Case: Diaz v. Brewer

2:09-cv-02402 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: Nov. 17, 2009

Closed Date: 2015

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On November 17, 2009, several lesbian and gay employees of the State of Arizona, each of whom was receiving family coverage for his or her committed same-sex life partner, filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona against the State of Arizona. Plaintiffs, represented by the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund and by private counsel, brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Section 38-651(O) of the Arizona Revised Statutes ("Section O") violated the United States Constitution. Specifically, plaintiffs claimed that Section O, which eliminated family health insurance coverage for non-spouse domestic partners, violated the equal protection and substantive due process guarantees of the Fourteenth Amendment because precluded same-sex domestic partners but not opposite-sex domestic partners from obtaining coverage. They sought declaratory and injunctive relief.

On January 25, 2010, the State moved to dismiss the case, and on April 1, plaintiffs moved for a preliminary injunction. On July 23, 2010, the District Court (Judge John W. Sedwick) addressed both motions in one order, granting the State's motion to dismiss as to the plaintiffs' due process claim but otherwise denying it, and granting plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction. Collins v. Brewer, 727 F. Supp. 2d 797 (D. Ariz. 2010). The Court found that plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits of their equal protection claim, as the denial of benefits to employees with same-sex domestic partners was not rationally related to the State's interests in cost control, administrative efficiency, and the promotion of marriage; it therefore enjoined the State from enforcing Section O and ordered it to make family health insurance coverage available to employees with same-sex partners.

The State appealed, and the District Court stayed proceedings pending the decision of the Court of Appeals. On September 6, 2011, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit (Circuit Judges Mary M. Schroeder and Sidney R. Thomas and District Judge Mark W. Bennet of the Northern District of Iowa, sitting by appointment) affirmed. Diaz v. Brewer, 656 F.3d 1008 (9th Cir. 2011). In an opinion by Judge Schroeder, the panel held that the District Court had correctly applied the rational basis test, and that while state employees have no constitutional right to benefits, "when a state chooses to provide such benefits, it may not do so in an arbitrary or discriminatory manner that adversely affects particular groups that may be unpopular." Id. at 1013. 656 F.3d 1008, 2011 WL 3890755, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18467.

The State filed a petition for panel rehearing and a petition for rehearing en banc, both of which the Ninth Circuit denied on April 3, 2012. Diaz v. Brewer, 676 F.3d 823 (9th Cir. 2012). Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain, joined by Judge Carlos T. Bea, dissented, arguing that there was no evidence that the Arizona legislature passed Section O with discriminatory intent and that the District Court had misapplied the rational basis test. He also noted that the District Court and panel's holding that opposite-sex-only marriage rules serve no rational purpose may be dispositive in challenges to state laws refusing to recognize same-sex marriage. 676 F.3d 823, 2012 WL 1109335, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 6623.

On July 2, 2012, the State filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court, and the District Court again stayed its proceedings pending the petition's resolution.

On June 27, 2013, the Supreme Court denied certiorari on the same day it issued its decisions in Windsor and Hollingsworth . The court ordered the case to proceed with discovery and indicated complaints should be amended to reflect the effect of the Supreme Court's decisions. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on September 9, 2013. The Court granted class action status on December 23, 2013. The class included all same-sex partners who are now or will in the future be eligible for partner health insurance benefits Ariz. Admin. Code § R2-5-10.

On September 30, 2014, the plaintiffs filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, and on October 1, 2014, the defendants did the same. However, on October 31, 2014, before the court ruled on those motions, the plaintiffs and defendants entered a Joint Motion seeking to dissolve the preliminary injunction and dismiss the case. On November 6, 2014, the court granted the motion, dissolving the preliminary injunction on midnight of December 31, 2014 and dismissing the case.

The Joint Motion was filed based on the plaintiffs' belief that, following the decisions in Connolly v. Brewer and Majors v. Jeanes and the Attorney General of the State's announcement that those decisions would not be appealed, same-sex couples' right to marry in Arizona would not be challenged and so the preliminary injunction in this case was moot.

