Case: Morrison v. Hall

6:93-cv-06383 | U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

Filed Date: Nov. 23, 1993

Closed Date: 2002

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On November 23, 1993, an inmate at the Oregon State Penitentiary filed a lawsuit pro se under 42 U.S.C. 1983 against the Oregon Department of Corrections in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon. The plaintiff alleged that his constitutional rights had been violated by the mail regulations at the prison, which resulted in the prison returning a magazine that the inmate received back to the publisher. On April 27, 1995, the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon (Judge Mic…

On November 23, 1993, an inmate at the Oregon State Penitentiary filed a lawsuit pro se under 42 U.S.C. 1983 against the Oregon Department of Corrections in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon. The plaintiff alleged that his constitutional rights had been violated by the mail regulations at the prison, which resulted in the prison returning a magazine that the inmate received back to the publisher.

On April 27, 1995, the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon (Judge Michael R. Hogan) granted summary judgment to the defendants. The plaintiff appealed. On December 19, 1996, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an unsigned opinion affirming the district court's decision with respect to qualified immunity and damages, but vacating the part of the opinion that denied the plaintiff injunctive and declaratory relief. Morrison v. Hall, No. 95-35470, 1996 WL 742463 (9th Cir.(Or.) Dec. 19, 1996). The case was remanded back to the district court. The plaintiff appealed. On October 6, 1997, the U.S. Supreme Court denied the petition for writ of certiorari. Morrison v. Hall, 522 U.S. 829 (1997). The plaintiff petitioned for rehearing. On December 15, 1997, the U.S. Supreme declined to rehear the petition. Morrison v. Hall, 522 U.S. 1036 (1997).

On April 3, 1998, the district court (Judge Hogan) granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismissed the case with prejudice. The plaintiff appealed. On August 17, 2001, the Ninth Circuit (Judge Harry Pregerson) affirmed the district court's decision regarding addressing requirements for prison mail, reversed the district court's decision regarding other mail regulations, and remanded the case for further consideration. Morrison v. Hall, 261 F.3d 896 (9th Cir. 2001).

On March 29, 2002, the plaintiff asked the district court to award him his costs incurred during the litigation, and on July 29, 2002, the district court (Judge Hogan) granted the request, ordering the defendants to pay the plaintiff $692.33 in litigation costs.

On April 1, 2002, the district court (Judge Hogan) granted the plaintiff's request for injunctive relief, held that the relief had already been granted by the prison's newly propagated mail rules, and dismissed the case.

Summary Authors

Kristen Sagar (7/11/2006)

People


Judge(s)

Canby, William Cameron Jr. (Arizona)

Coffin, Thomas M. (Oregon)

Hogan, Michael Robert (Oregon)

Kleinfeld, Andrew Jay (Alaska)

Pregerson, Dean D. (California)

Rymer, Pamela Ann (California)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Johns, Margaret Z. (California)

Attorneys(s) for Defendant

Kulongoski, Theodore R. (Oregon)

Linder, Virginia L. (Oregon)

Londahl, Jan Peter (Oregon)

Judge(s)

Canby, William Cameron Jr. (Arizona)

Coffin, Thomas M. (Oregon)

Hogan, Michael Robert (Oregon)

Kleinfeld, Andrew Jay (Alaska)

Pregerson, Dean D. (California)

Rymer, Pamela Ann (California)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Johns, Margaret Z. (California)

Attorneys(s) for Defendant

Kulongoski, Theodore R. (Oregon)

Linder, Virginia L. (Oregon)

Londahl, Jan Peter (Oregon)

McDonald, Kaye E (Oregon)

Reynolds, Michael D. (Oregon)

Williamson, Leonard W. (Oregon)

Expert/Monitor/Master

Gibson, Peggy (California)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

94-cv-06383

Docket (PACER)

Thorpe v. Hall

Sept. 28, 1998

Sept. 28, 1998

Docket

6:93-cv-06383

Docket (PACER)

