Case: Johnson v. District of Columbia

1:02-cv-02364 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: Dec. 2, 2002

Closed Date: 2013

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On December 2, 2002, nine female plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, filed this 42 U.S.C §1983 class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The plaintiffs challenged the practice of the U.S. Marshal's Service and the District of Columbia of conducting blanket strip, visual body cavity, and/or squat searches ("strip searches") of female arrestees that were being held in the Superior Court Cell Block of the D.C. Superior Court while awaiting presentment b…

On December 2, 2002, nine female plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, filed this 42 U.S.C §1983 class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The plaintiffs challenged the practice of the U.S. Marshal's Service and the District of Columbia of conducting blanket strip, visual body cavity, and/or squat searches ("strip searches") of female arrestees that were being held in the Superior Court Cell Block of the D.C. Superior Court while awaiting presentment before a judicial officer. Specifically, the plaintiffs complained that the policy and practice of subjecting all female arrestees to strip searches in the absence of reasonable individualized suspicion violated the Fourth Amendment. The plaintiffs further complained that the practice of subjecting female arrestees but not similarly situated male arrestees to blanket strip searches violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fifth Amendment. The plaintiffs sought declaratory and injunctive relief, monetary damages, and class certification. The class action complaint was amended twice in 2006.

Defendants denied all allegations and, on May 31, 2006, sought dismissal of the case on numerous grounds, including the defense of qualified immunity. On November 14, 2006, the District Court (Judge Rosemary M. Collyer) denied Defendants' motion to dismiss in its entirety. Johnson v. District of Columbia, 461 F.Supp.2d 48 (D.D.C. 2006). Defendants initially appealed, but the appeal was subsequently voluntarily dismissed. Johnson v. Government of District of Columbia, 2007 WL 1760078 (D.C.Cir. Jun 11, 2007).

On February 8, 2008, the District Court granted the plaintiff's motions for class certification. The Court designated two groups of classes, the Fifth Amendment Class and the Fourth Amendment Class.

The court defined the Fourth Amendment Class as, "Each woman who, during the Class Period (December 2, 1999, until April 25, 2003), was, (i) held in the Superior Court Cell Block; (ii) awaiting presentment under a statute of the District of Columbia; (iii) subjected to a blanket strip, visual body cavity and/or squat search; (iv) under similar circumstances for which male arrestees were not subjected to a blanket strip, visual body cavity and/or squat search."

The court defined the Fifth Amendment Class as, "each woman who, during the Class Period (December 2, 1999, until April 25, 2003), was, (i) held in the Superior Court Cell Block; (ii) awaiting presentment under a statute of the District of Columbia on either (a) a non-drug, non-violent traffic offense, (b) a non-drug, non- violent misdemeanor, or (c) a non-drug, non-violent felony; and (iii) subjected to a blanket strip, visual body cavity and/or squat search; (iv) without any individualized finding of reasonable suspicion or probable cause that she was concealing drugs, weapons or other contraband."

In this opinion, the District Court also dismissed all charges against the United States Marshall's Service.

On February 28, 2008, the plaintiffs filed a cross-claim against United States Superior Court Marshall Todd Dillard on the grounds that he caused them (separately and concurrently) to be subjected strip searches at the D.C. Superior Court cellblock in violation of the 4th and 5th amendments. And that by instituting and implementing a policy which subjected the plaintiffs, all women, to strip searches without individualized suspicion, the co-defendant is liable to the District for all, or part of the claims asserted by the plaintiff against the District of Columbia in this action, by virtue of his practice and policy. This crossclaim was partially in response to the District Court having previously dismissed the plaintiff's claims against the United States Marshall's Service.

On May 23, 2008, the District of Columbia filed for summary judgment for the charges against the District of Columbia. The District Court granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment on October 31, 2008. The Court found that the District of Columbia cannot be liable to the plaintiffs as a matter of law on any of the theories they advance inasmuch as the Marshal was a federal official and not an employee, servant, agent or actor under the control of the District of Columbia, and inasmuch as the District of Columbia had no choice but to turn over arrestees to the Superior Court Marshal for presentment. This dismissal left the Marshall (Todd Dillard) as the sole defendant in this case.

