Case: Williams v. City Of Chicago

COMPLAINT filed by Lucy Parsons Labs, Michael Williams, Daniel Ortiz; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19670038.(Manes, Jonathan) (Entered: 07/21/2022)

CIVIL Cover Sheet (Manes, Jonathan) (Entered: 07/21/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Lucy Parsons Labs, Daniel Ortiz, Michael Williams by Jonathan Matthew Manes (Manes, Jonathan) (Entered: 07/21/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Lucy Parsons Labs, Daniel Ortiz, Michael Williams by Alexa Van Brunt (Van Brunt, Alexa) (Entered: 07/21/2022)

clerk's notice

case assigned

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (emc, )

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (emc, )

summons issued

SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Eduardo Almanza, Salvatore Aloisio, David O'Neal Brown, Scott Brownley, City Of Chicago, Robert Costello, Nestor De Jesus, Michael Dougherty, Nicholas Evangelides, Mark Flechsig, Arthur Harb, Michael Kociolek, Mark LaPadula, David Magana, Carol Maresso, Michael Matias, Joseph Merkel, Juan Perez, Dale Potter, Jr, Harsimran Powar, Scott Reiff, Brian Roney (ak, )

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael Williams, Daniel Ortiz as to All Defendants. (Manes, Jonathan) (Entered: 08/03/2022)

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Lucy Parsons Labs and Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1 (Manes, Jonathan) (Entered: 08/03/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City Of Chicago by Michael P. Sheehan (Sheehan, Michael) (Entered: 08/22/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City Of Chicago by Yeoeun Yoon (Yoon, Yeoeun) (Entered: 08/22/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City Of Chicago by Ioana Maria Guset (Guset, Ioana) (Entered: 08/22/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City Of Chicago by Allan T. Slagel (Slagel, Allan) (Entered: 08/22/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City Of Chicago by Barton James O'Brien (O'Brien, Barton) (Entered: 08/22/2022)

MOTION by Defendant City Of Chicago for extension of time Defendant City of Chicago's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead (Sheehan, Michael) (Entered: 08/22/2022)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman: Defendant City of Chicago's unopposed motion for extension of time through October 21, 2022 to answer or otherwise plead in response to Plaintiff's complaint is granted. There will be no further extensions of that deadline. Mailed notice. (exr, ) (Entered: 08/22/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Robert Costello, Michael Kociolek by Shneur Z. Nathan (Nathan, Shneur) (Entered: 09/09/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Robert Costello, Michael Kociolek by Avi T. Kamionski (Kamionski, Avi) (Entered: 09/09/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Robert Costello, Michael Kociolek by Helen Catherine O'Shaughnessy (O'Shaughnessy, Helen) (Entered: 09/09/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Robert Costello, Michael Kociolek by Matthew James Mc Carter (Mc Carter, Matthew) (Entered: 09/09/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Robert Costello, Michael Kociolek by Neha Sharma Locke (Locke, Neha) (Entered: 09/09/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Eduardo Almanza, Salvatore Aloisio, Scott Brownley, Nestor De Jesus, Nicholas Evangelides, Mark Flechsig, Arthur Harb, Mark LaPadula, David Magana, Carol Maresso, Michael Matias, Joseph Merkel, Juan Perez, Dale Potter, Jr, Harsimran Powar, Scott Reiff by Shneur Z. Nathan (Nathan, Shneur) (Entered: 09/30/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Eduardo Almanza, Salvatore Aloisio, Scott Brownley, Nestor De Jesus, Nicholas Evangelides, Mark Flechsig, Arthur Harb, Mark LaPadula, David Magana, Carol Maresso, Michael Matias, Joseph Merkel, Juan Perez, Dale Potter, Jr, Harsimran Powar, Scott Reiff by Avi T. Kamionski (Kamionski, Avi) (Entered: 09/30/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Eduardo Almanza, Salvatore Aloisio, Scott Brownley, Nestor De Jesus, Nicholas Evangelides, Mark Flechsig, Arthur Harb, Mark LaPadula, David Magana, Carol Maresso, Michael Matias, Joseph Merkel, Juan Perez, Dale Potter, Jr, Harsimran Powar, Scott Reiff by Helen Catherine O'Shaughnessy (O'Shaughnessy, Helen) (Entered: 09/30/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Eduardo Almanza, Salvatore Aloisio, Scott Brownley, Nestor De Jesus, Nicholas Evangelides, Mark Flechsig, Arthur Harb, Mark LaPadula, David Magana, Carol Maresso, Michael Matias, Joseph Merkel, Juan Perez, Dale Potter, Jr, Harsimran Powar, Scott Reiff by Matthew James Mc Carter (Mc Carter, Matthew) (Entered: 09/30/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Eduardo Almanza, Salvatore Aloisio, Scott Brownley, Nestor De Jesus, Nicholas Evangelides, Mark Flechsig, Arthur Harb, Mark LaPadula, David Magana, Carol Maresso, Michael Matias, Joseph Merkel, Juan Perez, Dale Potter, Jr, Harsimran Powar, Scott Reiff by Neha Sharma Locke (Locke, Neha) (Entered: 09/30/2022)

