from the Open Society Initiative. Plaintiffs sued using pseudonyms under section 1983 for violation of their Fifth Amendment right to privacy and Eighth Amendment right to be free of cruel and unusual punishment. In addition, certain plaintiffs sued for violation of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. section 794, for discrimination in the participation of programs offered by the defendant. Plaintiffs also alleged violations of the DC Freedom of Information Law, D.C. Code section 1-1521, based on defendant's disclosure of confidential medical records. Finally, plaintiffs alleged breach of confidential relationship, invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Plaintiffs sought damages, declaratory relief, and a permanent injunction.

In May 1992, defendant moved to dismiss the action. In November 1992, at the hearing on that motion, defendant agreed that the motion should be treated as a motion for summary judgment and filed a statement of material facts not in dispute. Doe v. District of Columbia, 1993 WL 128496 (D.D.C. April 13, 1993). In his order dated April 1993, Judge Louis Oberdorfer denied defendant's motion for summary judgment due to lack of evidence of undisputable facts.

The docket reveals that the case subsequently settled. Although the underlying agreement itself does not appear in the docket, there is a motion for adoption of a consent order about attorneys' fees, as well as an order granting D.C. Prisoners Legal Services Project $37,500 in fees, and an August, 1993 stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice.

Summary Authors

John Maksymonko (8/1/2005)

People


Judge(s)

Oberdorfer, Louis Falk (District of Columbia)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Hall, Aurie Talbor (Maryland)

Smith, Jonathan Mark (District of Columbia)

Attorneys(s) for Defendant

Amato, Maria-Claudia T. (District of Columbia)

Judge(s)

Oberdorfer, Louis Falk (District of Columbia)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Hall, Aurie Talbor (Maryland)

Smith, Jonathan Mark (District of Columbia)

Attorneys(s) for Defendant

Amato, Maria-Claudia T. (District of Columbia)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:92-cv-00635

Docket (PACER)

Doe v. DC

Aug. 31, 1993

Aug. 31, 1993

Docket
4

1:92-cv-00635

Complaint

March 11, 1992

March 11, 1992

Complaint
124

1:92-cv-00635

Memorandum and Order

1993 WL 128496, 1993 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 4815

April 13, 1993

April 13, 1993

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

Last updated Aug. 15, 2022, 3:16 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

MOTION filed by plaintiff(s) to seal the applications to proceed in forma pauperis, the affirmance and all subsequent pleadings using pseudonyms (adc) (Entered: 03/16/1992)

March 11, 1992

March 11, 1992

2

ORDER by Judge John G. Penn : granting motion to seal the applications to proceed in forma pauperis, the affirmance and all subsequent pleadings using pseudonyms [1-1] by SAMUEL ROE, JOHN DOE, KAREN ZOE, SALLY ROE, JOHN DOE (N) (adc) (Entered: 03/16/1992)

March 11, 1992

March 11, 1992

3

MOTION filed by plaintiff(s) to proceed in forma pauperis placed under seal in the Vault in Room 1800 (adc) (Entered: 03/16/1992)

March 11, 1992

March 11, 1992

4

COMPLAINT filed summons (1) issued ; affirmation revealing the plaintiffs names placed under seal in the Vault in Room 1800 (adc) (Entered: 03/16/1992)

March 11, 1992

March 11, 1992

5

MOTION filed by defendant DC to extend time to 5/8/92 to respond to complaint (sm) (Entered: 04/10/1992)

April 9, 1992

April 9, 1992

7

INTERROGATORIES filed by plaintiff(s) to defendant DC (sm) (Entered: 04/15/1992)

April 14, 1992

April 14, 1992

8

RESPONSE by plaintiff(s) in opposition to motion to extend time to 5/8/92 to respond to complaint [5-1] by DC (sm) (Entered: 04/16/1992)

April 15, 1992

April 15, 1992

9

ORDER by Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer : granting motion to extend time to 5/8/92 to respond to complaint [5-1] by DC brief due 5/8/92 ; (N) (sm) (Entered: 05/04/1992)