On January 14, 2010, the District Court denied the plaintiff's motion to amend their complaint for the third time.

On April 5, 2010, the defendant filed for summary judgment on the plaintiffs' remaining claims against the Marshall.

On April 21, 2011, the District Court issued an opinion that granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment. The Court conceded that the record shows that during the class period female arrestees were subjected to a blanket practice of strip searches while many, if not most, male arrestees were not. It is nonetheless clear that former Marshal Dillard is entitled to qualified immunity from the Fourth Amendment claims. The Fifth Amendment claims similarly fail as the plaintiffs proffered no evidence that former Marshal Dillard purposefully discriminated by intending a gender disparity in search procedures. Summary judgment was denied to the plaintiffs on their Fourth Amendment claims and granted to Marshal Dillard on the Fourth and Fifth Amendment claims. Accordingly the case was dismissed from District Court.

On May 4, 2011, the plaintiffs filed an appeal to the DC Circuit Court.

On August 13, 2014 the DC Court of Appeals issued an opinion affirming the District Court's summary judgment ruling for Superior Court Marshal, finding him entitled to qualified immunity. And also affirming the District Court's summary judgment ruling for the District of Columbia, concluding that because the Superior Court Marshal in charge of the cellblock was at all times a federal official acting under color of federal law, the city had no authority to prevent the strip searches.

Summary Authors

Dan Dalton (2/5/2008)

Erin Pamukcu (3/10/2016)

Related Cases

Johnson v. District of Columbia, District of District of Columbia (2002)

Bame v. Clark, District of District of Columbia (2005)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4690129/parties/johnson-v-government-of-the-district-of-columbia/


Judge(s)

Collyer, Rosemary M. (District of Columbia)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:02-cv-02364

Docket [PACER]

Johnson v. Government of the District of Columbia

Aug. 13, 2014

Aug. 13, 2014

Docket
1

1:02-cv-02364

Class Action Complaint for Money Damages and Injunctive Relief

Johnson et al v. Government of the District of Columbia et al

Dec. 2, 2002

Dec. 2, 2002

Complaint
58-1

1:02-cv-02364

Class Action, First Amended Complaint for Money Damages and Injunctive Relief and Preliminary Injunction and Jury Demand

April 28, 2006

April 28, 2006

Complaint
62-1

1:02-cv-02364

Federal Defendant's Motion to Dismiss

Johnson, et al. v. Government of the District of Columbia, et al.

May 31, 2006

May 31, 2006

Pleading / Motion / Brief
81

1:02-cv-02364

Order

Johnson et al v. Government of the District of Columbia et al

Nov. 14, 2006

Nov. 14, 2006

Order/Opinion

461 F.Supp.2d 48

84-2

1:02-cv-02364

Class Action Second Amended Complaint for Money Damages and Jury Demand

Johnson et al v. Government of the District of Columbia et al

Dec. 5, 2006

Dec. 5, 2006

Complaint
1

07-05037

Complaint

June 11, 2007

June 11, 2007

Complaint
125

07-05037

Order [Re: Motion to Dismiss]

Johnson v. Government of District of Columbia

June 11, 2007

June 11, 2007

Order/Opinion

2007 WL 1760078

158

1:02-cv-02364

Memorandum Opinion

Feb. 8, 2008

Feb. 8, 2008

Order/Opinion

248 F.R.D. 46

159

1:02-cv-02364

Order

Feb. 8, 2008

Feb. 8, 2008

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4690129/johnson-v-government-of-the-district-of-columbia/

Last updated March 29, 2026, 4:35 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against TODD DILLARD, JOHN DOE, GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE (Filing fee $ 150.), filed by VICKIE BROOKS, DONNA CURTIS, KEISHA HOLLOWAY, DIANNA JOHNSON, LAURA LAMBERT, TONYA CECELIA MACK, CAROLYN MONTGOMERY, RUBBIYA MUHAMMED, DIANNE WILKES .(rje, ) Modified on 12/3/2002 (rje, ). (Entered: 12/03/2002)