On November 20, 2014, the plaintiffs filed a motion to vacate the previous order dissolving the preliminary injunction and dismissing the case, due to the November 17, 2014 appeals of Connolly v. Brewer and Majors v. Jeanes by the Attorney General that could potentially result in the dissolution of the Connolly and Jeanes permanent injunctions.

On December 10, 2014, the court denied the plaintiffs' motion and on January 13, 2015, the preliminary injunction was dissolved and the case closed in regards to all matters except ongoing litigation over attorney's fees.

On March 5, 2015, the court ordered that within seven days of receipt of the notices from plaintiffs, defendants must affix address labels and send them by U.S. mail to all State of Arizona employees who received family health coverage for a same-sex domestic partner or domestic partner’s child(ren) in 2014.

On June 5, 2015, the court granted plaintiffs’ application, and was awarded attorneys’ fees in the amount of $305,049.95 and costs in the amount of $1,936.67. 2015 WL 3555282.

	Document
2:09-cv-02402	Docket [PACER]	June 5, 2015	June 5, 2015 Docket
19 2:09-cv-02402	Amended Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief Collins v. Brewer	Jan. 7, 2010	Jan. 7, 2010 Complaint
47 2:09-cv-02402	Order and Opinion [Granting in Part and Denying in Part the State's Motion to Dismiss and Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction] Collins v. Brewer	July 23, 2010	July 23, 2010 Order/Opinion 727 F.Supp.2d 797
62-3 2:09-cv-02402 0:10-16797	[Ninth Circuit] Opinion [Affirming the District Court] U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit	Sept. 6, 2011	Sept. 6, 2011 Order/Opinion 656 F.3d 1008
62-2 2:09-cv-02402 0:10-16797	[Ninth Circuit] Order [Denying Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc] U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit	April 3, 2012	April 3, 2012 Order/Opinion 676 F.3d 823
0:12-00023	Petition for Writ of Certiorari Brewer v. Diaz Supreme Court of the United States	July 2, 2012	July 2, 2012 Pleading / Motion / Brief
0:12-00023	BRIEF OF RESPONDENTS IN OPPOSITION Brewer v. Diaz U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit	Aug. 20, 2012	Aug. 20, 2012 Pleading / Motion / Brief
0:12-00023	PETITIONERS’ REPLY BRIEF Brewer v. Diaz U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit	Aug. 31, 2012	Aug. 31, 2012 Pleading / Motion / Brief
68 2:09-cv-02402	Status Report on Petition for Writ of Certiorari Collins v. Brewer	Jan. 22, 2013	Jan. 22, 2013 Pleading / Motion / Brief
81 2:09-cv-02402	Second Amended Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief	Sept. 9, 2013	Sept. 9, 2013 Complaint

Title	Description		External URL Date / External URL
Diaz v. Brewer (formerly Collins v. Brewer) Lambda Legal	In the summer of 2009, while our nation was in the grips of an intense debate about improving health care access, the state of Arizona enacted a mean-spirited law to strip lesbian and gay state emplo…	Dec. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2014 https://www.lambdalegal.org/...
Brewer v. Diaz SCOTUSBlog	Issue: Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ignored this Court’s precedent and erred in holding that Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) Section 38-651(O) (Section O) violates the Equal Protectio…	July 27, 2013	July 27, 2013 https://www.scotusblog.com/...