May 1, 1992

May 1, 1992

10

MOTION filed by defendant DC to extend time to 5/12/92 within which to respond to the complaint (sm) (Entered: 05/11/1992)

May 8, 1992

May 8, 1992

11

MOTION filed by defendant DC to dismiss (sm) (Entered: 05/13/1992)

May 12, 1992

May 12, 1992

12

MOTION filed by defendant DC for protective order (sm) (Entered: 05/13/1992)

May 12, 1992

May 12, 1992

13

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by plaintiff(s) SALLY ROE, KAREN ZOE, JOHN DOE, SAMUEL ROE and JANE DOE of defendant DC at the Offices of the D.C. Prisoners' Legal Services Project, at 10:00 a.m. on June 22, 1992 (adc) (Entered: 05/22/1992)

May 19, 1992

May 19, 1992

14

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by plaintiff(s) SALLY ROE, KAREN ZOE, JOHN DOE, SAMUEL ROE and JANE DOE of Mary Campbell (9:00 a.m.) and William Hall, M.D. (1:00 p.m.) at the Offices of the D.C. Prisoners' Legal Services Project, Inc. (adc) (Entered: 05/22/1992)

May 19, 1992

May 19, 1992

15

RESPONSE by plaintiff(s) in opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss [11-1] by DC (adc) (Entered: 05/28/1992)

May 26, 1992

May 26, 1992

16

ERRATA by plaintiff(s) to correct an error in the Certificate of Service attached to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint from May 25, 1992 to May 26, 1992 (adc) (Entered: 05/28/1992)

May 27, 1992

May 27, 1992

17

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff(s) in opposition to defendant's motion for protective order [12-1] by DC (adc) (Entered: 05/28/1992)

May 27, 1992

May 27, 1992

18

MOTION filed by plaintiff(s) to compel discovery (adc) (Entered: 05/28/1992)

May 27, 1992

May 27, 1992

19

MOTION filed by defendant DC to extend time to within which to respond to plaintiffs' opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss and defendant's motion for a protective order (adc) (Entered: 06/11/1992)

June 8, 1992

June 8, 1992

20

ORDER by Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer : granting motion to extend time to 6/18/92 within which to respond to plaintiffs' opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss and defendant's motion for a protective order [19-1] by DC (N) (mon) (Entered: 06/16/1992)

June 16, 1992

June 16, 1992

22

RESPONSE by plaintiff(s) in opposition to motion for protective order [12-1] by DC, motion to dismiss [11-1] by DC, motion to extend time to 5/12/92 within which to respond to the complaint [10-1] by DC (adc) (Entered: 06/18/1992)

June 16, 1992

June 16, 1992

23

MOTION filed by plaintiff(s) to file affirmance under seal , and for a protective order (adc) (Entered: 06/18/1992)

June 16, 1992

June 16, 1992

24

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by plaintiff(s) of plaintiff RICHARD POE on June 23, 1992 at 2:00 p.m. (adc) (Entered: 06/18/1992)

June 16, 1992

June 16, 1992

25

REPLY by defendant DC to plaintiffs' opposition to motion to dismiss [11-1] by DC (adc) (Entered: 06/22/1992)

June 19, 1992

June 19, 1992

26

REPLY by defendant DC to plaintiffs' opposition to motion for protective order [12-1] by DC (adc) (Entered: 06/22/1992)

June 19, 1992

June 19, 1992

27

RESPONSE by defendant DC in opposition to motion to compel discovery [18-1] by JANE DOE, SAMUEL ROE, JOHN DOE, KAREN ZOE, SALLY ROE (adc) (Entered: 06/22/1992)

June 19, 1992

June 19, 1992

28

ORDER by Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer : granting motion to compel discovery [18-1] by JANE DOE, SAMUEL ROE, JOHN DOE, KAREN ZOE, SALLY ROE, denying motion for protective order [12-1] by DC motion hearing set for 1:45 9/11/92 on motion to dismiss ; (N) (mon) (Entered: 06/22/1992)