MOTION by Defendants Eduardo Almanza, Salvatore Aloisio, Scott Brownley, Robert Costello, Nestor De Jesus, Nicholas Evangelides, Mark Flechsig, Arthur Harb, Michael Kociolek, Mark LaPadula, David Magana, Carol Maresso, Michael Matias, Joseph Merkel, Juan Perez, Dale Potter, Jr, Harsimran Powar, Scott Reiff for extension of time UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR CERTAIN DEFENDANT OFFICERS TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING (Mc Carter, Matthew) (Entered: 09/30/2022)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman: The unopposed motion by Defendants Eduardo Almanza, Salvatore Aloisio, Scott Brownley, Robert Costello, Nestor De Jesus, Nicholas Evangelides, Mark Flechsig, Arthur Harb, Michael Kociolek, Mark LaPadula, David Magana, Carol Maresso, Michael Matias, Joseph Merkel, Juan Perez, Dale Potter, Jr, Harsimran Powar, and Scott Reiff for an extension of time through October 21, 2022, to file a responsive pleading 24 is granted. Mailed notice (ags, (Entered: 09/30/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant David O'Neal Brown by Michael P. Sheehan (Sheehan, Michael) (Entered: 10/19/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant David O'Neal Brown by Allan T. Slagel (Slagel, Allan) (Entered: 10/19/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant David O'Neal Brown by Yeoeun Yoon (Yoon, Yeoeun) (Entered: 10/19/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant David O'Neal Brown by Barton James O'Brien (O'Brien, Barton) (Entered: 10/19/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant David O'Neal Brown by Ioana Maria Guset (Guset, Ioana) (Entered: 10/19/2022)

MOTION by Plaintiffs Lucy Parsons Labs, Daniel Ortiz, Michael Williams for extension of time Joint Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint and Pleading Schedule (Manes, Jonathan) (Entered: 10/19/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Michael Dougherty by Avi T. Kamionski (Kamionski, Avi) (Entered: 10/21/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Michael Dougherty by Shneur Z. Nathan (Nathan, Shneur) (Entered: 10/21/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Michael Dougherty by Helen Catherine O'Shaughnessy (O'Shaughnessy, Helen) (Entered: 10/21/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Michael Dougherty by Matthew James Mc Carter (Mc Carter, Matthew) (Entered: 10/21/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Michael Dougherty by Neha Sharma Locke (Locke, Neha) (Entered: 10/21/2022)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman: The parties' joint motion for leave to amend complaint and pleading schedule 31 is granted, except that the Court will set a responsive pleading date for all defendants. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint by 11/14/2022. Defendant City of Chicago shall respond to the amended complaint by 1/4/2023. The individual officer defendants shall respond to the amended complaint by 1/13/2023. Given the timeline of this case and the generous schedule, there will be no extensions absent extraordinary circumstances. The parties are directed to confer no later than 1/13/2023 to discuss the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case, and they shall also discuss deadlines for any Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures that have not already been exchanged and a proposed discovery plan. Plaintiff is responsible for initiating such a conference, and all lead counsel for all parties must participate. In lieu of an initial status hearing, the parties shall file a joint written initial status report and proposed discovery plan by 1/20/2023. Failure or refusal to participate in such a conference or to cooperate in the preparation of the written report may constitute a basis for sanctions. After the Court receives the parties' written report, it will issue an order setting a discovery schedule if appropriate. Mailed notice. (kp, ) (Entered: 10/24/2022)