Aug. 9, 2002

Aug. 9, 2002

Docket

95-35470

Memorandum

U. S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

105 F.3d 665, 1996 WL 742463, 1996 U.S.App.LEXIS 33287

Dec. 19, 1996

Dec. 19, 1996

Order/Opinion

96-09024

Memorandum Decision

Supreme Court of the United States

522 U.S. 829, 118 S.Ct. 94, 139 L.Ed.2d 49

Oct. 6, 1997

Oct. 6, 1997

Order/Opinion

96-09024

Memorandum Decision

Supreme Court of the United States

522 U.S. 1036, 118 S.Ct. 645, 139 L.Ed.2d 622

Dec. 15, 1997

Dec. 15, 1997

Order/Opinion

98-35468

Reported Opinion

U. S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

261 F.3d 896

Aug. 17, 2001

Aug. 17, 2001

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

Last updated Aug. 13, 2022, 3:01 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

APPLICATION by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (sln) (Entered: 11/29/1993)

Nov. 23, 1993

Nov. 23, 1993

2

APPLICATION by Plaintiff Jody Butterfield TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (sln) (Entered: 11/29/1993)

Nov. 23, 1993

Nov. 23, 1993

3

ORDER Plaintiffs may proceed in forma pauperis subject to further review of the court Signed 11/23/93 (sln) (Entered: 11/29/1993)

Nov. 23, 1993

Nov. 23, 1993

4

COMPLAINT and JURY TRIAL DEMAND (Cause Code: 42:1983pr) (sln) (Entered: 11/29/1993)

Nov. 23, 1993

Nov. 23, 1993

5

ORDER: Provisional in forma pauperis status given the pltf confirmed. This complaint may go forward without the payment of fees or costs. The clerk shall issue process. Signed 12/14/93 Judge Thomas M. Coffin (lf) (Entered: 12/14/1993)

Dec. 14, 1993

Dec. 14, 1993

6

ORDER by Judge Thomas M. Coffin Contained in Plaintiffs' complaint is request for issuance of a temporary restraining order - Plaintiffs' request is DENIED without prejudice to refile with proof of service of complaint and service of the motion or reasons why service of the motion should not be required Signed 12/14/93 (counsel notified) (lf) (Entered: 12/14/1993)

Dec. 14, 1993

Dec. 14, 1993

7

SUMMONS ISSUED as to Patrick Hugh Morrison (lf) (Entered: 12/14/1993)

Dec. 14, 1993

Dec. 14, 1993

8

SUMMONS ISSUED as to Tamara Blair (lf) (Entered: 12/14/1993)

Dec. 14, 1993

Dec. 14, 1993

9

SUMMONS ISSUED as to Manfred F Maass (lf) (Entered: 12/14/1993)

Dec. 14, 1993

Dec. 14, 1993

10

MAIL RETURNED [order [6-1] ] addressed to Jody Butterfield marked "refused-return to sender" (lf) (Entered: 12/23/1993)

Dec. 21, 1993

Dec. 21, 1993

11

MOTION by Defendants Frank Hall, Manfred F Maass, Tamara Blair TO DISMISS before Honorable Michael R. Hogan #11 on not for oral argument calendar of 1/24/94 (lf) (Entered: 12/23/1993)

Dec. 23, 1993

Dec. 23, 1993

12

RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED upon Defendant Frank Hall on 12/21/93 (lf) (Entered: 12/29/1993)

Dec. 29, 1993

Dec. 29, 1993

13

RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED upon Defendant Tamara Blair on 12/21/93 (lf) (Entered: 12/29/1993)

Dec. 29, 1993

Dec. 29, 1993

14

RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED upon Defendant Manfred F Maass on 12/21/93 (lf) (Entered: 12/29/1993)

Dec. 29, 1993

Dec. 29, 1993

15

RESPONSE TO MOTION by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison re [11-1] Defendants' MOTION TO DISMISS (lf) (Entered: 01/05/1994)

Jan. 5, 1994

Jan. 5, 1994

16

ORDER - Plaintiff Butterfield ordered to file notice of change of address by 2/6/94 or show cause why action should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. If Plaintiff fails to notify court of change of address or show cause this action will be dismissed as to Plaintiff Butterfield for want of prosecution. by Honorable Michael R. Hogan Signed 1/5/94 (counsel notified) (lf) (Entered: 01/06/1994)

Jan. 5, 1994

Jan. 5, 1994

22

RESPONSE by Plaintiff Jody Butterfield to 1/5/94 order to show cause (lf) (Entered: 03/03/1994)

