Case: Watson Chiang, Gail v. Glickman, Daniel

1:00-cv-00004 | District Court of the Virgin Islands

Filed Date: Jan. 10, 2000

Closed Date: Dec. 4, 2009

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This is a case about discrimination in federal housing programs administered by the Rural Housing Service (RHS) of the United States Department of Agriculture. The plaintiffs resided in the United States Virgin Islands and claimed that the RHS discriminated against them on the basis of their race, gender, and national origin through the course of administering rural housing programs in the United States Virgin Islands. They filed this lawsuit on January 10, 2000, in the United States District C…

This is a case about discrimination in federal housing programs administered by the Rural Housing Service (RHS) of the United States Department of Agriculture. The plaintiffs resided in the United States Virgin Islands and claimed that the RHS discriminated against them on the basis of their race, gender, and national origin through the course of administering rural housing programs in the United States Virgin Islands. They filed this lawsuit on January 10, 2000, in the United States District Court for the Virgin Islands and sought to represent a class of similarly situated persons. They brought their claims under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA), the Fair Housing Act of 1988, the Administrative Procedure Act, and 42 U.S.C. §1983. 

There were three different ways that the plaintiffs alleged class members were discriminated against. First, some were denied an application and were told to put their names on an unlawful waiting list. This waiting list was a violation of the ECOA, and the plaintiffs estimated that the monetary damages amounted to $2.8 billion. Second, some members were given applications, but RHS then intentionally frustrated the system through delays, causing the members to be unable to obtain funding because the program would run out of funds, members would become ineligible, or members would give up on the process. Again, the plaintiffs alleged that this was a violation of the ECOA. Third, members that were able to obtain loans were denied loan services because of their race, gender, or national origin. The plaintiffs argued that the defendant participated in or agreed to the financing of substandard property or construction as part of its pattern of discrimination. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendant’s discriminatory actions violated their due process rights. As such, the plaintiffs sought declaratory and injunctive relief as well as monetary damages. The case was assigned to Judge Thomas K. Moore.

The plaintiffs defined their class as including “all persons who are Black, Hispanic, female, and/or Virgin Islanders who applied or attempted to apply for, and/or received” program benefits from RHS between January 1, 1981 and January 10, 2000. On February 28, 2003, the plaintiffs’ request for class certification was granted by Judge Moore. 213 F.R.D. 256. 

The defendant filed an interlocutory appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on October 2, 2003. In their appeal, the defendant argued that the class definition was overbroad and encompassed too many people for the action to be manageable. They also claimed that there were not common issues and thus class status would not be more beneficial than individual adjudications. 

On September 20, 2004, the Third Circuit affirmed in part the district court’s certification of the class. Writing for the court, Judge Edward Becker held that the commonality requirement for class certification was met as to the defendants alleged course of discriminatory conduct of placing applicants on waiting lists and otherwise delaying applications. While there was commonality as to the first two prongs of an ECOA claim, the court expressed doubts about whether there was commonality as to the latter two requirements––eligibility and denial by the defendant despite eligibility. Further, the court modified the class definition to include only “Virgin Islanders who applied or attempted to apply for, and/or received” benefits from the defendant because the court felt that a class certification including all Virgin Islanders who applied for aid was sufficient to encompass the plaintiffs’ claims. 385 F.3d 256. 

Following cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court on August 20, 2008, granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The court reasoned that the administration of funds in the Virgin Islands was no different from the procedure in any state and that the plaintiffs had not produced sufficient evidence that the defendant made distinctions between applicants on the basis of a protected status. Moreover, the district court found that the statute of limitations had run on the plaintiffs’ ECOA claims. 2008 WL 3925260. 

The plaintiffs appealed this decision. On December 4, 2009, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court’s decision. Writing for the court, Judge Julio M. Fuentes agreed with the analysis of the District Court and found the arguments raised by the plaintiffs unpersuasive. 362 F. App’x 252. This case is closed. 

