Case: United States v. Maricopa County

2:10-cv-01878 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: Sept. 2, 2010

Closed Date: 2011

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On September 2, 2010, the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ"), Civil Rights Division, filed this lawsuit under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in the United States Court for the District of Arizona, Phoenix Division. The DOJ sought declaratory and injunctive relief, claiming that Maricopa County had violated the Civil Rights Act by failing to comply with a DOJ investigation. Specifically, the DOJ claimed that Maricopa County had refused to comply after a year of being minimally…

On September 2, 2010, the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ"), Civil Rights Division, filed this lawsuit under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in the United States Court for the District of Arizona, Phoenix Division. The DOJ sought declaratory and injunctive relief, claiming that Maricopa County had violated the Civil Rights Act by failing to comply with a DOJ investigation. Specifically, the DOJ claimed that Maricopa County had refused to comply after a year of being minimally cooperative and obstructing the DOJ investigation into the police practices in Maricopa County.

Maricopa County receives federal funds for its Sheriff's Office. Under an implementing regulation, offices that receive financial assistance agree to give the DOJ access to their records and they make contractual agreements to that effect. The DOJ was investigating a violation of the Omnibus Crime Control Act and the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, and had requested documents from the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office (MCSO). The DOJ made 51 specific requests. After over a year had passed, the MCSO had only partially complied with 3 of these 51 requests. The DOJ found them to be in violation of Title VI and initiated this lawsuit.

On June 2, 2011, after the parties had both filed motions for summary judgment, a settlement agreement was reached. The agreement granted the DOJ access to the MCSO facilities. Additionally, the MCSO agreed to produce the documents that the DOJ had requested, as well as a blanket agreement to comply with Title VI. On August 1, 2011, the Court (Judge Murray G. Snow) dismissed the case 60 days after a Joint Motion to Remove Case to the Inactive Docket was made.

There is no further activity and this case appears to be closed.

On May 10, 2012, presumably as a result of the continued investigation, the United States filed a lawsuit against Maricopa County in a related case, United States v. Maricopa County, et. Al, docket #2:12-cv-00981-LOA, (Clearinghouse Code: PN-AZ-0001).

Summary Authors

Blase Kearney (5/14/2012)

Richard Jolly (11/22/2014)

Virginia Weeks (10/18/2017)

Related Cases

United States v. Maricopa County, District of Arizona (2012)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4133185/parties/united-states-v-maricopa-county-of/


Judge(s)

Silver [Moore-Silver], Roslyn O. (Arizona)

Snow, G. Murray (Arizona)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Aminfar, Amin (District of Columbia)

Austin, Roy L. (District of Columbia)

Burke, Dennis K. (District of Columbia)

Caspar, Edward G. (District of Columbia)

Colangelo, Matthew B. (District of Columbia)

England, Sheridan Leigh (District of Columbia)

Gayle, Winsome (District of Columbia)

Gelman, Laurie (District of Columbia)

Judge(s)

Silver [Moore-Silver], Roslyn O. (Arizona)

Snow, G. Murray (Arizona)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Aminfar, Amin (District of Columbia)

Austin, Roy L. (District of Columbia)

Burke, Dennis K. (District of Columbia)

Caspar, Edward G. (District of Columbia)

Colangelo, Matthew B. (District of Columbia)

England, Sheridan Leigh (District of Columbia)

Gayle, Winsome (District of Columbia)

Gelman, Laurie (District of Columbia)

Gray, Peter S. (District of Columbia)

Mondino, Jennifer L. (District of Columbia)

Perez, Thomas E. (District of Columbia)

Shapiro, Avner (District of Columbia)

Smith, Jonathan Mark (District of Columbia)

Walker, Michael Madison (District of Columbia)

Attorneys(s) for Defendant

Dowell, Leigh Eric (Arizona)

Estrella, Cynthia Renee (Arizona)

Hillbo, Alec R. (Arizona)

Irvine, Thomas K. (Arizona)

Jones, William R. Jr. (Arizona)

Martin, Kerry Scott (Arizona)

Masterson, John T. (Arizona)

Popolizio, Joseph John (Arizona)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:10-cv-01878

Docket [PACER]