ECF Number	Description	Date	Link Date / Link
1	COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 350.00, receipt number 0970-3365151, filed by Stephen Russell, Judith McDaniel, Deanna Pfleger, Leslie Kemp, Joseph R. Diaz, Carrie Sperling, Tracy Collins, Keith Humphrey, Corey Seemiller, Beverly Seckinger. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Barr, Daniel) (Entered: 11/17/2009) 1 Exhibit A View on PACER 2 Exhibit B View on PACER 3 Exhibit C View on PACER 4 Civil Cover Sheet View on PACER	Nov. 17, 2009	Nov. 17, 2009 PACER
11	MINUTE ORDER: This case has been reassigned to United States District Judge John W Sedwick. Future filings should reflect the case umbe CV 09-2402-PHX-JWS. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.(AMB) (Entered: 11/19/2009)	Nov. 17, 2009	Nov. 17, 2009 PACER
2	SUMMONS Submitted by Tracy Collins, Joseph R. Diaz, Keith Humphrey, Leslie Kemp, Judith McDaniel, Deanna Pfleger, Stephen Russell, Beverly Seckinger, Corey Seemiller, Carrie Sperling (Barr, Daniel) (Entered: 11/17/2009)	Nov. 17, 2009	Nov. 17, 2009 PACER
12	Notice re Magistrate consent form. (AMB) (Entered: 11/19/2009)	Nov. 17, 2009	Nov. 17, 2009 PACER
3	SUMMONS Submitted by Tracy Collins, Joseph R. Diaz, Keith Humphrey, Leslie Kemp, Judith McDaniel, Deanna Pfleger, Stephen Russell, Beverly Seckinger, Corey Seemiller, Carrie Sperling (Barr, Daniel) (Entered: 11/17/2009)	Nov. 17, 2009	Nov. 17, 2009 PACER
4	SUMMONS Submitted by Tracy Collins, Joseph R. Diaz, Keith Humphrey, Leslie Kemp, Judith McDaniel, Deanna Pfleger, Stephen Russell, Beverly Seckinger, Corey Seemiller, Carrie Sperling (Barr, Daniel) (Entered: 11/17/2009)	Nov. 17, 2009	Nov. 17, 2009 PACER
5	SUMMONS Submitted by Tracy Collins, Joseph R. Diaz, Keith Humphrey, Leslie Kemp, Judith McDaniel, Deanna Pfleger, Stephen Russell, Beverly Seckinger, Corey Seemiller, Carrie Sperling (Barr, Daniel) (Entered: 11/17/2009)	Nov. 17, 2009	Nov. 17, 2009 PACER
6	NOTICE of Appearance by Rhonda Lorraine Barnes on behalf of Tracy Collins, Joseph R. Diaz, Keith Humphrey, Leslie Kemp, Judith McDaniel, Deanna Pfleger, Stephen Russell, Beverly Seckinger, Corey Seemiller, Carrie Sperling (Barnes, Rhonda) (Entered: 11/18/2009)	Nov. 18, 2009	Nov. 18, 2009 PACER
7	NOTICE of Appearance by James Evans Barton on behalf of Tracy Collins, Joseph R. Diaz, Keith Humphrey, Leslie Kemp, Judith McDaniel, Deanna Pfleger, Stephen Russell, Beverly Seckinger, Corey Seemiller, Carrie Sperling (Barton, James) (Entered: 11/18/2009)	Nov. 18, 2009	Nov. 18, 2009 PACER
8	MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to attorney Tara L Borelli on behalf of plaintiffs Tracy Collins, Joseph R. Diaz, Keith Humphrey, Leslie Kemp, Judith McDaniel, Deanna Pfleger, Stephen Russell, Beverly Seckinger, Corey Seemiller, and Carrie Sperling. (BAS) (Entered: 11/19/2009)	Nov. 18, 2009	Nov. 18, 2009 PACER
9	MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to attorney Jennifer C Pizer on behalf of plaintiffs Tracy Collins, Joseph R. Diaz, Keith Humphrey, Leslie Kemp, Judith McDaniel, Deanna Pfleger, Stephen Russell, Beverly Seckinger, Corey Seemiller, and Carrie Sperling. (BAS) (Entered: 11/19/2009)	Nov. 18, 2009	Nov. 18, 2009 PACER
10	ORDER pursuant to General Order 05-25 granting 8 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice; granting 9 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice.Per the Court's Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, applicant has five (5) days in which to register as a user of the Electronic Filing System. Registration to be accomplished via the court's website at www.azd.uscourts.gov. (BAS)(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (Entered: 11/19/2009)	Nov. 19, 2009	Nov. 19, 2009 PACER