June 22, 1992

June 22, 1992

29

ANSWER by defendant DC to plaintiff's first set of interrogatories; attachments (adc) (Entered: 07/28/1992)

July 27, 1992

July 27, 1992

30

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by plaintiff(s) of John Noble at the offices of D.C. Prisoners' Legal Services Project, Inc. on 9/23/92 at 1:00 p.m. (adc) (Entered: 08/06/1992)

Aug. 5, 1992

Aug. 5, 1992

31

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by plaintiff(s) of David Roach on 9/23/92, at the offices of D.C. Prisoners' Legal Services Project, Inc. at 9:30 a.m. (adc) (Entered: 08/06/1992)

Aug. 5, 1992

Aug. 5, 1992

32

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by plaintiff(s) of Arthur Graves at the offices of D.C. Prisoners' Legal Services Project, Inc., on 9/17/92, at 1:00 p.m. (adc) (Entered: 08/06/1992)

Aug. 5, 1992

Aug. 5, 1992

33

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION (amended) by plaintiff(s) of William Hall, M.D. at the offices of D.C. Prisoners' Legal Services Project, Inc., on 8/25/92 at 10:00 a.m. (adc) (Entered: 08/06/1992)

Aug. 5, 1992

Aug. 5, 1992

34

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION (amended) by plaintiff(s) of Mary Campbell at the offices of D.C. Prisoners' Legal Services Project, Inc., at 10:00 a.m., on 8/24/92 (adc) (Entered: 08/06/1992)

Aug. 5, 1992

Aug. 5, 1992

35

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by plaintiff(s) of defendant DC on 8/19/92 at 10:00 a.m., at the offices of D.C. Prisoners' Legal Services Project, Inc. (adc) (Entered: 08/06/1992)

Aug. 5, 1992

Aug. 5, 1992

36

ANSWER (supplemental) by defendant DC to plaintiff's first set of interrogatories; attachment (dot) (Entered: 08/17/1992)

Aug. 14, 1992

Aug. 14, 1992

37

MOTION filed by defendant DC to continue the 9/11/92 hearing on defendant's motion to dismiss to 9/18/92 at 1:45 p.m. (adc) (Entered: 08/21/1992)

Aug. 20, 1992

Aug. 20, 1992

38

ORDER by Judge Stanley Sporkin : granting motion to continue the 9/11/92 hearing on defendant's motion to dismiss to 9/18/92 at 1:45 p.m. [37-1] by DC motion hearing set for 1:45 9/18/92 ; (N) (mon) (Entered: 08/31/1992)

Aug. 31, 1992

Aug. 31, 1992

39

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by plaintiff(s) of plaintiff(s) RICHARD POE on 9/14/92, at 11:00 a.m., at the Maximum Security Facility at Lorton, Virginia (adc) (Entered: 09/02/1992)

Sept. 1, 1992

Sept. 1, 1992

40

MOTION filed by plaintiff(s) SALLY ROE, plaintiff(s) KAREN ZOE, plaintiff(s) JOHN DOE, plaintiff(s) SAMUEL ROE, plaintiff(s) JANE DOE, plaintiff(s) RICHARD POE to amend complaint [4-1] ; EXHIBIT (SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT) (dot) (Entered: 09/08/1992)

Sept. 4, 1992

Sept. 4, 1992

41

MOTION filed by defendant DC to continue motions hearing to 10/13/92 (adc) (Entered: 09/16/1992)

Sept. 15, 1992

Sept. 15, 1992

42

ORDER by Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer : granting motion to continue motions hearing until further order of the Court. (N) (mon) (Entered: 09/21/1992)

Sept. 21, 1992

Sept. 21, 1992

43

SECOND INTERROGATORIES and request to produce documents filed by plaintiff(s) JANE DOE, et al. to defendant DC (pob) (Entered: 09/29/1992)

Sept. 28, 1992

Sept. 28, 1992

44

MOTION filed by plaintiff(s) for discovery sanctions ; exhibits (7) (adc) (Entered: 10/16/1992)