Aug. 9, 2011

Aug. 9, 2011

Docket

Justice Department Files Lawsuit Against Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office For Refusing Full Cooperation With Title VI Investigation

[Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office]

No Court

Sept. 2, 2010

Sept. 2, 2010

Press Release
1

2:10-cv-01878

Complaint

Sept. 2, 2010

Sept. 2, 2010

Complaint
58

2:10-cv-01878

Joint Motion to Remove Case to the Inactive Docket and Stay Proceedings

June 2, 2011

June 2, 2011

Settlement Agreement

Justice Department Settles Lawsuit with Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office

[Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office]

No Court

June 2, 2011

June 2, 2011

Press Release
58

2:12-cv-00981

Joint Motion to Remove Case to the Inactive Docket and Stay Proceedings

June 2, 2011

June 2, 2011

Pleading / Motion / Brief
65

2:10-cv-01878

Order

Aug. 1, 2011

Aug. 1, 2011

Order/Opinion

Department of Justice Releases Investigative Findings on the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office

[Maricopa County Sheriff's Office]

No Court

Dec. 15, 2011

Dec. 15, 2011

Press Release

2:10-cv-01878

United States' Investigation of the Maricopa County Sheriffs Office

No Court

Dec. 15, 2011

Dec. 15, 2011

Findings Letter/Report

Department of Justice Files Lawsuit in Arizona Against Maricopa County, Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, and Sheriff Joseph Arpaio

[Maricopa County Sheriff's Office]

No Court

May 10, 2012

May 10, 2012

Press Release

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4133185/united-states-v-maricopa-county-of/

Last updated June 3, 2022, 3:17 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT, filed by United States of America (submitted by Amin Aminfar). (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK) (Entered: 09/02/2010)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

Sept. 2, 2010

Sept. 2, 2010

RECAP
2

SUMMONS Submitted by United States of America (submitted by Amin Aminfar). (Attachments: # 1 Summons, # 2 Summons, # 3 Summons, # 4 Summons, # 5 Summons)(REK) (Entered: 09/02/2010)

1 Summons

View on PACER

2 Summons

View on PACER

3 Summons

View on PACER

4 Summons

View on PACER

5 Summons

View on PACER

Sept. 2, 2010

Sept. 2, 2010

PACER
3

This case has been assigned to the Honorable Lawrence O. Anderson. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV 10-1878-PHX-LOA. Magistrate Election form attached. (Attachments: # 1 Magistrate Consent Form)(REK) (Entered: 09/02/2010)

1 Magistrate Consent Form

View on PACER

Sept. 2, 2010

Sept. 2, 2010

PACER
4

SUMMONS Submitted by United States of America. (Attachments: # 1 Summons, # 2 Summons, # 3 Summons, # 4 Summons)(Aminfar, Amin) (Entered: 09/02/2010)

1 Summons

View on PACER

2 Summons

View on PACER

3 Summons

View on PACER

4 Summons

View on PACER

Sept. 2, 2010

Sept. 2, 2010

PACER
5

Summons Issued as to Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa, County of (by serving the following individual Board of Supervisors Members: R. Fulton Brock, Andrew W. Kunasek, Donald T. Stapley, Jr., Mary Rose Wilcox, and Max W. Wilson). (Attachments: # 1 Summons, # 2 Summons, # 3 Summons, # 4 Summons, # 5 Summons)(REK). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. (Entered: 09/02/2010)

1 Summons

View on PACER

2 Summons

View on PACER

3 Summons

View on PACER

4 Summons

View on PACER

5 Summons

View on PACER

Sept. 2, 2010

Sept. 2, 2010

PACER
6

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT AND ORDER - that Plaintiff shall file its written election to either consent to magistrate-judge jurisdiction or elect to proceed before a United States district judge on or before Thursday, September 26, 2010. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall file their written electionto either consent to magistrate-judge jurisdiction or elect to have this case assigned to a United States district judge within 14 days of its appearance herein or as otherwise directed by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 9/2/10. (KMG) (Entered: 09/03/2010)

Sept. 3, 2010

Sept. 3, 2010

PACER
7

NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas K Irvine on behalf of Maricopa, County of (Irvine, Thomas) (Entered: 09/03/2010)

