Case: San Jose v. Ross

3:18-cv-02279 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: April 17, 2018

Closed Date: Dec. 31, 2020

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The U.S. Census Bureau, a division of the U.S. Department of Commerce, conducts a census every ten years. The census surveys the number of persons in each household and, in the process, gathers certain demographic information about those persons. The Bureau’s stated goal in administering the census “is to count every person living in the United States once, only once and in the right place.” In 2018, the Department of Commerce announced the final list of questions for the 2020 decennial census that it will submit to Congress. This would include a question asking the citizenship status of every person in every household in the US, which has not been done since 1950. The citizenship question asked, “Is this person a citizen of the United States?” and required the respondent to select one of the following responses:

1) “Yes, born in the United States”;

(2) “Yes, born in Puerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, or Northern Marianas”;

(3) “Yes, born abroad of U.S. citizen parent or parents”;

(4) “Yes, citizen by naturalization – Print year of naturalization”; or

(5) “No, not a U.S. citizen

On April 17, 2018, the city of San Jose and the Black Alliance for Just Immigration (BAJI) filed a complaint against Wilbur Ross, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Commerce; the U.S. Department of Commerce; Ron Jarmin, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the U.S. Census Bureau; and the U.S. Census Bureau. The plaintiffs sought a declaration that including the citizenship question on the 2020 Census violated the Constitution’s “actual Enumeration” mandate and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) prohibition against “arbitrary and capricious” agency action. Further, to avoid irreparable harm, the plaintiffs sought an injunction prohibiting the Bureau from including the citizenship question on the 2020 Census.

The plaintiffs claimed that that fewer people would respond to the 2020 Census if it included a citizenship question. The inaccurate data would in turn result in funding allocations that would disadvantage San Jose and its residents. The data from the 2020 Census would be used not only to allocate congressional seats but also to determine funding for public health, education, transportation and neighborhood improvements, all of which are determined based on the population as determined by the Census. An increase in the undercount of persons living in San Jose, and specifically an increased undercount of minority populations, would lead to San Jose and its residents suffering harm through both lost representation in the United States House of Representatives and millions of dollars of foregone federal funding. BAJI claimed it would also be harmed due to the diversion of essential and limited resources—including time and money—from other important matters that it ordinarily would have been addressing through dialogues, presentations, workshops, publications, technical assistance and trainings to build alliances between African American and immigrant communities, in order to educate its diverse constituents regarding issues related to the census citizenship questions. Like the residents in San Jose, the minority and immigrant communities BAJI serves would also be deterred from responding to the 2020 Census because of the citizenship question.

The complaint was filed in the US District Court of California (Northern District – San Jose Division). The case was originally assigned to Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd, but San Jose did not consent to a US Magistrate Judge’s jurisdiction, and the case was randomly reassigned to U.S. District Judge Lucy H. Koh. On May 22, 2018, Judge Richard Seeborg signed an order relating this case to an earlier case assigned to him. In that case, State of California v Ross, the plaintiffs also claimed that the inclusion of a citizenship question operated by design to depress an accurate count of certain immigrant communities residing in the United States, in violation of the Constitution and the APA. Thus, San Jose v. Ross was reassigned to Judge Seeborg for all further proceedings.

The defendants moved to dismiss all claims asserted against them on June 21, but the judge rejected the motion, finding that the plaintiffs had standing to challenge the decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 Census and that the plaintiffs had properly stated claims for relief under both the Enumeration Clause of the Constitution and the APA. On November 2, 2018, the plaintiffs filed a motion for partial summary judgment, and the defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. The court found that there was a material dispute of fact regarding whether, and to what extent, the addition of the citizenship question would impact the final enumeration of the public. The judge also concluded that there were material disputes regarding whether Secretary Ross failed to “consider an important aspect of the problem” before making his decision. The judge accordingly denied both parties’ motions for summary judgment on December 14, 2018. 362 F.Supp.3d 749.

After the case survived summary judgment, the parties prepared for trial. The bench trial began on January 7, 2019. On February 15, 2019, the same day as closing arguments, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in a related case regarding the census, State of New York v. Department of Commerce. The defendants recommended the court defer its ruling until the Supreme Court had finished its proceedings. The plaintiffs opposed staying the case, and the court agreed.

On March 6, 2019, the court held that the decision to add a citizenship question violated the Administrative Procedure Act and the Enumeration Clause. 358 F.Supp.3d 965. The court held that the decision to include the citizenship question was arbitrary and capricious, was an abuse of discretion, and was not otherwise in accordance with the law. Notwithstanding the discretion given to the Secretary, the court found that the addition of the citizenship question would result in an undercount. Accordingly, on March 13, 2019, Judge Seeborg issued an order entering judgment for the plaintiffs on their APA claims, vacating Secretary Ross's decision to include the citizenship question on the 2020 Census, and permanently enjoining the defendants from including the citizenship question on the 2020 Census. On the same day, the defendants appealed to the Ninth Circuit. The case was docketed as No. 19-15457.

