Support Article

How To Search Guide
Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:

Support Article

How To Search Guide
50 cases, 54 documents
Ordered by
JAIL CONDITIONS
Benjamin v. Horn

1:75-cv-03073 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Filed Date: June 24, 1975

This case was consolidated for enforcement purposes with Ambrose v. Malcolm; Detainees of Queens House of Detention v. Malcolm; Detainees of Brooklyn House of Detention for Men v. Malcolm; Maldonado v. Ciuros; Forts v. Malcolm; and Rosenthal v. Malcolm. The summary below includes all of these in the consolidated form, but more information about each individual case is included in the "Related Cases" section. On June 24, 1975, a group of pretrial detainees at Rikers Island Detention Center for M…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. LUBY'S INC

2:04-cv-01094 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: May 27, 2004

Closed Date: Oct. 19, 2007

In May 2004, the Phoenix District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Luby's Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. We do not have a copy of the complaint. However, according to the consent decree and a court order in the case, the complaint alleged that the defendant violated the American with Disabilities Act of 1990 ("ADA") by discriminating against the charging party, an employee with an intellectual disability. Specifically, the defendant failed to reasona…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Custom Companies

1:02-cv-03768 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: May 28, 2002

Closed Date: 2009

In May of 2002, the EEOC's Chicago District Office filed suit in U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, against Custom Companies Inc., a trucking company, and related corporate entities. The suit alleged sexual harassment and retaliation in violation of Title VII. The charging parties intervened as plaintiffs. In July of 2003, the case was consolidated with a separate action brought by the EEOC against Custom Companies (1:03-cv-02293). The defendants made multiple motions for summ…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. EVERDRY WATERPROOFING

6:01-cv-06329 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York

Filed Date: June 27, 2001

Closed Date: 2006

The New York District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Everdry Waterproofing, Inc. (aka Everdry of Rochester), Everdry Marketing and Management, Inc., Everdry Management Services, Inc. (aka Everdry Waterproofing) and Everdry of Rochester in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York in June 2001. According to the court's denial of summary judgment for the defendant, the complaint alleged sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. …
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATION (d/b/a FORT DODGE ANIMAL HEALTH)

3:00-cv-03079 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa

Filed Date: Sept. 29, 2000

Closed Date: April 1, 2002

In September 2000, the Milwaukee District Office of the EEOC filed suit in U.S. District Court, Northern District of Iowa, against American Home Products Corporation, alleging sexual harassment and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Several private plaintiffs intervened in the case, which was subsequently consolidated with another case brought by a private party (3:00-cv-03046). Motions by both the defendant and the intervening plaintiffs for summary judgment were de…
IMMIGRATION AND/OR THE BORDER
Flores v. Reno

2:85-cv-04544 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Filed Date: July 11, 1985

Note: We've tagged this case as one challenging President Trump's immigration executive orders because those executive orders and their implementing memoranda, included as "resources," below, touch on many of the matters subject to longstanding court oversight in this case. On July 11, 1985, attorneys from the National Center for Immigrants' Rights, the National Center for Youth Law, and the ACLU Foundation of Southern California represented four minors who filed this class action complaint aga…

Settled: Implementation Ongoing

Appeal Pending

PRISON CONDITIONS
Wright v. Corrections Corporation of America

1:00-cv-00293 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: Feb. 16, 2000

On February 16, 2000, private attorneys, a public defender, and counsel from the D.C. Prisoners' Legal Services Project filed this 42 U.S.C § 1983 putative class action in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on behalf of incarcerated persons, their family members, legal counsel, and other recipients of telephone calls from prisoners housed in prison facilities operated by the defendant private corporation, Corrections Corporation of America (CCA—the largest operator of private …
JAIL CONDITIONS
Sutton v. Hopkins County, KY

4:03-cv-00003 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky

Filed Date: Jan. 9, 2003

Closed Date: 2013

On January 9, 2003, four persons represented by attorneys from several law firms in Louisville, Kentucky, filed this class action civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. The plaintiffs challenged the strip search policy of the Hopkins County, Kentucky, jail. The plaintiffs alleged that they were searched pursuant to a blanket strip search policy of the jail which required all pretrial detainees transferred from…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Bishop v. Gainer (Koski v. Gainer)

1:92-cv-03293 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: May 19, 1992

Closed Date: May 20, 2002

On May 19, 1992, white male police officers filed a lawsuit against the Illinois State Police (ISP) and Illinois in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants had violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, and the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, contending that racial quotas and different qualifications for the same jobs constituted reverse discrimination. The plaintiffs sou…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Nelson v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.

2:04-cv-00171 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Filed Date: Sept. 22, 2004

Closed Date: July 10, 2010

On August 11, 2005 a group of African-Americans filed a consolidated amended complaint under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.) and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 against Wal-Mart Stores Inc. in United States District Court of the Eastern District of Arkansas. The plaintiffs alleged that Wal-Mart discriminated against African-Americans in hiring and sought damages and injunctive and declaratory relief. Specifically, the plaintiffs contended that Wal-Mart's practice of "word of mo…