Support Article

How To Search Guide
Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:

Support Article

How To Search Guide
354 cases, 399 documents
Ordered by
IMMIGRATION AND/OR THE BORDER
J.G.G. v. Trump

1:25-cv-00766 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: March 15, 2025

Case Ongoing

This case is one of several lawsuits challenging the Trump administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act to detain and deport noncitizens without due process. You can see all of the cases here. This case challenged the Trump Administration’s authority to invoke the Alien Enemies Act to circumvent removal procedures and order the immediate removal of Venezuelan nationals from the United States. On March 15, 2025, five detained Venezuelan nationals filed this class action lawsuit in the District …
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
CODING IN PROCESS
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sheetz, Inc.

3:24-cv-00231 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

Filed Date: April 17, 2024

Case Ongoing

(This summary is temporary, while we research the case.) On April 17, 2024, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed this lawsuit against Sheetz Inc. The EEOC alleged that the Defendant refused to hire persons based on their criminal justice histories, thereby disparately impacting Black, Native American, and multiracial applicants. However, the EEOC reversed its position under the second Trump administration and moved to dismiss the case on June 6, 2025.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE (OTHER)
Does v. Snyder (Does II)

2:16-cv-13137 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

Filed Date: Aug. 30, 2016

Closed Date: May 5, 2022

This case involved a class action lawsuit on behalf of all people required to register under Michigan’s Sex Offender Registry Act (SORA). On August 30, 2016, the plaintiff filed this lawsuit on behalf of himself and similarly situated plaintiffs in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Southern Division against the governor of Michigan and the director of the Michigan State Police under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Represented by private co…
PRESIDENTIAL/GUBERNATORIAL AUTHORITY
Pippenger v. U.S. DOGE Service

1:25-cv-01090 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: April 10, 2025

Case Ongoing

This case challenges President Trump’s and the U.S. DOGE Service’s intervention in and dismantling of the United States Institute of Peace (USIP), an independent nonprofit organization established by Congress to promote global peace and conflict resolution. On April 10, 2025, several former employees, contractors, and a donor of USIP filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. They amended the complaint on April 14, 2025. The plaintiffs named the U.S. DOGE Servic…
DISABILITY RIGHTS
Aldridge v. Carowinds, LLC

3:17-cv-00708 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina

Filed Date: Dec. 6, 2017

Closed Date: Aug. 24, 2018

This is a case about disability-based discrimination at an amusement park, preventing a family from full enjoyment of the facilities. On December 6, 2017, Plaintiffs sued under Title III of the ADA in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, Charlotte Division, and this litigation resulted in a confidential settlement in their favor. The plaintiffs were represented by Disability Rights North Carolina.  The defendants, Carowinds LLC, Cedar Fair L.P. , Cedar Fair Southw…
IMMIGRATION AND/OR THE BORDER
National Association of Immigration Judges v. Neal

1:20-cv-00731 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia

Filed Date: July 1, 2020

Case Ongoing

This case challenged a policy of the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) which placed restrictions on immigration judges who wish to speak or write publicly in their personal capacities about certain topics. The 2017 policy imposed a preapproval requirement on all immigration judges who wished to speak at public events in their personal capacities. The 2020 policy, which replaced the 2017 policy, said that immigration judges were prohibited from speaking in their personal capacities …
IMMIGRATION AND/OR THE BORDER
Orellana Castaneda v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

2:17-cv-04267 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York

Filed Date: July 18, 2017

Case Ongoing

Undocumented immigrants allege that Suffolk County law enforcement unlawfully detained immigrants past their release dates based on ICE detainers, raising key questions about local enforcement of immigration laws. On July 18, 2017, an undocumented immigrant brought this case against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the County of Suffolk, and the Suffolk County Sheriff's Office (SCSO) in the United States District Court for the …
PRESIDENTIAL/GUBERNATORIAL AUTHORITY
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops v. United States Department of State

1:25-cv-00465 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: Feb. 18, 2025

Case Ongoing

This case challenged the U.S. Department of State’s (DOS) suspension of federal funding awards to and termination of cooperative agreements with non-governmental organizations that partnered with the government to provide refugee resettlement assistance through the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP). DOS claimed these actions were consistent with President Trump’s January 20, 2025 Executive Order 14169 “Reevaluating and Realigning United States Foreign Aid” (EO 14169).  On February 18, 202…
LABOR RIGHTS
Porteous v. Flowers Foods, Inc.

6:23-cv-01840 | U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

Filed Date: Dec. 7, 2023

Case Ongoing

In this case, a delivery driver for a baked goods company alleged that the company misclassified its delivery drivers as "independent contractors" as a shortcut to avoid paying delivery drivers overtime and benefits. Defendants were Flowers Foods, Inc., and its subsidiaries: Flowers Bakeries LLC and Flowers Baking Co. of Portland, LLC (“FBC Portland”). (Collectively, the defendants are hereinafter referred to as “Flowers Foods”). The plaintiff had worked as a delivery driver for the defendants …
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Chapman v. Maryland Department of State Police

1:23-cv-00442 | U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

Filed Date: Feb. 17, 2023

Case Ongoing

This case is about a Black employee of the Maryland Department of State Police (MDSP) who alleged that MDSP discriminated against him on the basis of race. Background This case arose against the backdrop of sustained scrutiny of the Maryland Department of State Police (MDSP) for alleged racial discrimination in its employment practices. In 2022, the U.S. Department of Justice launched a Title VII pattern-or-practice investigation into MDSP’s hiring and promotion procedures, ultimately concludin…