Sept. 3, 2010

Sept. 3, 2010

PACER
8

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT AND ORDER that Defendant Maricopa County, Arizona, shall file its written election to either consent to magistrate-judge jurisdiction or elect to proceed before a United States district judge on or before Thursday, September 22, 2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 9/9/10. (LSP) (Entered: 09/09/2010)

Sept. 9, 2010

Sept. 9, 2010

PACER
9

NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Madison Walker on behalf of United States of America (Walker, Michael) (Entered: 09/09/2010)

Sept. 9, 2010

Sept. 9, 2010

PACER
10

SUMMONS Returned Executed Maricopa County Sheriff's Office served on 9/2/2010; Maricopa, County of served on 9/2/2010 - c/o Max Wilson. (LAD) (Entered: 09/10/2010)

Sept. 10, 2010

Sept. 10, 2010

PACER
11

SUMMONS Returned Executed Joseph M Arpaio served on 9/2/2010. (LAD) (Entered: 09/10/2010)

Sept. 10, 2010

Sept. 10, 2010

PACER
12

SUMMONS Returned Executed upon Maricopa County, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office on 9/2/10 - c/o Mary Rose Wilcox (LAD) (Entered: 09/10/2010)

Sept. 10, 2010

Sept. 10, 2010

PACER
13

SUMMONS Returned Executed upon Maricopa County and Maricopa County Sheriff's Office on 9/2/10 - c/o Donald T. Stapley Jr. (LAD) (Entered: 09/10/2010)

Sept. 10, 2010

Sept. 10, 2010

PACER
14

SUMMONS Returned Executed on 9/2/10 on Maricopa County and Maricopa County Sheriff's Office - c/o R. Fulton Brock, Member (LAD) (Entered: 09/10/2010)

Sept. 10, 2010

Sept. 10, 2010

PACER
15

SUMMONS Returned Executed on 9/2/10 upon Maricopa County and Maricopa County Sheriff's Office - c/o Andrew W. Kunasek (LAD) (Entered: 09/10/2010)

Sept. 10, 2010

Sept. 10, 2010

PACER
16

NOTICE of Appearance by Laurie Gelman on behalf of United States of America (Gelman, Laurie) (Entered: 09/13/2010)

Sept. 13, 2010

Sept. 13, 2010

PACER
17

AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by United States of America.(Aminfar, Amin) (Entered: 09/13/2010)

Sept. 13, 2010

Sept. 13, 2010

PACER
18

MOTION for Summary Judgment by United States of America. (Aminfar, Amin) (Entered: 09/13/2010)

Sept. 13, 2010

Sept. 13, 2010

PACER
19

STATEMENT of Undisputed Facts re 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff United States of America. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Peter S. Gray, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit 11, # 13 Exhibit 12, # 14 Exhibit 13, # 15 Exhibit 14, # 16 Exhibit 15, # 17 Exhibit 16, # 18 Exhibit 17, # 19 Exhibit 18, # 20 Exhibit 19, # 21 Exhibit 20, # 22 Exhibit 21, # 23 Exhibit 22, # 24 Exhibit 23, # 25 Exhibit 24, # 26 Exhibit 25, # 27 Exhibit 26, # 28 Exhibit 27, # 29 Exhibit 28, # 30 Exhibit 29, # 31 Exhibit 30, # 32 Exhibit 31, # 33 Exhibit 32, # 34 Exhibit 33, # 35 Exhibit 34, # 36 Exhibit 35, # 37 Exhibit 36, # 38 Exhibit 37, # 39 Exhibit 38, # 40 Exhibit 39, # 41 Exhibit 40, # 42 Exhibit 41, # 43 Exhibit 42, # 44 Exhibit 43, # 45 Exhibit 44, # 46 Exhibit 45, # 47 Exhibit 46, # 48 Exhibit 47, # 49 Exhibit 48, # 50 Exhibit 49, # 51 Exhibit 50, # 52 Exhibit 51, # 53 Exhibit 52, # 54 Exhibit 53, # 55 Exhibit 54, # 56 Exhibit 55, # 57 Exhibit 56, # 58 Exhibit 57, # 59 Exhibit 58, # 60 Exhibit 59, # 61 Exhibit 60, # 62 Exhibit 61, # 63 Exhibit 62, # 64 Exhibit 63, # 65 Exhibit 64, # 66 Exhibit 65, # 67 Exhibit 66, # 68 Exhibit 67, # 69 Exhibit 68)(Aminfar, Amin) (Entered: 09/13/2010)