Jan. 24, 1994

Jan. 24, 1994

17

ORDER by Honorable Michael R. Hogan GRANTING Defendants' MOTION TO DISMISS [11-1]. Plaintiffs have 14 days to file an amended complaint. Signed 1/24/94 (counsel notified) (lf) (Entered: 01/25/1994)

Jan. 25, 1994

Jan. 25, 1994

18

MOTION by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (lf) (Entered: 01/27/1994)

Jan. 26, 1994

Jan. 26, 1994

19

MOTION by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION (lf) (Entered: 02/01/1994)

Feb. 1, 1994

Feb. 1, 1994

21

ORDER by Honorable Michael R. Hogan DENYING Plaintiff Morrison's MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL [18-1] Signed 2/25/94 (counsel notified) (lf) (Entered: 02/28/1994)

Feb. 28, 1994

Feb. 28, 1994

23

ORDER by Honorable Michael R. Hogan DENYING Plaintiffs' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION [19-1], Plaintiff Butterfield's mail was apparently returned because the address did not include his inmate identification number. Plaintiff Butterfield is requested to provide the clerk of court with that information. Signed 3/7/94 (counsel notified) (lf) (Entered: 03/08/1994)

March 7, 1994

March 7, 1994

24

MOTION by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER , FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (lf) (Entered: 03/24/1994)

March 24, 1994

March 24, 1994

25

ANSWER by All Defendants Frank Hall, Manfred F Maass, Tamara Blair to complaint [20-1] (lf) (Entered: 03/30/1994)

March 30, 1994

March 30, 1994

26

MOTION by Frank Hall, Manfred F Maass, Tamara Blair TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF BUTTERFIELD (lf) (Entered: 03/30/1994)

March 30, 1994

March 30, 1994

27

MOTION by Defendant Frank Hall, Defendant Manfred F Maass, Defendant Tamara Blair TO EXTEND TIME TO 5/2/94 TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR TRO/PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [24-1], [24-2] c-H (lf) (Entered: 03/31/1994)

March 31, 1994

March 31, 1994

28

ORDER - discovery be completed by 7/1/94 plaintiff file narrative statement by 7/1/94 defendant file narrative statement within 2 weeks thereafter. Honorable Michael R. Hogan (lf) (Entered: 04/04/1994)

April 4, 1994

April 4, 1994

29

ORDER by Honorable Michael R. Hogan GRANTING Defendants' MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO 5/2/94 TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR TRO/PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [24-1], [24-2] [27-1], CONTINUING Defendants' MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER [24-1], and MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [24-2] from 4/25/94 to not for oral argument calendar of 5/16/94 Signed 4/4/94 (counsel notified) (lf) (Entered: 04/04/1994)

April 4, 1994

April 4, 1994

30

MOTION by Defendant Frank Hall, Defendant Manfred F Maass, Defendant Tamara Blair TO EXTEND TIME TO 6/1/94 TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S DISCOVERY REQUESTS c-H (lf) (Entered: 04/21/1994)

April 21, 1994

April 21, 1994

31

RESPONSE by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison to [30-1] MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO 6/1/94 TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S DISCOVERY REQUESTS c-H (lf) (Entered: 05/02/1994)

May 2, 1994

May 2, 1994

32

RECORD OF ORDER by Honorable Michael R. Hogan allowing Plaintiffs 14 days to show cause in writing why Defendants' unopposed motion #26 should not be allowed. CONTINUING Defendants' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF BUTTERFIELD [26-1] from 5/2/94 to not for oral argument calendar of 5/23/94 (counsel notified) (lf) (Entered: 05/04/1994)

May 2, 1994

May 2, 1994

33

ORDER by Honorable Michael R. Hogan GRANTING Defendants' MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO 6/1/94 TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S DISCOVERY REQUESTS [30-1] (Order refers to extension of time to 6/1/94 to respond to Plaintiff's motion for TRO and preliminary injunction) Signed 5/2/94 (counsel notified) (lf) (Entered: 05/04/1994)

May 3, 1994

May 3, 1994

34

AMENDED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO 6/1/94 TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TRO AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [24-1], [24-2] by All Defendants (counsel notified) (lf) (Entered: 05/04/1994)