Summary Authors

Claire Butler (12/30/2022)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5001624/parties/watson-chiang-gail-v-glickman-daniel/


Attorney for Plaintiff

Douglas, Dana L (Virgin Islands)

Attorney for Defendant

Carroll, James S (Virgin Islands)

Edney, Marsha S (Virgin Islands)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Brady, Douglas A (Virgin Islands)

Chavez, Fernando F (Virgin Islands)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

1:00-cv-00004

Memorandum

Chiang v. Veneman

Feb. 28, 2003

Feb. 28, 2003

Order/Opinion

213 F.R.D. 256

08-04256

Opinion of the Court

Chiang v. Veneman

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Sept. 20, 2004

Sept. 20, 2004

Order/Opinion

385 F.3d 256

1:00-cv-00004

Memorandum

Chiang v. Schafer

Aug. 20, 2008

Aug. 20, 2008

Order/Opinion

2008 WL 3925260

08-04256

Opinion of the Court

Virgin Island v. Vilsack

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Jan. 27, 2010

Jan. 27, 2010

Order/Opinion

362 Fed.Appx. 252

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5001624/watson-chiang-gail-v-glickman-daniel/

Last updated July 2, 2026, 4:43 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Jan. 11, 2000

FILING FEE PAID $50.00 receipt 044046 eod 01/13/00 [MWR] (Entered: 01/11/2000)

RECAP
2 Jan. 11, 2000

MOTION PRO HAC VICE petition for james Wm. Morrison, Esq., Lee A. Wood, Esq., Federico Sayre, Esq., and Fernando F. Chavez, Esq. with attach affidavit and questionnaire eod 01/13/00 [MWR] (Entered: 01/11/2000)

RECAP
3 Jan. 11, 2000

SUMMONS issued for James A. Hurd, Jr, eod 01/13/00 [MWR] (Entered: 01/11/2000)

RECAP
4 Jan. 11, 2000

SUMMONS issued for Dainel Glickman, Sec'y of U.S. Dept of Agriculture eod 01/13/00 [MWR] (Entered: 01/11/2000)

RECAP
5 Jan. 11, 2000

SUMMONS issued for Janet Reno, Atyy Gen, USA eod 01/13/00 [MWR] (Entered: 01/11/2000)

RECAP
6 Jan. 11, 2000

ORDER (JLR) granting admission pro hac vice of James Wm Morrison, Esq., Lee Ardell Wood, Esq. Federico Sayre, Esq., and Fernando F. Chavez, Esq. cc attys eod 01/13/00 [MWR] (Entered: 01/11/2000)

RECAP
Jan. 11, 2000

Jams Calendar Events

7 Jan. 12, 2000

NOTICE of recusal by Mag. Resnick matter re-designated as 2000/4-F/B cc attys eod 01/14/00 [MWR] (Entered: 01/12/2000)

RECAP
8 Jan. 27, 2000

SUMMONS Return of Service on Daniel Glickman on 1/14/00 eod 01/28/00 [NAH] (Entered: 01/27/2000)

RECAP
9 Jan. 27, 2000

RETURN of service of Summons on Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United States on 1/14/00 eod 01/28/00 [NAH] (Entered: 01/27/2000)

RECAP
10 Jan. 27, 2000

RETURN of service of Summons on James A. Hurd, U.S. Attorney for the V.I. on 1/14/00 eod 01/28/00 [NAH] (Entered: 01/27/2000)

RECAP
11 Feb. 24, 2000

MOTION PRO HAC VICE admiission of Douglas B. Inman, Esq. with attach affidavit and questionnaire eod 02/25/00 [MWR] (Entered: 02/24/2000)

RECAP
12 Feb. 24, 2000

ORDER (JLR) granting admission of Douglas B. Inman., Esq. eod 02/25/00 [MWR] (Entered: 02/24/2000)

RECAP
13 March 16, 2000

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO respond to complaint deft unopposed eod 03/17/00 [MWR] (Entered: 03/16/2000)

RECAP
0 March 21, 2000

REASSIGNED from Judge FINCH to Judge MOORE eod 03/22/00 [MWR] (Entered: 03/21/2000)

RECAP
14 March 21, 2000

ORDER (RLF) of his recusal cc attys eod 03/22/00 [MWR] (Entered: 03/21/2000)

RECAP
15 April 13, 2000

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO respond to the complaint unopposed eod 04/14/00 [MWR] (Entered: 04/13/2000)

RECAP
16 May 25, 2000

VOLUME (2) TWO eod 05/30/00 [MWR] (Entered: 05/25/2000)

