Case: Dunsmore v. State of California

3:20-cv-00406 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California

Filed Date: March 2, 2020

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This class action lawsuit alleged that the San Diego County Jail denied proper health accommodations to detainees. On March 2, 2020, a jail detainee filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. The plaintiff sued the State of California, San Diego County, the San Diego Sheriff's Department, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, the San Diego County Sheriff, and the Attorney General of California. Proceeding pro se and in forma pau…

This class action lawsuit alleged that the San Diego County Jail denied proper health accommodations to detainees. On March 2, 2020, a jail detainee filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. The plaintiff sued the State of California, San Diego County, the San Diego Sheriff's Department, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, the San Diego County Sheriff, and the Attorney General of California. Proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, the plaintiff sought compensatory and punitive damages, as well as an injunction requiring meaningful access to legal resources in the county jail and Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) compliance. The case was assigned to District Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo.

The court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim on April 6, 2020. On July 23, 2020, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint, a motion for counsel, and motions for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction. The amended complaint added the Governor of California, the Mayor of San Diego, the Director of San Diego’s Office of Assigned Counsel, and a public defender as defendants. On August 4, 2020, the court dismissed the plaintiff’s first amended complaint with leave to amend for failure to state a claim and dismissed the motion for counsel because it was a civil case and no “exceptional circumstances” existed. The court also dismissed the motions for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction for lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendants and for failure to state a claim upon which § 1983 relief could be granted. 

The plaintiff appealed the dismissal of his amended complaint on September 8, 2020. On September 21, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the district court’s dismissal with leave to amend was not final or appealable. On October 1, the plaintiff petitioned for a writ of mandamus, which the Ninth Circuit denied on October 13. 

On October 6, the plaintiff filed a motion for a final order in the district court. On October 14, the district court construed the motion for a final order as a voluntary dismissal, which the court granted. The plaintiff appealed the voluntary dismissal on October 26, 2020. On August 23, 2021, the Ninth Circuit reversed the voluntary dismissal and remanded to the district court, reasoning that the allegations in the complaint were sufficient to warrant ordering defendants to file an answer. The sheriff and the county filed a motion to dismiss on November 3, 2021. The plaintiffs filed an ex parte motion to file an amended complaint on December 14, which Judge Gallo granted on December 17. Because the plaintiffs still needed to file an amended complaint, Judge Gallo also denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss without prejudice. Two private firms and the ACLU of San Diego filed appearances on behalf of the plaintiff in December 2021. The plaintiff (now represented by counsel) filed a second amended complaint on February 9, 2022, which joined other detainees as plaintiffs and brought additional claims against the City of San Diego, Correctional Healthcare Partners, Tri-City Medical Center, Liberty Healthcare, Mid-America Health, an individual doctor, the San Diego County Probation Department, and twenty individuals under the Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments, the ADA, and California state law. The second amended complaint alleged preventable deaths caused by suicide, overdoses, homicide, and medical neglect; chronic and dangerous understaffing of medical professionals; unsanitary living conditions; failure to track and accommodate disabilities; denial of access to counsel; “deliberate indifference” in violation off the Eighth Amendment; and race discrimination. The plaintiffs sought declaratory relief and an injunction requiring the defendants to implement a plan to eliminate the substantial risk of harm, discrimination, and statutory violations. The plaintiffs also sought certification for a class of adults who are now or will be incarcerated in a San Diego County Jail facility, and a subclass for those who meet the ADA’s definition of “qualified individuals with a disability.”  

The plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed as defendants the State of California, the Governor of California, the Mayor of San Diego, the Director of San Diego’s Office of Assigned Counsel, the San Diego County Sheriff, the Attorney General of California, and three other individuals on February 11, 2022; Tri-City Medical Center on February 22; and Mid-America Health on July 7. On May 2, 2022, the plaintiffs filed motions for a preliminary injunction and provisional class certification. 

The defendant doctor who worked at the jail, Liberty Healthcare, the County of San Diego, and Correctional Healthcare Partners each filed motions to dismiss the second amended complaint on March 4, May 3, and May 9, respectively. Mid-America Health filed a motion for summary judgment on June 1. The parties agreed to dismiss Mid-America Health as a defendant on July 7, and the court thus found the motion for summary judgment moot on July 11. 

The court denied the plaintiffs’ motions for a preliminary injunction and provisional class certification of an injunctive class on August 15, 2022. Judge Battaglia found that the fact that the plaintiffs were no longer incarcerated did not render their claims moot because their claims fell within the “capable-of-repetition-yet-evading review” branch of the mootness doctrine. The court, however, denied the motion for a preliminary injunction on the basis that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate likelihood of success on the merits, failed to plead an injury, and requested overly broad relief. Because he denied the motion for a preliminary injunction, Judge Battaglia also declined to certify an injunctive class on mootness grounds.

The plaintiffs’ case suffered another setback on September 27, 2022, when the court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ second amended complaint and directed the plaintiffs to file a new complaint with more specific facts. Judge Battaglia dismissed the plaintiffs’ Eighth Amendment claim with prejudice, finding that the plaintiffs did not provide authority for the proposition that the cruel and unusual punishment provision extends to pretrial detainees and that the plaintiffs had an alternative path to vindicating their rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The plaintiffs’ claim for violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act against the county was dismissed with prejudice because a claim under the Unruh Act does not apply against counties. 