May 3, 1994

May 3, 1994

35

ORDER by Honorable Michael R. Hogan GRANTING Defendants' MOTION [34-1] TO EXTEND TIME TO 6/1/94 TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TRO AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [24-1], [24-2], CONTINUING Plaintiff's MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER [24-1] and MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [24-2] from 5/16/94 to not for oral argument calendar of 6/13/94 Signed 5/9/94 (counsel notified) (lf) (Entered: 05/09/1994)

May 9, 1994

May 9, 1994

36

MOTION by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison FOR ORDER PREVENTING DEFENDANTS FROM RELOCATING PLAINTIFFS (lf) (Entered: 05/10/1994)

May 10, 1994

May 10, 1994

37

RESPONSE by Defendants' Frank Hall, Manfred F Maass, Tamara Blair to [36-1] MOTION FOR ORDER PREVENTING DEFENDANTS FROM RELOCATING PLAINTIFFS (lf) (Entered: 05/11/1994)

May 11, 1994

May 11, 1994

38

MOTION by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison FOR ORDER PREVENTING DEFENDANTS FROM DENYING PLAINTIFFS POSSESSION OF AND RECEIVING EVIDENCE (lf) (Entered: 05/16/1994)

May 16, 1994

May 16, 1994

39

MOTION by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison FOR RELIEF FROM DISCOVERY COSTS (lf) (Entered: 05/16/1994)

May 16, 1994

May 16, 1994

40

RESPONSE by All Defendants Frank Hall, Manfred F Maass, Tamara Blair to [24-2] MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (lf) (Entered: 05/23/1994)

May 23, 1994

May 23, 1994

41

RESPONSE by All Defendants Frank Hall, Manfred F Maass, Tamara Blair to [39-1] MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM DISCOVERY COSTS (lf) (Entered: 05/24/1994)

May 24, 1994

May 24, 1994

42

RESPONSE by Frank Hall, Manfred F Maass, Tamara Blair to [38-1] Plaintiff's MOTION FOR ORDER PREVENTING DEFENDANTS FROM DENYING PLAINTIFFS POSSESSION OF AND RECEIVING EVIDENCE (lf) (Entered: 05/24/1994)

May 24, 1994

May 24, 1994

44

RECORD OF ORDER before Magistrate Judge John P. Cooney reassign hrg to Honorable Michael R. Hogan SETTING MOTION FOR ORDER PREVENTING DEFENDANTS FROM DENYING PLAINTIFFS POSSESSION OF AND RECEIVING EVIDENCE [38-1] on not for oral argument calendar of 7/5/94 (counsel notified) (cw) (Entered: 06/13/1994)

June 13, 1994

June 13, 1994

45

MOTION by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison TO EXTEND TIME TO 8/1/94 TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY AND FILE NARRATIVE STATEMENT (cw) (Entered: 06/23/1994)

June 23, 1994

June 23, 1994

46

MOTION by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANTS SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT (lf) (Entered: 06/27/1994)

June 27, 1994

June 27, 1994

47

RECORD OF ORDER by Honorable Michael R. Hogan GRANTING Plaintiff Morrison's MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO 8/2/94 TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY AND FILE NARRATIVE STATEMENT [45-1] discovery ddl set for 8/2/94 (counsel notified) (lf) (Entered: 06/29/1994)

June 29, 1994

June 29, 1994

48

RESPONSE by All Defendants Frank Hall, Manfred F Maass, Tamara Blair to [38-1] MOTION FOR ORDER PREVENTING DEFENDANTS FROM DENYING PLAINTIFFS POSSESSION OF AND RECEIVING EVIDENCE (lf) (Entered: 07/07/1994)

July 7, 1994

July 7, 1994

49

NOTICE by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison styled answer to Defendant's Rule 68 Offer (lf) (Entered: 07/12/1994)

July 11, 1994

July 11, 1994

50

MOTION by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison TO EXTEND TIME TO 9/2/94 TO FILE NARRATIVE STATEMENT c-H (lf) (Entered: 08/01/1994)

July 29, 1994

July 29, 1994

51

RECORD OF ORDER by Honorable Michael R. Hogan GRANTING Plaintiff's MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO 9/2/94 TO FILE NARRATIVE STATEMENT [50-1] discovery ddl set for 9/2/94 (counsel notified) (lf) (Entered: 08/02/1994)

Aug. 2, 1994

Aug. 2, 1994

52

MOTION by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (lf) (Entered: 08/11/1994)

