Case: Zepeda Rivas v. Jennings

3:20-cv-02731 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: April 20, 2020

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

COVID-19 Summary: This is a class-action lawsuit brought on April 20, 2020, by seven individuals in immigration detention at the Mesa Verde Detention Facility (MVDF) and the Yuba County Jail (YCJ), seeking immediate release from unsafe conditions of the jail in light of the global coronavirus pandemic. The court granted the request for TRO on April 29, requiring ICE to provide information and access to detainees to facilitate a process of considering bail requests. On June 9, the court granted …

COVID-19 Summary: This is a class-action lawsuit brought on April 20, 2020, by seven individuals in immigration detention at the Mesa Verde Detention Facility (MVDF) and the Yuba County Jail (YCJ), seeking immediate release from unsafe conditions of the jail in light of the global coronavirus pandemic. The court granted the request for TRO on April 29, requiring ICE to provide information and access to detainees to facilitate a process of considering bail requests. On June 9, the court granted the motion for preliminary injunction and ordered the defendants to maintain the status quo while the case was pending. On August 5, the plaintiffs sought a TRO, claiming that the defendants' actions were insufficient and it was granted the next day. After the parties agreed to implement testing and other public safety protocols, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss and the plaintiffs responded with an amended class-action complaint. The court granted a second preliminary injunction on December 3, 2020, and a preliminary injunction related to a YCJ outbreak on January 6, 2021. The defendants appealed to the Ninth Circuit and the parties entered into mediation.

On April 20, 2020, seven noncitizens detained at the Mesa Verde Detention Facility (MVDF) and the Yuba County Jail (YCJ) filed this class-action lawsuit against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), seeking immediate release from what they said were unsafe jail conditions in light of the global coronavirus pandemic. Represented by the ACLU of Northern California and Southern California, the San Francisco Public Defender’s Office, Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights, and private attorneys, the plaintiffs brought this lawsuit as a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. under § 2241, and as a declaratory action under 42 U.S.C. § 2201-02. They alleged that their detention violated the Administrative Procedure Act, and their First and Fifth Amendment rights by subjecting them to a serious risk of contracting COVID-19. The plaintiffs sought a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief for the release of detainees in order to maintain a number of detainees for social distancing and prohibition against placing plaintiff class members into solitary confinement as a means of achieving social distancing, as well as attorney fees. The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and initially assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim, then reassigned to Judge Vince Chhabria. Concurrent with the complaint, plaintiffs sought class certification and a temporary restraining order to release a sufficient number of putative class members in order to allow for social distancing. The proposed class consisted of all civil immigration detainees at Mesa Verde and YCJ, with two subclasses: the “YCJ Subclass” and the “Mesa Verde Subclass.”

Plaintiffs were detainees in custody of ICE, many of whom with a high risk of COVID-19 due to underlying medical conditions. However, the conditions they faced during detention had become so dire that detainees at Mesa Verde organized a hunger strike to call attention to the lack of hygiene products, proper testing, and continued foot traffic in and out of the facility. In response to the hunger strike, GEO Group, the ICE contractor that ran the facility, threatened to revoke their access to purchases from the commissary. On April 25, the defendants moved to stay these proceedings in light of a separate case, Fraihat v. ICE (here in the Clearinghouse) in which a federal judge had just certified a nationwide class of immigration detainees challenging ICE’s overall response to the pandemic. In this case, the court denied the defendant’s motion to stay on April 29, and granted the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification and motion for a temporary restraining order, requiring ICE to provide information and access to detainees to facilitate a process of considering bail requests. 2020 WL 2059848.

On May 27, the defendants sought an order that would: 

  • Confirm the TRO had expired;
  • End the ongoing bail process;
  • Vacate all bail orders; and,
  • Deny the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction.

Two days later, the plaintiffs filed a brief opposing the expiration of the TRO. On June 9, the district court granted the motion for preliminary injunction. 2020 WL 3055449. The court found that although significant improvements had been made since the TRO, ICE had only made the safety improvements because it was ordered to do so. Therefore, the court found a preliminary injunction necessary to lock in place the safety improvements made. The defendants were ordered to maintain the status quo while the case was pending.

A status conference was held on June 19, and the court ordered the defendant to file a status report by June 22, regarding their planned response to the discovery that a member of the medical staff at Mesa Verde tested positive for COVID-19. ICE was ordered to respond to the plaintiff's discovery requests on an expedited basis by June 26. The defendant submitted status reports on June 22 and 25, reporting that the nurse is in self-isolation. Detainees who had exposure to the nurse tested negative. On June 29, the defendants reported that they would be implementing COVID-19 testing for all new arrivals on or about June 29 with a new Rapid RNA test that allowed for same-day results. They further reported that training for the medical staff and testing of the new equipment began the week of June 22. The same day, the defendants appealed to the Ninth Circuit and the Ninth Circuit ordered mediation on July 8.

On August 5, the plaintiffs moved for a TRO directing defendants to conduct rapid testing of all class members, clear a dorm to isolate all class members who tested positive for COVID-19, and to observe the limits on increased population in the remaining dorms as set out by the preliminary injunction order. The plaintiffs claimed that the defendants failed to take meaningful steps to halt an outbreak of COVID-19, and added more class members to MVDF than they released, increasing the density while the outbreak spread. They pointed out that the defendants also left symptomatic class members in their dorms to potentially infect other people, leading to more positive cases. In the motion, the plaintiffs alleged that "MVDF has failed to implement widespread testing of detainees and staff not because the facility lacks the resources to do so but precisely because MVDF has not developed a workable strategy for facilitating the isolation and cohorting that appropriately responding to many test results would require . . . In other words, widespread testing has not been done because Defendants fear they would not be able to handle the truths that it would reveal."

On August 6, the court granted the TRO, stating that "[t]he defendants, having responded to the health crisis in such a cavalier fashion (even in the face of litigation and a string of court orders), have lost the credibility to complain that the relief requested by the plaintiffs is too rigid or burdensome. The defendants have also lost the right to be trusted that they will accomplish on their own what the plaintiffs contend requires a court order to ensure." 2020 WL 4554646. The defendants were ordered to administer a COVID-19 test that returns rapid results to all detainees at the facility for each week at a minimum, maintain the current practice of not admitting new class members to the facility, maintain a dormitory to segregate detainees who test positive for COVID-19, and file daily reports about the status of the facility and the defendants’ efforts to manage COVID-19 risk. The plaintiffs’ request to impose a rigid cap of 35 detainees per dormitory was denied and the defendants were ordered to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue requiring the defendants to meet some or all of the above requirements on an ongoing basis pending final resolution of this case.

