Case: Fluellen v. Wetherington
1:02-cv-00479 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Filed Date: Feb. 20, 2002
Closed Date: 2003
Clearinghouse coding complete
Case Summary
On February 20, 2002, a group of prisoners with mental illness and/or intellectual disabilities incarcerated at Phillips State Prison filed a 42 U.S.C. §1983 class action lawsuit against the Georgia Department of Corrections and Phillips State Prison in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (Atlanta Division). Plaintiffs alleged that they were subject to physical, mental, and sexual abuse, excessive use of force, improper and prolonged placement in administrative and disciplinary segregation, and an on-going risk of suicide, self-injury, and death, in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794, and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12131, et seq.
Plaintiffs sought to represent a class of "all individuals whose abilities to cope with the demands of life within the correctional environment are impaired or in need of monitoring due to mental illness and/or an intellectual disability, who are now or will be in the future incarcerated in Phillips State Prison." On March 21, 2003, the District Court (Judge Julie E. Carnes) denied, without prejudice, Plaintiffs' motion for class certification on grounds that the definition of the proposed class was too vague and indefinite to be workable and that Plaintiffs failed to meet the prerequisites of numerosity, commonality, typicality, and adequacy of representation. The court thereby severed the claims of each individual plaintiff, directing them to file individual complaints within thirty days of the court's Order.
The court specified that the individual claim of Plaintiff Lacoya Fluellen would continue to be maintained in the current action (styled Fluellen, et al. v. Wetherington, et al., 1:02-CV-479-JEC) but that Fluellen, like the other individual plaintiffs, would have to file an amended complaint within thirty days. The court further emphasized the its refusal to certify the class was without prejudice and that, if the plaintiffs could, in the future, more adequately define the proposed class, the court would again consider a motion for class certification.
Fluellen, however, feared for his safety at Phillips State Prison and wished to transfer out of the facility. (See Ralph v. Adams, Order [Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss]). Because he could not accept such transfer while the lawsuit was pending, Fluellen, on April 9, 2003, dismissed his claim without prejudice. The case was terminated on the same day.
The District Court stated that, given the procedural posture, the voluntary dismissal by Fluellen meant that there was no longer any case. (See Ralph v. Adams, Order [Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss]) An amended class action complaint would thus have to be filed in the name of a different plaintiff. Consequently, Plaintiff's counsel chose Richard Ralph to be the named plaintiff in the purported class action and, on January 29, 2004, filed an amended class action complaint in the related case of Ralph v. Adams.
Summary Authors
Vidhya Reddy (3/4/2008)
Related Cases
Ralph v. Adams, Northern District of Georgia (2004)
People
For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/20768216/parties/fluellen-v-wetherington/
Carnes, Julie E. (Georgia)
Baker, Thurbert E. (Georgia)
Bright, Stephen B. (Georgia)
Caldas, Tamara Serwer (Georgia)
Amideo, William F. (Georgia)
Documents in the Clearinghouse
Docket
See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/20768216/fluellen-v-wetherington/
Last updated July 20, 2026, 4:55 a.m.
Docket for: Fluellen v. Wetherington
Case Details
State / Territory:
Case Type(s):
Special Collection(s):
Key Dates
Filing Date: Feb. 20, 2002
Closing Date: 2003
Case Ongoing: No
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Description:
Inmates at Phillips State Prison whose abilities to cope with the demands of life within the correctional environment are impaired or in need of monitoring due to mental illness and/or mental retardation [Class Not Certified]
Plaintiff Type(s):
Attorney Organizations:
Southern Center for Human Rights (SCHR)
Public Interest Lawyer: Yes
Filed Pro Se: No
Class Action Sought: Yes
Class Action Outcome: Granted
Defendants
State
Georgia Department of Corrections
Phillips State Prison
Facility Type(s):
Case Details
Causes of Action:
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.
Section 504 (Rehabilitation Act), 29 U.S.C. § 701
Constitutional Clause(s):
Other Dockets:
Northern District of Georgia 1:02-cv-00479
Northern District of Georgia 1:04-cv-00257
Available Documents:
Outcome
Prevailing Party: Defendant
Relief Granted:
Source of Relief:
Form of Settlement:
Issues
General/Misc.:
Discrimination Basis:
Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)
Affected Sex/Gender(s):
Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:
Assault/abuse by non-staff (facilities)
Assault/abuse by staff (facilities)
Sex w/ staff; sexual harassment by staff
Suicide prevention (facilities)
Medical/Mental Health Care:
Intellectual/Developmental Disability
Case Summary of Fluellen v. Wetherington, Civil Rights Litig. Clearinghouse, https://clearinghouse.net/case/9792/ (last updated 3/4/2008).