RECAP
17 May 31, 2000

NOTICE of service pursuant to LCRi 56.1 eod 06/01/00 [MWR] (Entered: 05/31/2000)

RECAP
18 June 29, 2000

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO file responses to deft motion to dismiss and for a moore definate statement eod 06/30/00 [MWR] (Entered: 06/29/2000)

RECAP
19 July 31, 2000

STIPULATION for extension of time until 9/1/00 to file and serve via mail the response of the pltf to deft 5/31/00 motion to dismiss eod 08/01/00 [MWR] (Entered: 07/31/2000)

RECAP
20 Aug. 11, 2000

STIPULATION by parties eod 08/14/00 [MWR] (Entered: 08/11/2000)

RECAP
21 Sept. 5, 2000

NOTICE of service of pltf opposition to deft motion to dismiss and for a more definate statement eod 09/07/00 [MWR] (Entered: 09/05/2000)

RECAP
22 Sept. 15, 2000

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO deft's unopposed motion for extension of time to file a reply memorandum in support of motion to dismiss eod 09/19/00 [NAH] (Entered: 09/15/2000)

RECAP
23 Oct. 30, 2000

NOTICE OF FILING pursuant to LRCi 56.1 eod 10/31/00 [MWR] (Entered: 10/30/2000)

RECAP
24 Oct. 30, 2000

MOTION TO DISMISS and for a more definate statement by deft eod 10/31/00 [MWR] (Entered: 10/30/2000)

RECAP
25 Oct. 30, 2000

OPPOSITION to deft motion to dismiss and for a more definate statement by pltf eod 10/31/00 [MWR] (Entered: 10/30/2000)

RECAP
26 Nov. 7, 2000

VOLUME (3) THREE eod 11/08/00 [MWR] (Entered: 11/07/2000)

RECAP
27 Nov. 7, 2000

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO file Sur Reply eod 11/15/00 [MWR] (Entered: 11/07/2000)

RECAP
28 Dec. 22, 2000

REPLY to deft. motion to dismiss and for a more definite statement by deft. eod 12/28/00 [MA] (Entered: 12/22/2000)

RECAP
29 Dec. 29, 2000

MOTION TO WITHDRAW as co-counsel for pltf eod 01/03/01 [MWR] (Entered: 12/29/2000)

RECAP
30 Jan. 31, 2001

NOTICE of Erratum and notice of logement of supplemental exhibits to pltf surreply to deft motion to dismiss and for a more definate statement eod 02/02/01 [MWR] (Entered: 01/31/2001)

RECAP
31 Feb. 16, 2001

NOTICE ASSIGNS HEARING to 02/23/01 at 09:30AM Room STT (TKM) c/m Order entered by Mag. Barnard eod 02/20/01 [MWR] (Entered: 02/16/2001)

RECAP
32 Feb. 22, 2001

ORDER (TKM) pltf may file their Sur Reply to deft reply on or before 12/22/00 cc attys eod 02/23/01 [MWR] (Entered: 02/22/2001)

RECAP
33 Feb. 22, 2001

ORDER (TKM) that James Wm Morrison, Esq. shall be releived of his obligation as counsel for pltf in this matter and his name shall be removed from the distriibution list for documents filed with or generated by the court in this matter effective the date of this order cc attys eod 02/23/01 [MWR] (Entered: 02/22/2001)

RECAP
34 Feb. 23, 2001

COURT REPORTER: Chandra kean eod 02/23/01 [CAB] (Entered: 02/23/2001)

RECAP
35 Feb. 23, 2001

ORDER (JLR) pltf first amended complaint (docket #16) STRICKEN for failure to comport with the requirements of LRCI 15.1 ORDERED deft motion to dismiss complaint document #24 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Count I, IV, XI, X, XII, VI, XIII, VII, XIV, VIII, and XV ard dismissed, Counts IX and XVI ECOA are DISMISSED as duplicative of Count II, pltfs shall file an Amended Complaint on/or before 3/23/01 etc. eod 02/28/01 [MWR] (Entered: 02/23/2001)

RECAP
36 Feb. 23, 2001

ORDER ASSIGNS CONF to 08/18/01 at 09:30AM Room CT2 (GWB) c/m eod 02/28/01 [MWR] (Entered: 02/23/2001)

RECAP
37 Feb. 26, 2001

JOINT discovery memorandum pursuant to local rule 16.1 eod 03/01/01 [MWR] (Entered: 02/26/2001)

RECAP
68 Feb. 28, 2001

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO file and answer unopposed eod 03/01/02 [MWR] (Entered: 02/28/2001)

RECAP
38 March 23, 2001

NOTICE of firm change of address and telephone number eod 03/26/01 [MWR] (Entered: 03/23/2001)

RECAP
39 March 23, 2001

AMENDED COMPLAINT first for unlawful discrimination under the protective categories of race (black & hispanic) gender (female) and national origin (Virgin Islanders) eod 03/26/01 [MWR] (Entered: 03/23/2001)

RECAP
40 May 10, 2001

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO file a answer unopposed eod 05/11/01 [MWR] (Entered: 05/10/2001)

RECAP
41 May 18, 2001

NOTICE of service of demand for production of document, set one, to deft by pltf and proposed class representative, denise Pittman by eod 05/21/01 [THT] (Entered: 05/18/2001)

RECAP
42 May 18, 2001

PTC ORDER FROM P/T ON (GWB) 05/18/01 scheduling ordered entered; status conf set 08/10/01 at 11:00 a.m. eod 05/21/01 [THT] (Entered: 05/18/2001)

RECAP
43 June 22, 2001

NOTICE of deft's motion to dismiss and to strike pltfs jury demand pursuant to LRCI 56.1 by deft eod 06/25/01 [THT] (Entered: 06/22/2001)

RECAP
44 July 5, 2001

MOTION (unopposed) for an enlargement of time in which to oppose deft's motion to dismiss and for a more definite statement by pltf's eod 07/06/01 [MA] (Entered: 07/05/2001)

RECAP
45 July 5, 2001

STIPULATED PRIVACY ACT PROTECTIVE ORDER by parties eod 07/06/01 [MA] (Entered: 07/05/2001)

RECAP
46 July 24, 2001

ORDER ASSIGNS HEARING to 11/16/01 at 09:30AM Room STT (GWB) c/m eod 07/25/01 [MWR] (Entered: 07/24/2001)

RECAP
47 Aug. 8, 2001

ORDER (JLR) stipulated privacy act protective order granted cc attys eod 08/09/01 [MWR] (Entered: 08/08/2001)

RECAP
48 Aug. 16, 2001

UNOPPOSED motion for an extension of time to file a reply memo in support of motion to dismiss by deft eod 08/17/01 [MWR] (Entered: 08/16/2001)

RECAP
49 Oct. 16, 2001

NOTICE of appearance of DOJ counsel Marsha S. Edney, Esq. for deft eod 10/17/01 [MWR] (Entered: 10/16/2001)

RECAP
50 Oct. 17, 2001

ORDER ASSIGNS HEARING to 01/18/02 at 09:30AM Room 295 (GWB) c/m eod 10/18/01 [MWR] (Entered: 10/17/2001)

RECAP
51 Oct. 19, 2001

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO respond to deft motion to dismiss by pltf eod 10/22/01 [MWR] (Entered: 10/19/2001)

RECAP
52 Oct. 23, 2001

ORDER (GMB) date for pltf to file response in oposition to deft pending motion to dismiss is extended to 11/13/01 and time within which deft may reply to pltf opposition is extended to 12/21/01 cc attys eod 10/24/01 [MWR] (Entered: 10/23/2001)

RECAP
53 Nov. 13, 2001

NOTICE OF FILING of pltf opposition to deft motion to dismiss pltfs. first amended Complaint and Motion to strike Jury Trial Demand by pltf eod 11/14/01 [THT] (Entered: 11/13/2001)

RECAP
56 Dec. 21, 2001

MOTION TO DISMISS pltf first amended complaintand to strike pltf jury demand eod 12/27/01 [MWR] (Entered: 12/21/2001)

RECAP
57 Dec. 21, 2001

VOLUME (4) FOUR eod 12/27/01 [MWR] (Entered: 12/21/2001)

RECAP
58 Dec. 21, 2001

MEMORANDUM of points and authorities in opposition to deft motion to dismiss pltf first amended complaint eod 12/27/01 [MWR] (Entered: 12/21/2001)

