Support Article

How To Search Guide
Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:

Support Article

How To Search Guide
110 cases, 125 documents
Ordered by
JUVENILE INSTITUTION
Donnell C. v. Illinois State Board of Education

1:92-cv-08230 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: Dec. 17, 1992

Closed Date: 2004

On December 17, 1992, twenty-three school-aged pretrial detainees in the Cook County Jail in Illinois filed this class action lawsuit under the Fourteenth Amendment, Due Process Clause, Equal Protection Clause, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The plaintiffs filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, on behalf of all current and future pretrial detainees confined in the divisions of the C…
INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY (FACILITY)
U.S. v. Puerto Rico

3:99-cv-01435 | U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico

Filed Date: April 21, 1999

On May 15, 1996, the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) sent notice to the Governor of Puerto Rico that it was conducting an investigation into the conditions of confinement at Integral Services ("CIS") in Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico, pursuant to its authority under the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act ("CRIPA"), 42 U.S.C. § 1997. CIS was one of six state-operated residential facilities serving persons with developmental disabilities in Puerto Rico. The DO…
PRISON CONDITIONS
Marria v. Broadus

1:97-cv-08297 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Filed Date: Nov. 10, 1997

Closed Date: 2004

On November 10, 1997, an inmate at the Shawangunk Correctional Facility in Wallkill, New York, filed a pro se lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the First and Fourteenth Amendments, and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) against the New York State Department of Corrections in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff asked the Court for declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as damages, alleging that his constitutional rights ha…
JAIL CONDITIONS
Roberts v. County of Mahoning

4:03-cv-02329 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio

Filed Date: Nov. 14, 2003

Closed Date: May 17, 2010

On November 14, 2003 Ohio inmates filed this class action lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Ohio, alleging that the conditions of confinement at the Mahoning County Justice Center ("Justice Center") and the Minimum Security Jail ("MSJ") violated their constitutional rights. The plaintiffs alleged that they were subjected severe overcrowding and corresponding deprivations. They sought equitable and declaratory relief.On March 5, 2004, …
PRISON CONDITIONS
Mast v. Indiana Department of Corrections

2:05-cv-00037 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana

Filed Date: Feb. 3, 2005

Closed Date: July 23, 2019

On February 3, 2005, inmates confined to the Secured Housing Unit ("SHU") at the Wabash Valley Correctional Facility in Indiana filed a class-action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The plaintiffs, represented by the ACLU National Prison Project and the ACLU of Indiana, asked the court for declaratory and injunctive relief, claiming that the confinement of certain mentally ill prisoners there was unconstitutional. On March 10, 2005,…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Kohler Company

4:99-cv-00486 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Filed Date: July 8, 1999

Closed Date: Dec. 14, 2004

On July 8, 1999, the Memphis and Little Rock offices of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) filed an employment discrimination lawsuit on behalf of a Black employee in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. They sued Kohler Company (doing business as Sterling Plumbing Group, Inc.) under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The EEOC alleged that the defendants discriminated against the complainant on the basis of race and fired him in retaliation for…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Tobacco Superstores, Inc.

3:05-cv-00218 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Filed Date: Sept. 19, 2005

Closed Date: 2011

On September 19, 2005, an African American employee, on behalf of other African American employees, filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. The plaintiff sued Tobacco Superstores Inc. under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The plaintiff, represented by the EEOC, asked the court for injunctive and individual relief, claiming that she and other African American employees were denied promotions because of their race, and that she was constructi…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Pokphand

2:99-cv-01389 | U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama

Filed Date: Nov. 23, 1999

Closed Date: May 15, 2001

The Birmingham District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Charoen Pokphand USA Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama in November 1999. The complaint is not available, but court documents indicate that the complaint alleged sexual harassment and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The case was consolidated with a private plaintiff case, Dinkins v. Charoen Pokphand USA, 2:99-cv-00847-ID-JLC (M.D. Ala. Aug. 10, 1999), in Ma…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
LAKE v. AK STEEL CORPORATION

2:03-cv-00517 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

Filed Date: April 15, 2003

Closed Date: 2010

On April 15, 2003, two African American employees of AK Steel Corporation brought this action in the Western District of Pennsylvania under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, asked the court for compensatory and punitive damages, as well as injunctive relief, claiming that AK Steel had discriminated against them because of their race. Specifically, the plaintiffs alleged that AK Steel had permitted its employees to use rac…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. WORTHINGTON, MOORE, & JACOBS

1:04-cv-03127 | U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

Filed Date: Sept. 30, 2004

Closed Date: July 18, 2011

On September 30, 2004, the EEOC's Baltimore Office filed suit against Worthington, Moore, & Jacobs, a collection agency operating out of Ellicott City, Maryland. The complaint, filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland and brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. § 2000e), alleged that the company president sexually harassed a number of female employees, and that the company retaliated against those who complained. On February 19, 2009, the court (Judge Everett…