On October 6, the plaintiffs asked the court to reconsider its dismissal of the Eighth Amendment  claim with prejudice. The court granted the motion to reconsider on October 31 and dismissed the Eighth Amendment claim without prejudice, finding that the court had mistakenly believed the plaintiffs were all pre-trial detainees. 

The plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint on November 18, which re-pleaded the Eighth Amendment claims and alleged more specific facts about the poor jail conditions, the plaintiffs’ disabilities, and the lack of access to medical care. The county filed a motion to dismiss this third amended complaint on December 23, 2022. On January 17, 2023, the court ordered the defendants to allow the plaintiffs’ counsel and experts to inspect the jail facilities. 

The plaintiffs moved for a preliminary injunction and for provisional class certification on April 25, 2023. Two days later, the court partially granted the county’s motion to dismiss the third amended complaint. Judge Battaglia dismissed the plaintiffs’ claim that the defendants over-incarcerate people with disabilities and left the rest of the claims intact.

The parties conducted an early neutral evaluation on May 24 and further settlement discussions on June 5, 8, 15, and 16. After these discussions, the parties and the court agreed on June 21 that: (1) the plaintiffs’ motion for provisional class certification should be granted for settlement purposes only, (2) the defendants must modify some showers and cells at Central Jail to comply with the ADA, (3) the defendants must improve intake procedures to ensure accessibility for incarcerated people with mobility disabilities, and (4) the defendants must improve accessibility to sign language interpreters for incarcerated people with hearing disabilities. The parties set out a schedule for the defendants’ implementation and the plaintiffs’ feedback regarding these remedial measures. Given the parties’ agreement, the court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction as moot on June 21. 

The parties conducted status conferences on July 12 and August 2. They also held several settlement conferences and issued multiple status reports between September and November 2023. The parties moved for class certification on October 24, which the court granted on November 3. The court certified additional subclasses for adults who are now or will be incarcerated in San Diego County Jail facilities and who either (1) have private counsel or are pursuing federal claims on a pro per basis or (2) are Black or Latinx. The case is ongoing as of November 6, 2023.

Summary Authors

Michelle Landry (7/12/2022)

Hannah Juge (10/18/2022)

Sophia Acker (11/7/2023)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/16922109/parties/dunsmore-v-state-of-california/


Judge(s)

Battaglia, Anthony Joseph (California)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Anderson, Eric D. (California)

Chartoff, Hannah M. (California)

Attorney for Defendant

Bloodworth, Brian T. (California)

Coleman, Susan E (California)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

3:20-cv-00406

Complaint Under the Civil Rights Act

Dunsmore v. State of California, et al

March 2, 2020

March 2, 2020

Complaint
4

3:20-cv-00406

Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Dismissing Complaint For Failing to State a Claim Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

April 6, 2020

April 6, 2020

Order/Opinion

2020 WL 1692431

19

3:20-cv-00406

First Amended Complaint

July 23, 2020

July 23, 2020

Complaint
23

3:20-cv-00406

Order

Aug. 4, 2020

Aug. 4, 2020

Order/Opinion

2020 WL 4464479

26

3:20-cv-00406

Order

Dunsmore v. State of California, et al.

Sept. 21, 2020

Sept. 21, 2020

Order/Opinion

2020 WL 6829562

20-55942

Order

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Sept. 21, 2020

Sept. 21, 2020

Order/Opinion

2020 WL 6829562

32

3:20-cv-00406

Order on Motion for Order

Dunsmore v. State of California, et al.

Oct. 14, 2020

Oct. 14, 2020

Order/Opinion

2020 WL 6081717

46

3:20-cv-00406

20-55942

USCA Mandate

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Aug. 23, 2021

Aug. 23, 2021

Order/Opinion

854 Fed.Appx. 913

80

3:20-cv-00406

Order (1) Granting Plaintiff's Motion To Amend And (2) Denying Defendants' Motion To Dismiss

Dunsmore v. State of California, et al.

Dec. 17, 2021

Dec. 17, 2021

Order/Opinion
81

3:20-cv-00406

Second Amended Civil Class Action Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

Dunsmore v. San Diego County Sheriff's Department

Feb. 9, 2022

Feb. 9, 2022

Complaint

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/16922109/dunsmore-v-state-of-california/

Last updated Dec. 21, 2024, 1:10 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against State of California, San Diego County, San Diego Sheriffs Dept., Dept of Corrections, Xavier Beccera, Gore, Attorney General, filed by Darryl Dunsmore. ($400.00 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Not Filed) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-406-AJB-WVG. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms)(jrd) (Entered: 03/03/2020)

March 2, 2020

March 2, 2020

RECAP
2

ORDER DISMISSING Civil Action for Failing to Prepay Filing Fees Required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) or File a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 3/5/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jrm) (Entered: 03/05/2020)

March 5, 2020

March 5, 2020

RECAP
3

MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Darryl Dunsmore. (jms) (Entered: 03/24/2020)