1 Affidavit Declaration of Peter S. Gray

View on PACER

2 Exhibit 1

View on PACER

3 Exhibit 2

View on PACER

4 Exhibit 3

View on PACER

5 Exhibit 4

View on PACER

6 Exhibit 5

View on PACER

7 Exhibit 6

View on PACER

8 Exhibit 7

View on PACER

9 Exhibit 8

View on PACER

10 Exhibit 9

View on PACER

11 Exhibit 10

View on PACER

12 Exhibit 11

View on PACER

13 Exhibit 12

View on PACER

14 Exhibit 13

View on PACER

15 Exhibit 14

View on PACER

16 Exhibit 15

View on PACER

17 Exhibit 16

View on PACER

18 Exhibit 17

View on PACER

19 Exhibit 18

View on PACER

20 Exhibit 19

View on PACER

21 Exhibit 20

View on PACER

22 Exhibit 21

View on PACER

23 Exhibit 22

View on PACER

24 Exhibit 23

View on PACER

25 Exhibit 24

View on PACER

26 Exhibit 25

View on PACER

27 Exhibit 26

View on PACER

28 Exhibit 27

View on PACER

29 Exhibit 28

View on PACER

30 Exhibit 29

View on PACER

31 Exhibit 30

View on PACER

32 Exhibit 31

View on PACER

33 Exhibit 32

View on PACER

34 Exhibit 33

View on PACER

35 Exhibit 34

View on PACER

36 Exhibit 35

View on PACER

37 Exhibit 36

View on PACER

38 Exhibit 37

View on PACER

39 Exhibit 38

View on PACER

40 Exhibit 39

View on PACER

41 Exhibit 40

View on PACER

42 Exhibit 41

View on PACER

43 Exhibit 42

View on PACER

44 Exhibit 43

View on PACER

45 Exhibit 44

View on PACER

46 Exhibit 45

View on PACER

47 Exhibit 46

View on PACER

48 Exhibit 47

View on PACER

49 Exhibit 48

View on PACER

50 Exhibit 49

View on PACER

51 Exhibit 50

View on PACER

52 Exhibit 51

View on PACER

53 Exhibit 52

View on PACER

54 Exhibit 53

View on PACER

55 Exhibit 54

View on PACER

56 Exhibit 55

View on PACER

57 Exhibit 56

View on PACER

58 Exhibit 57

View on PACER

59 Exhibit 58

View on PACER

60 Exhibit 59

View on PACER

61 Exhibit 60

View on PACER

62 Exhibit 61

View on PACER

63 Exhibit 62

View on PACER

64 Exhibit 63

View on PACER

65 Exhibit 64

View on PACER

66 Exhibit 65

View on PACER

67 Exhibit 66

View on PACER

68 Exhibit 67

View on PACER

69 Exhibit 68

View on PACER

Sept. 13, 2010

Sept. 13, 2010

PACER
20

NOTICE re Filing of Motion to Transfer Case by United States of America. (Attachments: # 1 Filed Motion to Transfer Case, # 2 Filed Proposed Order For Motion to Transfer Case)(Aminfar, Amin) (Entered: 09/13/2010)

1 Filed Motion to Transfer Case

View on PACER

2 Filed Proposed Order For Motion to Transfer Case

View on PACER

Sept. 13, 2010

Sept. 13, 2010

PACER
21

NOTICE re Service by United States of America re 17 Amended Complaint, 19 Statement,,,,, 20 Notice (Other), 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment. (Aminfar, Amin) (Entered: 09/13/2010)

Sept. 13, 2010

Sept. 13, 2010

PACER
22

NOTICE of Appearance by Kerry Scott Martin on behalf of Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office (Martin, Kerry) (Entered: 09/15/2010)

Sept. 15, 2010

Sept. 15, 2010

PACER
23

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT AND ORDER Defendants Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and Joseph M. Arpaio shall file their written election to either consent to magistrate-judge jurisdiction or elect to proceed before a United States district judge on or before Wednesday, September 28, 2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 9/16/10. (LSP) (Entered: 09/16/2010)

