Case: State of Oregon v. Noem

6:26-cv-00186 | U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

Filed Date: Jan. 28, 2026

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This action arose from consolidated litigation challenging the federal government's effective closure of AIRFAC Newport in Newport, Oregon. (Case Nos. 6:25-cv-02165 and 6:25-cv-02172) on the Clearinghouse here. After the State of Oregon amended its complaint to add claims concerning a proposed immigration detention facility on the Oregon coast and the City of Newport filed a separate lawsuit, City of Newport v. Noem (Case No. 6:25-cv-02396), challenging the same project, District Judge Ann Loui…

This action arose from consolidated litigation challenging the federal government's effective closure of AIRFAC Newport in Newport, Oregon. (Case Nos. 6:25-cv-02165 and 6:25-cv-02172) on the Clearinghouse here. After the State of Oregon amended its complaint to add claims concerning a proposed immigration detention facility on the Oregon coast and the City of Newport filed a separate lawsuit, City of Newport v. Noem (Case No. 6:25-cv-02396), challenging the same project, District Judge Ann Louise Aiken determined that the detention-facility claims were misjoined with the AIRFAC Newport claims. On January 29, 2026, the court severed Oregon's detention-facility claims and opened this action as a separate case.

On January 30, 2026, the State of Oregon filed this lawsuit against federal immigration officials in U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon. The state alleged that in 2025, defendants, including Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and ICE's acting director, began efforts to transform Newport Municipal Airport into an ICE detention facility capable of holding up to 200 noncitizens. After apparently abandoning those plans on December 4, 2025, defendants shifted their focus to other potential sites for a detention facility elsewhere on the Oregon Coast near Newport. Oregon claimed that defendants conducted these efforts without transparency or public process, ignoring information requests from local officials and Congress members, despite the area being environmentally sensitive with threatened and endangered species and tsunami risks. The state brought claims under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), alleging violations of the Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and sought declarations that the defendants' actions were ultra vires, contrary to law, and arbitrary and capricious.

On February 19, 2026, the court granted an unopposed motion to consolidate this action with the City of Newport’s lawsuit, with this case as the lead case. On February 27, 2026, defendants moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. On April 21, 2026, the court permitted Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition and Cascadia Wildlands, environmental advocacy organizations concerned about the potential environmental impacts of the proposed detention facility, to participate as plaintiff-intervenors. As of June 2026, defendants' motion to dismiss remains pending, and the court has not yet ruled on the merits of Oregon's claims.

This case is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Benjamin Glicksman (6/11/2026)

Claire Pollard (3/28/2026)

Related Cases

City of Newport v. Noem, District of Oregon (2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72200938/parties/state-of-oregon-v-noem/


Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
2

6:26-cv-00186

Opinion & Order

State of Oregon v. Noem et al.

Jan. 29, 2026

Jan. 29, 2026

Order/Opinion

2026 WL 243675

1

6:26-cv-00186

Conforming Complaint

State of Oregon v. Noem et al.

Jan. 30, 2026

Jan. 30, 2026

Complaint
21

6:26-cv-00186

Opinion & Order

State of Oregon v. Noem et al.

April 21, 2026

April 21, 2026

Order/Opinion

2026 WL 1078199

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72200938/state-of-oregon-v-noem/

Last updated Sept. 17, 2026, 3:28 a.m.

Docket for: State of Oregon v. Noem
ECF Number Date Description Link
2 Jan. 29, 2026

OPINION AND ORDER. Answer is due by 2/13/2026. Signed on 1/29/2026 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck) (Entered: 02/02/2026)

Clearinghouse
1 Jan. 30, 2026

Complaint. Conforming Complaint Filing fee in the amount of $405 collected. Agency Tracking ID: BORDC-10146954 Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by State of Oregon against Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Attachments: # 1 Attachment). (Marshall, Brian) (Entered: 01/30/2026)

1 Attachment

View on PACER

Clearinghouse
3 Feb. 2, 2026

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed on 2/2/2026 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck) (Entered: 02/02/2026)