March 23, 2020

March 23, 2020

PACER
4

Order: (1) Granting Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 3 ); and (2) Dismissing Complaint for Failing to State a Claim Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). The Secretary CDCR, or his designee, is ordered to collect from prison trust account the $350 balance of the filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income credited to the account and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b)(2). (Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR). Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 4/6/2020. (All non-registered users and Watch Commander served via U.S. Mail Service t/w Complaint form)(jrm) Modified docket text on 4/20/2020 (jrm). (Entered: 04/07/2020)

April 6, 2020

April 6, 2020

RECAP
5

Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia Rejecting Document: Motion to Proceed to IFP, from Plaintiff Darryl Dunsmore. Non-compliance with local rule(s), OTHER: Moot. Duplicate of Motion to Proceed IFP filed 3/23/2020 (ECF No. 3 ) was granted on 4/6/20 (ECF No. 4 ). Complaint was dismissed per 28 USC § 1915(e) & 1915A on 4/6/20. To proceed, Plaintiff must file Amended Complaint within 45 days of 4/6/20 Order. Rejected document was returned to the filer. Signed by the Chambers of Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 4/14/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jrm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/14/2020: # 1 Rejected Document) (jrm). (Entered: 04/14/2020)

April 14, 2020

April 14, 2020

PACER
6

Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia Rejecting Document: Motion for Appointment of Counsel, from Plaintiff Darryl Dunsmore. Non-compliance with local rule(s), OTHER: Case closed Civ.L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 - Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document; Civ.L. Rule 5.1 - Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation. Signed by the Chambers of Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 6/8/2020.(jrm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/9/2020: # 1 Rejected Document) (jrm). (Entered: 06/09/2020)

June 9, 2020

June 9, 2020

PACER
7

Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia Accepting Document: Motion for Extension of Time to File First Amended Complaint, from Plaintiff Darryl Dunsmore. Non-compliance with local rule(s), OTHER: Case closed per Order dated 4/6/2020 (ECF 4). Nunc Pro Tunc 6/19/2020. Signed by the Chambers of Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 6/22/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms) (Entered: 06/22/2020)

June 22, 2020

June 22, 2020

PACER
8

MOTION for Extension of Time to File to File First Amended Complaint by Darryl Dunsmore. Nunc Pro Tunc 6/19/2020(jms) (Entered: 06/22/2020)

June 22, 2020

June 22, 2020

PACER
9

ORDER BY JUDGE BATTAGLIA: GRANTING 8 Motion for Extension of Time to File First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff is granted an additional 45 days from the date of this order in which to file an amended complaint. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (sc) (Entered: 06/22/2020)

June 22, 2020

June 22, 2020

PACER

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File

June 22, 2020

June 22, 2020

PACER
10

Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia Rejecting Document: Motion for Intervention, from Plaintiff Darryl Dunsmore. Non-compliance with local rule(s), OTHER: Civ.L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 - Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document; Civ.L. Rule 5.1 - Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation; Complaint was dismissed per 28 USC § 1915(e) & 1915A on 4/6/20. To proceed, Plaintiff must file Amended Complaint, Rejected document was returned to the filer. Signed by the Chambers of Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 6/29/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jrm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/29/2020: # 1 Rejected Document) (jrm). (Entered: 06/29/2020)

June 29, 2020

June 29, 2020

PACER
11

***Document Stricken per Order 18 ** AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Attorney General, Xavier Beccera, Jackie Burden, Dept of Corrections, John Doe, Michael Garcia, Gore, Newsom, OAC, San Diego County, San Diego Sheriffs Dept., Sipperly, State of California, filed by Darryl Dunsmore. (jms) Modified to Strike on 7/23/2020 (jrm). (Main Document 11 replaced on 7/23/2020) (jrm). (Entered: 07/02/2020)

July 1, 2020

July 1, 2020

PACER
12

Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia Accepting Document: Declaration by Ken Karan and Exhibits, from Plaintiff Darryl Dunsmore. Non-compliance with local rule(s), OTHER: Filer not a party to the case. Nunc Pro Tunc 7/10/2020. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 7/17/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dsn) (Entered: 07/17/2020)

July 17, 2020

July 17, 2020

PACER
13

Declaration by Ken Karan and Exhibits, by Plaintiff Darryl Dunsmore. Nunc pro tunc 7/10/2020. (dsn) (Entered: 07/17/2020)

July 17, 2020

July 17, 2020

RECAP
14

Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia Accepting Document: Declaration, from Plaintiff Darryl Dunsmore. Document to be filed as "Motion to Strike Amended Complaint". Non-compliance with local rule(s), OTHER: S.D. Cal. CivLR 7.1.f.1: Document requests relief from Court but is not in motion format. Nunc Pro Tunc 7/13/2020. Signed by the chambers of Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 7/17/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dsn) (Entered: 07/17/2020)

July 17, 2020

July 17, 2020

PACER
15

Motion to Strike Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Darryl Dunsmore. Nunce pro tunc 7/13/2020. (dsn) Modified text and regenerated notice on 7/17/2020 (dsn). (Entered: 07/17/2020)

July 17, 2020

July 17, 2020

PACER
16

ORDER BY JUDGE BATTAGLIA: Setting Briefing Schedule re 15 MOTION to Strike Document : Responses due by 7/31/2020; Replies due by 8/7/2020; sur-replies will not be accepted.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (sc) (Entered: 07/17/2020)