Sept. 16, 2010

Sept. 16, 2010

PACER
24

Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) (Entered: 09/17/2010)

Sept. 16, 2010

Sept. 16, 2010

PACER
25

Minute Order: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.8(a), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge G. Murray Snow. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV 10-1878-PHX-GMS. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) (Entered: 09/17/2010)

Sept. 17, 2010

Sept. 17, 2010

PACER
26

NOTICE of Appearance by Alec R Hillbo on behalf of Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office (Hillbo, Alec) (Entered: 09/17/2010)

Sept. 17, 2010

Sept. 17, 2010

PACER
27

MOTION to Continue All Case Matters by Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Dowell, Leigh) (Entered: 09/27/2010)

1 Exhibit A

View on PACER

2 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Sept. 27, 2010

Sept. 27, 2010

PACER
28

RESPONSE to Motion re 27 MOTION to Continue All Case Matters filed by United States of America. (Aminfar, Amin) (Entered: 09/28/2010)

Sept. 28, 2010

Sept. 28, 2010

PACER
29

ANSWER to 17 Amended Complaint by Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office.(Martin, Kerry) (Entered: 09/28/2010)

Sept. 28, 2010

Sept. 28, 2010

PACER
30

REPLY to Response to Motion re 27 MOTION to Continue All Case Matters filed by Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office. (Dowell, Leigh) (Entered: 10/05/2010)

Oct. 5, 2010

Oct. 5, 2010

PACER
31

ORDER granting 27 Motion to Continue. Defendants shall locate new counsel and that new counsel shall file a notice of appearance no later than 14 days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 10/6/10.(LSP) (Entered: 10/06/2010)

Oct. 6, 2010

Oct. 6, 2010

PACER
32

ANSWER to 17 Amended Complaint by Maricopa, County of.(Irvine, Thomas) (Entered: 10/06/2010)

Oct. 6, 2010

Oct. 6, 2010

PACER
33

EX PARTE MOTION for Substitution of Counsel with Consent by Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Consent to Substitution of Counsel)(Masterson, John) (Entered: 10/14/2010)

1 Exhibit Consent to Substitution of Counsel

View on PACER

Oct. 14, 2010

Oct. 14, 2010

PACER
34

ORDER granting 33 Ex Parte Motion to Substitute Counsel. ORDERED that William R. Jones, Jr., John T. Masterson, Joseph J. Popolizio and the law firm of Jones, Skelton & Hochuli, P.L.C., be substituted as counsel of record for named Defendants Maricopa County Sheriffs Office and Joseph M. Arpaio in the place of Alec R. Hillbo, Kerry Scott Martin, Leigh Eric Dowell and the lawfirm of Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 10/21/10. (MAP) (Entered: 10/21/2010)

Oct. 21, 2010

Oct. 21, 2010

PACER
35

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Motion for Summary Judgment by Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Popolizio, Joseph) Modified on 11/1/2010 (LSP). CORRECTION to "Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply". (Entered: 10/29/2010)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Oct. 29, 2010

Oct. 29, 2010

PACER
36

RESPONSE to Motion re 35 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Motion for Summary Judgment filed by United States of America. (Aminfar, Amin) (Entered: 11/01/2010)

Nov. 1, 2010

Nov. 1, 2010

PACER
37

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 35 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response re 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment; Defendants are directed to file a Response on or before December 3, 2010. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 11/1/10.(LSP) (Entered: 11/01/2010)

Nov. 1, 2010

Nov. 1, 2010

PACER
38

STIPULATION Stipulated Motion to Extend Deadline to Respond to Motion for Summary Judgment by Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa, County of, United States of America. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Popolizio, Joseph) (Entered: 12/03/2010)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Dec. 3, 2010

Dec. 3, 2010

PACER
39

ORDER pursuant to 38 Stipulation: the deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 18) is extended to December 10, 2010. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 12/6/10. (LSP) (Entered: 12/06/2010)

Dec. 6, 2010

Dec. 6, 2010

PACER
40

RESPONSE to Motion re 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment, CROSS-MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office. (Popolizio, Joseph) Modified on 12/13/2010 (SAT). CORRECTION: Motion event added to entry of this two-part document. (Entered: 12/10/2010)