On March 18, 2019, the defendants filed a petition for writ of certiorari before judgment in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Department of Commerce v. New York, and affirmed the district court’s judgment that the decision to add a citizenship question violates the APA. Following its decision, the Supreme Court granted the defendants’ petition for writ of certiorari, docket No. 18-1214. The judgment was vacated and the case was remanded to the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Department of Commerce v. New York. The Ninth Circuit subsequent remanded the action the district court.

The plaintiffs filed an unopposed motion to enter final judgment on July 30, 2019. On August 1, 2019, Judge Seeborg granted the motion, vacated the prior judgment, and entered final judgment in favor of the plaintiffs on the APA claims and the defendants on the claims under the Enumeration Clause. The defendants were permanently enjoined from including a citizenship question or asking about citizenship on the 2020 census. The court was to retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the order until the 2020 Census results are processed and sent to the President by December 31, 2020. Since that date has passed, the case is closed.

Summary Authors

Esther Vinarov (2/9/2019)

Caitlin Kierum (11/23/2019)

Clearinghouse (6/24/2021)

State of New York v. U.S. Department of Commerce, Southern District of New York (2018)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6703080/parties/city-of-san-jose-v-ross/

Judge(s)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Cardona, Mario (California)

Case, Andrew Claude (California)

Attorney for Defendant

Bates, Christopher A. (California)

Edney, Marsha S. (California)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Delery, Stuart F. (California)

Judge(s)

Seeborg, Richard G. (California)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Cardona, Mario (California)

Case, Andrew Claude (California)

Frimann, Nora Valerie (California)

Greenbaum, Jon (California)

Guardado, Ana G. (California)

Libby, John Frederick (California)

McGuinness, John W. (California)

Perez, Salvador E (California)

Petrossian, Emil (California)

Rosenbaum, Mark Dale (California)

Rosenberg, Ezra D (California)

Showole, Olufunmilayo O (California)

Spence, Dorian Lawrence (California)

Attorney for Defendant

Bates, Christopher A. (California)

Edney, Marsha S. (California)

Ehrlich, Stephen (California)

Federighi, Carol (California)

Girdharry, Glenn M. (California)

Kisor, Colin A. (California)

Lucas, Gerald Brinton (California)

Morrell, David Michael (California)

Reimer, Christopher Robert Bachner (California)

Schiffer, Daniel A. (California)

Shumate, Brett A. (California)

Talmor, Kate (California)

Tomlinson, Martin (California)

Wells, Carlotta Porter (California)

Other

Delery, Stuart F. (California)

Kleinbrodt, Julian Wolfe (California)

Mugmon, Michael A. (California)

Southwell, Alexander H. (California)

Weir, Bryan Kipp (California)

Wydra, Elizabeth B. (California)

Attorney Contact Information via CourtListener

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

3:18-cv-02279	Docket	Nov. 18, 2019	Nov. 18, 2019 Docket
1 3:18-cv-02279	Complaint	April 17, 2018	April 17, 2018 Complaint
33 3:18-cv-02279	Related Case Order	May 22, 2018	May 22, 2018 Order/Opinion
86 3:18-cv-02279	Order Denying Motions to Dismiss	Aug. 17, 2018	Aug. 17, 2018 Order/Opinion
119 3:18-cv-02279	Order Denying Motions for Summary Judgment and for Partial Summary Judgment	Dec. 14, 2018	Dec. 14, 2018 Order/Opinion 362 F.Supp.3d 749
196 3:18-cv-02279	Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law	March 6, 2019	March 6, 2019 Order/Opinion 358 F.Supp.3d 965
197 3:18-cv-02279	Final Judgment, Order of Vacatur, and Permanent Injunction	March 13, 2019	March 13, 2019 Order/Opinion
14 3:18-cv-02279 19-15457	Petition for Writ of Certiorari U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit	March 14, 2019	March 14, 2019 Pleading / Motion / Brief
18-01214	Appendix	March 18, 2019	March 18, 2019
18-01214	Petition	March 18, 2019	March 18, 2019

show / hide documents

Resources

Resources related to this case
Title	Description		External URL Date / External URL
2020 Census Litigation	Every ten years, the U.S. Census Bureau conducts a count — the census — of all the people living in the country. The U.S. Constitution requires the government to count every adult and child, cit…	2020	https://www.brennancenter.org/...

show / hide resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6703080/city-of-san-jose-v-ross/

Last updated Aug. 23, 2026, 4:34 a.m.