July 17, 2020

July 17, 2020

PACER
17

ORDER BY JUDGE BATTAGLIA: DOCKETED IN ERROR, Order setting briefing schedule (Doc. No. 16). Briefing schedule vacated.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (sc) (Entered: 07/17/2020)

July 17, 2020

July 17, 2020

PACER

Order Setting Briefing Schedule

July 17, 2020

July 17, 2020

PACER

Order AND ~Util - Terminate Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings

July 17, 2020

July 17, 2020

PACER
18

ORDER Granting Motion to Strike Amended Complaint (ECF No. 15 ); and (2) Directing the Clerk of Court to File Amended Complaint' Motion for Civil Contempt; Motion to Appoint Counsel; Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 13 ). Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 7/22/2020. (jrm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/23/2020: # 1 Stricken Document) (jrm). (Entered: 07/23/2020)

July 22, 2020

July 22, 2020

RECAP
19

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Xavier Beccera, Jackie Burden, Kevin Faulconer, Michael Garcia, Gore, Craig Leff, Newsom, OAC, San Diego County, State of California, filed by Darryl Dunsmore. (jms) (Main Document 19 replaced on 7/30/2020) (jms). (Entered: 07/23/2020)

July 23, 2020

July 23, 2020

RECAP
20

MOTION for Civil Contempt by Darryl Dunsmore. (jms) (Entered: 07/23/2020)

July 23, 2020

July 23, 2020

PACER
21

MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Darryl Dunsmore. (jms) (Entered: 07/23/2020)

July 23, 2020

July 23, 2020

PACER
22

MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction by Darryl Dunsmore. (jms) (Entered: 07/23/2020)

July 23, 2020

July 23, 2020

RECAP
23

ORDER: (1) Denying motion for civil contempt, motion to appoint counsel, and motion for temporary restraining order;l and (2) Dismissing First Amended Complaint pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2) and 28 USC 1915A(b). Plaintiff is granted sixty (60) days leave from the date of this Order in which to file an Amended Complaint. (Blank civil rights form mailed to Plaintiff). Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 8/04/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp) (dlg). (Entered: 08/04/2020)

Aug. 4, 2020

Aug. 4, 2020

RECAP
24

NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit by Darryl Dunsmore as to 23 Order. IFP Status. (Notice of Appeal electronically transmitted to the US Court of Appeals.) (akr) (Entered: 09/10/2020)

Sept. 8, 2020

Sept. 8, 2020

PACER
25

USCA Case Number 20-55942 for 24 Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit filed by Darryl Dunsmore. (akr) (Entered: 09/10/2020)

Sept. 10, 2020

Sept. 10, 2020

PACER
26

ORDER of USCA as to 24 Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit filed by Darryl Dunsmore. A review of the record demonstrates that the USCA lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Dismissed. (akr) (Entered: 09/21/2020)

Sept. 21, 2020

Sept. 21, 2020

RECAP
27

USCA Case Number 20-72940 for the Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by Darryl Dunsmore. (akr) (Entered: 10/01/2020)

Oct. 1, 2020

Oct. 1, 2020

RECAP
28

Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia Accepting Document: Motion for Final Order, from Plaintiff Darryl Dunsmore. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ. L. Rule 5.1: Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation, Civ. L. Rule 7.1: Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document. Nunc Pro Tunc 10/5/2020. Signed by the Chambers of Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 10/6/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms) (Entered: 10/07/2020)

Oct. 6, 2020

Oct. 6, 2020

PACER
29

MOTION for Final Order by Darryl Dunsmore. Nunc Pro Tunc 10/6/2020(jms) (Entered: 10/07/2020)

Oct. 6, 2020

Oct. 6, 2020

PACER
30

ORDER of USCA as to the Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by Darryl Dunsmore. Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of the USCA by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. Accordingly, the petition is denied. No further filings will be accepted in this closed mandamus case. Denied. (akr) (Entered: 10/13/2020)

Oct. 13, 2020

Oct. 13, 2020

RECAP
31

MANDATE of USCA dismissing the appeal as to 24 Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit filed by Darryl Dunsmore. (akr) (Entered: 10/14/2020)

Oct. 13, 2020

Oct. 13, 2020

PACER
32

ORDER Granting Motion for Voluntary Dismissal. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 10/14/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jrm) (Entered: 10/15/2020)

Oct. 14, 2020

Oct. 14, 2020

RECAP
33

NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit by Darryl Dunsmore as to 32 Order. IFP Status. (Notice of Appeal electronically transmitted to the US Court of Appeals.) (akr) (Entered: 10/27/2020)

Oct. 26, 2020

Oct. 26, 2020

PACER
34

USCA Case Number 20-56135 for 33 Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit filed by Darryl Dunsmore. (akr) (Entered: 10/28/2020)

Oct. 28, 2020

Oct. 28, 2020

PACER
35

USCA Time Schedule Order as to 33 Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit filed by Darryl Dunsmore. (akr) (Entered: 10/28/2020)

Oct. 28, 2020

Oct. 28, 2020

PACER
36

Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia Rejecting Document: Motion for ADA Access, from Plaintiff Darryl Dunsmore. Non-compliance with local rule(s), OTHER: Case closed per Order Granting Motion for Voluntary Dismissal dated 10/14/2020 (ECF 14) Civ.L. Rule 7.1 - Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support; Civ.L. Rule 5.1 - Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation, Rejected document was returned to the filer. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 11/2/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jrm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/2/2020: # 1 Rejected Document) (jrm). (Entered: 11/02/2020)