AMENDED complaint by Lucy Parsons Labs, Michael Williams, Daniel Ortiz, Derick Scruggs against Eduardo Almanza, Salvatore Aloisio, David O'Neal Brown, Scott Brownley, City Of Chicago, Robert Costello, Nestor De Jesus, Michael Dougherty, Nicholas Evangelides, Michael Kociolek, Mark LaPadula, David Magana, Carol Maresso, Michael Matias, Joseph Merkel, Juan Perez, Dale Potter, Jr, Harsimran Powar, Scott Reiff, Brian Roney, Fidel Legorreta, Theodore Andrews, Jr, Sarah Keckley, Jane Doe and terminating Mark Flechsig (#1733) and Arthur Harb (#311) (Manes, Jonathan) (Entered: 11/14/2022)

SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Theodore Andrews, Jr (emc, )

summons issued

SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Sarah Keckley (emc, )

SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Fidel Legorreta (emc, )

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lucy Parsons Labs, Michael Williams, Daniel Ortiz, Derick Scruggs as to Theodore Andrews, Jr on 11/21/2022, answer due 12/12/2022; Sarah Keckley on 11/21/2022, answer due 12/12/2022; Fidel Legorreta on 11/21/2022, answer due 12/12/2022. (Manes, Jonathan) (Entered: 11/23/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Theodore Andrews, Jr, Fidel Legorreta by Shneur Z. Nathan (Nathan, Shneur) (Entered: 12/06/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Theodore Andrews, Jr, Fidel Legorreta by Avi T. Kamionski (Kamionski, Avi) (Entered: 12/06/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Theodore Andrews, Jr, Fidel Legorreta by Helen Catherine O'Shaughnessy (O'Shaughnessy, Helen) (Entered: 12/06/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Theodore Andrews, Jr, Fidel Legorreta by Matthew James Mc Carter (Mc Carter, Matthew) (Entered: 12/06/2022)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Theodore Andrews, Jr, Fidel Legorreta by Neha Sharma Locke (Locke, Neha) (Entered: 12/06/2022)

MOTION by Defendant City Of Chicago for leave to file excess pages Defendants City of Chicago and Superintendent Brown's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File an Oversized Motion (Sheehan, Michael) (Entered: 12/22/2022)

ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Executive Committee on 12/29/2022: Mailed notice. (tg, ) (Entered: 12/29/2022)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman: The unopposed motion for leave to file an oversized brief filed by the City of Chicago and Superintendent Brown 45 is granted. Defendants, however, should consider that the Court values concision and economy, encourages joint briefs and exhibits and adopting parts of a co-defendant's brief, and may strike redundant and uncoordinated briefing. Briefing should contain only such facts as are foundational to the legal analysis. Plaintiff shall respond to the motion by 2/6/2023. Any reply shall be filed by 2/24/2023. (kp, ) (Entered: 12/30/2022)

MOTION by Defendants Eduardo Almanza, Salvatore Aloisio, Theodore Andrews, Jr, Scott Brownley, Robert Costello, Nestor De Jesus, Michael Dougherty, Nicholas Evangelides, Sarah Keckley, Michael Kociolek, Mark LaPadula, Fidel Legorreta, David Magana, Carol Maresso, Michael Matias, Joseph Merkel, Juan Perez, Dale Potter, Jr, Harsimran Powar, Scott Reiff, Brian Roney for leave to file excess pages INDIVIDUAL OFFICER DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE EXCESS PAGES (Locke, Neha) (Entered: 01/03/2023)