Docket for: City Of San Jose v. Ross

ECF Number	Date	Description	Link
1	April 17, 2018	COMPLAINT against Ron Jarmin, Wilbur L. Ross, United States Census Bureau, United States Department of Commerce ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12276478.). Filed byCity Of San Jose, Black Alliance For Just Immigration. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Guardado, Ana) (Filed on 4/17/2018) (Entered: 04/17/2018) 1 Exhibit 1 View on PACER 2 Exhibit 2 View on PACER 3 Exhibit 3 View on PACER 4 Exhibit 4 View on PACER 5 Civil Cover Sheet View on RECAP	Clearinghouse
2	April 17, 2018	Certificate of Interested Entities by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City Of San Jose (Guardado, Ana) (Filed on 4/17/2018) (Entered: 04/17/2018)	RECAP
3	April 17, 2018	NOTICE of Appearance by Jon Greenbaum on behalf of plaintiffs (Greenbaum, Jon) (Filed on 4/17/2018) (Entered: 04/17/2018)	RECAP
4	April 17, 2018	Proposed Summons. (Guardado, Ana) (Filed on 4/17/2018) (Entered: 04/17/2018)	RECAP
5	April 17, 2018	Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/1/2018. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2018) (Entered: 04/17/2018)	RECAP
6	April 17, 2018	NOTICE of Appearance by John Frederick Libby on behalf of plaintiffs (Libby, John) (Filed on 4/17/2018) (Entered: 04/17/2018)	RECAP
7	April 17, 2018	NOTICE of Appearance by John William McGuinness on behalf of plaintiffs (McGuinness, John) (Filed on 4/17/2018) (Entered: 04/17/2018)	RECAP
8	April 17, 2018	Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 7/10/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/17/2018 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor before Magistrate Judge Howard R Lloyd. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2018) (Entered: 04/18/2018)	RECAP
	April 17, 2018	~Util - Case Assigned by Intake
9	April 18, 2018	Summons Issued as to Wilbur L. Ross, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2018) (Entered: 04/18/2018)	RECAP
10	April 18, 2018	Summons Issued as to United States Department of Commerce, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2018) (Entered: 04/18/2018)	RECAP
11	April 18, 2018	Summons Issued as to Ron Jarmin, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2018) (Entered: 04/18/2018)	RECAP
12	April 18, 2018	Summons Issued as to United States Census Bureau, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2018) (Entered: 04/18/2018)	RECAP
13	April 20, 2018	NOTICE of Appearance by Emil Petrossian on behalf of plaintiffs (Petrossian, Emil) (Filed on 4/20/2018) (Entered: 04/20/2018)	RECAP
14	April 25, 2018	*INCORRECT EVENT SELECTED WHEN POSTING DOCUMENT* CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by City Of San Jose re 1 Complaint, Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Commerce (Guardado, Ana) (Filed on 4/25/2018) Modified text on 4/26/2018 (dhmS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/25/2018)	Clearinghouse
15	April 25, 2018	*INCORRECT EVENT SELECTED WHEN POSTING DOCUMENT* CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by City Of San Jose re 1 Complaint, Ron Jarmin, in his Official Capacity as Acting Director of The U.S. Census Bureau (Guardado, Ana) (Filed on 4/25/2018) Modified text on 4/26/2018 (dhmS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/25/2018)	RECAP
16	April 25, 2018	*INCORRECT EVENT SELECTED WHEN POSTING DOCUMENT* CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by City Of San Jose re 1 Complaint, U.S. Census Bureau (Guardado, Ana) (Filed on 4/25/2018) Modified text on 4/26/2018 (dhmS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/25/2018)	RECAP
17	April 25, 2018	*INCORRECT EVENT SELECTED WHEN POSTING DOCUMENT* CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by City Of San Jose re 1 Complaint, U.S. Department of Commerce (Guardado, Ana) (Filed on 4/25/2018) Modified text on 4/26/2018 (dhmS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/25/2018)	RECAP
18	April 26, 2018	SUMMONS Returned Executed by City Of San Jose. Wilbur L. Ross served on 4/18/2018, answer due 5/9/2018. Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Commerce (Guardado, Ana) (Filed on 4/26/2018) (Entered: 04/26/2018)	RECAP
19	April 26, 2018	SUMMONS Returned Executed by City Of San Jose. United States Department of Commerce served on 4/18/2018, answer due 5/9/2018. U.S. Department of Commerce (Guardado, Ana) (Filed on 4/26/2018) (Entered: 04/26/2018)	RECAP
20	April 26, 2018	SUMMONS Returned Executed by City Of San Jose. Ron Jarmin served on 4/18/2018, answer due 5/9/2018. Ron Jarmin in His Official Capacity as Acting Director of the U.S. Census Bureau (Guardado, Ana) (Filed on 4/26/2018) (Entered: 04/26/2018)	RECAP
21	April 26, 2018	SUMMONS Returned Executed by City Of San Jose. United States Census Bureau served on 4/18/2018, answer due 5/9/2018. U.S. Census Bureau (Guardado, Ana) (Filed on 4/26/2018) (Entered: 04/26/2018)	RECAP
22	April 26, 2018	First MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-12305435.) filed by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City Of San Jose. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Rosenberg, Ezra) (Filed on 4/26/2018) (Entered: 04/26/2018) 1 Exhibit View on RECAP	RECAP
	April 26, 2018	Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101]Please re-file in its entirety using correct event Summons Returned Executed. Re: 14 Certificate of Service filed by City Of San Jose, 16 Certificate of Service filed by City Of San Jose, 15 Certificate of Service filed by City Of San Jose, 17 Certificate of Service filed by City Of San Jose (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2018)