Dec. 2, 2002

Dec. 2, 2002

2

NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by VICKIE BROOKS, DONNA CURTIS, KEISHA HOLLOWAY, DIANNA JOHNSON, LAURA LAMBERT, TONYA CECELIA MACK, CAROLYN MONTGOMERY, RUBBIYA MUHAMMED, DIANNE WILKES . Case related to Case No. 01-385. (rje, ) (Entered: 12/03/2002)

Dec. 2, 2002

Dec. 2, 2002

SUMMONS (5) Issued as to TODD DILLARD ; GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ; UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (rje, )

Dec. 2, 2002

Dec. 2, 2002

SUMMONS (1) REISSUED as to TODD DILLARD (mpt, )

Dec. 18, 2002

Dec. 18, 2002

3

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, by GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Attachments: # 1 # 2)(Becker, Leonard) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

Dec. 23, 2002

Dec. 23, 2002

MINUTE ENTRY: Upon consideration of the Consent Motion of Defendant Government of the District of Columbia to Enlarge Time to Answer the Complaint, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. District of Columbia's time to respond to the complaint is extended until January 31, 2003. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 12/26/02. (lcjdb2)

Dec. 26, 2002

Dec. 26, 2002

4

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE. (McDaniel, Oliver) (Entered: 01/09/2003)

Jan. 9, 2003

Jan. 9, 2003

Set Deadlines/Hearings: Answer due by 1/31/2003. (tb)

Jan. 15, 2003

Jan. 15, 2003

5

MOTION to Dismiss Complaint by GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Becker, Leonard) (Entered: 01/29/2003)

Jan. 29, 2003

Jan. 29, 2003

6

MOTION for Leave to Appear pro haec vice by Barrett Litt by DIANNA JOHNSON. (Claiborne, William) (Entered: 01/30/2003)

Jan. 30, 2003

Jan. 30, 2003

7

MOTION for Leave to Appear pro haec vice by Paul Estuar by DIANNA JOHNSON. (Claiborne, William) (Entered: 01/31/2003)

Jan. 31, 2003

Jan. 31, 2003

8

ENTERED IN ERROR..... ATTORNEY APPEARANCE. (Claiborne, William) Modified on 2/4/2003 (mpt, ). (Entered: 02/03/2003)

Feb. 3, 2003

Feb. 3, 2003

9

ENTERED IN ERROR..... ATTORNEY APPEARANCE. (Claiborne, William) Modified on 2/4/2003 (mpt, ). (Entered: 02/03/2003)

Feb. 3, 2003

Feb. 3, 2003

10

Memorandum in opposition to motion re 5 District's Motion to Dismiss filed by DIANNA JOHNSON. (Attachments: # 1)(Claiborne, William) (Entered: 02/10/2003)

Feb. 10, 2003

Feb. 10, 2003

11

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 5 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint by GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Becker, Leonard) (Entered: 02/13/2003)

Feb. 13, 2003

Feb. 13, 2003

12

First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, and Memorandum in Support Thereof by TODD DILLARD, JOHN DOE, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(McDaniel, Oliver) (Entered: 02/14/2003)

Feb. 14, 2003

Feb. 14, 2003

ORDER granting 6 Motion for Leave to Appear, granting 7 Motion for Leave to Appear, granting 11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 2/14/03. (dvb)

Feb. 14, 2003

Feb. 14, 2003

Case Reassigned to Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. Judge John D. Bates no longer assigned to the case. (rje, )

Feb. 14, 2003

Feb. 14, 2003

13

REPLY in support of motion re 5 to dismiss filed by GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Becker, Leonard) (Entered: 02/24/2003)

Feb. 24, 2003

Feb. 24, 2003

14

MOTION to Certify Class by DIANNA JOHNSON. (Attachments: # 1 # 2 # 3 # 4 # 5 # 6)(Claiborne, William) (Entered: 03/03/2003)