After the status conference held on August 11, the parties agreed that the defendants could exercise discretion regarding how frequently to re-test people who have already tested positive. The court ordered the defendants to provide more detailed information in their daily reports under threat of attorney sanction. GEO was ordered to submit a declaration explaining the current status of testing capacity and speed at Mesa Verde, and the defendants were ordered to enable class counsel to communicate with detainees who refused testing by both written communication to the Mesa Verde population as a whole, as well as real-time communication with the individual detainees who refused testing. The court also ordered that class members must agree to be tested prior to release, and that defendants are required to inform class counsel if any class member tests positive upon or after release. The parties were ordered to file briefs on the issue of whether it would be legally appropriate and practical for the court to issue an order requiring regular testing of all staff at Mesa Verde.

On August 14, the court ordered the defendants to administer point-of-care tests to everyone at Mesa Verde facility who had not already tested positive, and to file a submission answering the question of how it could be sufficient from a medical standpoint to check on people known to be infected with COVID only two times per day, considering the ongoing outbreak at the facility. The court denied the plaintiffs request to release everyone in the facility who had tested negative. The Court ordered that each staff member entering the facility be tested and that they be subsequently tested once a week until further notice. Staff members who declined testing were not allowed to enter the facility. The court further ordered the parties to file briefs discussing the appropriate level of care and monitoring necessary for a dorm full of people who have tested positive, the level of monitoring necessary to ensure that detainees are hospitalized promptly when needed, the assertion that people with COVID-19 are at greater risk of complications or death in the facility than if released, and who should pay for hospitalization and whether there are any financial disincentives to hospitalizing detainees. In the briefs, the plaintiffs criticized that the "[d]efendant's responses are not based on credible expert testimony[.]"

On August 21, the court ordered the defendants to create a written plan to improve their system of monitoring, caring for, and responding to medical assistance requests from detainees who had tested positive and who had health conditions that the CDC identified as creating an elevated risk of complications. During the course of the litigation, the court granted several bail requests, which the defendant appealed to the Ninth Circuit on August 31.

The defendants submitted a written plan based on CDC guidelines on August 31. They argued that no further court order was warranted and that the court should specify "in objective terms what the constitutional requirements are for treating COVID-19 patients" that was “narrowly tailored” to constitutional requirements. They argued that the plaintiffs' request of "acceptable standards” or otherwise to release additional detainees was too vague. On September 2, the plaintiffs objected to the defendants' written plan which they considered "outdated" and "incomplete" and merely defended its current practices and alleged that the defendants failed to meet and confer with them, contrary to the court's order. The defendants objected to this characterization of their written plan, and claimed that as of September 4, all of the detainees at Mesa Verde who tested positive for COVID-19 had recovered under the criteria set out by the CDC.

On September 21, the defendants submitted a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' complaint. They argued that the plaintiffs did not have a viable First Amendment retaliation claim, as a hunger strike is not a First Amendment protected conduct, and that their action in curbing such conduct had a legitimate goal in seeking to prevent civil detainees from harming themselves. The court continued to grant bail requests and requested briefing on the matter of likelihood of reinfection, finding that it was sufficiently unlikely to warrant heightened concern. Judge Chhabria denied the motion as moot on October 16, 2020, allowing the plaintiffs to file an amended complaint.

The plaintiffs filed their amended complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief and habeas petition on October 30 that requested certification for two subclasses, confined their claims for relief to the due process claims, and argued that it was defendants’ resistance to testing and quarantine led to the massive outbreak in Mesa Verde between June and August. On November 2, the defendants filed a response arguing why the court should not issue a preliminary injunction requiring them to meet the conditions of the temporary restraining order pending resolution of the case. The defendants stated that the situation at Mesa Verde had evolved since the initial issuance of the August 6 order, there had been no positive cases in 3 months and had created intake procedures to use if intakes into the facility were to be allowed; ultimately they argued that the conditions required by the temporary restraining order now went beyond what was necessary to address a constitutional harm.The plaintiffs responded to the defendants on November 10, arguing that the situation at Mesa Verde still required the court's oversight and that the defendants' factual assertions about compliance with CDC and ICE guidelines were misrepresentations.

On December 3, 2020, Judge Chhabria granted the plaintiffs' motion for a second preliminary injunction, citing to the inconsistencies and misrepresentations in the record of how the defendants were caring for the detainees in Mesa Verde, especially given the 15 staff members who had recently tested positive for COVID-19 after several months of no positive cases. Judge Chhabria ordered the defendants to:

  1. maintain the dorm reserved for positive-test detainees;
  2. perform pre-intake screening for COVID-19 symptoms including temperature and verbal checks, and reserve a dorm for quarantining new intakes for 14 days;
  3. limit each dorm's population sufficiently to allow for bunk beds to be spaced at least 6 feet apart;
  4. administer rapid-result testing to all detainees and staff, isolate detainees who test positive and ensure that staff do not work;
  5. isolate any symptomatic detainees and offer them a test;
  6. report positive tests to plaintiff's counsel immediately and file weekly status reports; and
  7. not transfer detainees out of Mesa Verde unless necessary for medical care, security, release/removal, or to prevent overcrowding.

The plaintiffs filed a motion for temporary restraining order on December 23, citing a new outbreak in YCJ, asking the court to step in and require protections for the class members detained in YCJ - including testing, isolation, prohibition of intakes and better hygiene supplies. The defendants filed their opposition, but Judge Chhabria granted the motion in part later that evening. The defendants were required to prevent new intakes into YCJ until the end of the outbreak (after there had been no new positive tests for 2 consecutive weeks), give rapid antigen tests to symptomatic class members and those who had been in close contact with a positive individual, individual isolation for symptomatic class members and isolate all individuals who test positive (either individually or with other positive detainees), clean and disinfect any cell or bunk prior to transfer, provide disposable masks to all class members daily, and provide daily updates to the court.

On January 6, 2021, Judge Chhabria converted the December 23 temporary restraining order to a preliminary injunction, requiring the defendants to continue the prescribed preventative measures for the duration of the outbreak in YCJ. On January 19, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the compliant, strike portions of the complaint, or transfer the matter to the Eastern District of California. On February 1, the federal defendants filed two appeals to the Ninth Circuit regarding the preliminary injunctions, which were later consolidated and sent to mediation (Case Nos. 21-15195 and 21-15197).

Back in the district court, the plaintiffs filed a status report noting the defendants' noncompliance with the January 6 preliminary injunction for YCJ. They cited the defendants' inability to provide accurate and timely information, lack of clean cells, and not following protocols for determining when to quarantine or isolate individuals. Additionally, they cited the Pekoske Memo, which was a newly released DHS document regarding immigration enforcement and COVID-19 protocols in detention. The plaintiffs requested further relief, which Judge Chhabria denied in part, only requiring the defendants to provide testing information for each class member at YCJ going back to December 11, 2020, and required the parties to meet further on the effect of the Pekoske memo to the case.