	April 26, 2018	Electronic Filing Error
23	April 27, 2018	Order granting 22 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 4/27/2018. (hrllc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2018) (Entered: 04/27/2018)	RECAP
24	April 30, 2018	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-12311932.) filed by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City Of San Jose. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment)(Spence, Dorian) (Filed on 4/30/2018) (Entered: 04/30/2018) 1 Attachment View on PACER	RECAP
25	April 30, 2018	Application for Refund, Receipt Number 0971-12311786 by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City Of San Jose. (Spence, Dorian) (Filed on 4/30/2018) (Entered: 04/30/2018)	RECAP
26	April 30, 2018	CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by City Of San Jose.. (Libby, John) (Filed on 4/30/2018) (Entered: 04/30/2018)	RECAP
27	April 30, 2018	CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (pmc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2018) (Entered: 04/30/2018)	RECAP
28	May 1, 2018	ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Lucy H. Koh and Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd remains as the referral judge for all further proceedings. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Judge Executive Committee on 5/1/18. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(cfeS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2018) (Entered: 05/01/2018) 1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording View on PACER	RECAP
29	May 1, 2018	CLERK'S NOTICE FOLLOWING CASE REASSIGNMENT TO THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH Following the case reassignment to Hon. Lucy H. Koh, an Initial Case Management Conference is set for 7/25/2018 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 8, 4th floor, in San Jose, California. A Joint Case Management Conference Statement is due 7-days before the scheduled conference date. See Civil L.R. 16-9 and Civil L.R. 16-10(a). The Court does not issue a revised Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines. The parties shall familiarize themselves with the Scheduling Notes and Standing Orders for the Hon. Lucy H. Koh: http://cand.uscourts.gov/lhk. (This is a text only docket entry, there is no document associated with this notice.) (iym, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2018) (Entered: 05/01/2018)	RECAP
30	May 3, 2018	NOTICE of Appearance by Carol Federighi for Defendants (Federighi, Carol) (Filed on 5/3/2018) (Entered: 05/03/2018)	RECAP
31	May 3, 2018	NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen Ehrlich (Ehrlich, Stephen) (Filed on 5/3/2018) (Entered: 05/03/2018)	RECAP
32	May 15, 2018	CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City Of San Jose Re Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related in Case No. 3:18-cv-01865 (Guardado, Ana) (Filed on 5/15/2018) (Entered: 05/15/2018)	RECAP
33	May 22, 2018	ORDER RELATING CASE(S): C-18-1865 RS and C-18-2279 HRL.. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/22/2018. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2018) (Entered: 05/22/2018)	Clearinghouse
34	May 22, 2018	ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Richard Seeborg for all further proceedings. pursuant to Order Relating Cases. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Judge Lucy H. Koh no longer assigned to the case. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2018) (Entered: 05/22/2018) 1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording View on PACER	RECAP
35	May 23, 2018	CLERK'S NOTICE RE: REASSIGNED CASE: You are notified that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Richard Seeborg upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Seeborg's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. Parties or counsel may appear personally at 10:00 a.m. or file a request to appear by telephone at 11:00 a.m. If any party files such a request to appear by telephone, the Case Management Conference shall be moved to 11:00 a.m. to be held telephonically. All parties shall appear telephonically and must contact Court Conference at 866/582-6878 at least one week prior to the Conference.Joint Case Management Statement due by 6/21/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/28/2018 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 03, 17th Floor.. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2018) (Entered: 05/23/2018)	RECAP
36	May 24, 2018	ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 24 Motion for Pro Hac Vice for attorney Dorian Lawrence Spence.(tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2018) (Entered: 05/24/2018)	RECAP
37	June 8, 2018	NOTICE of Appearance by Salvador E Perez on behalf of plaintiffs (Perez, Salvador) (Filed on 6/8/2018) (Entered: 06/08/2018)	RECAP
38	June 8, 2018	NOTICE by Ron Jarmin, Wilbur L. Ross, United States Census Bureau, United States Department of Commerce of Filing Administrative Record (Attachments: # 1 Certification of Administrative Record, # 2 Administrative Record Index, # 3 Administrative Record Part I, # 4 Administrative Record Part II, # 5 Administrative Record Part III)(Ehrlich, Stephen) (Filed on 6/8/2018) (Entered: 06/08/2018) 1 Certification of Administrative Record View on PACER 2 Administrative Record Index View on PACER 3 Administrative Record Part I View on PACER 4 Administrative Record Part II View on PACER 5 Administrative Record Part III View on PACER	RECAP