March 3, 2003

March 3, 2003

15

Second MOTION for Extension of Time to Extend Time Within Which to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint, and Within Which to Respond to Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification, and Memorandum in Support Thereof by TODD DILLARD, JOHN DOE, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(McDaniel, Oliver) (Entered: 03/12/2003)

March 12, 2003

March 12, 2003

16

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 14 MOTION to Certify Class by GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Becker, Leonard) (Entered: 03/14/2003)

March 14, 2003

March 14, 2003

17

Memorandum in opposition to motion re 15 filed by DIANNA JOHNSON. (Claiborne, William) (Entered: 03/24/2003)

March 24, 2003

March 24, 2003

18

Memorandum in opposition to motion re 16 filed by DIANNA JOHNSON. (Claiborne, William) (Entered: 03/27/2003)

March 27, 2003

March 27, 2003

19

MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by DIANNA JOHNSON. (Attachments: # 1 # 2 # 3 # 4 # 5 # 6 # 7 # 8 # 9 # 10 # 11 # 12 # 13 # 14 # 15 # 16 # 17)(Claiborne, William) (Entered: 03/28/2003)

March 27, 2003

March 27, 2003

20

Memorandum in opposition to motion re 19 filed by GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Decl. of Anne B. Wicks)(Becker, Leonard) (Entered: 04/03/2003)

April 3, 2003

April 3, 2003

21

REPLY in support of motion re 16 motn to enlarge time to respond to class certification motion filed by GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Becker, Leonard) (Entered: 04/03/2003)

April 3, 2003

April 3, 2003

MINUTE ENTRY ORDER: status conference is scheduled for 4/11/03 at 4 p.m. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 4/9/03. (dsj)

April 9, 2003

April 9, 2003

22

MOTION to Strike 20 Memorandum in Opposition affidavit Anne Wicks by DIANNA JOHNSON. (Claiborne, William) (Entered: 04/10/2003)

April 10, 2003

April 10, 2003

Minute Entry for Status Conference held on 4/11/2003 before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer: Further Status Conference set for April 28, 2003 at 10:00 AM.(Court Reporter Crystal Pilgrim) (cdw)

April 11, 2003

April 11, 2003

23

Memorandum in opposition to motion re 22 to strike Wicks declaration filed by GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Becker, Leonard) (Entered: 04/17/2003)

April 17, 2003

April 17, 2003

24

Consent MOTION Hold Motions In Abeyance Pending Settlement Discussions re 15 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to Extend Time Within Which to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint, and Within Which to Respond to Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification, and Memorandum in Support Thereof, 16 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 14 MOTION to Certify Class, 1 Complaint,, 5 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint, 19 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, 20 Memorandum in Opposition, 21 Reply in Support, 10 Memorandum in Opposition, 13 Reply in Support, 14 MOTION to Certify Class by VICKIE BROOKS, DONNA CURTIS, TODD DILLARD, JOHN DOE, GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, KEISHA HOLLOWAY, DIANNA JOHNSON, LAURA LAMBERT, TONYA CECELIA MACK, CAROLYN MONTGOMERY, RUBBIYA MUHAMMED, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, DIANNE WILKES. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(McDaniel, Oliver) (Entered: 04/25/2003)

April 25, 2003

April 25, 2003

Status Conference held before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 4/28/2003. (Court Reporter Crystal Pilgrim.) (cdw)

April 28, 2003

April 28, 2003

MINUTE ENTRY ORDER granting 24 Motion to Hold Motions in Abeyance Pending Settlement Discussions. Status hearing is scheduled for 5/30/03 at 10:30 a.m. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 4/28/03. (dsj)

April 28, 2003

April 28, 2003

25

NOTICE by TODD DILLARD, JOHN DOE, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE of Filing (Attachments: # 1 Stipulated Protective Order# 2 Confidentiality Agreement)(McDaniel, Oliver) (Entered: 05/27/2003)

May 27, 2003

May 27, 2003

MINUTE ENTRY ORDER re 25 Notice (Other) filed by JOHN DOE, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, TODD DILLARD. Stipulated Protective Order and Confidentiality Agreement are hereby approved by the Court. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 5/28/03. (dsj)

