Case: United States of America v. County of Los Angeles

2:15-cv-03174 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Filed Date: April 28, 2015

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Civil Rights Division initiated a civil investigation of the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department on August 19, 2011. The investigation focused on allegations of unconstitutional conduct by deputies at two stations located in the Antelope Valley cities of Lancaster and Palmdale, California. The DOJ proceeded under the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994,42 U.S.C. § 14141 (Section 14141), and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,42 U.S.C. § 2000d (Title VI). These laws authorize the United States to file a legal action when it has reasonable cause to believe that a law enforcement agency engages in a pattern or practice of violations of the Constitution or laws of the United States. In addition, the investigation was also founded on the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601–3631.

On June 28, 2013, the DOJ issued a findings letter to the LASD explaining that LASD's Antelope Valley stations engaged in a pattern or practice of discriminatory and otherwise unlawful searches and seizures, including the use of unreasonable force, in violation of the Fourth Amendment and Title VI. The DOJ also found that deputies assigned to these stations had engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination against African Americans in violation of the Fair Housing Act, by targeting certain residents who possessed housing vouchers.

Although the county denied the allegation of unconstitutional conduct, simultaneous to the findings letter being made public, the parties entered a "statement of intent" to reach a comprehensive settlement agreement. The statement of intent explained that "[t]he Agreement to be negotiated is intended to ensure that: 1) LASD personnel in the Antelope Valley engage in practices that comply with the Constitution and laws of the United States; and 2) the objectives of LASD's Core Values and Trust-Based Policing program are realized in the Antelope Valley community." The statement of intent indicated that the parties intended to reach a final settlement agreement by August 30, 2013.

Settlement negotiations took quite a bit longer. It was not until April 28, 2015, that the DOJ filed this lawsuit and its proposed settlement agreement. The case was filed in the U.S. Federal District Court for the Central District of California and assigned to Judge John F. Walter.

The DOJ brought this action under the Violent Crime Control and Enforcement Act (42 U.S.C. § 14141) and Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act as amended by the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. § 3601). The DOJ alleged in the complaint that the county violated the Fourteenth Amendment and the Fair Housing Act by engaging in the following behavior: (a) detaining individuals without legal authority; (b) engaging in a pattern of unreasonable force; (c) stopping and searching African American and Latino residents on impermissible considerations of race and ethnicity; (d) targeting African American residents participating in the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program; and (e) failing to create adequate accountability systems to curb unlawful policing. The DOJ requested declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and damages.

Under the terms of the settlement, within four years the county was to do the following:

create procedures to stop the practice of and detect discriminatory stops, searches, and seizures, as well as training on appropriate practices and the terms of the settlement;
ensure bias-free policing through training and monitoring of its practices across the county;
create and implement a housing non-discrimination policy, as well as a mechanism for documenting all incidents involving voucher holders;
enhance its data collection, analysis, and reporting methods to better assess its programs and improvemen;t
enhance community engagement through increased transparency and community feedback mechanisms;
revise its policies on use of force to encourage alternatives and de-escalation, prohibit certain actions, promote reporting on all incidents of use of force, and provide for supervision, training, and analysis;
create and implement policies to ensure accountability through personnel complaint review procedures, analysis of personnel data, and mentorship; and
comply with stipulated monitoring requirements and assessment procedures.
Further, the settlement agreement required the county to pay $700,000 to those harmed by its violations of the Fair Housing Act and $25,000 in civil penalties.

The court approved the settlement agreement on May 1, 2015, and a supplemental settlement agreement on July 21, 2015. The supplemental agreement established the terms and schedule for awarding damages to individuals harmed by the violation of the Fair Housing Act. The supplemental agreement created two categories of individuals harmed: individuals within Category 1 could receive between $1,000 and $10,000 in damage while those within Category 2 could receive between $5,000 and $20,000

On May 24, 2017, the parties filed a joint stipulation to amend the settlement order after determining that more individuals aggrieved by the county’s FHA violations would qualify for payment under Category 2. The amendment reduced the low end of the range of potential damages awarded to $3,000 to ensure that more individuals would receive damages. The court approved the amendment the next day.

Pursuant to the terms of the settlement, an independnt monitor has overseen implementation of the settlement’s terms and submitted semi-anual reports measuring LASD’s compliance. As of the 19th semi-annual monitoring report, submitted in January 2025, the county is still working toward sustained compliance. However, the report noted that LASD had made “significant progress toward compliance, especially in those areas and provisions requiring improvements in data analysis.”

