Filed Date: 1963
Closed Date: 1982
Clearinghouse coding in progress
(This summary is temporary, while we research the case.)
According to the U.S. Supreme Court's summary of this case, "In a California state court action seeking desegregation of the schools in the Los Angeles Unified School District (District), the trial court, in 1970, found de jure segregation in violation of both the State and Federal Constitutions and ordered the District to prepare a desegregation plan. The California Supreme Court affirmed, but based its decision solely upon the Equal Protection Clause of the State Constitution, which bars de facto as well as de jure segregation. On remand, the trial court approved a desegregation plan that included substantial mandatory pupil reassignment and busing. While the trial court was considering alternative new plans in 1979, the voters of California ratified an amendment (Proposition I) to the State Constitution which provides that state courts shall not order mandatory pupil assignment or transportation unless a federal court "would be permitted under federal decisional law" to do so to remedy a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution. The trial court denied the District's request to halt all mandatory reassignment and busing, holding that Proposition I was not applicable in light of the court's 1970 finding of de jure segregation in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. The court then ordered implementation of a revised plan that again included substantial mandatory pupil reassignment and busing. The California Court of Appeal reversed, concluding that the trial court's 1970 findings of fact would not support the conclusion that the District had violated the Federal Constitution through intentional segregation. The Court of Appeal also held that Proposition I was constitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment, and barred that part of the plan requiring mandatory student reassignment and busing."
In Crawford v. Los Angeles Board of Educ., 458 U.S. 527 (1982), the U.S. Supreme Court held that Proposition I was lawful.
Summary Authors
Christopher Felker (3/12/2013)
Armstrong, Orville [Jack] A. (California)
Bird, Rose Elizabeth (California)
Blackmun, Harry Andrew (District of Columbia)
Burger, Warren Earl (District of Columbia)
Chantry, Kenneth N. (California)
Clark, William P. Jr. (California)
Compton, Lynn Davis (California)
Egly, Paul (California)
Fleming, Macklin G. (California)
Gitelson, Alfred (California)
Armstrong, Orville [Jack] A. (California)
Bird, Rose Elizabeth (California)
Blackmun, Harry Andrew (District of Columbia)
Burger, Warren Earl (District of Columbia)
Chantry, Kenneth N. (California)
Clark, William P. Jr. (California)
Compton, Lynn Davis (California)
Egly, Paul (California)
Fleming, Macklin G. (California)
Gitelson, Alfred (California)
Kriegler, Sandy R. (California)
Marshall, Thurgood (District of Columbia)
McComb, Marshall F. (California)
Mosk, Stanley (California)
O'Connor, Sandra Day (District of Columbia)
Powell, Lewis Franklin Jr. (District of Columbia)
Rehnquist, William Hubbs (District of Columbia)
Richardson, Frank K. (California)
Roth, Lester W. (California)
Stevens, John Paul (District of Columbia)
Tobriner, Matthew Oscar (California)
Turner, Paul (California)
White, Byron Raymond (District of Columbia)
Wright, Donald Richard (California)
Beard, Paul James (California)
Bergman, Michael (California)
Berman, Bayard F. (California)
Bernhard, Herbert A. (California)
Browne, Sharon L. (California)
Gale, Mary Ellen (California)
Lloyd, Rees (California)
Martinez, John L. (California)
Medvene, Edward (California)
Miller, Halvor Thomas Jr. (California)
Munoz, Ricardo Florian (California)
Neusom, Thomas G. (California)
Okrand, Fred (California)
Pineda, Lynn Arthur (California)
Rintala, William (California)
Roberts, Virgil Patrick (California)
Rodriguez, Antonio (California)
Rosenbaum, Mark Dale (California)
Rosenthal, Sol (California)
Sheats, Samuel C. (California)
Smoot, Peter (California)
Sperber, Lawrence (California)
Tribe, Laurence (Massachusetts)
Wirin, A. L. (California)
Yi, Elizabeth Alum (California)
Apperson, Ronald J. (California)
Cooley, Winchester III (California)
Damus, Robert G. (District of Columbia)
De Flon, Alfred C. (California)
Farrell, Joseph B. (California)
Friedman, Michael Elliott (California)
Gill, L. (California)