Judge Chhabria denied the defendant's motion to dismiss on February 23, 2021, stating that GEO qualified as state actors for the purpose of the constitutional claim and denied the motion to transfer as frivolous. Judge Chhabria also denied the plaintiffs' request for further relief related to the Pekoske memo on March 16. Following initial mediation related to the appeals, the parties requested a stay of discovery and future case management deadlines in the district court while they sought to resolve the case in mediation. Judge Chhabria granted the stay on March 18, 2021.

On March 27, the GEO defendants filed a motion to modify the December 3, 2020, preliminary injunction, requesting removal of the population cap in dorms that housed fully-vaccinated detainees and to eliminate weekly testing requirement for all fully vaccinated detainees and staff unless they were exposed to a positive individual or were symptomatic. On June 1, the GEO defendants further moved to modify the preliminary injunction to permit a total population of 300 detainees or less. The plaintiffs opposed this motion on June 3, arguing that the motion was not permissible since the parties had agreed to defer briefing and argument on the motion pending mediation at the appellate level and that further discovery would be required in order to fully brief the motion. Judge Chhabria denied the plaintiffs motion but stayed the briefing schedule on the motion to modify.

On July 14, 2021, the parties notified the court that they had reached an agreement in principle and that the Ninth Circuit had set a deadline of 60 days for the federal defendants to file a motion to dismiss the appeal; they stated this motion for dismissal, due September 14, would fully resolve the case and address the preliminary injunctions and their population caps, at issue in the GEO defendants' motions to modify.

On January 27, 2022, the parties settled and the defendants agreed to provide safety measures to try to protect people in immigration detention from COVID. The defendants also agreed to limitations on their authority to redetain people that were released during the course of the lawsuit.

Summary Authors

Averyn Lee (9/25/2020)

Chandler Hart-McGonigle (11/22/2020)

Caitlin Kierum (9/7/2021)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17084894/parties/zepeda-rivas-v-jennings/


Judge(s)

Chhabria, Vince Girdhari (California)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Beier, Genna Ellis (California)

Bernwanger, Bree (California)

Cook, Timothy W (Massachusetts)

Freeman, William S. (California)

Friedman, Jennifer Taylor (California)

Gonzalez, Matt (California)

Kaufman, Michael Bryan (California)

Kaufman [inactive], Michael (California)

Lakin, Judah Ben (California)

Judge(s)

Chhabria, Vince Girdhari (California)

Attorneys(s) for Plaintiff

Beier, Genna Ellis (California)

Bernwanger, Bree (California)

Cook, Timothy W (Massachusetts)

Freeman, William S. (California)

Friedman, Jennifer Taylor (California)

Gonzalez, Matt (California)

Kaufman, Michael Bryan (California)

Kaufman [inactive], Michael (California)

Lakin, Judah Ben (California)

MacLean, Emilou (California)

Padilla, Stephanie (California)

Raju, Manour (California)

Ressl-Moyer, Tifanei (California)

Riordan, Sean Connor (California)

Rodarte, Hayden (California)

Salceda, Angelica (California)

Schenker, Martin S. (California)

Ugarte, Fransisco (California)

Unger, Francisco (Massachusetts)

Veroff, Julie Michelle (California)

Wells, Jordan (California)

Wille, Amalia Margarete (California)

Attorneys(s) for Defendant

Anderson, David Lloyd (California)

Choe, Shiwon (California)

Coleman, Susan E. (California)

Garbers, Wendy Marie (California)

Hong, Neal (California)

Hsu, Shining J (California)

Newman, Michael A.S. (California)

Oakes, Royal F. (California)

Weinstein, David S. (Florida)

Winslow, Sara (California)

Zack, Adrienne (California)

Other Attorney(s)

Day, Allison Marie (California)

Hon, Willis (California)

Expert/Monitor/Master

Bonnar, Erik (California)

Fishburn, Dana (California)

Freeman [inactive], William S (California)

Greifinger, Robert B. (New York)

Hernandez, Sandra (California)

Kaiser, Polly E (California)

Kavanagh, Kathleen Anne (California)

Keshavjee, Salmaan (Massachusetts)

Knox, Lisa V. (California)

Mishori, Ranit (District of Columbia)

Moon, Jennifer (District of Columbia)

Pham, Alexander (California)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

Docket [PACER]

Sept. 6, 2021 Docket
5-6, 5-7 & 35

Declarations in Support of Petitioners-Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order

April 20, 2020 Declaration/Affidavit
6 & 6-1 to 6-14

Plaintiffs-Petitioners' Notice of Motion and Motion for Provisional Class Certification; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof

April 20, 2020 Pleading / Motion / Brief
5 & 5-1 to 5-5

Petitioners-Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order

April 20, 2020 Pleading / Motion / Brief
1

Class Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Class Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief

April 20, 2020 Complaint
37 & 37-1 to 37-20

Federal Defendants' Opposition to Motions for TRO and Provisional Class Certification, and Motion to Stay in Light of Fraihart

April 25, 2020 Pleading / Motion / Brief
40

Opposition to Motion to Stay in Light of Fraihat (ECF NO. 38)

April 27, 2020 Pleading / Motion / Brief
50

Federal Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion to Stay in Light of Fraihat

April 27, 2020 Pleading / Motion / Brief
41

Reply in Support of Petitioners-Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification

April 27, 2020 Pleading / Motion / Brief
39 & 39-1 to 39-5

Reply in Support of Petitioners-Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order

April 27, 2020 Pleading / Motion / Brief

Resources

Title Description External URL

Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, et al. v. Abbott, et al.