	Document
2:15-cv-03174	Docket [PACER] United States v. County of Los Angeles	Jan. 24, 2020	Jan. 24, 2020 Docket
	Justice Department Opens Investigation into the Antelope Valley Stations of the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department [Antelope Valley Stations - Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department] No Court	Aug. 19, 2011	Aug. 19, 2011 Press Release
	Statement of Intent DOJ Investigation of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department Stations in Antelope Valley No Court	June 27, 2013	June 27, 2013 Settlement Agreement
	Re: Investigation of Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department Stations in Antelope Valley DOJ Investigation of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department Stations in Antelope Valley No Court	June 28, 2013	June 28, 2013 Findings Letter/Report
2:15-cv-03174	Resumen de la Carta de Hallazgos del Valle de Antelope [Findings Letter (Spanish)] DOJ Investigation of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department Stations in Antelope Valley No Court	Nov. 19, 2013	Nov. 19, 2013 Findings Letter/Report
1 2:15-cv-03174	Complaint United States v. County of Los Angeles	April 28, 2015	April 28, 2015 Complaint
	Justice Department and the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department Agree to Policing Reforms and Settlement of Police-Related Fair Housing Claims in the Antelope Valley [Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department] No Court	April 28, 2015	April 28, 2015 Press Release
4 2:15-cv-03174	Settlement Agreement United States v. County of Los Angeles	April 28, 2015	April 28, 2015 Settlement Agreement
14 2:15-cv-03174	Stipulation and Order Approving Settlement Agreement and Order of Resolution and Entry of Judgment United States v. County of Los Angeles	May 1, 2015	May 1, 2015 Order/Opinion
17 2:15-cv-03174	Order Approving Supplemental Settlement Agreement United States v. County of Los Angeles	July 21, 2015	July 21, 2015 Order/Opinion

Title	Description		External URL Date / External URL
Finding Aid: Traffic Stop Litigation Collection Tessa Bialek	This document is a guide to the Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse’s Traffic Stop Litigation collection, which gathers information about dozens of large-scale lawsuits challenging traffic stop pol…	Fall 2024	Nov. 26, 2024
Review of the Use of Monitors in Civil Settlement Agreements and Consent Decrees Involving State and Local Government Entities Attorney General Merrick Garland and Assoc. AG Vanita Gupta	Today, the Justice Department will begin implementing a set of principles and specific recommendations regarding the use ofmonitors in civil settlement agreements and consent decrees involving state …	9/13/2021	Sept. 13, 2021 https://www.justice.gov/...
Monitoring of the Antelope Valley Settlement Agreement National Council on Crime and Delinquency	This is a webpage run by the monitors in U.S. v. County of Los Angeles, the Antelope Valley Settlement agreement. In August 2011, the US Department of Justice (DOJ), Civil Rights Divisio…	December 2018	Dec. 31, 2018