Dec. 10, 2010

Dec. 10, 2010

PACER
41

STATEMENT of of Facts in Support of their Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office. (Attachments: # 1 Index and Exhibits 1-4, # 2 Exhibit 5, # 3 Exhibits 6-8, # 4 Exhibits 9-18, # 5 Exhibits 19-22)(Popolizio, Joseph) (Entered: 12/10/2010)

1 Index and Exhibits 1-4

View on PACER

2 Exhibit 5

View on PACER

3 Exhibits 6-8

View on PACER

4 Exhibits 9-18

View on PACER

5 Exhibits 19-22

View on PACER

Dec. 10, 2010

Dec. 10, 2010

PACER
42

OBJECTION re 19 Statement,,,,, by Defendants Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office. (Popolizio, Joseph) (Entered: 12/10/2010)

Dec. 10, 2010

Dec. 10, 2010

PACER
43

RESPONSE to Motion re 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment, CROSS-MOTION for Summary Judgment / Defendant Maricopa County's Response to Motion for Summary Judgment -and- Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Maricopa, County of. (Estrella, Cynthia) Modified on 12/13/2010 (SAT). CORRECTION: Motion event added to entry of this two-part document. (Entered: 12/10/2010)

Dec. 10, 2010

Dec. 10, 2010

RECAP
44

STATEMENT re 43 Response to Motion for Summary Judgment / Defendant's Controverting and Separate Statement of Facts in Support of Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Maricopa Count's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant Maricopa, County of. (Estrella, Cynthia) (Entered: 12/10/2010)

Dec. 10, 2010

Dec. 10, 2010

PACER
45

STIPULATION Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Reply to Defendants' Responses and Respond to Defendants' Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment by United States of America. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Aminfar, Amin) (Entered: 12/21/2010)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Dec. 21, 2010

Dec. 21, 2010

PACER
46

ORDER pursuant to 45 Stipulation: the United States shall be allowed through and including February 4, 2011, in which to file its combined Replies and Responses to Defendants respective Responses to the United States Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 12/22/10. (LSP) (Entered: 12/22/2010)

Dec. 22, 2010

Dec. 22, 2010

PACER
47

REPLY to Response to Motion re 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Response to 40 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment filed by United States of America. (Aminfar, Amin) Modified on 2/7/2011 (LSP). CORRECTION to document linkage. (Entered: 02/04/2011)

Feb. 4, 2011

Feb. 4, 2011

PACER
48

STATEMENT of Supplemental Facts re 47 Response to 40 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff United States of America. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Avner Shapiro, # 2 Exhibit 69, # 3 Exhibit 70)(Aminfar, Amin) Modified on 2/7/2011 (LSP). CORRECTION to document linkage. (Entered: 02/04/2011)

1 Affidavit Declaration of Avner Shapiro

View on PACER

2 Exhibit 69

View on PACER

3 Exhibit 70

View on PACER

Feb. 4, 2011

Feb. 4, 2011

PACER
49

OBJECTION re 41 Statement, by Plaintiff United States of America. (Aminfar, Amin) (Entered: 02/04/2011)

Feb. 4, 2011

Feb. 4, 2011

PACER
50

REPLY to Response to Motion re 43 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Response to 43 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment filed by United States of America. (Aminfar, Amin) Modified on 2/7/2011 (LSP). CORRECTION to document linkage and event. (Entered: 02/04/2011)

Feb. 4, 2011

Feb. 4, 2011

PACER
51

OBJECTION re 44 Statement, by Plaintiff United States of America. (Aminfar, Amin) (Entered: 02/04/2011)

Feb. 4, 2011

Feb. 4, 2011

PACER
52

STIPULATION to Extend Deadline to File Reply in Support of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment by Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa, County of, United States of America. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Popolizio, Joseph) (Entered: 02/24/2011)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Feb. 24, 2011

Feb. 24, 2011

PACER
53

ORDER pursuant to 52 Stipulation: extending the deadline for Defendants to file a Reply in Support of 43 their Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, to and including, April 26, 2011. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 2/24/11. (LSP) (Entered: 02/25/2011)