RECAP
59 Dec. 21, 2001

DECLARATION of Douglas Inman in support of pltf oppositin tomotion to dismiss the first amended complaint eod 12/28/01 [MWR] (Entered: 12/21/2001)

RECAP
60 Dec. 21, 2001

OPPOSITION by pltf to deft motion to dismiss pltf first amended complaint and motionto strike Jury Trial Demand eod 12/28/01 [MWR] (Entered: 12/21/2001)

RECAP
61 Dec. 21, 2001

REPLY memorandum in support of deft motion to dismiss pltf first amended complaint and to strike pltf jury trial demand eod 12/28/01 [MWR] (Entered: 12/21/2001)

RECAP
54 Dec. 27, 2001

NOTICE of service pursuant to LRCI 56.1 eod 12/27/01 [MWR] (Entered: 12/27/2001)

RECAP
55 Dec. 27, 2001

NOTICE OF FILING pursuant to LRCi 56.1(3) eod 12/27/01 [MWR] (Entered: 12/27/2001)

RECAP
62 Jan. 18, 2002

NOTICE ASSIGNS HEARING to 01/25/02 at 09:30AM Room 295 (GWB) c/m eod 01/18/02 [MWR] (Entered: 01/18/2002)

RECAP
63 Jan. 24, 2002

NOTICE of lodgment and lodgment of new legal authority relevant to pending motion to dismiss first amended complaint cc attys eod 01/24/02 [MWR] (Entered: 01/24/2002)

RECAP
64 Jan. 25, 2002

COURTROOM MINUTES of hearing held with Judge Moore on 1/25/02, court reporter C. Kean court made findings on the record and entered order eod 01/29/02 [MWR] (Entered: 01/25/2002)

RECAP
65 Jan. 25, 2002

ORDER (TKM) motion to dismiss is DENIED, cc attys eod 01/29/02 [MWR] (Entered: 01/25/2002)

RECAP
66 Jan. 25, 2002

PTC ORDER FROM P/T ON 1/25/02 order entered cc attys eod 01/29/02 [MWR] (Entered: 01/25/2002)

RECAP
67 Jan. 25, 2002

ORDER ASSIGNS CONF to 03/08/02 at 11:00AM Room 295 (GWB) c/m eod 01/29/02 [MWR] (Entered: 01/25/2002)

RECAP
69 March 1, 2002

MOTION for class certification by pltf eod 03/01/02 [MWR] (Entered: 03/01/2002)

RECAP
70 March 7, 2002

VOLUME (5) FIVE BEGIN WITH DOCUMENT #69 eod 03/08/02 [MWR] (Entered: 03/07/2002)

RECAP
71 March 8, 2002

ANSWER to complaint first class action complaint for unlawful discrimination under the protected categories of race (Black & Hispanic) Gender (Female) and National Origin (Virgin Islanders) (First Amended Complaint) eod 03/08/02 [MWR] (Entered: 03/08/2002)

RECAP
72 March 11, 2002

VOLUME (6) SIX eod 03/11/02 [MWR] (Entered: 03/11/2002)

RECAP
73 April 1, 2002

NOTICE OF FILING pursuant to Local Rule 26.1 document production by deft eod 04/02/02 [MWR] (Entered: 04/01/2002)

RECAP
74 April 12, 2002

NOTICE of service of demand for production of documents set one request for admission, set one; and interrog set one to deft by pltf and proposed class representative Gail Watson Chiang eod 04/15/02 [MWR] (Entered: 04/12/2002)

RECAP
75 April 19, 2002

MEMORANDUM in support of defts opposition to pltf motion for class certification eod 04/19/02 [MWR] (Entered: 04/19/2002)

RECAP
76 May 15, 2002

REPLY to deft's opposition to motion for class certification by pltf eod 05/15/02 [MWR] (Entered: 05/15/2002)

RECAP
77 May 15, 2002

DECLARATION of Douglas Inman in support of pltf reply to deft's opposition to motion for class certification eod 05/15/02 [MWR] (Entered: 05/15/2002)

RECAP
78 May 16, 2002

VOLUME (7) SEVEN eod 05/16/02 [MWR] (Entered: 05/16/2002)

RECAP
79 May 20, 2002

ORDER ASSIGNS CONF to 05/31/02 at 10:00AM Room STT (JLR) c/m eod 05/22/02 [MWR] (Entered: 05/20/2002)

