Support Article

How To Search Guide
Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:

Support Article

How To Search Guide
119 cases, 1,012 documents
Ordered by
IMMIGRATION AND/OR THE BORDER
CODING IN PROCESS
N-E-M-B v. Bostock

3:25-cv-00989 | U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

Filed Date: June 10, 2025

Case Ongoing

(This summary is temporary, while we research the case.) On June 10, 2025, the Plaintiff filed this immigration-related petition for writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. The petition has not been made public.
IMMIGRATION AND/OR THE BORDER
CODING IN PROCESS
J-C-R-M v. Bostock

3:25-cv-00990 | U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

Filed Date: June 10, 2025

Case Ongoing

(This summary is temporary, while we research the case.) On June 10, 2025, the Plaintiff filed this immigration-related petition for writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. The petition has not been made public.
LABOR RIGHTS
Porteous v. Flowers Foods, Inc.

6:23-cv-01840 | U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

Filed Date: Dec. 7, 2023

Case Ongoing

In this case, a delivery driver for a baked goods company alleged that the company misclassified its delivery drivers as "independent contractors" as a shortcut to avoid paying delivery drivers overtime and benefits. Defendants were Flowers Foods, Inc., and its subsidiaries: Flowers Bakeries LLC and Flowers Baking Co. of Portland, LLC (“FBC Portland”). (Collectively, the defendants are hereinafter referred to as “Flowers Foods”). The plaintiff had worked as a delivery driver for the defendants …
PRESIDENTIAL/GUBERNATORIAL AUTHORITY
Oregon Council for the Humanities v. United States DOGE Service

3:25-cv-00829 | U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

Filed Date: May 15, 2025

Case Ongoing

On May 15, 2025, the Oregon Council for the Humanities and the Federation of State Humanities Councils filed this lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon against DOGE and its Acting Administrator, the National Endowment for the Humanities and its Acting Chairman, and the National Council on the Humanities. The plaintiffs challenged the defendants' termination of grants to state and jurisdictional councils like the plaintiffs that enabled such councils to preserve …
IMMIGRATION AND/OR THE BORDER
Pineros y Campesinos Unidos del Noreste v. Noem

6:25-cv-00699 | U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

Filed Date: April 28, 2025

Case Ongoing

On April 28, 2025, five labor and religious organizations with noncitizen members filed this lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon against the Department of Homeland Security and its Secretary, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and its Acting Director, and the U.S. Customs and Border Protection and its Acting Commissioner. The Plaintiffs challenged the ending of protections for sensitive locations, like locations of religious worship, from immigration…
IMMIGRATION AND/OR THE BORDER
CODING IN PROCESS
Ortega Gonzalez v. Noem

6:25-cv-00622 | U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

Filed Date: April 16, 2025

Case Ongoing

This case is one of numerous lawsuits challenging the Trump administration’s abrupt termination of immigration visas—mostly student or work visas—with no notice to the visa-holders and with dubious or no legal basis. You can see all of the cases here. (This summary is temporary, while we research the case.) On April 16, 2025, an international student—attending school on an F-1 visa--filed this lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon against the U.S. Department of …
PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS/CONTRACTING
Parents for Privacy v. Sessions

3:17-cv-01813 | U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

Filed Date: Nov. 13, 2017

Closed Date: Dec. 11, 2020

This case is a challenge to an Oregon school’s policy of allowing transgender students to use the restroom that aligned with their gender identity, claiming that it violated the rights of cisgender students and parents. On November 13, 2017, Parents for Privacy, Parents Rights in Education, and a few private plaintiffs on behalf of their children (collectively, “Parents for Privacy”) sued Dallas School District No. 2, Oregon Department of Education, the Superintendent of Public Instruction for …
PRISON CONDITIONS
VanValkenburg v. Oregon Department of Corrections

3:14-cv-00916 | U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

Filed Date: June 6, 2014

Closed Date: June 9, 2017

On June 6, 2014, a deaf prison inmate who primarily communicates in American Sign Language filed a lawsuit in the District Court of Oregon against the Oregon Department of Corrections. The plaintiff brought disability discrimination claims under the ADA and a state anti-discrimination statute, as well as an unjust enrichment claim. The plaintiff, represented by private attorneys, sought $460,000 in damages, claiming that there was a failure by the prison system to communicate with him since the…
POLICING
Pettibone v. Trump

3:20-cv-01464 | U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

Filed Date: Aug. 26, 2020

Closed Date: Jan. 20, 2025

This case is about the federal law enforcement mission, “Operation Diligent Valor,” directed by the Department of Homeland Security against protestors during the widespread racial justice protests in Portland, Oregon in the summer of 2020. Individual Oregon residents along with Black Millennial Movement and Rose City Justice, Inc. brought this lawsuit on August 26, 2020 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon against President Donald Trump, Acting DHS Secretary Chad Wolf, the Depa…
DISABILITY RIGHTS
CODING IN PROCESS
Disability Rights Oregon v. City of Grants Pass

25CV05989 | Oregon state trial court

Filed Date: Jan. 30, 2025

Case Ongoing

(This summary is temporary, while we research the case.) On January 30, 2025, Disability Rights Oregon and several individual plaintiffs sued the city of Grants Pass, Oregon, alleging that the city's restrictions on encampments for unhoused people violated state law because they were objectively unreasonable and discriminatory against people with disabilities. The court issued a temporary restraining order against the enforcement of various city ordinances.