ECF Number	Description	Date	Link Date / Link
1	COMPLAINT Fee Exemption in accordance with statute, filed by Plaintiff United States. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit "A", # 2 Exhibit "B") (Attorney Robyn-Marie L Monteleone added to party United States(pty:pla))(Monteleone, Robyn-Marie) (Entered: 04/28/2015)	April 28, 2015	April 28, 2015 Clearinghouse
2	CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff United States. (Monteleone, Robyn-Marie) (Entered: 04/28/2015)	April 28, 2015	April 28, 2015 PACER
3	NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff United States. Related Case(s): 2:11-cv-04817 (Monteleone, Robyn-Marie) (Entered: 04/28/2015)	April 28, 2015	April 28, 2015 PACER
4	SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT filed by Plaintiff United States. (Monteleone, Robyn-Marie) (Entered: 04/28/2015)	April 28, 2015	April 28, 2015 Clearinghouse
5	STIPULATION for Order for Entry of Settlement Agreement Pursuant to FRCP 41(A)(2) filed by Plaintiff United States. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order for Entry of Settlement Agreement Pursuant to FRCP 41(A)(2))(Monteleone, Robyn-Marie) (Entered: 04/28/2015)	April 28, 2015	April 28, 2015 PACER
6	NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (ghap) (Entered: 04/29/2015)	April 29, 2015	April 29, 2015 RECAP
7	NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) (Entered: 04/29/2015)	April 29, 2015	April 29, 2015 PACER
8	NOTICE OF FILING FEE DUE on Pro Hac Vice Application mailed to attorney Charles Hart for Plaintiff United States of America. Pro Hac Vice application has not been received by the court. Please return your completed Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case, form G-64, or a copy of the Notice of Electronic Filing of your application and the $325.00 fee and this notice immediately. Out-of-state federal government attorneys who are not employed by the U.S. Department of Justice are required to file a Pro Hac Vice application;no filing fee is required. You have been removed as counsel of record from this case for failure to submit this filing fee. (ghap) (Entered: 04/29/2015)	April 29, 2015	April 29, 2015 PACER
9	NOTICE OF FILING FEE DUE on Pro Hac Vice Application mailed to attorney Norrinda Brown Hayat for Plaintiff United States of America. Pro Hac Vice application has not been received by the court. Please return your completed Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case, form G-64, or a copy of the Notice of Electronic Filing of your application and the $325.00 fee and this notice immediately. Out-of-state federal government attorneys who are not employed by the U.S. Department of Justice are required to file a Pro Hac Vice application;no filing fee is required. You have been removed as counsel of record from this case for failure to submit this filing fee. (ghap) (Entered: 04/29/2015)	April 29, 2015	April 29, 2015 PACER
10	STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. All counsel are ordered to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules of the Central District of California, the General Orders of the Central District and the Judges Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court for the Central District of California. See document for details. (gk) (Entered: 04/29/2015)	April 29, 2015	April 29, 2015 PACER
11	RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Charles Hart on behalf of Plaintiff United States of America. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. Attorney is with the USDOJ and does not have to apply PHV pursuant to 28 USC 515(a). (lt) (Entered: 04/30/2015)	April 30, 2015	April 30, 2015 PACER
12	RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Norrinda Brown Hayat on behalf of Plaintiff United States of America. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. Attorney is with the USDOJ and does not have to apply PHV pursuant to 28 USC 515(a) (lt) (Entered: 04/30/2015)	April 30, 2015	April 30, 2015 PACER
13	ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 14-03 (Related Case) filed. Transfer of case declined by Judge Otis D. Wright, II, for the reasons set forth on this order. Related Case No. CV11-04817 ODW (VBKx) (mg) (Entered: 04/30/2015)	April 30, 2015	April 30, 2015 PACER
14	STIPULATION AND ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER OF RESOLUTION AND ENTRY OF JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter: It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Settlement Agreement and Order of Resolution 5 is APPROVED and Judgment shall be ENTERED in this matter in the attached form. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2), the Complaint is hereby conditionally dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE and the matter is placed on the Court's inactive docket until further application by the Parties or order of the Court. The Court retains complete jurisdiction of this matter to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement until the Defendants have fulfilled their obligations, at which point the case will be dismissed. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (gk) (Entered: 05/01/2015)	May 1, 2015	May 1, 2015 Clearinghouse
15	STIPULATION for Order Requesting Approval of Supplemental Settlement Agreement filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Monteleone, Robyn-Marie) (Entered: 07/20/2015)	July 20, 2015	July 20, 2015 PACER
16	SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Supplemental filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Monteleone, Robyn-Marie) (Entered: 07/20/2015)	July 20, 2015	July 20, 2015 PACER