13	Summons Issued as to Janice K. Brewer, Phillip Hamilton, Kathy Peckardt, David Raber. (Attachments: # 1 David Raber, # 2 Kathy Peckardt, # 3 Phillip Hamilton)(AMB). *** IMPORTANT: You must select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" on the print screen in order for the court seal to appear on the summons you print. Modified on 11/19/2009 TO NOTE THAT SUMMONS WERE DATED/ISSUED ON 11/18/09 (REW, ). (Entered: 11/19/2009) 1 David Raber View on PACER 2 Kathy Peckardt View on PACER 3 Phillip Hamilton View on PACER	Nov. 19, 2009	Nov. 19, 2009 PACER
14	NOTICE of Appearance by Tara L Borelli on behalf of Tracy Collins, Joseph R Diaz, Keith B Humphrey, Leslie Kemp, Judith McDaniel, Deanna Pfleger, Stephen Russell, Beverly Seckinger, Corey Seemiller, Carrie Sperling (Borelli, Tara) (Entered: 11/20/2009)	Nov. 20, 2009	Nov. 20, 2009 PACER
15	NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer C Pizer on behalf of Tracy Collins, Joseph R Diaz, Keith B Humphrey, Leslie Kemp, Judith McDaniel, Deanna Pfleger, Stephen Russell, Beverly Seckinger, Corey Seemiller, Carrie Sperling (Pizer, Jennifer) (Entered: 11/20/2009)	Nov. 20, 2009	Nov. 20, 2009 PACER
16	NOTICE of Appearance by Charles Arnold Grube on behalf of Janice K Brewer, Phillip Hamilton, Kathy Peckardt, David Raber (Grube, Charles) (Entered: 12/10/2009)	Dec. 10, 2009	Dec. 10, 2009 PACER
17	STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by Janice K Brewer, David Raber, Phillip Hamilton, Kathy Peckardt. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Order extending time)(Grube, Charles) (Entered: 12/10/2009) 1 Text of Proposed Order Order extending time View on PACER	Dec. 10, 2009	Dec. 10, 2009 PACER
18	ORDER granting 17 Stipulation For Extension of Time To Answer Complaint. Defendants' answer due 1/8/2010. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 12/11/09. (JWS, ) (Entered: 12/11/2009)	Dec. 11, 2009	Dec. 11, 2009 PACER
19	AMENDED COMPLAINT for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief against Janice K Brewer, Phillip Hamilton, Kathy Peckardt, David Raber, Unknown Parties, filed by Stephen Russell, Judith McDaniel, Deanna Pfleger, Leslie Kemp, Joseph R Diaz, Carrie Sperling, Tracy Collins, Keith B Humphrey, Corey Seemiller, Beverly Seckinger.(Barton, James) (Entered: 01/07/2010)	Jan. 7, 2010	Jan. 7, 2010 PACER
20	Additional Attachments to Main Document re 19 Amended Complaint, Index of Exhibits and Exhibits A, B and C by Plaintiffs Tracy Collins, Joseph R Diaz, Keith B Humphrey, Leslie Kemp, Judith McDaniel, Deanna Pfleger, Stephen Russell, Beverly Seckinger, Corey Seemiller, Carrie Sperling. (Barton, James) (Entered: 01/08/2010)	Jan. 8, 2010	Jan. 8, 2010 PACER
21	MOTION to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction by Philip Hamilton. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Philip Hamilton)(Grube, Charles) (Entered: 01/25/2010) 1 Affidavit Declaration of Philip Hamilton View on PACER	Jan. 25, 2010	Jan. 25, 2010 PACER
22	MOTION to Dismiss Case by Janice K Brewer, Kathy Peckardt, David Raber. (Grube, Charles) (Entered: 01/25/2010)	Jan. 25, 2010	Jan. 25, 2010 PACER
23	RESPONSE to Motion re 22 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendants Brewer, Raber and Peckardt filed by Tracy Collins, Joseph R Diaz, Keith B Humphrey, Leslie Kemp, Judith McDaniel, Deanna Pfleger, Stephen Russell, Beverly Seckinger, Corey Seemiller, Carrie Sperling. (Borelli, Tara) (Entered: 02/11/2010)	Feb. 11, 2010	Feb. 11, 2010 PACER
24	* DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER COURT ORDER 28, FILED 2/23/10 * Notice of Appearance filed by Pasquale (not a party to the case) (REW) Modified on 2/23/2010 (KMG). (Entered: 02/16/2010)	Feb. 12, 2010	Feb. 12, 2010 PACER
25	* DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER COURT ORDER 28, FILED 2/23/10 * Additional Attachments to Main Document; Exhibits re 24 Notice filed by Pasquale (not a party to the case) (REW) Modified on 2/23/2010 (KMG). (Entered: 02/16/2010)	Feb. 12, 2010	Feb. 12, 2010 PACER
26	RESPONSE to Motion re 21 MOTION to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction by Defendant Philip Hamilton filed by Tracy Collins, Joseph R Diaz, Keith B Humphrey, Leslie Kemp, Judith McDaniel, Deanna Pfleger, Stephen Russell, Beverly Seckinger, Corey Seemiller, Carrie Sperling. (Barton, James) (Entered: 02/16/2010)	Feb. 16, 2010	Feb. 16, 2010 PACER
27	REPLY in Support re 22 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Janice K Brewer, Kathy Peckardt, David Raber. (Grube, Charles) (Entered: 02/22/2010)	Feb. 22, 2010	Feb. 22, 2010 PACER
28	ORDER - At docket 24 Pasquale Labate purports to join in this litigation. Pasquale Labate is not a party to this lawsuit. The Clerk is directed to strike the filing at docket 24 and the related materials at docket 25 from the record of this case. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 2/22/10. (KMG) (Entered: 02/23/2010)	Feb. 23, 2010	Feb. 23, 2010 PACER
29	REPLY in Support re 21 MOTION to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Philip Hamilton. (Grube, Charles) (Entered: 02/24/2010)	Feb. 24, 2010	Feb. 24, 2010 PACER
30	MINUTE ORDER from the Chambers of Judge John W Sedwick granting Defendant Hamilton's 21 Motion to Dismiss..(REW) (Entered: 03/15/2010)	March 15, 2010	March 15, 2010 PACER
31	MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Tracy Collins, Joseph R Diaz, Keith B Humphrey, Leslie Kemp, Judith McDaniel, Deanna Pfleger, Stephen Russell, Beverly Seckinger, Corey Seemiller, Carrie Sperling. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Beverly Seckinger, # 2 Affidavit of Carrie Sperling, # 3 Affidavit of Corey Seemiller, # 4 Affidavit of Deanna Pfleger, # 5 Affidavit of Joseph R. Diaz, # 6 Affidavit of Keith B. Humphrey, # 7 Affidavit of Leslie Kemp, # 8 Affidavit of Stephen Russell, # 9 Affidavit of Tracy Collins, # 10 Text of Proposed Order for Preliminary Injunction)(Borelli, Tara) (Entered: 04/01/2010) 1 Affidavit of Beverly Seckinger View on PACER 2 Affidavit of Carrie Sperling View on PACER 3 Affidavit of Corey Seemiller View on PACER 4 Affidavit of Deanna Pfleger View on PACER 5 Affidavit of Joseph R. Diaz View on PACER 6 Affidavit of Keith B. Humphrey View on PACER 7 Affidavit of Leslie Kemp View on PACER 8 Affidavit of Stephen Russell View on PACER 9 Affidavit of Tracy Collins View on PACER 10 Text of Proposed Order for Preliminary Injunction View on PACER	April 1, 2010	April 1, 2010 PACER
32	Additional Attachments to Main Document re 31 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Declaration of Tara Borelli in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiffs Tracy Collins, Joseph R Diaz, Keith B Humphrey, Leslie Kemp, Judith McDaniel, Deanna Pfleger, Stephen Russell, Beverly Seckinger, Corey Seemiller, Carrie Sperling. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit D, # 2 Exhibit E)(Borelli, Tara) (Entered: 04/01/2010) 1 Exhibit D View on PACER 2 Exhibit E View on PACER	April 1, 2010	April 1, 2010 PACER
33	Additional Attachments to Main Document re 31 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Certificate of Service for Proposed Order by Plaintiffs Tracy Collins, Joseph R Diaz, Keith B Humphrey, Leslie Kemp, Judith McDaniel, Deanna Pfleger, Stephen Russell, Beverly Seckinger, Corey Seemiller, Carrie Sperling. (Borelli, Tara) (Entered: 04/01/2010)	April 1, 2010	April 1, 2010 PACER