Aug. 11, 1994

Aug. 11, 1994

53

RESPONSE by All Defendants to [52-1] Plaintiffs' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (lf) (Entered: 08/17/1994)

Aug. 17, 1994

Aug. 17, 1994

54

MOTION by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison FOR DEFENDANTS TO BE HELD IN CONTEMPT (lf) (Entered: 08/30/1994)

Aug. 30, 1994

Aug. 30, 1994

56

AFFIDAVIT by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison of Patrick Morrison MOTION response [55-1] (lf) (Entered: 09/07/1994)

Sept. 7, 1994

Sept. 7, 1994

57

NARRATIVE STATEMENT by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison (lf) (Entered: 09/07/1994)

Sept. 7, 1994

Sept. 7, 1994

58

REPLY by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison re MOTION response [55-1] (lf) (Entered: 09/07/1994)

Sept. 7, 1994

Sept. 7, 1994

59

ORDER by Honorable Michael R. Hogan Plaintiff Butterfield was ordered to file a narrative statement by 7/1/94. It has not been filed. Plaintiff Butterfield ordered to show cause by 9/23/94 why action should not be dismissed as to Plaintiff Butterfield for want of prosecution. Signed 9/9/94 (counsel notified) (lf) (Entered: 09/12/1994)

Sept. 12, 1994

Sept. 12, 1994

60

ORDER by Honorable Michael R. Hogan DENYING Plaintiffs' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [52-1], DENYING Plaintiffs' MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANTS SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT [46-1], DENYING Plaintiffs' MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM DISCOVERY COSTS [39-1], DENYING Plaintiffs' MOTION FOR ORDER PREVENTING DEFENDANTS FROM DENYING PLAINTIFFS POSSESSION OF AND RECEIVING OF EVIDENCE AND CONTACT WITH PLAINTIFFS WITNESSES [38-1] which is construed as a motion for temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM DISCOVERY COSTS [39-1], DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO PREVENT DEFENDANTS FROM RELOCATING PLAINTIFFS [36- 1], DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER OR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [24-1] [24-2], GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION [26-1] TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF BUTTERFIELD Signed 9/12/94 (counsel notified) (lf) (Entered: 09/12/1994)

Sept. 12, 1994

Sept. 12, 1994

61

RECORD OF ORDER by Honorable Michael R. Hogan SETTING tel- pretrial-set-trial conference set for 8:30 10/24/94 (counsel notified) (lf) (Entered: 09/13/1994)

Sept. 12, 1994

Sept. 12, 1994

62

NOTICE OF APPEAL to Court of Appeals by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison from order #60 denying Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (lf) (Entered: 09/22/1994)

Sept. 22, 1994

Sept. 22, 1994

63

TRANSCRIPT DESIGNATION AND ORDERING FORM - none designated appeal [62-1] (lf) (Entered: 09/22/1994)

Sept. 22, 1994

Sept. 22, 1994

64

MOTION by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANTS SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT (lf) (Entered: 09/22/1994)

Sept. 22, 1994

Sept. 22, 1994

NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL mailed to Court of Appeals For the Ninth Circuit and to counsel along with copy of appealed document and docket sheet. (lf) (Entered: 09/23/1994)

Sept. 23, 1994

Sept. 23, 1994

66

NOTIFICATION by US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit of Docket Number 94-35911 by Plaintiff regarding [62-1] (lf) (Entered: 10/03/1994)

Oct. 3, 1994

Oct. 3, 1994

67

COPY OF ORDER from the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [62-1] time schedule order. Appellant's opening brief due 1/9/95. Appellee's brief due 2/7/95. Any reply due 14 days thereafter (lf) (Entered: 10/03/1994)

Oct. 3, 1994

Oct. 3, 1994

68

CERTIFICATE OF RECORD transmitted to US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [62-1] (lf) (Entered: 10/04/1994)

Oct. 3, 1994

Oct. 3, 1994

69

RECORD OF ORDER by Honorable Michael R. Hogan DENYING Plaintiff's MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF A COPY OF FILE [65-1], DENYING Plaintiff's MOTION TO STAY [65-2], DENYING Plaintiff's MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANTS SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT [64-1], DENYING Plaintiff's MOTION FOR DEFENDANTS TO BE HELD IN CONTEMPT [54-1] (counsel notified) (lf) (Entered: 10/05/1994)