Nov. 2, 2020

Nov. 2, 2020

PACER
37

NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit by Darryl Dunsmore as to 36 Notice and Order of Document Discrepancies Rejecting Document. IFP Status. (Notice of Appeal electronically transmitted to the US Court of Appeals.) (akr) (Entered: 11/19/2020)

Nov. 18, 2020

Nov. 18, 2020

RECAP
38

USCA Case Number 20-56221 for 37 Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit filed by Darryl Dunsmore. (akr) (Entered: 11/20/2020)

Nov. 20, 2020

Nov. 20, 2020

PACER
39

USCA Time Schedule Order as to 37 Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit filed by Darryl Dunsmore. (akr) (Entered: 11/20/2020)

Nov. 20, 2020

Nov. 20, 2020

PACER
40

REFERRAL NOTICE from USCA as to 37 Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit filed by Darryl Dunsmore. This matter is referred to the USDC for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. If the USDC elects to revoke in forma pauperis status, the USDC is requested to notify the USCA and the parties of such determination within 21 days of the date of this referral. If the USDC does not revoke in forma pauperis status, such status will continue automatically for this appeal pursuant to FRAP 24(a). This referral shall not affect the briefing schedule previously established by the USCA. (akr) (Entered: 12/15/2020)

Dec. 15, 2020

Dec. 15, 2020

PACER
41

ORDER of USCA t/w Prisoner Authorization Form as to 37 Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit filed by Darryl Dunsmore. Appellant has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis and has completed and filed the required authorization form directing the appropriate prison officials to assess, collect, and forward to the USDC the filing and docketing fees for this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(b)(1) and (2). USCA assesses and defines initial filing fee. Appellant is not responsible for payment when the funds in appellant's prison trust account total less than $10, but payments must resume when additional deposits are made or funds are otherwise available. The Clerk shall serve this order and appellant's completed authorization form on the Attorney General for the State of California, who shall notify the appropriate agency or prison authority responsible for calculating, collecting, and forwarding the initial payment assessed in this order and for assessing, collecting, and forwarding the remaining monthly payments of the fee to the USDC for this appeal. Each payment should be accompanied by the USDC and appellate docket numbers for this appeal and a record of previous payments made for this appeal. (akr) (Entered: 03/17/2021)

March 17, 2021

March 17, 2021

PACER
42

Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia Rejecting Document: Motin for Petition for Writ of Mandate, from Plaintiff Darryl Dunsmore. Non-compliance with local rule(s), OTHER: Civ.L. Rule 7.1 - Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support; Civ.L. Rule 5.1 - Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation; Case Closed; appeal pending; document illegible. Signed by the Chambers of Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 4/22/2021. (Attachments: # 1 rejected document)(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jrm) (Entered: 04/22/2021)

April 22, 2021

April 22, 2021

PACER
43

Mail Returned as Undeliverable re 42 Notice and Order of Document Discrepancies. Mail sent to Darryl Dunsmore. (bta) (Entered: 05/11/2021)

May 11, 2021

May 11, 2021

PACER
44

ORDER of USCA as to 37 Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit filed by Darryl Dunsmore. A review of the docket demonstrates that appellant has failed to file the opening brief in this case. Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to prosecute. This order served on the USDC shall, 21 days after the date of the order, act as the mandate of the USCA. (akr) (Entered: 06/21/2021)

June 21, 2021

June 21, 2021

PACER
45

Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia Rejecting Document: Motion for TRO and Preliminary Injunction, from Plaintiff Darryl Dunsmore. Non-compliance with local rule(s), OTHER: Case closed Civ.L. Rule 7.1 - Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support; Civ.L. Rule 5.1 - Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia. (Attachments: # 1 Rejected Document)(jrm) (Entered: 08/10/2021)

Aug. 10, 2021

Aug. 10, 2021

PACER
46

MANDATE of USCA reversing and remanding to the USDC as to 33 Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit filed by Darryl Dunsmore. (akr) (Entered: 08/23/2021)

Aug. 23, 2021

Aug. 23, 2021

RECAP
47

NOTICE of Spreading the Mandate: The Court spreads the USCA Mandate No. 20-56135. Court will issue a written order. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (lrf) (Entered: 08/23/2021)

Aug. 23, 2021

Aug. 23, 2021

PACER

Notice of Spreading the Mandate

Aug. 23, 2021

Aug. 23, 2021

PACER
48

Order Directing U.S. Marshal Service to Effect Service of First Amended Complaint, (Doc. No. 19 ). Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 8/24/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (Certified Copy to USM) (jrm) (Entered: 08/24/2021)

Aug. 24, 2021

Aug. 24, 2021

PACER
49

Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (Attachments: # 1 IFP Letter)(jrm) (Entered: 08/24/2021)

Aug. 24, 2021

Aug. 24, 2021

PACER
50

NOTICE of Change of Address by Darryl Dunsmore (jms) (Entered: 08/30/2021)

Aug. 27, 2021

Aug. 27, 2021

PACER
51

Mail Returned as Undeliverable re 45 Notice and Order of Document Discrepancies. Mail sent to Darryl Dunsmore. (bta) (Entered: 08/31/2021)