17	ORDER APPROVING SUPPLEMENTAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 15 by Judge John F. Walter AND NOW, upon consideration of the parties' attached Stipulation and Supplemental Settlement Agreement, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that pursuant to paragraph 196 of the Settlement Agreement, the Supplemental Settlement Agreement is APPROVED. (jp) (Entered: 07/21/2015)	July 21, 2015	July 21, 2015 Clearinghouse
18	STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Monitors' Initial Six Month Report filed by Defendants The County of Los Angeles, The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Approving Extension of Time to File Monitors' Initial Six Month Report)(Attorney Roger H Granbo, Jr added to party The County of Los Angeles(pty:dft), Attorney Roger H Granbo, Jr added to party The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department(pty:dft))(Granbo, Roger) (Entered: 11/20/2015)	Nov. 20, 2015	Nov. 20, 2015 PACER
19	ORDER APPROVING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MONITORS' INITIAL SIX MONTH REPORT by Judge John F. Walter. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the time for the Monitors to submit the initial six month report as required by Paragraph 171 of the Settlement Agreement is extended to December 22, 2015. (jloz) (Entered: 11/20/2015)	Nov. 20, 2015	Nov. 20, 2015 PACER
20	SUBMISSION OF MONITORS' INITIAL SIX MONTH REPORT filed by Defendants The County of Los Angeles, The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. (Granbo, Roger) (Entered: 12/22/2015)	Dec. 22, 2015	Dec. 22, 2015 Clearinghouse
21	SUBMISSION OF MONITORS' SECOND SIX MONTH REPORT filed by Defendants The County of Los Angeles, The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. (Granbo, Roger) (Entered: 06/22/2016)	June 22, 2016	June 22, 2016 Clearinghouse
22	MONTHLY REPORT of Compliance with Agreement filed by Defendants The County of Los Angeles, The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. (Attachments: # 1 Third Six Month Report)(Granbo, Roger) (Entered: 12/23/2016)	Dec. 23, 2016	Dec. 23, 2016 PACER
23	NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Cynthia Coe on behalf of Plaintiff United States of America (Attorney Cynthia Coe added to party United States of America(pty:pla))(Coe, Cynthia) (Entered: 02/21/2017)	Feb. 21, 2017	Feb. 21, 2017 PACER
24	NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Joanna Berney Hull on behalf of Plaintiff United States of America (Attorney Joanna Berney Hull added to party United States of America(pty:pla))(Hull, Joanna) (Entered: 05/23/2017)	May 23, 2017	May 23, 2017 PACER
25	Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Joanna Berney Hull counsel for Plaintiff United States of America. Robyn-Marie Lyon Monteleone is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Hull, Joanna) (Entered: 05/23/2017)	May 23, 2017	May 23, 2017 PACER
26	Joint STIPULATION to AMEND Order, 17 filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Hull, Joanna) (Entered: 05/24/2017)	May 24, 2017	May 24, 2017 PACER
27	ORDER APPROVING AMENDMENT TO SUPPLEMENTAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND NOW, upon consideration of the Parties Joint Stipulation Amending the Supplemental Settlement Agreement 26, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Attachment A of the Supplemental Settlement Agreement is AMENDED to permit compensation to Category 2 aggrieved persons in the range of $3,500 to $20,000 by Judge John F. Walter. (jp) (Entered: 05/25/2017)	May 25, 2017	May 25, 2017 PACER
28	NOTICE of Distribution of Settlement Fund filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Hull, Joanna) (Entered: 06/05/2017)	June 5, 2017	June 5, 2017 PACER
29	SUBMISSION OF MONITORS' FOURTH SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT filed by Defendants The County of Los Angeles, The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. (Granbo, Roger) (Entered: 06/22/2017)	June 22, 2017	June 22, 2017 Clearinghouse
30	Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Acrivi Coromelas counsel for Plaintiff United States of America. Adding Acrivi Coromelas as counsel of record for Plaintiff for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Acrivi Coromelas. (Attorney Acrivi Coromelas added to party United States of America(pty:pla))(Coromelas, Acrivi) (Entered: 07/12/2017)	July 12, 2017	July 12, 2017 PACER
31	SUBMISSION OF MONITORS' FIFTH SEMI- ANNUAL REPORT filed by Defendants The County of Los Angeles, The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. (Granbo, Roger) (Entered: 12/22/2017)	Dec. 22, 2017	Dec. 22, 2017 Clearinghouse
32	SUBMISSION OF MONITORS' SIXTH SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT filed by Defendants The County of Los Angeles, The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. (Granbo, Roger) (Entered: 06/22/2018)	June 22, 2018	June 22, 2018 Clearinghouse
33	Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Joanna Berney Hull counsel for Plaintiff United States of America. Joanna Hull is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Hull, Joanna) (Entered: 07/31/2018)	July 31, 2018	July 31, 2018 PACER
34	Request to Modify Schedule for Submission of the Semi-Annual Reports; [Proposed Order] filed by Defendants The County of Los Angeles, The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Approving the Parties' Request to Modify the Schedule for Submitting the Semi-Annual Reports)(Granbo, Roger) (Entered: 11/06/2018)	Nov. 6, 2018	Nov. 6, 2018 PACER
35	ORDER APPROVING THE PARTIES' REQUEST TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULE FOR SUBMITTING THE SEMI-ANNUAL REPORTS 34 by Judge John F. Walter. The Semi-Annual reports, as required by Paragraph 171 of the Settlement Agreement, shall be filed by January 25 and July 25 of each year, with the next report to be submitted by January 25, 2019. (iv) (Entered: 11/07/2018)	Nov. 7, 2018	Nov. 7, 2018 PACER