RECAP
4 Feb. 3, 2026

Motion to Intervene . Eric McCord Wriston,Eric McCord Wriston,Meriel L. Darzen for Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition,Eric McCord Wriston,Meriel L. Darzen for Cascadia Wildlands. Filed by Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition, Cascadia Wildlands. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit) (Wriston, Eric) (Entered: 02/03/2026)

1 Exhibit

View on PACER

RECAP
5 Feb. 3, 2026

Unopposed Motion to Consolidate . Elizabeth Kinsman,Keith A. Ketterling,Lydia Anderson-Dana,Elizabeth Kinsman,Anuj Shah,Chloe Jasper,Tiffany A. Johnson,Elizabeth Kinsman,Keith A. Ketterling,Lydia Anderson-Dana,Anuj Shah,Chloe Jasper,Tiffany A. Johnson for City of Newport. Filed by City of Newport. (Kinsman, Elizabeth) (Entered: 02/03/2026)

RECAP
6 Feb. 6, 2026

Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint, 1 . Filed by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Todd M. Lyons, United States Department of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem. (Luse, Susanne) (Entered: 02/06/2026)

RECAP
7 Feb. 6, 2026

Response to Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint, 1 6 . Filed by State of Oregon. (Marshall, Brian) (Entered: 02/06/2026)

RECAP
8 Feb. 10, 2026

ORDER by Judge Ann L. Aiken GRANTING Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint 6 . Answer is due by 2/27/2026. (bd) (Entered: 02/10/2026)

RECAP
Feb. 10, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer a Complaint/Petition

9 Feb. 17, 2026

Response in Opposition to Motion to Intervene 4 . Filed by Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (Duffy, Sean) (Entered: 02/17/2026)

RECAP
10 Feb. 19, 2026

ORDER: Granting Unopposed Motion to Consolidate 5 . Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck) (Entered: 02/19/2026)

RECAP
Feb. 19, 2026

Order on Motion to Consolidate

11 Feb. 27, 2026

Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . Filed by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Todd M. Lyons, United States Department of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem, Todd Lyons, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Kristi Noem, Kevin Lunday, United States Coast Guard. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)Associated Cases: 6:26-cv-00186-AA, 6:25-cv-02396-AA (Duffy, Sean) (Entered: 02/27/2026)

1 Exhibit

View on RECAP

RECAP
12 March 3, 2026

Reply to Motion to Intervene (4 in 6:26-cv-00186-AA), Motion to Intervene (8 in 6:25-cv-02396-AA). Filed by Cascadia Wildlands, Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition.Associated Cases: 6:26-cv-00186-AA, 6:25-cv-02396-AA (Wriston, Eric) (Entered: 03/03/2026)

RECAP
13 March 5, 2026

SCHEDULING ORDER: Status Conference is set for 3/26/2026 at 10:30AM in Eugene by telephone before Judge Ann L. Aiken. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. Associated Cases: 6:26-cv-00186-AA, 6:25-cv-02396-AA (ck) (Entered: 03/05/2026)

RECAP
14 March 5, 2026

Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response/Reply to Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (15 in 6:25-cv-02396-AA, 15 in 6:25-cv-02396-AA, 11 in 6:26-cv-00186-AA, 11 in 6:26-cv-00186-AA). Filed by State of Oregon.Associated Cases: 6:26-cv-00186-AA, 6:25-cv-02396-AA (Marshall, Brian) (Entered: 03/05/2026)

RECAP
March 5, 2026

1 - Scheduling

15 March 6, 2026

ORDER: Granting 14 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to 11 . Response is due by 4/2/2026. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck) (Entered: 03/06/2026)

RECAP
16 March 6, 2026

Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response/Reply to Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (15 in 6:25-cv-02396-AA, 15 in 6:25-cv-02396-AA, 11 in 6:26-cv-00186-AA, 11 in 6:26-cv-00186-AA). Filed by City of Newport.Associated Cases: 6:26-cv-00186-AA, 6:25-cv-02396-AA (Anderson-Dana, Lydia) (Entered: 03/06/2026)