Aug. 31, 2021

Aug. 31, 2021

PACER
52

NOTICE of Change of Address by Darryl Dunsmore (jms) (Entered: 09/20/2021)

Sept. 16, 2021

Sept. 16, 2021

PACER
53

Mail Returned as Undeliverable re 47 Notice of Spreading the Mandate. Mail sent to Darryl Dunsmore. (bta) (Entered: 09/30/2021)

Sept. 30, 2021

Sept. 30, 2021

PACER
54

USM 285 - Summons Returned Unexecuted by Darryl Dunsmore as to John Doe. (jrm) (Entered: 10/15/2021)

Oct. 12, 2021

Oct. 12, 2021

PACER
55

Summons Returned Unexecuted (USM 285) by Darryl Dunsmore as to Dept of Corrections. (jrm) (Entered: 10/15/2021)

Oct. 12, 2021

Oct. 12, 2021

PACER
56

Summons Returned Unexecuted (USM 285) by Darryl Dunsmore as to John Doe - Theodore Weathers. (jrm) (Entered: 10/15/2021)

Oct. 12, 2021

Oct. 12, 2021

PACER
57

Summons Returned Unexecuted (USM 285) by Darryl Dunsmore as to John Doe - David Rankin. (jrm) (Entered: 10/15/2021)

Oct. 12, 2021

Oct. 12, 2021

PACER
58

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (USM 285) as to Jackie Burden by Darryl Dunsmore (jrm) (Entered: 10/27/2021)

Oct. 19, 2021

Oct. 19, 2021

PACER
59

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (USM 285) as to Michael Garcia by Darryl Dunsmore (jrm) (Entered: 10/27/2021)

Oct. 19, 2021

Oct. 19, 2021

PACER
60

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (USM 285) as to Craig Leiff by Darryl Dunsmore (jrm) (Entered: 10/27/2021)

Oct. 19, 2021

Oct. 19, 2021

PACER
61

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (USM 285) as San Diego County by Darryl Dunsmore (jrm) (Entered: 10/27/2021)

Oct. 19, 2021

Oct. 19, 2021

PACER
62

Summons Returned Unexecuted (USM 285) by Darryl Dunsmore as to Kevin Faulconer. (jrm) (Entered: 10/27/2021)

Oct. 19, 2021

Oct. 19, 2021

PACER
63

Summons Returned Unexecuted by Darryl Dunsmore as to Gore. (jrm) (Entered: 10/27/2021)

Oct. 19, 2021

Oct. 19, 2021

PACER
64

MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Gore, San Diego County. (Attachments: # 1 Memo of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendants County of San Diego and William Gore's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, # 2 Proof of Service)(Lenert, Ronald)Attorney Ronald Lenert added to party Gore(pty:dft), Attorney Ronald Lenert added to party San Diego County(pty:dft) (jrm). (Entered: 11/03/2021)

Nov. 3, 2021

Nov. 3, 2021

PACER
65

ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule on Defendants 64 MOTION to Dismiss. Responses due by 1/10/2022. Replies due by 1/28/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 11/5/2021.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ag) (Entered: 11/05/2021)

Nov. 5, 2021

Nov. 5, 2021

RECAP
66

NOTICE of Appearance by Gay Crosthwait Grunfeld on behalf of Darryl Dunsmore (Grunfeld, Gay)Attorney Gay Crosthwait Grunfeld added to party Darryl Dunsmore(pty:pla)(jms). (Entered: 12/13/2021)

Dec. 13, 2021

Dec. 13, 2021

RECAP
67

NOTICE of Appearance by Richard Van Swearingen on behalf of Darryl Dunsmore (Swearingen, Richard)Attorney Richard Van Swearingen added to party Darryl Dunsmore(pty:pla) (jms). (Entered: 12/13/2021)

Dec. 13, 2021

Dec. 13, 2021

PACER
68

NOTICE of Appearance by Eric D. Monek Anderson on behalf of Darryl Dunsmore (Monek Anderson, Eric)Attorney Eric D. Monek Anderson added to party Darryl Dunsmore(pty:pla) (jms). (Entered: 12/13/2021)

Dec. 13, 2021

Dec. 13, 2021

PACER
69

NOTICE of Appearance by Priyah Kaul on behalf of Darryl Dunsmore (Kaul, Priyah)Attorney Priyah Kaul added to party Darryl Dunsmore(pty:pla) (jms). (Entered: 12/13/2021)

Dec. 13, 2021

Dec. 13, 2021

PACER
70

NOTICE of Appearance as Counsel of Record by Christopher M. Young on behalf of Darryl Dunsmore (Young, Christopher)Attorney Christopher M. Young added to party Darryl Dunsmore(pty:pla) (jms). (Entered: 12/14/2021)

Dec. 14, 2021

Dec. 14, 2021

PACER
71

NOTICE of Appearance as Counsel of Record by Oliver M. Kiefer on behalf of Darryl Dunsmore (Kiefer, Oliver)Attorney Oliver M. Kiefer added to party Darryl Dunsmore(pty:pla) (jms). (Entered: 12/14/2021)

Dec. 14, 2021

Dec. 14, 2021

PACER
72

NOTICE of Appearance by Bardis Vakili on behalf of Darryl Dunsmore (Vakili, Bardis)Attorney Bardis Vakili added to party Darryl Dunsmore(pty:pla) (jms). (Entered: 12/14/2021)