39	June 11, 2018	CLERK'S NOTICE CHANGING THE TIME ON INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Initial Case Management Conference previously set 10:00 am has been continued to 02:30 PM on 6/28/2018 in San Francisco, Courtroom 03, 17th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2018) (Entered: 06/11/2018)	RECAP
40	June 11, 2018	ADR Clerk's Notice re: Non-Compliance with Court Order (ewh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2018) (Entered: 06/11/2018)	RECAP
41	June 11, 2018	NOTICE of Appearance by Olufunmilayo O Showole (Showole, Olufunmilayo) (Filed on 6/11/2018) (Entered: 06/11/2018)	RECAP
42	June 11, 2018	STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER -- Joint Request for Relief from Automatic Referral to ADR Multi-Option Program filed by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City Of San Jose. (Showole, Olufunmilayo) (Filed on 6/11/2018) (Entered: 06/11/2018)	RECAP
43	June 11, 2018	STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER -- Stipulation for Hearing and Briefing Deadlines Re: Discovery Outside the Administrative Record filed by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City Of San Jose. (Showole, Olufunmilayo) (Filed on 6/11/2018) (Entered: 06/11/2018)	RECAP
44	June 11, 2018	ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Federighi, Carol) (Filed on 6/11/2018) (Entered: 06/11/2018)	RECAP
45	June 12, 2018	ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Showole, Olufunmilayo) (Filed on 6/12/2018) (Entered: 06/12/2018)	RECAP
46	June 12, 2018	ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 42 Stipulation. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2018) (Entered: 06/12/2018)	RECAP
47	June 12, 2018	ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 43 Stipulation for hearing and briefing deadlines re: discovery outside the administrative record. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2018) (Entered: 06/12/2018)	RECAP
48	June 14, 2018	MOTION to Expand Discovery Beyond the Administrative Record filed by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City Of San Jose. Responses due by 6/21/2018. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of John F. Libby in Support of Motion, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G)(Libby, John) (Filed on 6/14/2018) (Entered: 06/14/2018) 1 Declaration of John F. Libby in Support of Motion View on PACER 2 Exhibit A View on PACER 3 Exhibit B View on PACER 4 Exhibit C View on PACER 5 Exhibit D View on PACER 6 Exhibit E View on PACER 7 Exhibit F View on PACER 8 Exhibit G View on PACER	RECAP
49	June 14, 2018	Brief in Support of Review on the Administrative Record filed byRon Jarmin, Wilbur L. Ross, United States Census Bureau, United States Department of Commerce. (Ehrlich, Stephen) (Filed on 6/14/2018) (Entered: 06/14/2018)	RECAP
50	June 18, 2018	STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Briefing Schedule and Excess Pages filed by Ron Jarmin, Wilbur L. Ross, United States Census Bureau, United States Department of Commerce. (Bailey, Kate) (Filed on 6/18/2018) (Entered: 06/18/2018)	RECAP
51	June 18, 2018	ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 50 briefing schedule and excess pages for defendants' motion to dismiss. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2018) (Entered: 06/19/2018)	RECAP
52	June 21, 2018	NOTICE by Ron Jarmin, Wilbur L. Ross, United States Census Bureau, United States Department of Commerce of Filing Supplement to Administrative Record (Attachments: # 1 Supplement)(Ehrlich, Stephen) (Filed on 6/21/2018) (Entered: 06/21/2018) 1 Supplement View on PACER	RECAP
53	June 21, 2018	RESPONSE to re 49 Brief -- Opposition to Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Review on the Administrative Record by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City Of San Jose. (Libby, John) (Filed on 6/21/2018) (Entered: 06/21/2018)	RECAP
54	June 21, 2018	REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting -- Joint Rule 26(f) Report and Initial Case Management Conference Statement. (Libby, John) (Filed on 6/21/2018) (Entered: 06/21/2018)	RECAP
55	June 21, 2018	MOTION to Dismiss filed by Ron Jarmin, Wilbur L. Ross, United States Census Bureau, United States Department of Commerce. Responses due by 7/17/2018. Replies due by 7/26/2018. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ehrlich, Stephen) (Filed on 6/21/2018) (Entered: 06/21/2018) 1 Proposed Order View on PACER	RECAP
56	June 21, 2018	Brief in Further Support of Review on the Administrative Record filed byRon Jarmin, Wilbur L. Ross, United States Census Bureau, United States Department of Commerce. (Bailey, Kate) (Filed on 6/21/2018) (Entered: 06/21/2018)	RECAP
57	June 26, 2018	NOTICE by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City Of San Jose re 52 Notice (Other) (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of John Libby in Support of Notice, # 2 Exhibit A)(Libby, John) (Filed on 6/26/2018) (Entered: 06/26/2018) 1 Declaration of John Libby in Support of Notice View on PACER 2 Exhibit A View on PACER	RECAP