RECAP
17 March 6, 2026

ORDER: Granting 16 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to 11 . Response is due by 4/2/2026. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck) (Entered: 03/06/2026)

RECAP
March 6, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion

18 March 11, 2026

SCHEDULING ORDER: Status Conference is reset from 3/26/2026 to 4/21/2026 at 10:00AM in Eugene by telephone before Judge Ann L. Aiken. Response to Motion to Dismiss 11 is reset from 4/2/2026 to 4/28/2026. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck) (Entered: 03/11/2026)

RECAP
March 11, 2026

1 - Scheduling

19 March 25, 2026

Notice of Appearance of Coby Healy Howell appearing on behalf of State of Oregon. Filed by on behalf of State of Oregon.Associated Cases: 6:26-cv-00186-AA, 6:25-cv-02396-AA (Howell, Coby) (Entered: 03/25/2026)

RECAP
20 April 21, 2026

SCHEDULING ORDER: The Court is in receipt of the parties' e-mailed joint letter. The Status Conference set for 4/21/2026 at 10:00AM is VACATED. A Joint Status Report is due by 4/28/2026. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. Associated Cases: 6:26-cv-00186-AA, 6:25-cv-02396-AA (ck) (Entered: 04/21/2026)

RECAP
21 April 21, 2026

OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff-Intervenors Motion to Intervene is GRANTED. Signed on 4/21/2026 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. Associated Cases: 6:26-cv-00186-AA, 6:25-cv-02396-AA (ck) (Entered: 04/21/2026)

Clearinghouse
April 21, 2026

1 - Scheduling

22 April 28, 2026

Second Motion for Extension of Time . Filed by State of Oregon.Associated Cases: 6:26-cv-00186-AA, 6:25-cv-02396-AA (Howell, Coby) (Entered: 04/28/2026)

RECAP
23 April 28, 2026

Joint Status Report . Filed by City of Newport. Associated Cases: 6:26-cv-00186-AA, 6:25-cv-02396-AA (Ketterling, Keith) (Entered: 04/28/2026)

RECAP
24 April 29, 2026

ORDER: Granting in Part Motion for Extension of Time (22) in case 6:26-cv-00186-AA (26) in case 6:25-cv-02396-AA. Response is due by 5/12/2026. The Court will consider any requests for further extensions or new requests for a status conference to discuss jurisdictional discovery as needed. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. Associated Cases: 6:26-cv-00186-AA, 6:25-cv-02396-AA (ck) (Entered: 04/29/2026)

RECAP
April 29, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time

25 May 11, 2026

Third Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response/Reply to Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (15 in 6:25-cv-02396-AA, 15 in 6:25-cv-02396-AA, 11 in 6:26-cv-00186-AA, 11 in 6:26-cv-00186-AA). Filed by City of Newport, State of Oregon.Associated Cases: 6:26-cv-00186-AA, 6:25-cv-02396-AA (Anderson-Dana, Lydia) (Entered: 05/11/2026)

RECAP
26 May 11, 2026

ORDER: Granting 25 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to 11 . Response is due by 6/2/2026. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck) (Entered: 05/11/2026)

RECAP
May 11, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion

27 May 29, 2026

Fourth Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response/Reply to Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (11 in 6:26-cv-00186-AA, 11 in 6:26-cv-00186-AA, 15 in 6:25-cv-02396-AA, 15 in 6:25-cv-02396-AA). Filed by City of Newport, State of Oregon.Associated Cases: 6:26-cv-00186-AA, 6:25-cv-02396-AA (Anderson-Dana, Lydia) (Entered: 05/29/2026)

RECAP
28 June 1, 2026

ORDER: Granting 27 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to 11 . Response is due by 6/30/2026. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck) (Entered: 06/01/2026)