Center for Reproductive Rights

This litigation challenges actions taken by Governor Greg Abbott and other state officials to ensure that patients can continue to access essential, time-sensitive abortion services during the COVID-… April 22, 2020 https://reproductiverights.org/case/planned-parenthood-center-choice-et-al-v-abbott-et-al

Zepeda Rivas v. Jennings (Immigration Detention)

ACLU of Northern California

On April 20th, 2020, immigrants detained at the Mesa Verde Detention Facility and the Yuba County Jail filed a class action lawsuit against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), asking the feder… April 24, 2020 https://www.aclunc.org/our-work/legal-docket/zepeda-rivas-v-jennings-immigration-detention

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17084894/zepeda-rivas-v-jennings/

Last updated May 12, 2022, 8 p.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link
1

COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14393143.). Filed byJAVIER ALFARO, LAWRENCE KURIA MWAURA, DUNG TUAN DANG, BRENDA RUBI RUIZ TOVAR, LUCIANO GONZALO MENDOZA JERONIMO, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUEZ. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) Modified on 4/21/2020 (mclS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/20/2020)

1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

April 20, 2020 Clearinghouse
1

COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14393143.). Filed byJAVIER ALFARO, LAWRENCE KURIA MWAURA, DUNG TUAN DANG, BRENDA RUBI RUIZ TOVAR, LUCIANO GONZALO MENDOZA JERONIMO, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUEZ. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) Modified on 4/21/2020 (mclS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/20/2020)

1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

April 20, 2020 Clearinghouse
1

COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14393143.). Filed byJAVIER ALFARO, LAWRENCE KURIA MWAURA, DUNG TUAN DANG, BRENDA RUBI RUIZ TOVAR, LUCIANO GONZALO MENDOZA JERONIMO, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUEZ. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) Modified on 4/21/2020 (mclS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/20/2020)

1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

April 20, 2020 Clearinghouse
1

COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14393143.). Filed byJAVIER ALFARO, LAWRENCE KURIA MWAURA, DUNG TUAN DANG, BRENDA RUBI RUIZ TOVAR, LUCIANO GONZALO MENDOZA JERONIMO, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUEZ. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) Modified on 4/21/2020 (mclS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/20/2020)

1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

April 20, 2020 Clearinghouse
1

COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14393143.). Filed byJAVIER ALFARO, LAWRENCE KURIA MWAURA, DUNG TUAN DANG, BRENDA RUBI RUIZ TOVAR, LUCIANO GONZALO MENDOZA JERONIMO, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUEZ. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) Modified on 4/21/2020 (mclS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/20/2020)

1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

April 20, 2020 Clearinghouse
2

Proposed Summons. (Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) (Entered: 04/20/2020)

April 20, 2020 PACER
2

Proposed Summons. (Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) (Entered: 04/20/2020)

April 20, 2020 PACER
2

Proposed Summons. (Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) (Entered: 04/20/2020)

April 20, 2020 PACER
2

Proposed Summons. (Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) (Entered: 04/20/2020)

April 20, 2020 PACER
2

Proposed Summons. (Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) (Entered: 04/20/2020)

April 20, 2020 PACER
3

Proposed Summons. (Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) (Entered: 04/20/2020)

April 20, 2020 PACER
3

Proposed Summons. (Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) (Entered: 04/20/2020)

April 20, 2020 PACER
3

Proposed Summons. (Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) (Entered: 04/20/2020)

April 20, 2020 PACER
3

Proposed Summons. (Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) (Entered: 04/20/2020)

April 20, 2020 PACER
3

Proposed Summons. (Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) (Entered: 04/20/2020)

April 20, 2020 PACER
4

Proposed Summons. (Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) (Entered: 04/20/2020)

April 20, 2020 PACER
4

Proposed Summons. (Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) (Entered: 04/20/2020)

April 20, 2020 PACER
4

Proposed Summons. (Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) (Entered: 04/20/2020)

April 20, 2020 PACER
4

Proposed Summons. (Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) (Entered: 04/20/2020)

April 20, 2020 PACER
4

Proposed Summons. (Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) (Entered: 04/20/2020)

April 20, 2020 PACER
5

First MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by JAVIER ALFARO, DUNG TUAN DANG, LUCIANO GONZALO MENDOZA JERONIMO, LAWRENCE KURIA MWAURA, BRENDA RUBI RUIZ TOVAR, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUEZ, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS. (Attachments: # 1 *** ERRONEOUS ENTRY - SEE 35 *** Declaration of Sandra Hernandez, # 2 Declaration of Robert B. Greifinger, MD, # 3 Declaration of Dr. Ranit Mishori (MD, MHS, FAAFP), # 4 Declaration of Lisa Knox Regarding Conditions of Confinement at the Mesa Verde ICE Processing Facility, # 5 Declaration of Attorney Kathleen Anne Kavanagh Regarding Conditions of Confinement at Yuba County Jail, # 6 Declaration of Sean Riordan in Support of Petitioners-Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, # 7 Proposed Temporary Restraining Order)(Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) Modified on 4/27/2020 (mclS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/20/2020)

1 Declaration Declaration of Sandra Hernandez

View on PACER

2 Declaration Declaration of Robert B. Greifinger, MD

View on PACER

3 Declaration Declaration of Dr. Ranit Mishori (MD, MHS, FAAFP)

View on PACER

4 Declaration Declaration of Lisa Knox Regarding Conditions of Confinement at the

View on PACER

5 Declaration Declaration of Attorney Kathleen Anne Kavanagh Regarding Conditions

View on PACER

6 Declaration Declaration of Sean Riordan in Support of Petitioners-Plaintiffs

View on PACER

7 Proposed Order [Proposed] Temporary Restraining Order

View on RECAP

April 20, 2020 Clearinghouse
5

First MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by JAVIER ALFARO, DUNG TUAN DANG, LUCIANO GONZALO MENDOZA JERONIMO, LAWRENCE KURIA MWAURA, BRENDA RUBI RUIZ TOVAR, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUEZ, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS. (Attachments: # 1 *** ERRONEOUS ENTRY - SEE 35 *** Declaration of Sandra Hernandez, # 2 Declaration of Robert B. Greifinger, MD, # 3 Declaration of Dr. Ranit Mishori (MD, MHS, FAAFP), # 4 Declaration of Lisa Knox Regarding Conditions of Confinement at the Mesa Verde ICE Processing Facility, # 5 Declaration of Attorney Kathleen Anne Kavanagh Regarding Conditions of Confinement at Yuba County Jail, # 6 Declaration of Sean Riordan in Support of Petitioners-Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, # 7 Proposed Temporary Restraining Order)(Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) Modified on 4/27/2020 (mclS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/20/2020)

1 Declaration Declaration of Sandra Hernandez

View on PACER

2 Declaration Declaration of Robert B. Greifinger, MD

View on PACER

3 Declaration Declaration of Dr. Ranit Mishori (MD, MHS, FAAFP)

View on PACER

4 Declaration Declaration of Lisa Knox Regarding Conditions of Confinement at the

View on PACER

5 Declaration Declaration of Attorney Kathleen Anne Kavanagh Regarding Conditions

View on PACER

6 Declaration Declaration of Sean Riordan in Support of Petitioners-Plaintiffs

View on PACER

7 Proposed Order [Proposed] Temporary Restraining Order

View on RECAP

April 20, 2020 Clearinghouse
5

First MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by JAVIER ALFARO, DUNG TUAN DANG, LUCIANO GONZALO MENDOZA JERONIMO, LAWRENCE KURIA MWAURA, BRENDA RUBI RUIZ TOVAR, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUEZ, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS. (Attachments: # 1 *** ERRONEOUS ENTRY - SEE 35 *** Declaration of Sandra Hernandez, # 2 Declaration of Robert B. Greifinger, MD, # 3 Declaration of Dr. Ranit Mishori (MD, MHS, FAAFP), # 4 Declaration of Lisa Knox Regarding Conditions of Confinement at the Mesa Verde ICE Processing Facility, # 5 Declaration of Attorney Kathleen Anne Kavanagh Regarding Conditions of Confinement at Yuba County Jail, # 6 Declaration of Sean Riordan in Support of Petitioners-Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, # 7 Proposed Temporary Restraining Order)(Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) Modified on 4/27/2020 (mclS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/20/2020)