Oct. 15, 1992

Oct. 15, 1992

45

INTERROGATORIES (first set) filed by defendant DC to plaintiff(s) RICHARD POE (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

Oct. 20, 1992

Oct. 20, 1992

46

REQUEST by defendant DC to plaintiff(s) RICHARD POE for production of documents (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

Oct. 20, 1992

Oct. 20, 1992

47

INTERROGATORIES (first set) filed by defendant DC to plaintiff(s) SAMUEL ROE (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

Oct. 20, 1992

Oct. 20, 1992

48

INTERROGATORIES (first set) filed by defendant DC to plaintiff(s) JOHN DOE (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

Oct. 20, 1992

Oct. 20, 1992

49

INTERROGATORIES (first set) filed by defendant DC to plaintiff(s) JOHN DOE (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

Oct. 20, 1992

Oct. 20, 1992

50

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by defendant DC of plaintiff(s) KAREN ZOE on 12/8/92 at 10:00 a.m., at the Medium Security Facility (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

Oct. 20, 1992

Oct. 20, 1992

52

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by defendant DC of plaintiff(s) JOHN DOE on 12/9/92 at 10:00 a.m., at the Central Facility (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

Oct. 20, 1992

Oct. 20, 1992

53

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by defendant DC of plaintiff(s) SAMUEL ROE on 12/9/92 at 2:00 p.m., at the Medium Security Facility (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

Oct. 20, 1992

Oct. 20, 1992

54

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by defendant DC of plaintiff(s) RICHARD POE on 12/10/92 at 10:00 a.m. at the Offices of Defense Counsel (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

Oct. 20, 1992

Oct. 20, 1992

55

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by defendant DC of plaintiff(s) JANE DOE on 12/7/92 at 10:00 a.m., at the Minimum Security Facility (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

Oct. 20, 1992

Oct. 20, 1992

56

INTERROGATORIES (first set) filed by defendant DC to plaintiff(s) JANE DOE (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

Oct. 20, 1992

Oct. 20, 1992

57

REQUEST by defendant DC to plaintiff(s) JANE DOE for production of documents (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

Oct. 20, 1992

Oct. 20, 1992

58

INTERROGATORIES (first set) filed by defendant DC to plaintiff(s) KAREN ZOE (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

Oct. 20, 1992

Oct. 20, 1992

59

REQUEST by defendant DC to plaintiff(s) KAREN ZOE for production of documents (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

Oct. 20, 1992

Oct. 20, 1992

60

INTERROGATORIES (first set) filed by defendant DC to plaintiff(s) SALLY ROE (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

Oct. 20, 1992

Oct. 20, 1992

70

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by defendant DC of Jean Coe on 12/8/92 at 2:00 p.m., at the Correctional Treatment Facility (adc) (Entered: 11/12/1992)

Oct. 20, 1992

Oct. 20, 1992

71

INTERROGATORIES (first set) filed by defendant DC Jean Coe (adc) (Entered: 11/12/1992)

Oct. 20, 1992

Oct. 20, 1992

72

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by defendant DC of Peter Foe on 12/10/92 at 10:00 a.m., at the office of defense counsel (adc) (Entered: 11/12/1992)

Oct. 20, 1992

Oct. 20, 1992

73

INTERROGATORIES filed by defendant DC of Peter Foe (adc) (Entered: 11/12/1992)

Oct. 20, 1992

Oct. 20, 1992

74

REQUEST by defendant DC to plaintiff(s) SALLY ROE for production of documents (adc) (Entered: 11/12/1992)

Oct. 20, 1992

Oct. 20, 1992

75

REQUEST by defendant DC for production of documents to Peter Foe (adc) (Entered: 11/12/1992)

Oct. 20, 1992

Oct. 20, 1992

62

MOTION filed by defendant DC to extend time to an additional two days to within which to oppose to plaintiffs' motion for discovery sanctions (adc) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

Nov. 3, 1992

Nov. 3, 1992

63

MOTION filed by defendant DC to extend time to 11/30/92 to answer plaintiffs' second set of interrogatories and request for production of documents (adc) (Entered: 11/06/1992)

