Support Article

How To Search Guide
Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:

Support Article

How To Search Guide
400 cases, 453 documents
Ordered by
JUVENILE INSTITUTION
U.S. v. Essex County

2:87-cv-04829 | U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey

Filed Date: Dec. 9, 1987

Closed Date: 2003

On January 6, 1986, the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice [DOJ] notified the state of New Jersey that it intended to investigate the conditions of confinement at the Essex County Youth House at Newark, New Jersey pursuant to the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (CRIPA), 42 U.S.C. § 1997 et seq. Following its investigation, the DOJ issued its findings letter on July 23 1986, which outlined various egregious conditions of confinement that existed at the facility…
JUVENILE INSTITUTION
United States v. Puerto Rico

3:94-cv-02080 | U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico

Filed Date: Aug. 10, 1994

On August 10, 1994, after conducting a comprehensive investigation, the United States filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. The U.S. sued the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the governor, various executive officials, and the directors of several juvenile facilities under the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (CRIPA), 42 U.S.C. § 1997 et seq. The U.S., represented by the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the U.S. Attorney'…
JUVENILE INSTITUTION
Horton v. Williams

3:94-cv-05428 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Filed Date: Aug. 11, 1994

Closed Date: Aug. 23, 2001

On August 11, 1994, juvenile plaintiffs filed a § 1983 civil rights class action suit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington (Tacoma), challenging conditions of confinement at the Green Hill School (GHS). Plaintiffs were represented by attorneys for the National Center for Youth Law Columbia Legal Services and sought declaratory and injunctive relief.Plaintiffs amended their Complaint on August 17, 1994. Defendants moved to dismiss, which was denied by the District …
PRISON CONDITIONS
Clark v. California

3:96-cv-01486 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: April 22, 1996

On April 22, 1996, two prisoners with developmental disabilities, incarcerated within facilities run by the California Department of Corrections (CDC), filed a class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and the Rehabilitation Act (RA), against the State of California, its Governor, CDC and prison officials. The plaintiffs, represented by the Prison Law Office, the Disability Rights an…
JAIL CONDITIONS
Hollingsworth v. Campbell County, Kentucky

2:05-cv-00079 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky

Filed Date: April 29, 2005

Closed Date: June 30, 2008

Built in 1991, the Campbell County Detention Center was designed to hold 135 prisoners. It quickly became overcrowded. In the weeks before this lawsuit was filed in the district court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, on April 29, 2005, the jail's population reached a high of 276 prisoners, many of whom were forced to sleep on the floor. Many of the inmates were awaiting transfer to the Kentucky Department of Corrections (KDOC), which was also named as a defendant in this lawsuit. The KDO…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Key Energy Services, Inc.

2:03-cv-00331 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas

Filed Date: Sept. 4, 2003

Closed Date: June 21, 2004

In September 2003, the EEOC district office of San Antonio, Texas brought this suit against Key Energy Services, Inc., the parent company of Brooks Well Servicing, Inc., in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. The complaint alleged violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, in that a female employee was sexually harassed by a male manager and male coworkers when they made obscene comments, sexual innuendos, and requested to have sex with her. The charging …
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Moore & Cowart Contractors

3:03-cv-00121 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas

Filed Date: April 7, 2003

Closed Date: 2007

In April 2003, the EEOC San Antonio District Office filed this suit against Moore & Cowart Contractors, Inc., a general construction firm, in the U.S. District Court for Western District of Texas. The aggrieved female employee initially filed a claim under the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act. This case was then consolidated with the EEOC's suit, which alleged that the defendant violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when it allowed the aggrieved employee to suffer from inappr…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. 24 HOUR FITNESS USA, INC.

3:04-cv-02096 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas

Filed Date: Sept. 28, 2004

Closed Date: Nov. 22, 2006

In September 2004, the EEOC district office in Dallas, Texas brought this suit against 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc., a national health club chain, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The complaint alleges that a female employee was unlawfully discriminated against because of her sex, retaliated against, and constructively discharged, all in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Specifically, the employee stated that when she was promoted a managerial …
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. GREG & DEB'S, INC d/b/a NORTH PARK LOUNGE CLUBHOUSE

2:06-cv-00769 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

Filed Date: June 12, 2006

Closed Date: 2011

The EEOC sued Greg & Deb's, Inc.; Mark & Greg's, Inc.; and the offending owners on June 12, 2006 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The EEOC's complaint alleged that the defendants violated Title VII when they discriminated against the intervenor employee, who intervened in August, 2006, based on sex (female) by creating a sexually harassing work environment which lead to her constructive discharge. The parties settled their dispute with a consent decree on M…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. REGIS CORPORATION dba SMART STYLE HAIR SALON

2:06-cv-00824 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio

Filed Date: Sept. 29, 2006

Closed Date: Nov. 13, 2010

In September 2006 the Cleveland District Office of the EEOC filed this lawsuit against hair salon company Regis Corporation, doing business as Smart Style Family Hair Salon, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio alleging discrimination on the basis of race and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Specifically, the complaint alleged that two complaining parties were retaliated against for opposing a practice of racial segregation of work …