1 Declaration Declaration of Sandra Hernandez

View on PACER

2 Declaration Declaration of Robert B. Greifinger, MD

View on PACER

3 Declaration Declaration of Dr. Ranit Mishori (MD, MHS, FAAFP)

View on PACER

4 Declaration Declaration of Lisa Knox Regarding Conditions of Confinement at the

View on PACER

5 Declaration Declaration of Attorney Kathleen Anne Kavanagh Regarding Conditions

View on PACER

6 Declaration Declaration of Sean Riordan in Support of Petitioners-Plaintiffs

View on PACER

7 Proposed Order [Proposed] Temporary Restraining Order

View on RECAP

April 20, 2020 Clearinghouse
5

First MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by JAVIER ALFARO, DUNG TUAN DANG, LUCIANO GONZALO MENDOZA JERONIMO, LAWRENCE KURIA MWAURA, BRENDA RUBI RUIZ TOVAR, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUEZ, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS. (Attachments: # 1 *** ERRONEOUS ENTRY - SEE 35 *** Declaration of Sandra Hernandez, # 2 Declaration of Robert B. Greifinger, MD, # 3 Declaration of Dr. Ranit Mishori (MD, MHS, FAAFP), # 4 Declaration of Lisa Knox Regarding Conditions of Confinement at the Mesa Verde ICE Processing Facility, # 5 Declaration of Attorney Kathleen Anne Kavanagh Regarding Conditions of Confinement at Yuba County Jail, # 6 Declaration of Sean Riordan in Support of Petitioners-Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, # 7 Proposed Temporary Restraining Order)(Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) Modified on 4/27/2020 (mclS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/20/2020)

1 Declaration Declaration of Sandra Hernandez

View on PACER

2 Declaration Declaration of Robert B. Greifinger, MD

View on PACER

3 Declaration Declaration of Dr. Ranit Mishori (MD, MHS, FAAFP)

View on PACER

4 Declaration Declaration of Lisa Knox Regarding Conditions of Confinement at the

View on PACER

5 Declaration Declaration of Attorney Kathleen Anne Kavanagh Regarding Conditions

View on PACER

6 Declaration Declaration of Sean Riordan in Support of Petitioners-Plaintiffs

View on PACER

7 Proposed Order [Proposed] Temporary Restraining Order

View on RECAP

April 20, 2020 Clearinghouse
5

First MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by JAVIER ALFARO, DUNG TUAN DANG, LUCIANO GONZALO MENDOZA JERONIMO, LAWRENCE KURIA MWAURA, BRENDA RUBI RUIZ TOVAR, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUEZ, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS. (Attachments: # 1 *** ERRONEOUS ENTRY - SEE 35 *** Declaration of Sandra Hernandez, # 2 Declaration of Robert B. Greifinger, MD, # 3 Declaration of Dr. Ranit Mishori (MD, MHS, FAAFP), # 4 Declaration of Lisa Knox Regarding Conditions of Confinement at the Mesa Verde ICE Processing Facility, # 5 Declaration of Attorney Kathleen Anne Kavanagh Regarding Conditions of Confinement at Yuba County Jail, # 6 Declaration of Sean Riordan in Support of Petitioners-Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, # 7 Proposed Temporary Restraining Order)(Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) Modified on 4/27/2020 (mclS, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/20/2020)

1 Declaration Declaration of Sandra Hernandez

View on PACER

2 Declaration Declaration of Robert B. Greifinger, MD

View on PACER

3 Declaration Declaration of Dr. Ranit Mishori (MD, MHS, FAAFP)

View on PACER

4 Declaration Declaration of Lisa Knox Regarding Conditions of Confinement at the

View on PACER

5 Declaration Declaration of Attorney Kathleen Anne Kavanagh Regarding Conditions

View on PACER

6 Declaration Declaration of Sean Riordan in Support of Petitioners-Plaintiffs

View on PACER

7 Proposed Order [Proposed] Temporary Restraining Order

View on RECAP

April 20, 2020 Clearinghouse
6

First MOTION to Certify Class filed by JAVIER ALFARO, DUNG TUAN DANG, LUCIANO GONZALO MENDOZA JERONIMO, LAWRENCE KURIA MWAURA, BRENDA RUBI RUIZ TOVAR, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUEZ, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS. Responses due by 4/24/2020. Replies due by 4/27/2020. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Angel Zepeda, # 2 Declaration Declaration of Brenda Rubi Ruiz Tovar, # 3 Declaration Declaration of Lawrence Kuria Mwaura, # 4 Declaration Declaration of Luciano Gonzalo Mendoza Joronimo, # 5 Declaration Declaration of Coraima Yaritza Sanchez Nuez, # 6 Declaration Declaration of Javier Alfaro, # 7 Declaration Declaration Dung Tuan Dang, # 8 Declaration Declaration of William S. Freeman in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 9 Declaration Declaration of Bree Bernwanger in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 10 Declaration Declaration of Martin S. Schenker in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 11 Declaration Declaration of Genna Ellis Beier in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 12 Declaration Declaration of Jordan Wells in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 13 Declaration Declaration of Judah Lakin in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 14 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Petitioners-Plaintiffs' Motion for Provisional Class Certification)(Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) (Entered: 04/20/2020)

1 Declaration Declaration of Angel Zepeda

View on RECAP

2 Declaration Declaration of Brenda Rubi Ruiz Tovar

View on PACER

3 Declaration Declaration of Lawrence Kuria Mwaura

View on PACER

4 Declaration Declaration of Luciano Gonzalo Mendoza Joronimo

View on PACER

5 Declaration Declaration of Coraima Yaritza Sanchez Nuez

View on PACER

6 Declaration Declaration of Javier Alfaro

View on PACER

7 Declaration Declaration Dung Tuan Dang

View on PACER

8 Declaration Declaration of William S. Freeman in Support of Motion for Class Cer

View on PACER

9 Declaration Declaration of Bree Bernwanger in Support of Motion for Class Certif

View on PACER

10 Declaration Declaration of Martin S. Schenker in Support of Motion for Class Cer

View on PACER

11 Declaration Declaration of Genna Ellis Beier in Support of Motion for Class Cert

View on PACER

12 Declaration Declaration of Jordan Wells in Support of Motion for Class Certifica

View on PACER

13 Declaration Declaration of Judah Lakin in Support of Motion for Class Certificat

View on PACER

14 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Petitioners-Plaintiffs' Motion for

