Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:
6 cases, 40 documents
Ordered by
PUBLIC BENEFITS/GOVERNMENT SERVICES
Boston Alliance of Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Youth (BAGLY) v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

1:20-cv-11297 | U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts

Filed Date: July 9, 2020

Case Ongoing

This case is about a regulation promulgated by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) affecting protections against discrimination in healthcare on the basis of sex. In 2010, Congress passed the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to increase the number of Americans with health insurance and to decrease the cost of healthcare. One provision in the law, Section 1557, aimed to protect against various forms of discrimination in healthcare and health insurance, including discrimination on the…
EDUCATION
Balow v. Michigan State University

1:21-cv-00044 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan

Filed Date: Jan. 15, 2021

Closed Date: Jan. 23, 2023

This is an ongoing Title IX case about Michigan State University's attempt to eliminate its varsity aquatics program. In October 2020, MSU –– a NCAA Division 1 school –– announced it would discontinue its women's and men's varsity swimming and diving programs at the end of the 2020-2021 season due to budget cuts. Eleven women on the team then hired private counsel to sue the University, president, its board of trustees, and its director of athletics. Their January 15, 2021 complaint, filed in t…
REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Rev. Blackmon v. Missouri

2322-CC00120 | Missouri state trial court

Filed Date: Jan. 19, 2023

Case Ongoing

On January 19, 2023, a group of religious leaders who support abortion rights filed this lawsuit in the Circuit Court of St. Louis City (Missouri state trial court) challenging the state’s Total Abortion Ban (H.B. 126), Gestational Age Bans (H.B. 126), Reason Ban (H.B. 126), 72-Hour Delay (H.B. 1307), Same-Physician Requirement (S.B. 5), Medication Abortion Restrictions (S.B. 5), and Concurrent Original Jurisdiction Provision (S.B. 5). This lawsuit, filed against the state of Missouri, the Gove…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
National Women's Law Center v. OMB

1:17-cv-02458 | U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Filed Date: Nov. 15, 2017

Case Ongoing

On November 15, 2017, the National Women’s Law Center and the Labor Counsel for Latin American Advancement filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The case was assigned to Judge Tanya S. Chutkan. The plaintiffs sued the federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB), the Administrator for the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) (a division of the Office of Management and Budget), and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), under the…
EDUCATION
Communities Equity v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'n

1:98-cv-00479 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan

Filed Date: June 26, 1998

Closed Date: 2010

On June 26, 1998, a class of high school girls in Michigan filed this complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan under §1983, alleging that the Michigan High School Athletic Association (MHSAA) violated provisions of Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Represented by private counsel and by the National Women's Law Center and Equity Legal, the plaintiffs contended that MHSAA refused to authorize additional sports for high school gi…
REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Irish 4 Reproductive Health v. United States Department of Health and Human Services

3:18-cv-00491 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana

Filed Date: June 26, 2018

Case Ongoing

The suit challenged a settlement agreement between the Trump Administration and the University of Notre Dame to deny students, employees, and their dependents insurance coverage of contraceptive care guaranteed to them by the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The lawsuit also challenged the Trump administration’s interim final rules announced in October 2017 that would have allowed virtually any employer or university to refuse to comply with the ACA contraceptive coverage requirement. On June 26, 201…