58	June 27, 2018	STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3.d filed byBlack Alliance For Just Immigration, City Of San Jose. (Attachments: # 1 Order in Sierra Club v. Zinke No. 17-cv-07187-WHO)(Libby, John) (Filed on 6/27/2018) (Entered: 06/27/2018) 1 Order in Sierra Club v. Zinke No. 17-cv-07187-WHO View on PACER	RECAP
59	June 28, 2018	TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on 6/28/2018 before Judge Richard Seeborg by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City Of San Jose, for Court Reporter Lydia Zinn. (Guardado, Ana) (Filed on 6/28/2018) (Entered: 06/28/2018)	RECAP
60	June 28, 2018	Transcript of Proceedings held on 6/28/2018, before Judge Richard Seeborg. Court Reporter/Transcriber Lydia Zinn, telephone number (415) 531-6587. Per General Order No. 59 and Judicial Conference policy, this transcript may be viewed only at the Clerk's Office public terminal or may be purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber until the deadline for the Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Any Notice of Intent to Request Redaction, if required, is due no later than 5 business days from date of this filing. (Re (59 in 3:18-cv-02279-RS) Transcript Order ) Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/30/2018. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/26/2018. (zinnlr62S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2018) (Entered: 06/28/2018)	RECAP
61	June 28, 2018	Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Richard Seeborg: Status Conference held on 6/28/2018. Parties shall meet and confer regarding proposed scheduling issues and specific suggestions as to the scope of discovery by 8/10/2018. Motion Hearing set for 8/10/2018 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 03, 17th Floor before Judge Richard Seeborg.Total Time in Court: 1 hour 13 minutes. Court Reporter: Lydia Zinn. Plaintiff Attorney: Gabrielle Boutin, R. Matthew Wise, Mark Beckington for State of California; Emil Petrossian, Ezra Rosenberg, John F. Libby for City of San Jose; Maria Bee for City of Oakland. Defendant Attorney: Kate Bailey, Carol Federighi. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cl, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 6/28/2018) Modified on 6/29/2018 (tlhS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 06/29/2018)	RECAP
62	July 2, 2018	NOTICE of Appearance by Bryan Kipp Weir (Weir, Bryan) (Filed on 7/2/2018) (Entered: 07/02/2018)	RECAP
63	July 2, 2018	MOTION for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae filed by Project on Fair Representation. (Attachments: # 1 Brief Amicus Curiae, # 2 Proposed Order)(Weir, Bryan) (Filed on 7/2/2018) (Entered: 07/02/2018) 1 Brief Amicus Curiae View on PACER 2 Proposed Order View on PACER	RECAP
64	July 3, 2018	ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting (43) Motion for Leave to File in case 3:18-cv-01865-RS; granting (63) Motion for Leave to File in case 3:18-cv-02279-RS. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2018) (Entered: 07/03/2018)	RECAP
65	July 5, 2018	TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on 6/28/2018 before Judge Richard Seeborg for Court Reporter Lydia Zinn. (rjdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2018) (Entered: 07/05/2018)	RECAP
66	July 10, 2018	NOTICE by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City Of San Jose // Notice of Ruling (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Showole, Olufunmilayo) (Filed on 7/10/2018) (Entered: 07/10/2018) 1 Exhibit 1 View on PACER	RECAP
67	July 16, 2018	NOTICE of Appearance by Ana G. Guardado (Guardado, Ana) (Filed on 7/16/2018) (Entered: 07/16/2018)	RECAP
68	July 17, 2018	OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re 55 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed byBlack Alliance For Just Immigration, City Of San Jose. (Libby, John) (Filed on 7/17/2018) (Entered: 07/17/2018)	RECAP
69	July 19, 2018	ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting (54) Motion for Leave to File.(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2018) (Entered: 07/19/2018)	RECAP
70	July 19, 2018	MOTION for Leave to File Amici Curie Brief of Current Members of Congress and Bipartisan Former Members of Congress filed by Brian Schatz, Michael F. Bennet, Richard Blumenthal, Cory A. Booker, Ben Cardin, Tammy Duckworth, Richard Durbin, Kamala D. Harris, Mazie Hirono, Bill Nelson, Ron Wyden, Carolyn Maloney, Nanette Diaz Barragan, Howard Berman, Donald S. Beyer, Jr, Earl Blumenauer, Anthony G. Brown, Michael Capuano, Salud O. Carbajal, Tony Cardenas, Andre Carson, Judy Chu, David N. Cicilline, Yvette D. Clarke, Wm. Lacy Clay, Emanuel Cleaver, II, James Clyburn, Steve Cohen, Gerrold Connolly, Luis Correa, Joe Courtney, Joe Crowley, Henry Cuellar, Elijah E. Cummings, Danny K. Davis, Diana DeGette, John K. Delaney, Rosa L. DeLauro, Mark DeSaulnier, Ted Deutch, Debbie Dingell, Keith Ellison, Eliot L. Engel, Adriano Espaillat, Elizabeth Esty, Bill Foster, Lois Frankel, Marcia L. Fudge, Ruben Gallego, Jimmy Gomez, Gene Green, Raul M. Grijalva, Luis Gutierrez, Colleen Hanabusa, Alcee L. Hastings, Steny Hoyer, Sheila Jackson Lee, Pramila Jayapal, Hakeem Jeffries, Henry C. "Hank" Johnson, Jr, Ro Khanna, Ruben J. Kihuen, Daniel T. Kildee, John B. Larson, Brenda L. Lawrence, Barbara Lee, John Lewis, Zoe Lofgren, Alan Lowenthal, Nita Lowey, Michelle Lujan Grisham, Stephen F. Lynch, Doris Matsui, Betty McCollum, A. Donald McEachin, James P. McGovern, Jerry McNerney, Gregory