Dec. 14, 2021

Dec. 14, 2021

PACER
73

NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Paul Markovitz on behalf of Darryl Dunsmore (Markovitz, Jonathan)Attorney Jonathan Paul Markovitz added to party Darryl Dunsmore(pty:pla)(jms). (Entered: 12/14/2021)

Dec. 14, 2021

Dec. 14, 2021

PACER
74

Ex Parte MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint, Ex Parte MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion to Dismiss by Darryl Dunsmore. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Christopher M. Young, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2)(Young, Christopher)(jms). (Entered: 12/14/2021)

1 Declaration of Christopher M. Young

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit 1

View on PACER

3 Exhibit 2

View on RECAP

Dec. 14, 2021

Dec. 14, 2021

RECAP
75

NOTICE of Intent to File Written Opposition to Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion by Gore, San Diego County re 74 Ex Parte MOTION for Leave to File Amended ComplaintEx Parte MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion to Dismiss (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)(Lenert, Ronald) (jrm). (Entered: 12/15/2021)

Dec. 15, 2021

Dec. 15, 2021

PACER
76

NOTICE of Appearance as Counsel of Record by Isabella Neal on behalf of Darryl Dunsmore (Neal, Isabella)Attorney Isabella Neal added to party Darryl Dunsmore(pty:pla)(jrm). (Entered: 12/15/2021)

Dec. 15, 2021

Dec. 15, 2021

PACER
77

ORDER BY JUDGE BATTAGLIA: Setting Briefing Schedule re 74 Ex Parte MOTION for Leave to File Amended ComplaintEx Parte MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion to Dismiss : Responses due by 12/29/2021; Replies due by 1/5/2022; sur-replies will not be accepted. Motion Hearing set for 2/24/2022 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 4A before Judge Anthony J. Battaglia. Counsel is reminded to follow Judge Battaglia's chambers rules with regard to getting a motion hearing date prior to filing. (no document attached) (sc) (Entered: 12/16/2021)

Dec. 16, 2021

Dec. 16, 2021

PACER
78

NOTICE of Appearance by Aaron J. Fischer on behalf of Darryl Dunsmore (Fischer, Aaron)Attorney Aaron J. Fischer added to party Darryl Dunsmore(pty:pla) (jmo). (Entered: 12/16/2021)

Dec. 16, 2021

Dec. 16, 2021

PACER

Order Setting Briefing Schedule

Dec. 16, 2021

Dec. 16, 2021

PACER
79

ORDER BY JUDGE BATTAGLIA: Order vacating briefing schedule and motion hearing date (doc. No. 77). The Ex Parte MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint, Ex Parte MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion to Dismiss (doc. No. 74), filed by plaintiff is set before Magistrate Judge Gallo. (no document attached) (sc) (Entered: 12/17/2021)

Dec. 17, 2021

Dec. 17, 2021

PACER
80

ORDER (1) Granting Plaintiff's motion to amend and (2) Denying Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. Nos. 64 & 74 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 12/17/2021. (jpp) (Entered: 12/17/2021)

Dec. 17, 2021

Dec. 17, 2021

RECAP

~Util - Terminate Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings AND Order

Dec. 17, 2021

Dec. 17, 2021

PACER
81

AMENDED COMPLAINT (SECOND AMENDED CIVIL CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF) against San Diego County Sheriff's Department, County of San Diego, Correctional Healthcare Partners, Inc., Tri-City Medical Center, Liberty Healthcare, Inc., Mid-America Health, Inc., Logan Haak, M.D., Inc., San Diego County Probation Department, filed by Darryl Dunsmore, Josue Lopez, Christopher Nelson, Reanna Levy, Christopher Norwood, Ernest Archuleta, Anthony Edwards, Laura Zoerner.New Summons Requested. (Swearingen, Richard)(smy1). (Entered: 02/09/2022)

Feb. 9, 2022

Feb. 9, 2022

RECAP
82

Summons Issued re 81 . Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jrm) (Entered: 02/10/2022)

Feb. 10, 2022

Feb. 10, 2022

PACER
83

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Ernest Archuleta, Darryl Dunsmore, Anthony Edwards, Reanna Levy, Josue Lopez, Christopher Nelson, Christopher Norwood, Laura Zoerner (Without Prejudice of Defendants State of California, Gavin Newsom, Kevin Faulconer, Michael Garcia, William Gore, Xavier Becerra, Jackie Burden, Craig Leff, Office of Assigned Counsel, and Sergeant Sipperly) (Swearingen, Richard) (smy1). (Entered: 02/11/2022)

Feb. 11, 2022

Feb. 11, 2022

RECAP
84

NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Thomas Grohman on behalf of Mid-America Health, Inc. (Grohman, Christopher)Attorney Christopher Thomas Grohman added to party Mid-America Health, Inc.(pty:dft)(jrm). (Entered: 02/16/2022)

Feb. 16, 2022

Feb. 16, 2022

RECAP
85

Notice of Appearance by Mid-America Health, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit)(Grohman, Christopher)(jrm). Updated docket text/event; QC Mailer sent re incorrectly filed PHV application on 2/18/2022 (jrm). (Entered: 02/16/2022)