36	SUBMISSION OF MONITORS' SEVENTH SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT filed by Defendants The County of Los Angeles, The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. (Granbo, Roger) (Entered: 01/25/2019)	Jan. 25, 2019	Jan. 25, 2019 Clearinghouse
37	SUBMISSION OF MONITORS' EIGHTH SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT filed by Defendants The County of Los Angeles, The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. (Granbo, Roger) (Entered: 07/25/2019)	July 25, 2019	July 25, 2019 Clearinghouse
38	SUBMISSION OF MONITORS' NINTH SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT filed by Defendants The County of Los Angeles, The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. (Granbo, Roger) (Entered: 01/24/2020)	Jan. 24, 2020	Jan. 24, 2020 Clearinghouse
39	SUBMISSION OF MONITORS' TENTH SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT filed by Defendants The County of Los Angeles, The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. (Granbo, Roger) (Entered: 07/24/2020)	July 24, 2020	July 24, 2020 PACER
40	SUBMISSION OF MONITORS' ELEVENTH SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT filed by Defendants The County of Los Angeles, The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. (Granbo, Roger) (Entered: 01/25/2021)	Jan. 25, 2021	Jan. 25, 2021 PACER
41	Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Roger H Granbo, Jr counsel for Defendants The County of Los Angeles, The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. Roger H. Granbo, Jr. is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Attorney for Defendants Carrie Clarke. (Granbo, Roger) (Entered: 04/05/2021)	April 5, 2021	April 5, 2021 PACER
42	Stricken REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Carrie Clarke in place of attorney Roger H. Granbo, Jr. filed by Attorney for Defendants The County of Los Angeles, The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. (Granbo, Roger) Modified on 4/7/2021 (sr). (Entered: 04/05/2021)	April 5, 2021	April 5, 2021 PACER
43	NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Carrie Clarke in place of attorney Roger H. Granbo, Jr. 42 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. Other error(s) with document(s): No [Prop] Order attached. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom) (Entered: 04/07/2021)	April 7, 2021	April 7, 2021 PACER
44	Text Entry Order STRIKING REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY 42 for the reasons stated in the Clerk's Notice of Deficiencies 43 .THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 04/07/2021)	April 7, 2021	April 7, 2021 PACER
	Text Only Scheduling Notice	April 7, 2021	April 7, 2021 PACER
45	Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Carrie Clarke counsel for Defendants The County of Los Angeles, The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. Adding Carrie Clarke as counsel of record for County of Los Angeles; Los Angeles Sheriffs Department for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants County of Los Angeles; Los Angeles Sheriffs Department. (Clarke, Carrie) (Entered: 07/28/2021)	July 28, 2021	July 28, 2021 PACER
46	SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT of SUBMISSION OF MONITORS' TWELFTH SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT filed by Defendants The County of Los Angeles, The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. (Clarke, Carrie) (Entered: 07/28/2021)	July 28, 2021	July 28, 2021 RECAP
47	SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT of SUBMISSION OF MONITORS' THIRTEENTH SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT filed by Defendants The County of Los Angeles, The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. (Clarke, Carrie) (Entered: 01/25/2022)	Jan. 25, 2022	Jan. 25, 2022 RECAP
48	SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT filed by Defendants The County of Los Angeles, The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. (Clarke, Carrie) (Entered: 07/25/2022)	July 25, 2022	July 25, 2022 PACER
49	SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT of SUBMISSION OF MONITORS' 15th SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT filed by Defendants The County of Los Angeles, The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. (Clarke, Carrie) (Entered: 01/25/2023)	Jan. 25, 2023	Jan. 25, 2023 RECAP
50	Report	July 25, 2023	July 25, 2023 PACER
51	Report	Jan. 25, 2024	Jan. 25, 2024 PACER
52	Report	July 25, 2024	July 25, 2024 PACER
53	Report	Jan. 27, 2025	Jan. 27, 2025 PACER
54	Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)	March 26, 2025	March 26, 2025 PACER
55	Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)	March 26, 2025	March 26, 2025 PACER
56	Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)	March 26, 2025	March 26, 2025 PACER
57	Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)	March 26, 2025	March 26, 2025 PACER
58	Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)	March 26, 2025	March 26, 2025 PACER
59	Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)	March 26, 2025	March 26, 2025 PACER
60	Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)	March 26, 2025	March 26, 2025 PACER
61	Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)	March 26, 2025	March 26, 2025 PACER
62	Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)	May 1, 2025	May 1, 2025 PACER
63	Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)	May 1, 2025	May 1, 2025 PACER
64	Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)	May 1, 2025	May 1, 2025 PACER
65	Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)	May 1, 2025	May 1, 2025 PACER

Case: United States of America v. County of Los Angeles

2:15-cv-03174 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Case Summary

People

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Resources

Docket

Case Details