Feb. 25, 2011

Feb. 25, 2011

PACER
54

*Reply to Response to Motion re 40 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office. (Popolizio, Joseph) *Modified on 4/27/2011, to Reply to Response to Motion and to add 40, (LSP). (Entered: 04/26/2011)

April 26, 2011

April 26, 2011

PACER
55

STATEMENT of Facts in Support of Reply to Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment re 54 Reply by Defendants Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, 2, 3, 4)(Popolizio, Joseph) (Entered: 04/26/2011)

1 Exhibit 1, 2, 3, 4

View on PACER

April 26, 2011

April 26, 2011

PACER
56

*REPLY to Response to Motion re 43 MOTION for Summary Judgment, Reply in Support of its Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Maricopa, County of. (Estrella, Cynthia) *Modified on 4/27/2011, deleted 40 and ]18], (LSP).* (Entered: 04/26/2011)

April 26, 2011

April 26, 2011

PACER
57

Minute Order: Status Conference set for 6/3/2011 3:30 p.m. in Courtroom 602, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge G Murray Snow. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.(ADG) (Entered: 06/01/2011)

June 1, 2011

June 1, 2011

PACER
58

Joint MOTION to Stay and Remove Case to the Inactive Docket by United States of America. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Agreement, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Aminfar, Amin) (Entered: 06/02/2011)

1 Exhibit A - Agreement

View on PACER

2 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

June 2, 2011

June 2, 2011

PACER
59

NOTICE re No Objection to Joint Motion to Remove Case to the Inactive Docket and Stay Proceedings by Maricopa, County of re 58 Joint MOTION to Stay and Remove Case to the Inactive Docket. (Irvine, Thomas) (Entered: 06/02/2011)

June 2, 2011

June 2, 2011

PACER
60

NOTICE of Appearance by Avner Michael Shapiro on behalf of United States of America (Shapiro, Avner) (Entered: 06/03/2011)

June 3, 2011

June 3, 2011

PACER
61

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge G Murray Snow. Appearances: Avner Shapiro (telephonically) and Michael Walker for plaintiff. Joseph Popolizio for defendants Joseph Arpaio and Maricopa County Sheriff's Office. Cynthia Estrella for defendant Maricopa County. Status Conference held on 6/3/2011. Order to follow. (Court Reporter Candy Potter.) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (KFZ) (Entered: 06/03/2011)

June 3, 2011

June 3, 2011

PACER
62

ORDER that this matter will, without further Order of this Court, be dismissed without prejudice within 60 days of the date of this Order unless prior to that date the United States of America files a motion to postpone dismissal of the case. The Clerk shall terminate this matter on August 2, 2011 unless the United States of America has filed a motion to postpone the dismissal of the case. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 6/3/11. (LSP) (Entered: 06/06/2011)

June 6, 2011

June 6, 2011

PACER
63

MOTION to Dismiss Case without prejudice by United States of America. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Aminfar, Amin) (Entered: 08/01/2011)

1 Exhibit A

View on PACER

2 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

Aug. 1, 2011

Aug. 1, 2011

PACER
64

RESPONSE to Motion re 63 MOTION to Dismiss Case without prejudice filed by Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Popolizio, Joseph) (Entered: 08/01/2011)

1 Exhibit

View on PACER

Aug. 1, 2011

Aug. 1, 2011

PACER
65

ORDER granting the United States' 63 Motion to Dismiss and dismissing this action without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), each party to bear their own costs and fees. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 08/01/11. (ESL) (Entered: 08/01/2011)

Aug. 1, 2011

Aug. 1, 2011

PACER
66

NOTICE OF ATTORNEY SUBSTITUTION: Sheridan L. England appearing for United States of America. Attorney Michael Madison Walker terminated. (England, Sheridan) (Entered: 08/09/2011)

Aug. 9, 2011

Aug. 9, 2011

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: Arizona

Case Type(s):

Policing

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 2, 2010

Closing Date: 2011

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

The United States Department of Justice

Plaintiff Type(s):

U.S. Dept of Justice plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

U.S. Dept. of Justice Civil Rights Division

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Maricopa County (Maricopa), County

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.

Availably Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Order Duration: 2011 - 2011

Issues

General:

Failure to train

Inadequate citizen complaint investigations and procedures

Racial profiling

Records Disclosure

Discrimination-basis:

Race discrimination