May 28, 2003

May 28, 2003

26

NOTICE of Appearance by Holly Michelle Johnson on behalf of GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (Johnson, Holly) (Entered: 05/29/2003)

May 29, 2003

May 29, 2003

27

ENTERED IN ERROR.....STATUS REPORT by DIANNA JOHNSON. (Attachments: # 1)(Claiborne, William) Modified on 5/30/2003 (rje, ). (Entered: 05/29/2003)

May 29, 2003

May 29, 2003

28

STATUS REPORT by DIANNA JOHNSON. (Attachments: # 1)(Claiborne, William) (Entered: 05/30/2003)

May 30, 2003

May 30, 2003

29

NOTICE by GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Withdrawing Appearance of Holly Johnson (Johnson, Holly) (Entered: 05/30/2003)

May 30, 2003

May 30, 2003

30

NOTICE of Hearing: Status Conference set for 6/10/2003 at 08:45 AM before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. (cdw) (Entered: 06/02/2003)

May 30, 2003

May 30, 2003

"NOTICE OF CORRECTED DOCKET ENTRY. Document No. 27 was entered in error and counsel was instructed to refile said pleading." (rje, )

May 30, 2003

May 30, 2003

Status Conference held before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 5/30/2003. (Court Reporter Crystal Pilgrim) (cdw)

May 30, 2003

May 30, 2003

31

MOTION to Continue by DIANNA JOHNSON. (Attachments: # 1)(Claiborne, William) (Entered: 06/05/2003)

June 5, 2003

June 5, 2003

MINUTE ENTRY ORDER granting 31 Motion to Continue. Status hearing is reset for 6/19/03 at 8:45 a.m. Deadline for making recommendations on discovery and scheduling is 6/13/03. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 6/6/03. (dsj)

June 6, 2003

June 6, 2003

32

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Submit a Proposed Scheduling Order, Time for Filing Having Expired, and to Continue the Status Hearing by VICKIE BROOKS, DONNA CURTIS, TODD DILLARD, JOHN DOE, GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, KEISHA HOLLOWAY, DIANNA JOHNSON, LAURA LAMBERT, TONYA CECELIA MACK, CAROLYN MONTGOMERY, RUBBIYA MUHAMMED, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, DIANNE WILKES. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(McDaniel, Oliver) (Entered: 06/17/2003)

June 17, 2003

June 17, 2003

MINUTE ENTRY ORDER granting 32 Motion for Extension of Time. Proposed scheduling order is due 7/13/03 and status hearing reset for 7/21/03 at 9:00 a.m. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 6/18/03. (dsj)

June 18, 2003

June 18, 2003

33

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 7/3/03. (dsj) (Entered: 07/03/2003)

July 3, 2003

July 3, 2003

MINUTE ENTRY ORDER: Given the Court's order referring this case to mediation 33, the status hearing scheduled for 7/21/03 is canceled. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 7/10/03.(dsj)

July 10, 2003

July 10, 2003

MINUTE ENTRY ORDER: Pursuant to the Court's Order dated July 3, 2003, the parties are directed to submit a joint report on the status of mediation no later than 9/11/03 at 5:00 p.m. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 9/8/03. (dsj)

Sept. 8, 2003

Sept. 8, 2003

34

STATUS REPORT on Mediation (Joint) by VICKIE BROOKS, DONNA CURTIS, TODD DILLARD, JOHN DOE, GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, KEISHA HOLLOWAY, DIANNA JOHNSON, LAURA LAMBERT, TONYA CECELIA MACK, CAROLYN MONTGOMERY, RUBBIYA MUHAMMED, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, DIANNE WILKES. (McDaniel, Oliver) (Entered: 09/10/2003)

Sept. 10, 2003

Sept. 10, 2003

MINUTE ENTRY ORDER: The parties have been in settlement discussions since 4/28/03 and this case was referred to mediation on 7/3/03. Given the status of this case, it is hereby ordered that all pending motions are denied without prejudice. In the event that mediation fails, the parties may refile these motions (and responsive briefs) with the Court. In the meantime, the Court orders that mediation is continued for 60 days and the parties shall file a second report on the status of mediation no later than 11/11/03. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 9/11/03. (dsj)

