Support Article

How To Search Guide
Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:

Support Article

How To Search Guide
28 cases, 128,959 documents
Ordered by
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Adams & Boyle v. Slatery

3:15-cv-00705 | U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee

Filed Date: June 25, 2015

Challenge to Tennessee Abortion Restrictions This case was filed on June 25, 2015 in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee by three reproductive healthcare providers on behalf of their patients. The complaint alleged that several state restrictions on abortion providers violated the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. The named defendants were the state Attorney General, the Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Health, and the Pres…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota v. Daugaard

4:11-cv-04071 | U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota

Filed Date: May 27, 2011

Closed Date: Oct. 21, 2022

This is a case challenging an abortion restriction in the state of South Dakota. According to the plaintiffs, South Dakota H.B. 1217 sought to restrict women's access to abortion services in South Dakota by (1) imposing what was at the time the longest mandatory delay in the country; (2) forcing every woman who sought an abortion to disclose and discuss private personal and medical information with an unlicensed, non-medical organization opposed to her decision; (3) requiring physicians to enga…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Stuart v. Huff

1:11-cv-00804 | U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina

Filed Date: Sept. 29, 2011

This case has to do with the “Woman’s Right to Know Act” (the Act), which was enacted on July 28, 2011 after the legislature overrode a veto by the Governor of North Carolina. This case was brought by the ACLU, Planned Parenthood, Center for Reproductive Rights, and A Woman’s Choice of Raleigh, Inc., on behalf of various physicians, licensed to practice medicine in the State of North Carolina and other various clinics providing reproductive health care services in North Carolina. The case was b…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Falls Church Medical Center, LLC v. Oliver

3:18-cv-00428 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia

Filed Date: June 20, 2018

Closed Date: July 28, 2020

This case, brought in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia on June 20, 2018, challenged the constitutionality of several Virginia statutes and regulations that governed the provision of abortion care throughout the state. The plaintiffs were a series of Virginia healthcare providers that provided elective abortion care, gynelogical, and family planning services. Represented by the ACLU, the Center for Reproductive Rights, Planned Parenthood, and a private law firm, plain…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Texas Medical Providers Performing Abortion Services v. Lakey

1:11-cv-00486 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas

Filed Date: June 13, 2011

Closed Date: Feb. 6, 2012

This is a case challenging Texas abortion restrictions requiring physicians to show patients seeking abortions their sonogram images and play the sound of the fetal heartbeat as part of the informed-consent process. On June 13, 2011, a group of Texas abortion providers filed this class-action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. The plaintiffs, represented by the Center for Reproductive Rights, sued the Commissioner of the Texas Department of State Health Servic…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Tucson Women's Center v. Arizona Medical Board

2:09-cv-01909 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: Sept. 14, 2009

Closed Date: March 5, 2010

This case challenged Arizona abortion restrictions enacted 2009 requiring patients to wait 24 hours after an initial appointment to receive an abortion, and prohibiting physicians from billing patients until after the 24-hour waiting period ended. On September 14, 2009, a coalition of medical clinics and physicians filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. The plaintiffs sued the attorney general of Arizona and the executive director of the Arizona Medical Board…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Whole Woman's Health Alliance v. Rokita

1:18-cv-01904 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana

Filed Date: June 21, 2018

Closed Date: Oct. 21, 2022

This is a case challenging Indiana laws regulating abortion. On June 21, 2018, a group of abortion providers and nonprofit organizations filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. The plaintiffs, represented by The Lawyering Project and a private firm, sued Indiana under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking injunctive and declaratory relief and attorney's fees. They claimed Indiana’s abortion laws violated the free speech clause of the First Amendment and the due p…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana and Kentucky, Inc. v. Cameron

3:22-cv-00198 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky

Filed Date: April 14, 2022

Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana and Kentucky (Planned Parenthood) filed this suit on April 14, 2022 in the Western District of Kentucky in response to the enactment of the Humanity in Healthcare Act of 2022 (the Act) on April 13. The Act imposed significant restrictions on abortion providers, including imposing vast reporting requirements and banning all abortions after fifteen weeks, with very narrow exceptions. Under the Act, providers risked significant fines and …
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. Moore

20-cvs-500147 | North Carolina state trial court

Filed Date: Sept. 3, 2020

Closed Date: Dec. 22, 2022

Abortion providers in North Carolina (Planned Parenthood South Atlantic; A Woman’s Choice of Charlotte; A Woman’s Choice of Greensboro; A Woman’s Choice of Raleigh; three doctors; and an advanced practice clinician), and SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective filed this case on September 3, 2020 to challenge five medically unnecessary abortion restrictions (the “Abortion Restrictions”): The Advanced Practice Clinician (“APC”) Ban, which disallows qualified physician assistan…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Gainesville Woman Care, LLC v. Florida

2015-CA-1323 | Florida state trial court

Filed Date: June 11, 2015

This is a state court case challenging an abortion restriction in the state of Florida. According to the plaintiffs, House Bill 633 (the Mandatory Delay Law) sought to restrict women’s access to abortion services in Florida by imposing a minimum 24-hour delay between receiving state-mandated information about the nature and risks of abortion and the abortion procedure. Florida Statutes § 390.0111 required physicians to provide the information in-person (an earlier case challenging that provisio…