Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citations

Citation 1

Citation 2

Citation 3

Search for:
220 cases, 1401 documents
Ordered by
REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Planned Parenthood Arizona Incorporated v. Betlach

2:12-cv-01533 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: July 16, 2012

Closed Date: Aug. 22, 2013

This is a case challenging a 2012 Arizona abortion law. In 1980, Congress barred the use of Medicaid funds for elective abortions, but medical providers who offered elective abortions were still eligible to receive Medicaid reimbursement for other healthcare services. However, on May 4, 2012, the Arizona governor signed Arizona Assembly HB 2800 into law, making providers that conducted elective abortion procedures ineligible to receive Medicaid reimbursements for any healthcare services. Arizon…
ELECTION/VOTING RIGHTS
CODING IN PROCESS
Di Genova-Chang v. Ducey

4:20-cv-00141 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: March 31, 2020

NOTE: This case is being tracked in close to real time by the Stanford/MIT Healthy Elections Project. So for information, see their tracker. According to their summary as of 09/05/2020, Citing multiple federal laws (Public Health & Welfare, Civil Rights Act, Voting Rights Act of 1965, Help America Vote Act 2002, National Voter Registration Act of 1993; Voting Accessibility for the Elderly & Handicapped Act of 1984), Plaintiff (Arizona resident) filed suit against Arizona's Governor and the St…
ELECTION/VOTING RIGHTS
De La Fuente v. Hobbs

2:20-cv-01276 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: June 29, 2020

Closed Date: Oct. 2, 2020

COVID-19 Summary: Initially tracked by the Stanford/MIT Healthy Elections Project, this lawsuit was filed on June 29, 2020 by the Alliance Party its nominee for the 2020 Presidential Election, seeking modifications of Arizona's signature requirements for third-party candidates in light of COVID-19. The case was voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiffs on October 2, 2020.  The Alliance Party, a national political party, and their 2020 presidential nominee, Roque "Rocky" De La Fuente, filed this …
ELECTION/VOTING RIGHTS
CODING IN PROCESS
Yazzie v. Hobbs

3:20-cv-08222 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: Aug. 26, 2020

Case Ongoing

NOTE: This case is being tracked in close to real time by the Stanford/MIT Healthy Elections Project. So for information, see their tracker. According to their summary as of 10/31/2020, Plaintiffs allege that state law requiring that mailed ballots be received, not postmarked, before 7PM on Election Day to be counted is unconstitutional given unique circumstances for Navajo Nation, COVID-19, and USPS reorganizational issues.
IMMIGRATION AND/OR THE BORDER
Adlerstein v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection

4:19-cv-00500 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: Oct. 16, 2019

Case Ongoing

This case involves the effects of the Trump administration’s efforts to increase scrutiny of private United States citizens working on behalf of migrants and refugees along the U.S.-Mexico border. On October 16, 2019, the plaintiffs, three humanitarian activists, filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona against U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”), U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”), the FBI, and each of their respective directors in their of…
POLICING
CODING IN PROCESS
Puente v. Phoenix, City of

2:18-cv-02778 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: Sept. 4, 2018

Case Ongoing

(This summary is temporary, while we research the case.) This class action alleged that the Phoenix Police Department used excessive force and violated protestors' First Amendment rights when they used tear gas, pepper balls, and batons to disperse protestors.
REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
CODING IN PROCESS
Isaacson v. Horne

2:12-cv-01501 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: July 12, 2012

Closed Date: April 15, 2014

(This summary is temporary, while we research the case.) In July 2012, the ACLU and the ACLU of Arizona challenged an Arizona law banning pre-viability abortions on behalf of an Arizona doctor whose patients included women in need of medical care.
REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Isaacson v. Brnovich

2:21-cv-01417 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: Aug. 17, 2021

Case Ongoing

On April 27, 2021, the Arizona governor signed S.B. 1457 (the "Act"): legislation that limited access to abortions in the state. Two physicians who provided reproductive health care services in Arizona, the Arizona National Organization for Women, the National Council of Jewish Women, Inc., and the Arizona Medical Association (collectively, "the plaintiffs") filed this lawsuit on August 17, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona challenging and seeking to enjoin enforcemen…
REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Horne

2:13-cv-01079 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: May 29, 2013

Closed Date: Jan. 11, 2016

This is a case challenging House Bill 2443, which the Arizona Legislature passed on March 23, 2011. The act amended the Arizona abortion statute by prohibiting any person from knowingly: (1) providing an abortion to a woman seeking the procedure because she did not want to give birth to a child of a certain race or gender, (2) using force or threats to injure or intimidate a woman for the purpose of coercing a sex-selection or race-selection abortion, and (3) knowingly soliciting or accepting m…
REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Tucson Women's Center v. Arizona Medical Board

2:09-cv-01909 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: Sept. 14, 2009

Closed Date: March 5, 2010

This case challenged Arizona abortion restrictions enacted 2009 requiring patients to wait 24 hours after an initial appointment to receive an abortion, and prohibiting physicians from billing patients until after the 24-hour waiting period ended. On September 14, 2009, a coalition of medical clinics and physicians filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. The plaintiffs sued the attorney general of Arizona and the executive director of the Arizona Medical Board…