Oct. 4, 1994

Oct. 4, 1994

70

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS before Honorable Michael R. Hogan Telephone conf held on 10/24/94. Telephone Status Conference set for 8:30 3/7/95 (cc: Counsel notified) Court Rptr Amanda Essner (lf) (Entered: 10/24/1994)

Oct. 24, 1994

Oct. 24, 1994

71

ORDER by Honorable Michael R. Hogan This appeal has been taken in good faith. Signed 11/1/94 (counsel notified) (lf) (Entered: 11/02/1994)

Nov. 1, 1994

Nov. 1, 1994

72

MOTION by All Defendants Frank Hall, Defendant Manfred F Maass, Defendant Tamara Blair FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (lf) (Entered: 11/02/1994)

Nov. 1, 1994

Nov. 1, 1994

73

MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT by Defendant Frank Hall, Defendant Manfred F Maass, Defendant Tamara Blair of MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [72-1] (lf) (Entered: 11/02/1994)

Nov. 1, 1994

Nov. 1, 1994

74

MOTION by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison TO EXTEND TIME TO 30 DAYS AFTER APPEAL DECIDED TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [72-1] c-H (lf) (Entered: 11/08/1994)

Nov. 8, 1994

Nov. 8, 1994

75

RECORD OF ORDER before Honorable Michael R. Hogan reassign hrg to Honorable Michael R. Hogan GRANTING Plaintiff's MOTION [72-1] TO EXTEND TIME TO 30 DAYS AFTER APPEAL DECIDED TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [74-1] to the extent that Plaintiff shall file his response by 12/10/94. CONTINUING All Defendants' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [72-1] from Judge Cooney's calendar to not for oral argument calendar of 12/27/94 before Judge Hogan. (counsel notified) (lf) (Entered: 11/10/1994)

Nov. 10, 1994

Nov. 10, 1994

76

MOTION by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (lf) (Entered: 11/22/1994)

Nov. 22, 1994

Nov. 22, 1994

77

RECORD OF ORDER by Honorable Michael R. Hogan CONTINUING Defendants' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [72-1] from 12/27/94 to not for oral argument calendar of 1/9/95 (counsel notified) (lf) (Entered: 11/23/1994)

Nov. 23, 1994

Nov. 23, 1994

78

RESPONSE by Defendant to [76-1] MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (sln) (Entered: 11/30/1994)

Nov. 30, 1994

Nov. 30, 1994

79

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT by All Defendants Frank Hall, Manfred F Maass, Tamara Blair of MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [72-1] (lf) (Entered: 12/05/1994)

Dec. 5, 1994

Dec. 5, 1994

80

MOTION by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison TO EXTEND TIME TO 1/9/95 TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [72-1] c-H (lf) (Entered: 12/08/1994)

Dec. 8, 1994

Dec. 8, 1994

81

RECORD OF ORDER by Honorable Michael R. Hogan GRANTING Plaintiff's MOTION [80-1] TO EXTEND TIME TO 1/9/95 TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [72-1], CONTINUING Defendants' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [72-1] from 1/9/95 to not for oral argument calendar of 1/30/95 (counsel notified) (lf) (Entered: 12/14/1994)

Dec. 14, 1994

Dec. 14, 1994

82

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [76-1] by Patrick Hugh Morrison SHOULD BE DENIED (Counsel notified) (Meyer) (Entered: 01/03/1995)

Jan. 3, 1995

Jan. 3, 1995

83

RESPONSE by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison to [72-1] MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (lf) (Entered: 01/10/1995)

Jan. 10, 1995

Jan. 10, 1995

84

MOTION by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison FOR ORDER TO ALLOW CONTACT WITH WITNESSES (lf) (Entered: 01/20/1995)

Jan. 20, 1995

Jan. 20, 1995

85

MEMORANDUM by Defendants Frank Hall, Manfred F Maass, Tamara Blair in opposition MOTION FOR ORDER TO ALLOW CONTACT WITH WITNESSES [84-1] (lf) (Entered: 01/20/1995)

Jan. 20, 1995

Jan. 20, 1995

86

MEMORANDUM by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison in opposition MOTION FOR ORDER TO ALLOW CONTACT WITH WITNESSES [84-1] (lf) (Entered: 01/26/1995)