W. Meeks, Grace Meng, Gwen Moore, Constance Morella, Jerrold Nadler, Grace F. Napolitano, Rick Nolan, Donald Norcross, Eleanor Holmes Norton, Frank Pallone, Jr, Jimmy Panetta, Bill Pascrell, Jr, Nancy Pelosi, Ed Perlmutter, Chellie Pingree, Mark Pocan, Jared Polis, John Porter, David E. Price, Mike Quigley, Jamie Raskin, Kathleen M. Rice, Jacky Rosen, Lucille Roybal-Allard, Bobby L. Rush, Linda T. Sanchez, John Sarbanes, Janice D. Schakowsky, Claudine Schneider, Jose Serrano, Brad Sherman, Albio Sires, David Skaggs, Adam Smith, Peter Smith, Darren Soto, Jackie Speier, Mark Takano, Bennie G. Thompson, Mike Thompson, Dina Titus, Norma J. Torres, Juan Vargas, Filemon Vela, Nydia M. Velazquez, Tim Walz, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Bonnie Watson Coleman, Henry A. Waxman, Peter Welch, John Yarmuth. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Proposed Amici Curiae Brief, # 2 Proposed Order)(Wydra, Elizabeth) (Filed on 7/19/2018) (Entered: 07/19/2018) 1 Appendix Proposed Amici Curiae Brief View on PACER 2 Proposed Order View on PACER	RECAP
71	July 19, 2018	ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 70 Motion for Leave to File. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2018) (Entered: 07/19/2018)	RECAP
72	July 24, 2018	NOTICE of Appearance by Michael A Mugmon (Mugmon, Michael) (Filed on 7/24/2018) (Entered: 07/24/2018)	RECAP
73	July 24, 2018	MOTION for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief filed by Muslim Advocates, NALEO Educational Fund, National Coalition on Black Civic Participation, The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law, The Leadership Conference Education Fund, The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. (Attachments: # 1 Amicus Brief, # 2 Proposed Order)(Mugmon, Michael) (Filed on 7/24/2018) (Entered: 07/24/2018) 1 Amicus Brief View on PACER 2 Proposed Order View on PACER	RECAP
74	July 25, 2018	Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 55 MOTION to Dismiss, 56 Brief filed by Ron Jarmin, Wilbur L. Ross, United States Census Bureau, United States Department of Commerce. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Bailey Declaration in Support of Unopposed Motion)(Bailey, Kate) (Filed on 7/25/2018) (Entered: 07/25/2018) 1 Declaration Bailey Declaration in Support of Unopposed Motion View on PACER	RECAP
75	July 25, 2018	ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting (61) Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply in case 3:18-cv-01865-RS; granting (74) Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply in case 3:18-cv-02279-RS. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2018) (Entered: 07/25/2018)	RECAP
76	July 27, 2018	ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 73 Motion for Leave to File. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2018) (Entered: 07/27/2018)	RECAP
77	July 31, 2018	REPLY (re 55 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed byRon Jarmin, Wilbur L. Ross, United States Census Bureau, United States Department of Commerce. (Bailey, Kate) (Filed on 7/31/2018) (Entered: 07/31/2018)	RECAP
78	Aug. 6, 2018	ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Brief (Civ. L.R. 7-11) re 48 MOTION to Expand Discovery Beyond the Administrative Record filed by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City Of San Jose. Responses due by 8/9/2018. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Proposed Order)(Libby, John) (Filed on 8/6/2018) (Entered: 08/06/2018) 1 Exhibit A View on PACER 2 Proposed Order View on PACER	RECAP
79	Aug. 8, 2018	STATUS REPORT -- Joint Report on Coordination of Discovery by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City Of San Jose. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Libby, John) (Filed on 8/8/2018) (Entered: 08/08/2018) 1 Exhibit A View on PACER 2 Exhibit B View on PACER	RECAP
80	Aug. 10, 2018	Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Richard Seeborg: Motion Hearing held on 8/10/2018. Bench Trial set for 1/7/2019 at 09:00 AM before Judge Richard Seeborg. Motion Hearing set for 12/7/2018 at 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 03, 17th Floor before Judge Richard Seeborg. Parties shall submit proposed scheduling order. Motions taken under submission; Court to issue an order.Total Time in Court: 2 hours 30 minutes.Court Reporter: Jo Ann Bryce.Plaintiff Attorney: State of California - R. Matthew Wise, David Holtzman, Gabrielle Boutin, Malia McPherson, Charles Coleman, Harvey Levine, Intervenor - Sue Ann Salmon Evans City of San Jose - Ezra Rosenberg, Ana Guardado, Emil Petrossian.Defendant Attorney: Kate Bailey, M. Andrew Zee. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cl, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 8/10/2018) (Entered: 08/10/2018)	RECAP
81	Aug. 10, 2018	MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-12586100.) filed by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City Of San Jose. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Case, Andrew) (Filed on 8/10/2018) (Entered: 08/10/2018) 1 Certificate of Good Standing View on RECAP	RECAP
82	Aug. 10, 2018	TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on August 10, 2018 before Judge Richard Seeborg by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City Of San Jose, for Court Reporter Jo Ann Bryce. (Guardado, Ana) (Filed on 8/10/2018) (Entered: 08/10/2018)	RECAP