Nov. 5, 1992

Nov. 5, 1992

64

RESPONSE by defendant DC in opposition to motion for discovery sanctions [44-1] by SAMUEL ROE, JOHN DOE, KAREN ZOE, SALLY ROE (adc) (Entered: 11/06/1992)

Nov. 5, 1992

Nov. 5, 1992

65

ORDER by Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer : motion hearing set for 1:45 11/12/92 ; (N) (mon) (Entered: 11/10/1992)

Nov. 10, 1992

Nov. 10, 1992

66

ORDER by Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer : granting motion to extend time to an additional two days to 11/5/92 within which to oppose to plaintiffs' motion for discovery sanctions [62-1] by DC (N) (mon) (Entered: 11/10/1992)

Nov. 10, 1992

Nov. 10, 1992

67

RESPONSE by plaintiff(s) in opposition to motion to extend time to 11/30/92 to answer plaintiffs' second set of interrogatories and request for production of documents [63-1] by DC (adc) (Entered: 11/12/1992)

Nov. 12, 1992

Nov. 12, 1992

68

REPLY by plaintiff(s)to defendant's` response to motion for discovery sanctions [44-1] by SAMUEL ROE, JOHN DOE, KAREN ZOE, SALLY ROE (adc) (Entered: 11/12/1992)

Nov. 12, 1992

Nov. 12, 1992

69

RESPONSE (OPPOSITIONS) by plaintiff(s) to defendant's cross motion for sanctions and costs (adc) (Entered: 11/12/1992)

Nov. 12, 1992

Nov. 12, 1992

STATUS HEARING before Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer : plaintiffs' motion for sanctons is withdrawn. Reporter: Vernell Marshall (mon) (Entered: 11/13/1992)

Nov. 13, 1992

Nov. 13, 1992

76

ORDER by Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer : granting motion to extend time to 11/30/92 to answer plaintiffs' second set of interrogatories and request for production of documents [63-1] by DC (N) (mon) (Entered: 11/16/1992)

Nov. 16, 1992

Nov. 16, 1992

77

ORDER by Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer : granting motion to amend complaint [4-1] [40-1] by plaintiff(s)sssss (N) (mon) (Entered: 11/17/1992)

Nov. 16, 1992

Nov. 16, 1992

114

AMENDED COMPLAINT (second) by plaintiff(s) adding JEAN COE, PETER FOE amending complaint [4-1] (adc) (Entered: 02/24/1993)

Nov. 16, 1992

Nov. 16, 1992

78

MOTION filed by plaintiff(s) to extend time to 11/18/92 to file stipulation concerning discovery ; exhibit (adc) Modified on 11/19/1992 (Entered: 11/19/1992)

Nov. 18, 1992

Nov. 18, 1992

79

ORDER by Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer : granting motion to extend time to 11/18/92 to file stipulation concerning discovery [78-1] by JOHN DOE, KAREN ZOE, SALLY ROE (N) (mon) (Entered: 11/20/1992)

Nov. 18, 1992

Nov. 18, 1992

80

RESPONSE by plaintiff(s) to defendant's request for production of documents (adc) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

Nov. 23, 1992

Nov. 23, 1992

81

MOTION filed by plaintiff(s) to extend time to 12/2/92 to file executed interrogatory answers (adc) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

Nov. 23, 1992

Nov. 23, 1992

82

ANSWER by plaintiff(s) KAREN ZOE to defendant's first set of interrogatories (adc) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

Nov. 23, 1992

Nov. 23, 1992

83

ANSWER by plaintiff(s) JANE DOE to defendant's first set of interrogatories (adc) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

Nov. 23, 1992

Nov. 23, 1992

84

ANSWER by plaintiff(s) JOHN DOE to defendant's first set of interrogatories (adc) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

Nov. 23, 1992

Nov. 23, 1992

85

OBJECTIONS by plaintiff(s) SALLY ROE to request [74-1] by DC (adc) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