Sept. 11, 2003

Sept. 11, 2003

35

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Second Mediation Status Report by DIANNA JOHNSON. (Attachments: # 1)(Claiborne, William) (Entered: 11/14/2003)

Nov. 14, 2003

Nov. 14, 2003

MINUTE ENTRY ORDER granting 35 Motion for Extension of Time to File Report. The parties shall file their second report on the status of mediation no later than 12/1/03. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 11/19/03. (dsj)

Nov. 19, 2003

Nov. 19, 2003

36

Second MOTION for Extension of Time to file second status report by DIANNA JOHNSON. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Claiborne, William) (Entered: 12/01/2003)

Dec. 1, 2003

Dec. 1, 2003

MINUTE ENTRY ORDER granting 36 Motion for Extension of Time. The parties shall file their second report on the status of mediation no later than 12/4/03. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 12/2/03. (dsj)

Dec. 2, 2003

Dec. 2, 2003

37

Consent MOTION for Protective Order by DIANNA JOHNSON. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Claiborne, William) (Entered: 12/04/2003)

Dec. 4, 2003

Dec. 4, 2003

38

STATUS REPORT on Mediation by DIANNA JOHNSON. (Claiborne, William) (Entered: 12/04/2003)

Dec. 4, 2003

Dec. 4, 2003

MINUTE ENTRY ORDER granting 37 Motion for Protective Order. The Stipulated Protective Order is hereby approved and entered. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 12/4/03. (dsj)

Dec. 4, 2003

Dec. 4, 2003

MINUTE ENTRY ORDER extending mediation for 60 days and directing the parties to file a status report on 2/20/04. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 12/23/03. (dsj)

Dec. 23, 2003

Dec. 23, 2003

39

STATUS REPORT (Joint) by VICKIE BROOKS, DONNA CURTIS, TODD DILLARD, JOHN DOE, GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, KEISHA HOLLOWAY, DIANNA JOHNSON, LAURA LAMBERT, TONYA CECELIA MACK, CAROLYN MONTGOMERY, RUBBIYA MUHAMMED, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, DIANNE WILKES. (McDaniel, Oliver) (Entered: 02/20/2004)

Feb. 20, 2004

Feb. 20, 2004

MINUTE ENTRY ORDER: Upon consideration of the parties' status report, mediation is continued for 45 days. A status hearing is set for 4/19/04 at 9:15 a.m. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 3/3/04. (dsj)

March 3, 2004

March 3, 2004

MINUTE ENTRY ORDER extending referral to mediation to 6/30/04. A status hearing is scheduled for 6/28/04 at 10:30 a.m. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 4/19/04. (dsj)

April 19, 2004

April 19, 2004

Status Conference held before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 4/19/2004. A further Status Conference is set for 6/28/2004 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 6 before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. (Court Reporter: Elaine Merchant) (cdw)

April 19, 2004

April 19, 2004

40

ORDER signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on June 28, 2004. (cdw) (Entered: 06/29/2004)

June 28, 2004

June 28, 2004

Status Conference held before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 6/28/2004. A telephone conference is set for 7/12/2004 at 2:30 PM in Courtroom 6 before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. A status conference is set for 7/30/2004 at 9:15 AM in Courtroom 6 before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. (Court Reporter: Crystal Pilgrim) (cdw)

June 28, 2004

June 28, 2004

Telephone Conference held before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 7/12/2004. Oral motion by the plaintiff to vacate the status conference set for 7/30/04 and for a futher telephone conference, heard and granted. A telephone conference is set for 8/3/2004 at 4:45 PM before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. (Court Reporter: Crystal Pilgrim) (cdw)

July 12, 2004

July 12, 2004

42

MOTION for Extension of Time to prepare a position memorandum to 8/2/04; and to prepare the "two-months" database to 8/23/04 by TODD DILLARD. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(ks, ) (Entered: 08/05/2004)