83	Aug. 10, 2018	ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 81 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Andrew Case. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2018) (Entered: 08/10/2018)	RECAP
84	Aug. 11, 2018	Transcript of Proceedings held on 8/10/18, before Judge Richard Seeborg. Court Reporter Jo Ann Bryce, telephone number 510-910-5888, email: joann_bryce@cand.uscourts.gov. Per General Order No. 59 and Judicial Conference policy, this transcript may be viewed only at the Clerk's Office public terminal or may be purchased through the Court Reporter until the deadline for the Release of Transcript Restriction after 90 days. After that date, it may be obtained through PACER. Any Notice of Intent to Request Redaction, if required, is due no later than 5 business days from date of this filing. (Re (82 in 3:18-cv-02279-RS) Transcript Order ) Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/9/2018. (jabS, COURTSTAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2018) (Entered: 08/11/2018)	RECAP
85	Aug. 13, 2018	TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on 8/10/2018 before Judge Richard Seeborg for Court Reporter Jo Ann Bryce. (rjdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2018) (Entered: 08/13/2018)	RECAP
86	Aug. 17, 2018	ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg denying (37) Motion to Dismiss in case 3:18-cv-01865-RS; denying (55) Motion to Dismiss in case 3:18-cv-02279-RS. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2018) (Entered: 08/17/2018)	Clearinghouse
87	Aug. 17, 2018	ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY OUTSIDE THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/17/18. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2018) (Entered: 08/17/2018)	RECAP
88	Aug. 29, 2018	STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER -- Stipulation to Case Schedule filed by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City Of San Jose. (Libby, John) (Filed on 8/29/2018) (Entered: 08/29/2018)	RECAP
89	Aug. 30, 2018	STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 88 TO CASE SCHEDULE AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT. Bench Trial set for 1/7/2019 at 09:00 AM before Judge Richard Seeborg. Pretrial Conference set for 1/2/2019 at 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 03, 17th Floor before Judge Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/30/18. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2018) (Entered: 08/30/2018)	RECAP
90	Aug. 31, 2018	ANSWER to Complaint byRon Jarmin, Wilbur L. Ross, United States Census Bureau, United States Department of Commerce. (Federighi, Carol) (Filed on 8/31/2018) (Entered: 08/31/2018)	RECAP
91	Sept. 4, 2018	Joint ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION For Entry of FRE 502(d) Order filed by Ron Jarmin, Wilbur L. Ross, United States Census Bureau, United States Department of Commerce. Responses due by 9/10/2018. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed FRE 502(d) Order)(Federighi, Carol) (Filed on 9/4/2018) (Entered: 09/04/2018) 1 Proposed Order Proposed FRE 502(d) Order View on PACER	RECAP
92	Sept. 6, 2018	ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 91 Administrative Motion. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2018) (Entered: 09/06/2018)	RECAP
93	Oct. 9, 2018	STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER -- Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Deadline To Complete Discovery filed by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City Of San Jose. (Case, Andrew) (Filed on 10/9/2018) (Entered: 10/09/2018)	RECAP
94	Oct. 9, 2018	ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 93 Stipulation extending deadline to complete discovery. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2018) (Entered: 10/09/2018)	RECAP
95	Oct. 10, 2018	NOTICE by Ron Jarmin, Wilbur L. Ross, United States Census Bureau, United States Department of Commerce of Stay Issued by Supreme Court (Federighi, Carol) (Filed on 10/10/2018) (Entered: 10/10/2018)	RECAP
96	Oct. 11, 2018	NOTICE by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City Of San Jose re 95 Notice (Other) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3)(Case, Andrew) (Filed on 10/11/2018) (Entered: 10/11/2018) 1 Exhibit 1 View on PACER 2 Exhibit 2 View on PACER 3 Exhibit 3 View on PACER	RECAP
97	Nov. 1, 2018	STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Enlarge Page Limitations filed by Black Alliance For Just Immigration, City Of San Jose. (Case, Andrew) (Filed on 11/1/2018) (Entered: 11/01/2018)	RECAP

show / hide docket entries

Case Details

State / Territory:

California

Case Type(s):

Public Benefits/Government Services

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Trump Administration 1.0: Challenges to the Government

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 17, 2018

Closing Date: Dec. 31, 2020

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

City of San Jose and the Black Alliance for Just Immigration (BAJI), a California nonprofit corporation that educates and engages African Americans and Black immigrants to organize and advocate for equality and justice in laws and in their communities

Plaintiff Type(s):

City/County Plaintiff

Non-profit NON-religious organization

Attorney Organizations:

Lawyers Comm. for Civil Rights Under Law

Public Counsel

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Federal