Jan. 26, 1995

Jan. 26, 1995

87

MOTION by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE , and FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (lf) (Entered: 02/03/1995)

Feb. 3, 1995

Feb. 3, 1995

88

MEMORANDUM by Defendants Frank Hall, Manfred F Maass, Tamara Blair in opposition MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE [87-1] (lf) (Entered: 02/07/1995)

Feb. 7, 1995

Feb. 7, 1995

89

MINUTES OF ORDER by Magistrate Judge John P. Cooney REFERRING Findings and Recommendation [82-1] to Honorable Michael R. Hogan (counsel notified) (lf) (Entered: 02/15/1995)

Feb. 15, 1995

Feb. 15, 1995

90

ORDER by Honorable Michael R. Hogan ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION [82-1] THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [76-1] by Patrick Hugh Morrison SHOULD BE DENIED Signed 2/16/95 (counsel notified) (lf) (Entered: 02/21/1995)

Feb. 17, 1995

Feb. 17, 1995

91

MOTION by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison TO EXTEND TIME TO 3/2/95 TO REPLY TO DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE [87-1] c-H (lf) (Entered: 02/22/1995)

Feb. 21, 1995

Feb. 21, 1995

92

AFFIDAVIT by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison of Lucy Morrison (lf) (Entered: 02/23/1995)

Feb. 22, 1995

Feb. 22, 1995

93

AFFIDAVIT by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison of Carla Christopherson (lf) (Entered: 02/24/1995)

Feb. 24, 1995

Feb. 24, 1995

94

RECORD OF ORDER by Honorable Michael R. Hogan GRANTING Plaintiff's MOTION [91-1] TO EXTEND TIME TO 3/2/95 TO REPLY TO DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE [87-1] (counsel notified) (lf) (Entered: 03/01/1995)

March 1, 1995

March 1, 1995

95

RECORD OF ORDER by Honorable Michael R. Hogan CONTINUING tel-set-trial conference from 3/7/95 to 8:30 4/4/95 (counsel notified) (lf) (Entered: 03/01/1995)

March 1, 1995

March 1, 1995

96

REPLY TO RESPONSE by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison re [87-1] MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (lf) (Entered: 03/01/1995)

March 1, 1995

March 1, 1995

97

MOTION by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison FOR ORDER FOR COURT'S ASSISTANCE IN LOCATING WITNESSES (lf) (Entered: 03/15/1995)

March 15, 1995

March 15, 1995

98

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison of MOTION FOR ORDER TO ALLOW CONTACT WITH WITNESSES [84-1] c-H (lf) (Entered: 03/23/1995)

March 23, 1995

March 23, 1995

99

MEMORANDUM by Defendants Frank Hall, Manfred F Maass, Tamara Blair in opposition MOTION FOR ORDER FOR COURT'S ASSISTANCE IN LOCATING WITNESSES [97-1] (lf) (Entered: 03/27/1995)

March 24, 1995

March 24, 1995

99

RESPONSE by Defendants Frank Hall, Manfred F Maass, Tamara Blair to [98-1] Plaintiff's supplemental memorandum (lf) (Entered: 03/27/1995)

March 24, 1995

March 24, 1995

100

MOTION by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison REASSIGN CASE TO ANOTHER JUDGE OR MAGISTRATE (lf) (Entered: 03/27/1995)

March 27, 1995

March 27, 1995

101

RECORD OF ORDER by Honorable Michael R. Hogan CONTINUING tel-set-trial conference from 4/4/95 to 8:30 4/25/95 (counsel notified) (lf) (Entered: 03/28/1995)

March 28, 1995

March 28, 1995

102

REPLY TO RESPONSE by Plaintiff Patrick Hugh Morrison re [97-1] MOTION FOR ORDER FOR COURT'S ASSISTANCE IN LOCATING WITNESSES (lf) (Entered: 03/31/1995)

March 31, 1995

March 31, 1995

Case Details

State / Territory: Oregon

Case Type(s):

Prison Conditions

Key Dates

Filing Date: Nov. 23, 1993

Closing Date: 2002

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

State inmate challenging constitutionality of prison mail regulations under First Amendment

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: Yes

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Oregon State Penitentiary, State

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Freedom of speech/association

Availably Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Order Duration: 2002 - 2002

Issues

General:

Mail

Type of Facility:

Government-run