July 30, 2004

July 30, 2004

41

MOTION for Extension of Time to (One-Day) to Prepare Position Memorandum, and Memorandum in Support Thereof by TODD DILLARD, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(McDaniel, Oliver) (Entered: 08/02/2004)

Aug. 2, 2004

Aug. 2, 2004

MINUTE ENTRY ORDER granting 41 Motion for Extension of Time to Prepare Position Memorandum. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 8/3/04. (dsj)

Aug. 3, 2004

Aug. 3, 2004

Status Conference held before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 8/10/2004. A further Status Conference is set for 9/15/2004 at 9:15 AM in Courtroom 6 before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. (Court Reporter: Crystal Pilgrim) (cdw)

Aug. 10, 2004

Aug. 10, 2004

43

MOTION for Extension of Time to Prepare the "Two-Months" Database, and Memorandum in Support Thereof by TODD DILLARD, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(McDaniel, Oliver) (Entered: 08/23/2004)

Aug. 23, 2004

Aug. 23, 2004

MINUTE ORDER granting 43 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. The position memorandum shall be prepared by 9/3/04.Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 8/25/04. (ato)

Aug. 25, 2004

Aug. 25, 2004

Status Conference held before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 9/15/2004. A further Status Conference is set for 11/15/2004 at 11:15 AM in Courtroom 6 before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. (Court Reporter: Crystal Pilgrim) (cdw)

Sept. 15, 2004

Sept. 15, 2004

NOTICE: The correct date and time for the next status conference in this case is 10/15/2004 at 11:15 AM in Courtroom 6 before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. (cdw)

Sept. 15, 2004

Sept. 15, 2004

Status Conference held before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 10/15/2004. A further Status Conference is set for 11/17/2004 at 10:15 AM in Courtroom 6 before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. (Court Reporter: Crystal Pilgrim) (cdw)

Oct. 15, 2004

Oct. 15, 2004

NOTICE of Hearing: Status Conference reset for 12/6/2004 at 11:15 AM in Courtroom 6 before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. Please be punctual.(cdw)

Nov. 10, 2004

Nov. 10, 2004

Status Conference held before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 12/6/2004. A Telephone Conference is set for 1/4/2005 at 11:00 AM before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. A further Status Conference is set for 1/28/2005 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 6 before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. (Court Reporter: Crystal Pilgrim) (cdw)

Dec. 6, 2004

Dec. 6, 2004

44

NOTICE of Appearance by Maria-Claudia T. Amato on behalf of GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (Amato, Maria-Claudia) (Entered: 12/13/2004)

Dec. 13, 2004

Dec. 13, 2004

MINUTE ENTRY ORDER. The next telephone conference will be held on January 28, 2005 at 11:30 a.m. Another telephone conference is scheduled for February 25, 2005 at 2:15 p.m. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 1/4/05. (dyc)

Jan. 4, 2005

Jan. 4, 2005

Telephone Conference held before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 1/4/2005. (Court Reporter: Crystal Pilgrim) (cdw)

Jan. 4, 2005

Jan. 4, 2005

Set/Reset Hearings: Telephone Conference set for 1/18/2005 at 11:30 AM before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. Telephone Conference set for 2/25/2005 at 2:15 PM before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. (cdw)

Jan. 4, 2005

Jan. 4, 2005

MINUTE ENTRY ORDER denying as moot 42 Motion for Extension of Time to Prepare a Position Memorandum. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 1/24/05. (dyc)

Jan. 24, 2005

Jan. 24, 2005

Telephone Conference held before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 1/28/2005. (Court Reporter: Crystal Pilgrim) (cdw)

Jan. 28, 2005

Jan. 28, 2005

NOTICE of Hearing: Status Conference set for 2/16/2004 at 9:15 AM in Courtroom 6 before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. Please be punctual.(cdw)