Halverson, Jerry F. (California)
Hart-Nibbrig, Harold Christiaan (California)
Johnson, Michael C. (California)
Jordan, Judd Lindsay (California)
Kennedy, Harold Woodworth (California)
Kirwan, Betty-Jane (California)
Langstaff, Clarence Heald (California)
Larson, John H. (California)
Maharg, John D. (California)
Peterson, David (California)
Reynolds, David Emmett (California)
Schneider, Raymond W. (California)
Shea, G. William (California)
Adler, James N. (California)
Bardos, (California)
Bartman, Thomas Fred (California)
Bhargava, Anurima (District of Columbia)
Collisson, Peter (California)
Cooper, Charles Justin (District of Columbia)
Dietrich, Andrea (California)
Driver, Shanta (Michigan)
Duff, Joseph Hairston (California)
Dunlap, Thomas Paine (California)
Echeagaray, Norma (California)
Edwards, G. Kip (California)
Faer, Laura Lynne (California)
Ferraro, (California)
Fiedler, (California)
Fine, Jack D. (California)
Fisher, Raymond C. (California)
Fridkis, Cliff (California)
Garcin, Thomas E. (California)
Goldberg, Arthur L. (California)
Grosz, David Brant (California)
Harris, H Elizabeth (California)
Hoffman, Paul L. (California)
Horth-Neubert, Stacy R. (California)
Jones, Nathaniel Raphael (Ohio)
Kao, Winifred (California)
Keeny, Christy Virginia (California)
Kenneally, Gwen (California)
Kerley-Schwartz, Stephanie (California)
Lavender, Carol King (California)
Lee, Rex E. (District of Columbia)
Lhamon, Catherine (California)
Lindsey, Michael Kaj (California)
Logan, Dorothea (California)
McKinsey, Brenda Powers (California)
Michael, Barbara (California)
Mirell, Douglass E. (California)
Paul, Lee G. (California)
Peters, Aulana Louise (California)
Powers, Brenda (California)
Russell, Jason D. (California)
Saferstein, Harvey Irving (California)
Schwab, Richard Joseph (California)
Smith-Evans, Leticia (New York)
Spencer, Ruth A. (California)
Stern, Robert Steven (California)
Su, Julie A (California)
Tenner, Jack (California)
Thomas, Holly A. (New York)
Trygstad, Lawrence Benson (California)
Valenzuela, Cynthia Ann (California)
Vera, Hernan D. (California)
Washington, George B. (Michigan)
Weisman, Joseph (California)
Willick, Daniel Harold (California)
Younger, (California)
Ziegler, Mara Jean (California)
Arias, Beatriz (Arizona)
Armor, David James (California)
Brennan, William Joseph Jr. (District of Columbia)
Caughey, John Walton (California)
Cohen, David K. (California)
Crain, Robert L. (New York)
Davidson, Gordon (California)
Dodson, Daniel W. (New York)
Farley, Reynolds (Michigan)
Gardner, Arthur F. (California)
Gifford, Bernard R. (California)
Gordon, Calvin Wayne (California)
Hain, Elwood Brett Junior (California)
Hammerman, Sam (California)
Hardy, Georgiana (California)
James, Judy (California)
Kelley, Robert E (California)
McKenna, George J. III (California)
Nastasia, Rose Mary (California)
Nathanson, Julia (California)
Orfield, Gary (California)
Pettigrew, Thomas Fraser (Massachusetts)
Price, Monroe E. (California)
Purdy, Robert (California)
Rabinovitz, Francine (California)
Sullivan, Neil V. (California)
Willett, Hugh C. (California)
Yudof, Mark G. (Texas)
Last updated Sept. 8, 2022, 3:04 a.m.
Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.State / Territory: California
Case Type(s):
Key Dates
Filing Date: 1963
Closing Date: 1982
Case Ongoing: No
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Description:
Class of all black and Mexican descent students attending school in the Los Angeles Unified School District
Plaintiff Type(s):
Attorney Organizations:
Public Interest Lawyer: Yes
Filed Pro Se: No
Class Action Sought: Yes
Class Action Outcome: Granted
Defendants
Los Angeles Board of Education (Los Angeles, Los Angeles), School District
Board of Education of the City of Los Angeles (Los Angeles), City
Defendant Type(s):
Case Details
Causes of Action:
Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.
Constitutional Clause(s):
Available Documents:
Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief
U.S. Supreme Court merits opinion
Outcome
Prevailing Party: Plaintiff
Nature of Relief:
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Preliminary injunction / Temp. restraining order
Source of Relief:
Order Duration: 1970 - 1982
Content of Injunction:
Develop anti-discrimination policy
Issues
General:
Discrimination-basis:
National origin discrimination
Race:
Type of Facility:
National Origin/Ethnicity: