Case: Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice v. O'Connor

120543 | Oklahoma state supreme court

Filed Date: July 1, 2022

Closed Date: March 21, 2023

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On July 1, 2022, abortion providers filed this case directly with the Supreme Court of Oklahoma as a challenge to two abortion bans. This case was brought by Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice, Tulsa Women’s Reproductive Clinic, an M.D., Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains, and Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma against the State of Oklahoma. Represented by the Center for Reproductive Rights, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, and private counsel, P…

On July 1, 2022, abortion providers filed this case directly with the Supreme Court of Oklahoma as a challenge to two abortion bans. This case was brought by Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice, Tulsa Women’s Reproductive Clinic, an M.D., Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains, and Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma against the State of Oklahoma. Represented by the Center for Reproductive Rights, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, and private counsel, Plaintiffs asked the Court to assume original jurisdiction and declare Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 861 (the 1910 Ban) and S.B. 612 (the 2022 Ban) unconstitutional under the Oklahoma Constitution. Plaintiffs argued that the Bans the state constitution’s right to personal autonomy and bodily integrity and due process protections. Plaintiffs also asked the Court to permanently bar the State of Oklahoma (the State) from enforcing the 1910 and 2022 bans.

The 1910 Ban is a criminal ban on abortion with a limited exception to “preserve” a person’s “life.” The 1910 Ban was deemed unconstitutional in 1973, shortly after the United States Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade. Since then, the 1910 Ban had not been enforced in Oklahoma. Upon the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade in Jackson Women's Health Organization v. Dobbs, the Oklahoma Attorney General reinstated the pre-Roe ban. 

In 2021, the State enacted a trigger law with the intention of permitting the revival of the 1910 Ban upon the overturning of Roe. The State also passed the 2022 Ban, which took effect on August 27, 2022. The 2022 Ban makes providing any abortion a felony but contains different penalties and different exceptions from the 1910 Ban. Most notably, whereas the 1910 ban allowed for abortions to preserve life, the 2022 Ban allowed for abortions in cases of "medical emergency." The 2022 Ban enables physicians who provide abortions to face up to ten years in prison and/or a fine of up to $100,000. 

The Oklahoma legislature enacted other laws seeking to prohibit and/or restrict abortions entirely in Oklahoma and these laws were also challenged before the Supreme Court of Oklahoma in Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice v. O’Connor, No. 120376. 

In their complaint, Plaintiffs also called for temporary injunctive relief, claiming it was warranted because Plaintiffs, and those whose interests they represented, would suffer irreparable injury if the 1910 Ban and 2022 Ban remained in effect. On September 12, 2022, the Court summarily denied the emergency motion for an immediate temporary restraining order and/or temporary injunction, without providing a rationale. 

On November 1, 2022 the case was officially assigned to the Supreme Court for the State of Oklahoma. A few months later, on March 21, 2023 the Supreme Court for the State of Oklahoma, in a 5-4 decision, issued its ruling, deciding that the state constitution protects the right to abortion when pregnancy risks the pregnant person’s health, not only in life-threatening situations. However, the Court declined to answer whether the state constitution protects a broader right to abortion outside of those circumstances. The ruling struck down the 2022 ban under a strict scrutiny review, saying it violated Oklahomans' rights to access abortion care in life-threatening situations, but upheld the 1910 ban. The distinguishing factor between the two bans was the court's conclusion that the preservation of life exception was broader than the medical emergency exception. The Court also ruled that the 1910 ban was neither unconstitutionally vague nor repealed by implication, as plaintiffs had argued. 

The case is now closed.

Summary Authors

Nina Leeds (4/10/2023)

Avery Coombe (11/12/2024)

People


show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

120543

Docket No. PR-120543

April 17, 2023

April 17, 2023

Docket

120543

Application For Original Jurisdiction and Petition for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and/or a Writ of Prohibition

July 1, 2022

July 1, 2022

Complaint

120543

Order

Sept. 12, 2022

Sept. 12, 2022

Order/Opinion

120543

Order Granting Declaratory Relief

Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice v. Gentner Drummond et al.

March 21, 2023

March 21, 2023

Order/Opinion

526 P.3d 1123

Docket

Last updated Aug. 30, 2023, 2:32 p.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: Oklahoma

Case Type(s):

Healthcare Access and Reproductive Issues

Special Collection(s):

Abortion Trigger Ban Cases

Key Dates

Filing Date: July 1, 2022

Closing Date: March 21, 2023

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice, Tulsa Women’s Reproductive Clinic, an M.D., Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains, and Planned Parenthood of Arkansas and Eastern Oklahoma

Attorney Organizations:

Center for Reproductive Rights

Planned Parenthood Federation of America

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

State of Oklahoma, State

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

State law

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Non-settlement Outcome

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Mixed

Nature of Relief:

Declaratory Judgment

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Content of Injunction:

Preliminary relief denied

Issues

Reproductive rights:

Abortion

Complete abortion ban

Criminalization

Reproductive health care (including birth control, abortion, and others)