RECAP
June 1, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion

29 June 26, 2026

Fifth Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response/Reply to Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (15 in 6:25-cv-02396-AA, 15 in 6:25-cv-02396-AA, 11 in 6:26-cv-00186-AA, 11 in 6:26-cv-00186-AA). Filed by City of Newport, State of Oregon.Associated Cases: 6:26-cv-00186-AA, 6:25-cv-02396-AA (Jasper, Chloe) (Entered: 06/26/2026)

RECAP
30 June 26, 2026

ORDER: Granting 29 Fifth Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to 11 . Response is due by 7/15/2026. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck) (Entered: 06/26/2026)

RECAP
June 26, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion

31 July 14, 2026

Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response/Reply to Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (15 in 6:25-cv-02396-AA, 15 in 6:25-cv-02396-AA, 11 in 6:26-cv-00186-AA, 11 in 6:26-cv-00186-AA). Filed by City of Newport, State of Oregon.Associated Cases: 6:26-cv-00186-AA, 6:25-cv-02396-AA (Jasper, Chloe) (Entered: 07/14/2026)

RECAP
32 July 14, 2026

ORDER: Granting 31 Sixth Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to 11 . Response is due by 7/30/2026. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck) (Entered: 07/14/2026)

RECAP
July 14, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion

33 July 24, 2026

SCHEDULING ORDER: Status Conference is set for 8/13/2026 at 11:30AM in Eugene by telephone before Judge Ann L. Aiken. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. Associated Cases: 6:26-cv-00186-AA, 6:25-cv-02396-AA (ck) (Entered: 07/24/2026)

RECAP
July 24, 2026

1 - Scheduling

34 July 28, 2026

Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response/Reply to Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (15 in 6:25-cv-02396-AA, 15 in 6:25-cv-02396-AA, 11 in 6:26-cv-00186-AA, 11 in 6:26-cv-00186-AA). Filed by City of Newport, State of Oregon.Associated Cases: 6:26-cv-00186-AA, 6:25-cv-02396-AA (Shah, Anuj) (Entered: 07/28/2026)

RECAP
35 July 29, 2026

ORDER: Granting 34 Seventh Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to 11 . Response is due by 8/14/2026. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck) (Entered: 07/29/2026)

RECAP
July 29, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion

36 Aug. 13, 2026

MINUTES of Proceedings: Telephonic Status Conference held before Judge Ann L. Aiken. Defendants shall pursue approval for the settlement in principle on or before 9/9/2026. A further Status Conference is set for 9/11/2026 at 10:30AM in Eugene by telephone before Judge Ann L. Aiken. The Court withdraws with leave to refile Motion to Dismiss (11) in case 6:26-cv-00186-AA and (15) in case 6:25-cv-02396-AA with no objection from the parties. Brian Marshall present as counsel for State of Oregon. Keith Ketterling, Lydia Anderson-Dana, Tiffany Johnson present as counsel for City of Newport. Meriel Darzen, Eric Wriston present as counsel for intervenor plaintiffs. Sean Duffy present as counsel for defendants. FTR: Courtroom 4. Associated Cases: 6:26-cv-00186-AA, 6:25-cv-02396-AA (ck) (Entered: 08/13/2026)

RECAP
Aug. 13, 2026

Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim AND Order on Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction AND Status Conference

Sept. 11, 2026

Status Conference

Case Details

State / Territory:

Oregon

Case Type(s):

Immigration and/or the Border

Environmental Justice

Public Benefits/Government Services

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government

Key Dates

Filing Date: Jan. 28, 2026

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

The State of Oregon, with Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition and Cascadia Wildlands as Plaintiff-Intervenors. This is also consolidated with a case filed by the City of Newport.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Non-profit NON-religious organization

State Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Federal

United State Immigration and Customs Enforcement

United States Department of Homeland Security

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

National Environmental Protection Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321–4370f

Other Dockets:

District of Oregon 6:26-cv-00186

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Relief Sought:

Attorneys fees

Declaratory judgment

Injunction

Relief Granted:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

Environmental Justice and Resources:

Environmental Impact Statements

Immigration/Border:

Border police

Enforcement location

Presidential/Gubernatorial Authority:

Commandeering

Recommended Citation