Feb. 2, 2005

Feb. 2, 2005

Status Conference held before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 2/16/2005. Defendant directed to submit a full proposal to the plaintiff via email by midnight on 2/17/05. A further Status Conference is set for 2/23/2005 at 3:15 PM in Courtroom 6 before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. (Court Reporter: Crystal Pilgrim) (cdw)

Feb. 16, 2005

Feb. 16, 2005

45

NOTICE of Delivery of Draft Stipulation of Settlement and Dismissal by UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, TODD DILLARD re Status Conference,, Set Deadlines/Hearings, (McDaniel, Oliver) (Entered: 02/17/2005)

Feb. 17, 2005

Feb. 17, 2005

Telephone Conference held before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 2/25/2005. A further telephone conference is set for 3/14/2005 at 11:15 AM before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. (Court Reporter: Crystal Pilgrim) (cdw)

Feb. 25, 2005

Feb. 25, 2005

Set/Reset Hearings: The Telephone Conference currently set for 3/14/05 has been rescheduled for 3/21/2005 at 10:30 AM before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. The parties should first initiate a conference call amongst themselves and then call in the Court. (cdw)

March 10, 2005

March 10, 2005

Telephone Conference held before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 3/21/2005. (cdw)

March 21, 2005

March 21, 2005

46

NOTICE of Change of Address by William Charles Claiborne, III (Claiborne, William) (Entered: 04/07/2005)

April 7, 2005

April 7, 2005

47

MOTION for Hearing Status Hearing by DIANNA JOHNSON. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Claiborne, William) (Entered: 05/09/2005)

May 9, 2005

May 9, 2005

MINUTE ENTRY ORDER granting 47 Motion for Hearing nunc pro tunc. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 5/16/05. (dyc)

May 16, 2005

May 16, 2005

48

NOTICE of Appearance by Maria-Claudia T. Amato on behalf of GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (Amato, Maria-Claudia) (Entered: 05/17/2005)

May 17, 2005

May 17, 2005

NOTICE of Hearing: Status Conference set for 5/23/2005 at 2:15 PM in Courtroom 6 before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. Please be punctual.(cdw)

May 18, 2005

May 18, 2005

Status Conference held before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 5/23/2005. A further Status Conference is set for 7/29/2005 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 6 before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. The defendant is directed to file a notice with the Court advising when the documents have been sent out. (Court Reporter: Scott Wallace) (cdw)

May 23, 2005

May 23, 2005

49

MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete the Settlement Approval Process by UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, TODD DILLARD. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(McDaniel, Oliver) (Entered: 06/28/2005)

June 28, 2005

June 28, 2005

MINUTE ENTRY ORDER granting 49 Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Complete the Settlement Approval Process as unopposed. The settlement documents must be submitted to the Department of Justice by no later than August 1, 2005. A joint status report shall be filed with the Court by no later than August 2, 2005. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 7/11/05. (dyc)

July 11, 2005

July 11, 2005

Set Deadlines/Hearings: Joint status report due by 8/2/2005. (cdw)

July 11, 2005

July 11, 2005

NOTICE of Hearing: Status Conference set for 8/29/2005 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 6 before Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. Please be punctual.(cdw)

Aug. 19, 2005

Aug. 19, 2005

Case Details

State / Territory:

District of Columbia

Case Type(s):

Jail Conditions

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Strip Search Cases

Key Dates

Filing Date: Dec. 2, 2002

Closing Date: 2013

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Females arrested in DC from 12/2/99 until case termination who were taken to the Superior Court for presentment on DC warrants or code offenses and who were subjected to strip searches while waiting for presentment before a DC Superior Court judge.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

Kaye, McLane, Bednarski & Litt

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

Federal

United States Marshals Service

State

DC Superior Court

Government of the District of Columbia

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Ex Parte Young (Federal) or Bivens

Constitutional Clause(s):

Equal Protection

Unreasonable search and seizure

Other Dockets:

District of District of Columbia 1:02-cv-02364

U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit 11-05115

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Non-settlement Outcome

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Relief Granted:

None

Source of Relief:

None

None yet

Issues

General/Misc.:

Search policies

Discrimination Basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Strip search policy (facilities)

Recommended Citation