View on RECAP

April 20, 2020 Clearinghouse
6

First MOTION to Certify Class filed by JAVIER ALFARO, DUNG TUAN DANG, LUCIANO GONZALO MENDOZA JERONIMO, LAWRENCE KURIA MWAURA, BRENDA RUBI RUIZ TOVAR, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUEZ, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS. Responses due by 4/24/2020. Replies due by 4/27/2020. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Angel Zepeda, # 2 Declaration Declaration of Brenda Rubi Ruiz Tovar, # 3 Declaration Declaration of Lawrence Kuria Mwaura, # 4 Declaration Declaration of Luciano Gonzalo Mendoza Joronimo, # 5 Declaration Declaration of Coraima Yaritza Sanchez Nuez, # 6 Declaration Declaration of Javier Alfaro, # 7 Declaration Declaration Dung Tuan Dang, # 8 Declaration Declaration of William S. Freeman in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 9 Declaration Declaration of Bree Bernwanger in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 10 Declaration Declaration of Martin S. Schenker in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 11 Declaration Declaration of Genna Ellis Beier in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 12 Declaration Declaration of Jordan Wells in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 13 Declaration Declaration of Judah Lakin in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 14 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Petitioners-Plaintiffs' Motion for Provisional Class Certification)(Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) (Entered: 04/20/2020)

1 Declaration Declaration of Angel Zepeda

View on RECAP

2 Declaration Declaration of Brenda Rubi Ruiz Tovar

View on PACER

3 Declaration Declaration of Lawrence Kuria Mwaura

View on PACER

4 Declaration Declaration of Luciano Gonzalo Mendoza Joronimo

View on PACER

5 Declaration Declaration of Coraima Yaritza Sanchez Nuez

View on PACER

6 Declaration Declaration of Javier Alfaro

View on PACER

7 Declaration Declaration Dung Tuan Dang

View on PACER

8 Declaration Declaration of William S. Freeman in Support of Motion for Class Cer

View on PACER

9 Declaration Declaration of Bree Bernwanger in Support of Motion for Class Certif

View on PACER

10 Declaration Declaration of Martin S. Schenker in Support of Motion for Class Cer

View on PACER

11 Declaration Declaration of Genna Ellis Beier in Support of Motion for Class Cert

View on PACER

12 Declaration Declaration of Jordan Wells in Support of Motion for Class Certifica

View on PACER

13 Declaration Declaration of Judah Lakin in Support of Motion for Class Certificat

View on PACER

14 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Petitioners-Plaintiffs' Motion for

View on RECAP

April 20, 2020 Clearinghouse
6

First MOTION to Certify Class filed by JAVIER ALFARO, DUNG TUAN DANG, LUCIANO GONZALO MENDOZA JERONIMO, LAWRENCE KURIA MWAURA, BRENDA RUBI RUIZ TOVAR, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUEZ, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS. Responses due by 4/24/2020. Replies due by 4/27/2020. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Angel Zepeda, # 2 Declaration Declaration of Brenda Rubi Ruiz Tovar, # 3 Declaration Declaration of Lawrence Kuria Mwaura, # 4 Declaration Declaration of Luciano Gonzalo Mendoza Joronimo, # 5 Declaration Declaration of Coraima Yaritza Sanchez Nuez, # 6 Declaration Declaration of Javier Alfaro, # 7 Declaration Declaration Dung Tuan Dang, # 8 Declaration Declaration of William S. Freeman in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 9 Declaration Declaration of Bree Bernwanger in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 10 Declaration Declaration of Martin S. Schenker in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 11 Declaration Declaration of Genna Ellis Beier in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 12 Declaration Declaration of Jordan Wells in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 13 Declaration Declaration of Judah Lakin in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 14 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Petitioners-Plaintiffs' Motion for Provisional Class Certification)(Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) (Entered: 04/20/2020)

1 Declaration Declaration of Angel Zepeda

View on RECAP

2 Declaration Declaration of Brenda Rubi Ruiz Tovar

View on PACER

3 Declaration Declaration of Lawrence Kuria Mwaura

View on PACER

4 Declaration Declaration of Luciano Gonzalo Mendoza Joronimo

View on PACER

5 Declaration Declaration of Coraima Yaritza Sanchez Nuez

View on PACER

6 Declaration Declaration of Javier Alfaro

View on PACER

7 Declaration Declaration Dung Tuan Dang

View on PACER

8 Declaration Declaration of William S. Freeman in Support of Motion for Class Cer

View on PACER

9 Declaration Declaration of Bree Bernwanger in Support of Motion for Class Certif

View on PACER

10 Declaration Declaration of Martin S. Schenker in Support of Motion for Class Cer

View on PACER

11 Declaration Declaration of Genna Ellis Beier in Support of Motion for Class Cert

View on PACER

12 Declaration Declaration of Jordan Wells in Support of Motion for Class Certifica

View on PACER

13 Declaration Declaration of Judah Lakin in Support of Motion for Class Certificat

View on PACER

14 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Petitioners-Plaintiffs' Motion for

View on RECAP

April 20, 2020 Clearinghouse
6

First MOTION to Certify Class filed by JAVIER ALFARO, DUNG TUAN DANG, LUCIANO GONZALO MENDOZA JERONIMO, LAWRENCE KURIA MWAURA, BRENDA RUBI RUIZ TOVAR, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUEZ, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS. Responses due by 4/24/2020. Replies due by 4/27/2020. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Angel Zepeda, # 2 Declaration Declaration of Brenda Rubi Ruiz Tovar, # 3 Declaration Declaration of Lawrence Kuria Mwaura, # 4 Declaration Declaration of Luciano Gonzalo Mendoza Joronimo, # 5 Declaration Declaration of Coraima Yaritza Sanchez Nuez, # 6 Declaration Declaration of Javier Alfaro, # 7 Declaration Declaration Dung Tuan Dang, # 8 Declaration Declaration of William S. Freeman in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 9 Declaration Declaration of Bree Bernwanger in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 10 Declaration Declaration of Martin S. Schenker in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 11 Declaration Declaration of Genna Ellis Beier in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 12 Declaration Declaration of Jordan Wells in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 13 Declaration Declaration of Judah Lakin in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 14 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Petitioners-Plaintiffs' Motion for Provisional Class Certification)(Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) (Entered: 04/20/2020)