RECAP
80 May 28, 2002

NOTICE of reent decision of US District Court of the district of Coumbia in Garcia v Venemen eod 05/29/02 [MWR] (Entered: 05/28/2002)

RECAP
81 May 30, 2002

APPEARANCE of Class member Emma C Ayala-Miller eod 05/30/02 [MWR] (Entered: 05/30/2002)

RECAP
82 May 30, 2002

APPEARANCE of class member Debbie Gonsalves-Berriero eod 05/30/02 [MWR] (Entered: 05/30/2002)

RECAP
83 May 30, 2002

APPEARANCE of class member Giberto Belardo, Jr. eod 05/30/02 [MWR] (Entered: 05/30/2002)

RECAP
84 May 30, 2002

APPEARANCE of class member Cleste Bermudez eod 05/30/02 [MWR] (Entered: 05/30/2002)

RECAP
85 May 30, 2002

APPEARANCE of class member Rita Berry eod 05/30/02 [MWR] (Entered: 05/30/2002)

RECAP
86 May 30, 2002

APPEARANCE of class member Karen V. Blyden eod 05/30/02 [MWR] (Entered: 05/30/2002)

RECAP
87 May 30, 2002

APPEARANCE of class member Delore K. Braithwaite eod 05/30/02 [MWR] (Entered: 05/30/2002)

RECAP
88 May 30, 2002

APPEARANCE of class member Elizabeth Burnett eod 05/30/02 [MWR] (Entered: 05/30/2002)

RECAP
89 May 30, 2002

APPEARANCE of class member Dian Cartier eod 05/30/02 [MWR] (Entered: 05/30/2002)

RECAP
90 May 30, 2002

APPEARANCE of class member Esther M. Clifford eod 05/30/02 [MWR] (Entered: 05/30/2002)

RECAP
91 May 30, 2002

APPEARANCE of class member Valerie M. Charles eod 05/30/02 [MWR] (Entered: 05/30/2002)

RECAP
92 May 30, 2002

APPEARANCE of class member Miguel & Carmen Cruz eod 05/30/02 [MWR] (Entered: 05/30/2002)

RECAP
93 May 30, 2002

APPEARANCE of class member Wanda I. Cruz eod 05/30/02 [MWR] (Entered: 05/30/2002)

RECAP
94 May 30, 2002

APPEARANCE 0f class member Seveein Davis eod 05/30/02 [MWR] (Entered: 05/30/2002)

RECAP
95 May 30, 2002

APPEARANCE of class member Tania N. Davis eod 05/30/02 [MWR] (Entered: 05/30/2002)

RECAP
96 May 30, 2002

APPEARANCE of class member Maud Crew eod 05/30/02 [MWR] (Entered: 05/30/2002)

RECAP
97 May 30, 2002

APPEARANCE of class member Alicia Edwards eod 05/30/02 [MWR] (Entered: 05/30/2002)

RECAP
98 May 30, 2002

APPEARANCE of class member Paulette T. Edwards eod 05/30/02 [MWR] (Entered: 05/30/2002)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Virgin Islands

Case Type(s):

Fair Housing/Lending/Insurance

Key Dates

Filing Date: Jan. 10, 2000

Closing Date: Dec. 4, 2009

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

The plaintiffs in this case are individuals who resided in the United States Virgin Islands who claimed that the Rural Housing Service discriminated against them on the basis of their race, gender, and national origin through the course of administering rural housing programs.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

Federal

United States Department of Agriculture

Defendant Type(s):

Housing Authority

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA), 15 U.S.C. § 1691

Fair Housing Act/Fair Housing Amendments Act (FHAA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601 et seq.

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Due Process: Procedural Due Process

Equal Protection

Other Dockets:

District Court of the Virgin Islands 1:00-cv-00004

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 08-04256

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Relief Granted:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

General/Misc.:

Housing

Housing assistance

Pattern or Practice

Public assistance grants

Public benefits (includes, e.g., in-state tuition, govt. jobs)

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

Housing Sales/Rental

Lending

Discrimination Basis:

National origin discrimination

Race discrimination

Sex discrimination

Affected National Origin/Ethnicity(s):

Other

Affected Race(s):

Black

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

Recommended Citation