Case: United States v. Piedmont Regional Jail Authority
3:13-cv-00646 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Filed Date: Sept. 20, 2013
Closed Date: 2014
Clearinghouse coding complete
Case Summary
On September 20, 2013, the United States of America filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia against Piedmont Regional Jail Authority, Virginia, pursuant to the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C § 1997. The plaintiffs, represented by the U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division attorneys, asked the court for permanent injunctive relief, alleging that the Jail's conditions of confinement deprived them of their rights, privileges and immunities afforded by the U.S. Constitution.
Specifically, the plaintiff alleged that, among other things, the defendant permitted unqualified personnel to evaluate and manage serious medical conditions, inadequately screened incoming prisoners for medical issues, inadequately trained its staff on suicide prevention, mental health care and first-responder health care, charged excessive co-payments for prisoners, and did not adequately supervise prisoners on suicide watch.
On September 6, 2012, the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice issued a "Findings Letter", where it concluded that certain conditions at the Jail violated the constitutional rights of the inmates.
The parties filed a joint motion to enter into a settlement agreement on September 20, 2013. On October 1, 2013, the Court (Judge James Spencer) issued an order granting the joint motion for settlement and approving the settlement agreement in its entirety.
Under the agreement, the Jail is to provide more appropriate medical staffing, better screen and document prisoners' health issues, reduce or exclude co-payments, and implement comprehensive policies for suicide prevention. The Jail must file bi-annual compliance reports and must notify the Monitor, James Welch, and the plaintiff upon death of any prisoner, or any serious suicide attempt. If the Monitor finds non-compliance, the plaintiff shall give notice to the defendant and allow 30 days to cure the failure. If the failure is not cured, the plaintiff may initiate contempt proceedings without further notice.
The agreement provides that the Court (Judge John Spencer) shall retain jurisdiction over the action until the defendant is determined to have substantially complied with the agreement. The agreement shall terminate when the Jail has achieved substantial compliance with the provisions of the agreement and has maintained such compliance for a period of 18 months. If substantial compliance has been achieved and maintained for 18 months, the parties will jointly stipulate to dismissal of the case within 30 days. The agreement is binding upon all the parties, including successors in office. The parties do not foresee any further litigation and the parties have foregone their obligations to preserve potentially discoverable information.
On September 6, 2012, the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice issued issued a "Findings Letter", where it concluded that certain conditions at the Jail violated the constitutional rights of the inmates.
The parties filed a joint motion to enter into a settlement agreement on September 20, 2013. On October 1, 2013, the Court (Judge James Spencer) issued an order granting the joint motion for settlement and approving the settlement agreement in its entirety.
Under the agreement, the Jail is to ensure medical staffing is sufficient and are properly licensed and trained, to ensure the initial screenings of incoming prisoners are fully documented and available to medical staff, to implement a system to provide each prisoner with a comprehensive health assessment with follow-up procedures, to ensure that all officers are trained annually in providing first-responder medical care and are trained on suicide prevention and mental health care, to exclude co-payment from health care at the Jail leaving only co-payment fee to see a nurse and is not to require co-payment if it results in effectively denying care to the prisoner, to provide sufficient mental health staffing and mental health screening including a chronic care program, to implement comprehensive policies for suicide prevention. The Jail shall file with the Court bi-annual compliance reports, the first of which is due within 180 days of the date when the Court (Judge John Spencer) signs and enters the agreement. Thereafter, the Jail is to file bi-annual compliance reports every six months. The Jail shall notify the Monitor and the plaintiff upon death of any prisoner, or any serious suicide attempt. If the Monitor finds non-compliance, the plaintiff shall give notice to the defendant and allow 30 days to cure the failure. If the failure is not cured, the plaintiff may initiate contempt proceedings without further notice.
The parties have jointly selected James Welch to be the Monitor of the implementation of the agreement. He is to have full and complete access to the Jail, records, staff and prisoners. The Monitor is to issue an initial report 120 days after the defendant files its first compliance report, and every 180 days afterwards.
The agreement provides that the Court (Judge John Spencer) shall retain jurisdiction over the action until the defendant is determined to have substantially complied with the agreement. The agreement shall terminate when the Jail has achieved substantial compliance with the provisions of the agreement and has maintained such compliance for a period of 18 months. If substantial compliance has been achieved and maintained for 18 months, the parties will jointly stipulate to dismissal of the case within 30 days. The agreement is binding upon all the parties, including successors in office. The parties do not foresee any further litigation and the parties have foregone their obligations to preserve potentially discoverable information.
The last action of the Court (Judge John Spencer) was an order granting motion for an extension of the time to file on February 3, 2014. The reporting deadlines under the agreement have been extended for 60 days.
Summary Authors
Zhandos Kuderin (3/18/2014)
People
For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/14345451/parties/united-states-v-piedmont-regional-jail-authority/
Fleisher, Aaron Saul (Virginia)
Holder, Eric H. (Virginia)
Cohen, Zachary Daniel (Virginia)
Bass, Matthew Ethan (Virginia)
Dix, Mark Dennis (Virginia)
Documents in the Clearinghouse
Docket
See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/14345451/united-states-v-piedmont-regional-jail-authority/
Last updated Aug. 7, 2026, 4:31 p.m.
Docket for: United States v. Piedmont Regional Jail Authority
Case Details
State / Territory:
Case Type(s):
Healthcare Access and Reproductive Issues
Special Collection(s):
Key Dates
Filing Date: Sept. 20, 2013
Closing Date: 2014
Case Ongoing: No reason to think so
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Description:
United States Government
Plaintiff Type(s):
U.S. Dept of Justice plaintiff
Attorney Organizations:
U.S. Dept. of Justice Civil Rights Division
Public Interest Lawyer: Yes
Filed Pro Se: No
Class Action Sought: No
Class Action Outcome: Not sought
Defendants
County
Piedmont Regional Jail
Defendant Type(s):
Case Details
Causes of Action:
Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (CRIPA), 42 U.S.C. § 1997 et seq.
Constitutional Clause(s):
Other Dockets:
Eastern District of Virginia 3:13-cv-00646
Available Documents:
Outcome
Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed
Relief Granted:
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief:
Form of Settlement:
Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Content of Injunction:
Issues
General/Misc.:
Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:
Suicide prevention (facilities)
Medical/Mental Health Care:
Case Summary of United States v. Piedmont Regional Jail Authority, Civil Rights Litig. Clearinghouse, https://clearinghouse.net/case/13162/ (last updated 3/18/2014).