1 Declaration Declaration of Angel Zepeda

View on RECAP

2 Declaration Declaration of Brenda Rubi Ruiz Tovar

View on PACER

3 Declaration Declaration of Lawrence Kuria Mwaura

View on PACER

4 Declaration Declaration of Luciano Gonzalo Mendoza Joronimo

View on PACER

5 Declaration Declaration of Coraima Yaritza Sanchez Nuez

View on PACER

6 Declaration Declaration of Javier Alfaro

View on PACER

7 Declaration Declaration Dung Tuan Dang

View on PACER

8 Declaration Declaration of William S. Freeman in Support of Motion for Class Cer

View on PACER

9 Declaration Declaration of Bree Bernwanger in Support of Motion for Class Certif

View on PACER

10 Declaration Declaration of Martin S. Schenker in Support of Motion for Class Cer

View on PACER

11 Declaration Declaration of Genna Ellis Beier in Support of Motion for Class Cert

View on PACER

12 Declaration Declaration of Jordan Wells in Support of Motion for Class Certifica

View on PACER

13 Declaration Declaration of Judah Lakin in Support of Motion for Class Certificat

View on PACER

14 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Petitioners-Plaintiffs' Motion for

View on RECAP

April 20, 2020 Clearinghouse
6

First MOTION to Certify Class filed by JAVIER ALFARO, DUNG TUAN DANG, LUCIANO GONZALO MENDOZA JERONIMO, LAWRENCE KURIA MWAURA, BRENDA RUBI RUIZ TOVAR, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUEZ, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS. Responses due by 4/24/2020. Replies due by 4/27/2020. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Angel Zepeda, # 2 Declaration Declaration of Brenda Rubi Ruiz Tovar, # 3 Declaration Declaration of Lawrence Kuria Mwaura, # 4 Declaration Declaration of Luciano Gonzalo Mendoza Joronimo, # 5 Declaration Declaration of Coraima Yaritza Sanchez Nuez, # 6 Declaration Declaration of Javier Alfaro, # 7 Declaration Declaration Dung Tuan Dang, # 8 Declaration Declaration of William S. Freeman in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 9 Declaration Declaration of Bree Bernwanger in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 10 Declaration Declaration of Martin S. Schenker in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 11 Declaration Declaration of Genna Ellis Beier in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 12 Declaration Declaration of Jordan Wells in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 13 Declaration Declaration of Judah Lakin in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 14 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Petitioners-Plaintiffs' Motion for Provisional Class Certification)(Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) (Entered: 04/20/2020)

1 Declaration Declaration of Angel Zepeda

View on RECAP

2 Declaration Declaration of Brenda Rubi Ruiz Tovar

View on PACER

3 Declaration Declaration of Lawrence Kuria Mwaura

View on PACER

4 Declaration Declaration of Luciano Gonzalo Mendoza Joronimo

View on PACER

5 Declaration Declaration of Coraima Yaritza Sanchez Nuez

View on PACER

6 Declaration Declaration of Javier Alfaro

View on PACER

7 Declaration Declaration Dung Tuan Dang

View on PACER

8 Declaration Declaration of William S. Freeman in Support of Motion for Class Cer

View on PACER

9 Declaration Declaration of Bree Bernwanger in Support of Motion for Class Certif

View on PACER

10 Declaration Declaration of Martin S. Schenker in Support of Motion for Class Cer

View on PACER

11 Declaration Declaration of Genna Ellis Beier in Support of Motion for Class Cert

View on PACER

12 Declaration Declaration of Jordan Wells in Support of Motion for Class Certifica

View on PACER

13 Declaration Declaration of Judah Lakin in Support of Motion for Class Certificat

View on PACER

14 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Petitioners-Plaintiffs' Motion for

View on RECAP

April 20, 2020 Clearinghouse
7

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by JAVIER ALFARO, DUNG TUAN DANG, LUCIANO GONZALO MENDOZA JERONIMO, LAWRENCE KURIA MWAURA, BRENDA RUBI RUIZ TOVAR, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUEZ, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS re 6 First MOTION to Certify Class, 2 Proposed Summons, 5 First MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, 3 Proposed Summons, 4 Proposed Summons, 1 Complaint, (Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) (Entered: 04/20/2020)

April 20, 2020 PACER
7

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by JAVIER ALFARO, DUNG TUAN DANG, LUCIANO GONZALO MENDOZA JERONIMO, LAWRENCE KURIA MWAURA, BRENDA RUBI RUIZ TOVAR, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUEZ, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS re 6 First MOTION to Certify Class, 2 Proposed Summons, 5 First MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, 3 Proposed Summons, 4 Proposed Summons, 1 Complaint, (Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) (Entered: 04/20/2020)

April 20, 2020 PACER
7

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by JAVIER ALFARO, DUNG TUAN DANG, LUCIANO GONZALO MENDOZA JERONIMO, LAWRENCE KURIA MWAURA, BRENDA RUBI RUIZ TOVAR, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUEZ, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS re 6 First MOTION to Certify Class, 2 Proposed Summons, 5 First MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, 3 Proposed Summons, 4 Proposed Summons, 1 Complaint, (Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) (Entered: 04/20/2020)

April 20, 2020 PACER
7

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by JAVIER ALFARO, DUNG TUAN DANG, LUCIANO GONZALO MENDOZA JERONIMO, LAWRENCE KURIA MWAURA, BRENDA RUBI RUIZ TOVAR, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUEZ, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS re 6 First MOTION to Certify Class, 2 Proposed Summons, 5 First MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, 3 Proposed Summons, 4 Proposed Summons, 1 Complaint, (Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) (Entered: 04/20/2020)

April 20, 2020 PACER
7

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by JAVIER ALFARO, DUNG TUAN DANG, LUCIANO GONZALO MENDOZA JERONIMO, LAWRENCE KURIA MWAURA, BRENDA RUBI RUIZ TOVAR, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUEZ, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS re 6 First MOTION to Certify Class, 2 Proposed Summons, 5 First MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, 3 Proposed Summons, 4 Proposed Summons, 1 Complaint, (Freeman, William) (Filed on 4/20/2020) (Entered: 04/20/2020)

April 20, 2020 PACER
8

Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/5/2020. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
8

Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/5/2020. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
8

Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/5/2020. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
8

Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/5/2020. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
8

Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/5/2020. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER

~Util - Case Assigned by Intake

April 21, 2020 PACER

~Util - Case Assigned by Intake

April 21, 2020 PACER

~Util - Case Assigned by Intake

April 21, 2020 PACER

~Util - Case Assigned by Intake

April 21, 2020 PACER

~Util - Case Assigned by Intake

April 21, 2020 PACER
9

NOTICE of Appearance by Genna Ellis Beier (Beier, Genna) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 RECAP
9

NOTICE of Appearance by Genna Ellis Beier (Beier, Genna) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 RECAP
9

