Case: Felix v. Lingle

1:93-cv-00367 | U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii

Filed Date: May 4, 1993

Closed Date: June 1, 2005

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In May 1993, a class of over 13,000 children with disabilities residing in Hawaii sued the state, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii, for failing to provide educational and mental health services to students. The plaintiffs were represented by the Hawaii Disability Rights Center and private counsel. On May 24, 1994 U.S. District Court Judge Ezra found the State liable for its failure to provide services to plaintiff class under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Ac…

In May 1993, a class of over 13,000 children with disabilities residing in Hawaii sued the state, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii, for failing to provide educational and mental health services to students. The plaintiffs were represented by the Hawaii Disability Rights Center and private counsel.

On May 24, 1994 U.S. District Court Judge Ezra found the State liable for its failure to provide services to plaintiff class under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 504.

The parties reached a settlement agreement in October 1994, which provided that Hawaii develop educational and mental health supports and services, programs, and placement in accordance with the IDEA and Section 504. This was approved by the Court on October 25; Judge Ezra appointed a special master and a court monitor to facilitate compliance.

The terms of the decree included:

  • The Departments of Education and Health were named responsible agencies but were obligated to form partnerships with other state and private agencies.

  • The State is required to establish a system of care of programs, placements, services, and an organizational and managerial infrastructure to support it.

  • The State was required to develop an implementation plan within seven months.

  • The State was required to establish maintenance of service programs as measured by May 1994 appropriations.

  • Full implementation was to be complete by June 30, 2000.

  • The state agreed to pay all costs for the court monitor, the technical assistance panel, plaintiff counsel, and the special master.

The plan was subsequently amended in August 1996 and December 1998.

On May 30, 2000 Judge Ezra found the State in contempt for failing to design and implement the system of care stipulated in the consent

decree. The Court added requirements to the decree that Hawaii meet infrastructure and initial performance benchmarks. The Court also ordered monitoring to verify improvements and compliance.

At this point, the Hawaii Legislature initiated an investigation into fiscal issues related to the consent decree. The state Office of Auditor assisted in the investigation by providing reports on use of funds by the Departments of Health and Education. The Office of Auditor recommended that the Departments implement coordinated capabilities for reporting and analysis of costs, including the use of consistent measurements for children's progress to ensure that health services were effective in meeting educational goals.

Because Hawaii had substantially complied with the Consent Decree by September 2002, the Court shifted the burden of monitoring to the state Department of Education and Health. In April 2004, the State met its obligation and the Consent Decree was terminated after an additional five quarters of reporting on key indicators.

None of the documents for this case are available via PACER, except the docket sheet. And there are no opinions available online, either. There is, however, a great deal of information available at this site, also linked below. Much of the summary above is based on the December 2001 audit posted there (and also here in the Clearinghouse).

Summary Authors

Elizabeth Homan (10/29/2012)

People


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Carroll, Benjamin L. (Hawaii)

Attorney for Defendant

Aina, Charleen (Hawaii)

Chang, Steven K. (Hawaii)

Chiu, Joelle K. (Hawaii)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Bennett, Mark Jeremy (Hawaii)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:93-cv-00367

Docket

May 31, 2005

May 31, 2005

Docket
1

1:93-cv-00367

Complaint

Felix v. Waihee

May 4, 1993

May 4, 1993

Complaint

1:93-cv-00367

Assessment of the State is Efforts Related to the Felix Consent Decree

Felix v. Waihee

Dec. 1, 1998

Dec. 1, 1998

Monitor/Expert/Receiver Report

Legislative Report

Felix v. Cayetano

No Court

Dec. 1, 2001

Dec. 1, 2001

Findings Letter/Report

1:93-cv-00367

Follow-Up and Management Audit of the Felix Consent Decree

Felix v. Cayetano

No Court

Dec. 17, 2001

Dec. 17, 2001

Monitor/Expert/Receiver Report

Report of the Joint Senate-House Investigative Committee to Investigate the State's Compliance With the Felix Consent Decree

Felix v. Cayetano

No Court

Dec. 26, 2001

Dec. 26, 2001

Findings Letter/Report

Legislative Report

No Court

None

Findings Letter/Report

Docket

Last updated Dec. 18, 2024, 2:45 p.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: Hawaii

Case Type(s):

Child Welfare

Special Collection(s):

Olmstead Cases

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 4, 1993

Closing Date: June 1, 2005

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

All children and adolescents with disabilities residing in Hawaii who are eligible for and in need of education and mental health services pursuant to the IDEA but for whom such services are either unavailable, inadequate, or inappropriate․

Plaintiff Type(s):

State Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

NDRN/Protection & Advocacy Organizations

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

Hawaii, State

Defendant Type(s):

Law-enforcement

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Indv. w/ Disab. Educ. Act (IDEA), Educ. of All Handcpd. Children Act , 20 U.S.C. § 1400

Section 504 (Rehabilitation Act), 29 U.S.C. § 701

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Findings Letter/Report

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Order Duration: 1994 - None

Issues

General/Misc.:

Access to public accommodations - governmental

Education

Government services

Juveniles

Neglect by staff

School/University Facilities

Disability and Disability Rights:

Autism

Depression

Developmental disability without intellectual disability

Disability, unspecified

Integrated setting

Intellectual/developmental disability, unspecified

Learning disability

Mental Illness, Unspecified

Mental impairment

Reasonable Accommodations

Schizophrenia

Special education

Discrimination Basis:

Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

Male

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Placement in mental health facilities

Medical/Mental Health Care:

Intellectual/Developmental Disability

Intellectual disability/mental illness dual diagnosis

Medical care, general

Medical care, unspecified

Mental health care, general

Mental health care, unspecified