Support Article

How To Search Guide
Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:

Support Article

How To Search Guide
13 cases, 128,959 documents
Ordered by
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Whole Woman's Health Alliance v. Rokita

1:18-cv-01904 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana

Filed Date: June 21, 2018

Closed Date: Oct. 21, 2022

This is a case challenging Indiana laws regulating abortion. On June 21, 2018, a group of abortion providers and nonprofit organizations filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. The plaintiffs, represented by The Lawyering Project and a private firm, sued Indiana under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking injunctive and declaratory relief and attorney's fees. They claimed Indiana’s abortion laws violated the free speech clause of the First Amendment and the due p…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. Moore

20-cvs-500147 | North Carolina state trial court

Filed Date: Sept. 3, 2020

Closed Date: Dec. 22, 2022

Abortion providers in North Carolina (Planned Parenthood South Atlantic; A Woman’s Choice of Charlotte; A Woman’s Choice of Greensboro; A Woman’s Choice of Raleigh; three doctors; and an advanced practice clinician), and SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective filed this case on September 3, 2020 to challenge five medically unnecessary abortion restrictions (the “Abortion Restrictions”): The Advanced Practice Clinician (“APC”) Ban, which disallows qualified physician assistan…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
South Wind Women's Center v. Hunter

CV-2019-2506 | Oklahoma state trial court

Filed Date: Nov. 8, 2019

Closed Date: Feb. 23, 2021

On November 8, 2019, South Wind Women's Center and Trust Women Oklahoma City (two reproductive healthcare facilities), the medical director of the Trust Women clinics, and a nurse practitioner of Trust Women filed this lawsuit. Represented by the Center for Reproductive Rights, the plaintiffs challenged two Oklahoma statutes, 63 O.S. § 1-729.1 (“Physician-In Person Law”) and 63 O.S. § 1-731(A) (”Physician-Only Law”). The Physician-In Person Law prohibited the administration of medication aborti…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Trust Women Foundation Inc. v. Bennett

2019-CV-000060 | Kansas state trial court

Filed Date: Jan. 30, 2019

This case is about telemedicine abortion in Kansas. The case follows directly from Trust Women v. Schmidt, in which plaintiff Trust Women, a reproductive health care clinic in Kansas that relies on telemedicine, won a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order preventing the state from enforcing House Bill 2028's ban on telemedicine abortion. However, following that preliminary injunction, Kansas appealed on January 30, 2019 and asserted that Kansas Healing Arts, other Kanas abortio…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Trust Women Foundation Inc. v. Schmidt

2018-CV-844 | Kansas state trial court

Filed Date: Nov. 8, 2018

On November 8, 2018, the Trust Women Foundation ("Trust Women") challenged a law that would have prohibited the provision of abortion care via telemedicine in Kansas. Trust Women is a reproductive health care clinic in Kansas that has relied on telemedicine to expand its practice and meet patient requests for remote care. The Center for Reproductive Rights and a private attorney represented Trust Women in the lawsuit, which they brought in Kansas' third Judicial District (Shawnee County), in Di…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration

2:22-cv-00223 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas

Filed Date: Nov. 18, 2022

On November 18, 2022, four national medical associations and four doctors with alleged experience in caring for pregnant and post-abortive patients sued the United States Food & Drug Administration (FDA), seeking to overturn the agency’s decades-old authorization of mifepristone, a pill that induces abortions. Represented by Alliance Defending Freedom and a private law firm, Plaintiffs brought suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Plaintiffs brought suit u…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
GenBioPro, Inc. v. Sorsaia

3:23-cv-00058 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia

Filed Date: Jan. 25, 2023

In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs decision, the West Virginia legislature enacted the Unborn Child Protection Act (UCPA), which banned nearly all abortions regardless of the stage of pregnancy with only limited exceptions for nonviable fetuses and embryos, ectopic pregnancies, and medical emergencies. On January 25, 2023, GenBioPro, a company that manufacturers and sells a generic version of the abortion medication mifepristone, brought suit in the U.S. District Court for the S…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Bryant v. Stein

1:23-cv-00077 | U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina

Filed Date: Jan. 25, 2023

This is a case about medication abortion in North Carolina. This lawsuit was filed on January 25, 2023, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. The plaintiff, a North Carolina physician, sued North Carolina, alleging that it was unconstitutional for the state to regulate mifepristone, an abortion medication, because the federal government already did so through the FDA and the federal regulations should preempt those imposed by the state. The plaintiff, represented…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Washington v. United States Food and Drug Administration

1:23-cv-03026 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington

Filed Date: Feb. 23, 2023

On February 23, 2023, ten states led by the state of Washington filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington against the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and the United States Department of Health and Human Services (“DHHS”).  The states sought an injunction against the January 2023 Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (“REMS”) restrictions imposed by the FDA on the drug mifepristone, a commonly prescribed abortion drug.  The states claimed t…
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Planned Parenthood of Montana v. State of Montana II

CDV-2023-231 | Montana state trial court

Filed Date: April 10, 2023

This case is about a challenge to a Montana ban on dilation and evacuation (“D&E”).  On April 10, 2023, Planned Parenthood of Montana and its Chief Medical Officer (collectively, “Planned Parenthood”) brought this lawsuit in a state trial court against the State of Montana to raise a pre-enforcement challenge against HB 721. The bill in question was passed by the Montana legislature and if in effect, it would ban dilation and evacuation, the most common and safest method for second-trimester ab…