Case: Wilson v. Wallace

1:17-cv-00582 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio

Filed Date: Sept. 5, 2017

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

(This summary is temporary, while we research the case.) Plaintiffs sought an injunction to prohibit the defendant, a county representative, from banning them from the representative's Facebook page.

Summary Authors

Kathleen Lok (9/22/2022)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

1:17-cv-00582

[Untitled]

None

Sept. 5, 2017

Sept. 5, 2017

None
5

1:17-cv-00582

[Untitled]

None

Oct. 30, 2017

Oct. 30, 2017

None

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/14500004/wilson-v-wallace/

Last updated Sept. 22, 2022, 11:52 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-6107491), filed by Lisa Wilson, Kyle Riley, Kathryn Wuest, Danny Wilson, Amanda Johnson. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Engel, Joshua) (Entered: 09/05/2017)

Sept. 5, 2017

Sept. 5, 2017

Clearinghouse

If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (bjc)

Sept. 6, 2017

Sept. 6, 2017

PACER
2

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Defendant David Wallace on 9/5/2017; answer due 11/6/2017. (Engel, Joshua) Modified to include service and answer details on 9/28/2017 (eh). (Entered: 09/27/2017)

Sept. 27, 2017

Sept. 27, 2017

PACER
3

NOTICE of Appearance by Vincent P Antaki for Defendant David Wallace (Antaki, Vincent) (Entered: 10/24/2017)

Oct. 24, 2017

Oct. 24, 2017

PACER
4

Joint MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment by Plaintiffs Amanda Johnson, Kyle Riley, Danny Wilson, Lisa Wilson, Kathryn Wuest. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Engel, Joshua) (Entered: 10/24/2017)

Oct. 24, 2017

Oct. 24, 2017

PACER
5

CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER re 4 Motion to Approve Consent Judgment. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 10/30/2017. (jlw) (Entered: 10/30/2017)

Oct. 30, 2017

Oct. 30, 2017

Clearinghouse

Case Details

State / Territory: Ohio

Case Type(s):

Speech and Religious Freedom

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 5, 2017

Case Ongoing: No reason to think so

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

A group of citizens of Hamilton Township, Ohio who had their comments deleted and were banned from commenting on the page by an elected representative.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Hamilton Township, City

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Ex parte Young (federal or state officials)

Constitutional Clause(s):

Freedom of speech/association

Availably Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Monetary Relief

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Attorneys fees

Declaratory Judgment

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

Type of Facility:

Government-run