34	MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to attorney Desmund Wu on behalf of Tracy Collins, Joseph R Diaz, Keith B Humphrey, Leslie Kemp, Judith McDaniel, Deanna Pfleger, Stephen Russell, Beverly Seckinger, and Corey Seemiller. (BAS) (Entered: 04/05/2010)	April 2, 2010	April 2, 2010 PACER
35	ORDER pursuant to General Order 05-25 granting 34 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice.Per the Court's Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, applicant has five (5) days in which to register as a user of the Electronic Filing System. Registration to be accomplished via the court's website at www.azd.uscourts.gov. (BAS)(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (Entered: 04/05/2010)	April 5, 2010	April 5, 2010 PACER
36	Notice re Substitution by Tracy Collins, Joseph R Diaz, Keith B Humphrey, Leslie Kemp, Judith McDaniel, Deanna Pfleger, Stephen Russell, Beverly Seckinger, Corey Seemiller, Carrie Sperling (Barnes, Rhonda) (Entered: 04/05/2010)	April 5, 2010	April 5, 2010 PACER
37	STIPULATION For Extension of Time to File Response to Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Janice K Brewer. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Winters, Kathryn) (Entered: 04/16/2010) 1 Text of Proposed Order View on PACER	April 16, 2010	April 16, 2010 PACER
38	ORDER granting 37 Stipulation of time to file response to Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Defendants' response due on or before 5/3/10 and plaintiffs' reply due on or before 5/27/10. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 4/19/10. (JWS) (Entered: 04/19/2010)	April 19, 2010	April 19, 2010 PACER
39	JUDGE SEDWICK TEXT ORDER re 31 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and 22 MOTION to Dismiss Case: The court will hear argument on the motions at dockets 22 and 31 in Courtroom 401, at the Sandra Day O' Connor Courthouse, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, at 9:00 AM on June 28, 2010. The court does not expect that testimony will be needed in connection with the motion for a preliminary injunction, but if a party anticipates the need to present testimony, the party shall file a notice advising of that fact no later than May 28, 2010. The notice must identify each witness, briefly summarize the testimony expected from each witness, and provide an estimate of the duration of direct examination of each witness. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. cc: AZ and AK calendar clerks. (JWS) (Entered: 05/03/2010)	May 3, 2010	May 3, 2010 PACER
40	RESPONSE in Opposition re 31 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Janice K Brewer, Kathy Peckardt, David Raber. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Charles A Grube, # 2 Affidavit Declaration of Karen Battilana, # 3 Exhibit Battilana Declaration, Ex. B, Part 1, # 4 Exhibit Battilana Declaration, Ex. B. Part 2, # 5 Exhibit Battilana Ex. B, Part 3)(Grube, Charles) (Entered: 05/03/2010) 1 Affidavit Declaration of Charles A Grube View on PACER 2 Affidavit Declaration of Karen Battilana View on PACER 3 Exhibit Battilana Declaration, Ex. B, Part 1 View on PACER 4 Exhibit Battilana Declaration, Ex. B. Part 2 View on PACER 5 Exhibit Battilana Ex. B, Part 3 View on PACER	May 3, 2010	May 3, 2010 PACER

Case: Diaz v. Brewer

2:09-cv-02402 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Case Summary

People

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Resources

Docket

Case Details