NOTICE of Appearance by Genna Ellis Beier (Beier, Genna) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 RECAP
9

NOTICE of Appearance by Genna Ellis Beier (Beier, Genna) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 RECAP
9

NOTICE of Appearance by Genna Ellis Beier (Beier, Genna) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 RECAP
10

NOTICE of Appearance by Jordan Samuel Wells FOR PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS (Wells, Jordan) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
10

NOTICE of Appearance by Jordan Samuel Wells FOR PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS (Wells, Jordan) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
10

NOTICE of Appearance by Jordan Samuel Wells FOR PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS (Wells, Jordan) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
10

NOTICE of Appearance by Jordan Samuel Wells FOR PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS (Wells, Jordan) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
10

NOTICE of Appearance by Jordan Samuel Wells FOR PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS (Wells, Jordan) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
11

NOTICE of Appearance by Hayden Miles Rodarte (Rodarte, Hayden) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
11

NOTICE of Appearance by Hayden Miles Rodarte (Rodarte, Hayden) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
11

NOTICE of Appearance by Hayden Miles Rodarte (Rodarte, Hayden) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
11

NOTICE of Appearance by Hayden Miles Rodarte (Rodarte, Hayden) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
11

NOTICE of Appearance by Hayden Miles Rodarte (Rodarte, Hayden) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
12

Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 7/13/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/20/2020 01:30 PM. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
12

Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 7/13/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/20/2020 01:30 PM. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
12

Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 7/13/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/20/2020 01:30 PM. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
12

Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 7/13/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/20/2020 01:30 PM. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
12

Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 7/13/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/20/2020 01:30 PM. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
13

Summons Issued as to Matthew T. Albence, David Jennings, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
13

Summons Issued as to Matthew T. Albence, David Jennings, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
13

Summons Issued as to Matthew T. Albence, David Jennings, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
13

Summons Issued as to Matthew T. Albence, David Jennings, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
13

Summons Issued as to Matthew T. Albence, David Jennings, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
14

Summons Issued as to Geo Group, Inc. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
14

Summons Issued as to Geo Group, Inc. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
14

Summons Issued as to Geo Group, Inc. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
14

Summons Issued as to Geo Group, Inc. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
14

Summons Issued as to Geo Group, Inc. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
15

Summons Issued as to Nathan Allen. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
15

Summons Issued as to Nathan Allen. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
15

Summons Issued as to Nathan Allen. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
15

Summons Issued as to Nathan Allen. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
15

Summons Issued as to Nathan Allen. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 PACER
16

CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Matthew T. Albence, David Jennings, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement.. (Garbers, Wendy) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 RECAP
16

CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Matthew T. Albence, David Jennings, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement.. (Garbers, Wendy) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 RECAP
16

CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Matthew T. Albence, David Jennings, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement.. (Garbers, Wendy) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 RECAP
16

CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Matthew T. Albence, David Jennings, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement.. (Garbers, Wendy) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 RECAP
16

CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Matthew T. Albence, David Jennings, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement.. (Garbers, Wendy) (Filed on 4/21/2020) (Entered: 04/21/2020)

April 21, 2020 RECAP
17

CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2020) (Entered: 04/22/2020)

April 22, 2020 PACER
17

CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2020) (Entered: 04/22/2020)

April 22, 2020 PACER
17

CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2020) (Entered: 04/22/2020)

April 22, 2020 PACER
17

CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2020) (Entered: 04/22/2020)

April 22, 2020 PACER
17

CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2020) (Entered: 04/22/2020)

April 22, 2020 PACER

Clerk's Notice of Impending Reassignment - Text Only

April 22, 2020 PACER

Clerk's Notice of Impending Reassignment - Text Only

April 22, 2020 PACER

Clerk's Notice of Impending Reassignment - Text Only

April 22, 2020 PACER

Clerk's Notice of Impending Reassignment - Text Only

April 22, 2020 PACER

Clerk's Notice of Impending Reassignment - Text Only

April 22, 2020 PACER
18

ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Vince Chhabria for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 04/22/2020. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2020) (Entered: 04/22/2020)

1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording

View on PACER

April 22, 2020 PACER
18

ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Vince Chhabria for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 04/22/2020. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2020) (Entered: 04/22/2020)

1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording

View on PACER

April 22, 2020 PACER
18

ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Vince Chhabria for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 04/22/2020. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2020) (Entered: 04/22/2020)

1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording

View on PACER

April 22, 2020 PACER
18

ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Vince Chhabria for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 04/22/2020. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2020) (Entered: 04/22/2020)

1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording

View on PACER

April 22, 2020 PACER
18

ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Vince Chhabria for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 04/22/2020. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2020) (Entered: 04/22/2020)

1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording

View on PACER

April 22, 2020 PACER

State / Territory: California

Case Type(s):

Immigration and/or the Border

Special Collection(s):

COVID-19 (novel coronavirus)

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 20, 2020

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Seven individuals detained at the Mesa Verde Detention Facility and the Yuba County Jail seeking immediate release of detainees from unsafe conditions of the jail in light of the global coronavirus pandemic. The class is all civil immigration detainees at Mesa Verde and YCJ, with two subclasses: the “YCJ Subclass” and the “Mesa Verde Subclass.”

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

ACLU Affiliates (any)

ACLU of Northern California

ACLU of Southern California

Lawyers Comm. for Civil Rights Under Law

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

GEO Group, Private Entity/Person

Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Federal

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Yuba), Federal

Defendant Type(s):

Law-enforcement

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Ex Parte Young (Federal) or Bivens

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

Habeas Corpus, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241-2253; 2254; 2255

Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Due Process: Substantive Due Process

Freedom of speech/association

Special Case Type(s):

Habeas

Availably Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Preliminary injunction / Temp. restraining order

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Order Duration: 2020 - None

Content of Injunction:

Preliminary relief granted

Issues

General:

Bathing and hygiene

Conditions of confinement

Sanitation / living conditions

Totality of conditions

Crowding:

Crowding / caseload

Medical/Mental Health:

Medical care, general

COVID-19:

CDC Guidance ordered implemented

Contact tracing ordered

COVID reporting ordered

COVID testing ordered/modified

Mitigation Denied

Mitigation Granted

Mitigation Requested

Population reduction/cap

PPE-ordered provided to prisoners for free

PPE-ordered worn by staff

Quarantine/isolation ordered

Release Granted

Release granted-group

Release granted-individual

Release-process created/modified

Release Requested

Sanitizer/Handsoap ordered made available/used

Social distancing ordered

Transfer-ordered or process created/modified

Wellness/temperature checks ordered

Type of Facility:

Government-run

Non-government for profit

Immigration/Border:

Constitutional rights

Detention - conditions