Nov. 23, 1992

Nov. 23, 1992

86

ANSWER by Jean Coe to defendant's first set of interrogatories (adc) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

Nov. 23, 1992

Nov. 23, 1992

87

ANSWER by Peter Foe to defendant's first set of interrogatories (adc) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

Nov. 23, 1992

Nov. 23, 1992

88

ANSWER by plaintiff(s) RICHARD POE to defendant's first set of interrogatories (adc) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

Nov. 23, 1992

Nov. 23, 1992

89

ANSWER by plaintiff(s) SAMUEL ROE to defendant's first set of interrogatories (adc) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

Nov. 23, 1992

Nov. 23, 1992

90

REQUEST (supplemental) by plaintiff(s) to defendant DC for production of documents (adc) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

Nov. 23, 1992

Nov. 23, 1992

91

NOTICE OF FILING by defendant DC the statement of material facts to which there is no genuine dispute (adc) (Entered: 11/24/1992)

Nov. 23, 1992

Nov. 23, 1992

92

STIPULATION filed and fiated by Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer regarding certain interrogatories; that plaintiffs withdraw their motion for sanctions without prejudie to refile and that defendant withdraws its cross motion for sanctions without prejudice to refile . (N) (pob) (Entered: 11/25/1992)

Nov. 24, 1992

Nov. 24, 1992

93

ANSWER by plaintiff(s) KAREN ZOE to defendant's first set of interrogatories (adc) (Entered: 12/02/1992)

Nov. 30, 1992

Nov. 30, 1992

94

ANSWER by Jean Coe to defendant's first set of interrogatories (adc) (Entered: 12/02/1992)

Nov. 30, 1992

Nov. 30, 1992

95

ANSWER by plaintiff(s) JANE DOE to defendant's first set of interrogatories (adc) Modified on 12/03/1992 (Entered: 12/03/1992)

Dec. 2, 1992

Dec. 2, 1992

97

ANSWER by plaintiff(s) SAMUEL ROE to defendant's first set of interrogatories (adc) (Entered: 12/03/1992)

Dec. 2, 1992

Dec. 2, 1992

98

ANSWER by plaintiff(s) RICHARD POE to defendant's first set of interrogatories (adc) (Entered: 12/03/1992)

Dec. 2, 1992

Dec. 2, 1992

99

ORDER by Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer : granting motion to extend time to 12/2/92 to file executed interrogatory answers [81-1] by JOHN DOE, KAREN ZOE, SALLY ROE (N) (mon) (Entered: 12/07/1992)

Dec. 7, 1992

Dec. 7, 1992

100

MOTION filed by plaintiff(s) for discovery sanctions (adc) (Entered: 12/08/1992)

Dec. 7, 1992

Dec. 7, 1992

111

RESPONSE by plaintiff(s) in opposition to motion for summary judgment; exhibits (7) (adc) (Entered: 01/04/1993)

Dec. 10, 1992

Dec. 10, 1992

112

MEMORANDUM by defendant DC in opposition to request for jury trial; "Let this be filed" (adc) (Entered: 01/04/1993)

Dec. 11, 1992

Dec. 11, 1992

101

RESPONSE by defendant DC in opposition to motion for discovery sanctions [100-1] by JOHN DOE, KAREN ZOE, SALLY ROE (adc) (Entered: 12/22/1992)

Dec. 18, 1992

Dec. 18, 1992

Case Details

State / Territory: District of Columbia

Case Type(s):

Prison Conditions

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 11, 1992

Closing Date: Aug. 31, 1993

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Five prisoners who are infected with HIV and are incarcerated in District of Columbia correctional facilities alleging correctional officials unlawfully and without permission revealed their HIV status to other prisoners and to correctional staff

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: Unknown

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

District of Columbia Correctional Facilities, Regional

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Section 504 (Rehabilitation Act), 29 U.S.C. § 701

State law

Constitutional Clause(s):

Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Due Process

Availably Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

Discrimination-basis:

Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)

Medical/Mental Health:

Medical care, general

Type of Facility:

Government-run