1 Exhibit

View on PACER

2 Exhibit

View on PACER

Feb. 16, 2022

Feb. 16, 2022

PACER
86

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Ernest Archuleta, Darryl Dunsmore, Anthony Edwards, Reanna Levy, Josue Lopez, Christopher Nelson, Christopher Norwood, Laura Zoerner re 83 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, (Swearingen, Richard)(jrm). (Entered: 02/16/2022)

Feb. 16, 2022

Feb. 16, 2022

PACER
87

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Josue Lopez, Laura Zoerner, Darryl Dunsmore, Anthony Edwards, Reanna Levy, Christopher Nelson, Christopher Norwood, Ernest Archuleta. Liberty Healthcare, Inc. served. (Swearingen, Richard)(jrm). (Entered: 02/17/2022)

Feb. 17, 2022

Feb. 17, 2022

PACER
88

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Josue Lopez, Laura Zoerner, Darryl Dunsmore, Anthony Edwards, Reanna Levy, Christopher Nelson, Christopher Norwood, Ernest Archuleta. Logan Haak, M.D., Inc. served. (Swearingen, Richard)(jrm). (Entered: 02/17/2022)

Feb. 17, 2022

Feb. 17, 2022

PACER
89

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Josue Lopez, Laura Zoerner, Darryl Dunsmore, Anthony Edwards, Reanna Levy, Christopher Nelson, Christopher Norwood, Ernest Archuleta. Mid-America Health, Inc. served. (Swearingen, Richard)(jrm). (Entered: 02/17/2022)

Feb. 17, 2022

Feb. 17, 2022

PACER
90

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Josue Lopez, Laura Zoerner, Darryl Dunsmore, Anthony Edwards, Reanna Levy, Christopher Nelson, Christopher Norwood, Ernest Archuleta. San Diego County Probation Department served. (Swearingen, Richard)(jrm). (Entered: 02/17/2022)

Feb. 17, 2022

Feb. 17, 2022

PACER
91

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Josue Lopez, Laura Zoerner, Darryl Dunsmore, Anthony Edwards, Reanna Levy, Christopher Nelson, Christopher Norwood, Ernest Archuleta. San Diego County Sheriff's Department served. (Swearingen, Richard)(smy1). (Entered: 02/18/2022)

Feb. 18, 2022

Feb. 18, 2022

PACER
92

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Josue Lopez, Laura Zoerner, Darryl Dunsmore, Anthony Edwards, Reanna Levy, Christopher Nelson, Christopher Norwood, Ernest Archuleta. Correctional Healthcare Partners, Inc. served. (Swearingen, Richard)(smy1). (Entered: 02/18/2022)

Feb. 18, 2022

Feb. 18, 2022

PACER
93

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Ernest Archuleta, Darryl Dunsmore, Anthony Edwards, Reanna Levy, Josue Lopez, Christopher Nelson, Christopher Norwood, Laura Zoerner Without Prejudice of Defendant Tri-City Medical Center (Swearingen, Richard) (smy1). (Entered: 02/22/2022)

Feb. 22, 2022

Feb. 22, 2022

RECAP
94

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Ernest Archuleta, Darryl Dunsmore, Anthony Edwards, Reanna Levy, Josue Lopez, Christopher Nelson, Christopher Norwood, Laura Zoerner re 93 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, (Swearingen, Richard)(smy1). (Entered: 02/24/2022)

Feb. 24, 2022

Feb. 24, 2022

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: California

Case Type(s):

Jail Conditions

Disability Rights

Special Collection(s):

Deaf or Blind in Jail/Prison

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 2, 2020

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

A class of all adults who are now, or will be in the future, incarcerated in a San Diego County Jail facility, and subclasses of those incarcerated people who (1) have a legally defined "disability"; (2) have private counsel or are pursuing claims on a pro per basis; or (3) are Black or Latinx.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

ACLU Affiliates (any)

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: Yes

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

San Diego County Sheriff's Department (San Diego, San Diego), County

County of San Diego (San Diego), County

San Diego County Probation Department (San Diego), County

Defendant Type(s):

Law-enforcement

Jurisdiction-wide

Corrections

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.

Section 504 (Rehabilitation Act), 29 U.S.C. § 701

State law

Ex parte Young (federal or state officials)

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

General/Misc.:

Access to lawyers or judicial system

Access to public accommodations - governmental

Bathing and hygiene

Bathrooms

Conditions of confinement

Counseling

Failure to train

Neglect by staff

Rehabilitation

Sanitation / living conditions

Disability and Disability Rights:

Depression

Disability, unspecified

Effective Communication (ADA)

Hearing impairment

Intellectual/developmental disability, unspecified

Learning disability

Mental Illness, Unspecified

Mental impairment

Mobility impairment

Visual impairment

Discrimination Basis:

Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Restraints (physical)

Solitary confinement/Supermax (conditions or process)

Medical/Mental Health Care:

Dental care

HIV/AIDS

Intellectual/Developmental Disability

Intellectual disability/mental illness dual diagnosis

Medical care, general

Medical care, unspecified

Medication, administration of

Mental health care, general

Mental health care, unspecified

Self-injurious behaviors

Suicide prevention

Untreated pain

Vision care

Wound care

Policing:

Improper treatment of mentally ill suspects