RESPONSE by Lucy Parsons Labs, Daniel Ortiz, Derick Scruggs, Michael Williamsin Opposition to MOTION by Defendants Eduardo Almanza, Salvatore Aloisio, Theodore Andrews, Jr, Scott Brownley, Robert Costello, Nestor De Jesus, Michael Dougherty, Nicholas Evangelides, Sarah Keckley, Michael Kociolek, Mark LaPadula, Fidel Legorreta, David Magana, Caro 48 for leave to file excess pages. (Manes, Jonathan) (Entered: 01/03/2023)

REPLY by Eduardo Almanza, Salvatore Aloisio, Theodore Andrews, Jr, Scott Brownley, Robert Costello, Nestor De Jesus, Michael Dougherty, Nicholas Evangelides, Sarah Keckley, Michael Kociolek, Mark LaPadula, Fidel Legorreta, David Magana, Carol Maresso, Michael Matias, Joseph Merkel, Juan Perez, Dale Potter, Jr, Harsimran Powar, Scott Reiff, Brian Roney to response in opposition to motion, 49 (Locke, Neha) (Entered: 01/03/2023)

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants David O'Neal Brown, City Of Chicago (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Sheehan, Michael) (Entered: 01/04/2023)

1

View on RECAP

2

View on RECAP

3

View on RECAP

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Lucy Parsons Labs, Daniel Ortiz, Derick Scruggs, Michael Williams by Elizabeth N. Mazur (Mazur, Elizabeth) (Entered: 01/05/2023)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman: The Individual Officer Defendants' motion for leave to file an oversize motion to dismiss 48, which Plaintiffs oppose 49, is denied. Defendants are, however, given leave, by 1/13/2023, to file a 35-page motion to dismiss, which, in the Court's view, should be sufficient to develop arguments appropriate for resolution at this stage. Defendants should prioritize their arguments accordingly. Plaintiffs' response shall not exceed the page length of the Individual Defendants' motion and shall be filed by 2/13/2023; any Reply shall be filed by 3/6/2023. The briefing schedule 47 on the motion to dismiss filed by the City of Chicago and Superintendent Brown is modified as follows: by 2/6/2023, Plaintiffs shall file a response of no more than 15 pages, addressing only the Rule 12(b)(1) Argument and Section V of the Rule 12(b)(6) Argument. Any reply on those topics shall be filed by 2/24/2023. The Court may direct additional briefing on that motion. The dates the Court previously set 37 for the parties to confer and file a joint initial status report and proposed discovery plan stand. The Court does not typically stay discovery during the pendency of motions to dismiss. Mailed notice. (kp, ) (Entered: 01/06/2023)

MOTION by Defendants Juan Perez, Eduardo Almanza, Dale Potter, Jr, Theodore Andrews, Jr, Salvatore Aloisio, Harsimran Powar, Robert Costello, Michael Matias, Scott Brownley, Nestor De Jesus, Nicholas Evangelides, Sarah Keckley, Scott Reiff, Mark LaPadula, Fidel Legorreta, David Magana, Carol Maresso, Joseph Merkel, Michael Kociolek, Brian Roney, Michael Dougherty to dismiss INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (Locke, Neha) (Entered: 01/13/2023)

STATUS Report Joint Initial Status Report and Proposed Discovery Plan by Lucy Parsons Labs, Daniel Ortiz, Derick Scruggs, Michael Williams (Manes, Jonathan) (Entered: 01/20/2023)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Lucy Parsons Labs, Daniel Ortiz, Derick Scruggs, Michael Williams by Daniel Massoglia (Massoglia, Daniel) (Entered: 01/25/2023)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman: The Court has reviewed the parties joint initial status report and proposed discovery plan and sets the following deadlines. Amendment of pleadings and joinder of parties is to be completed eight weeks before the close of fact discovery. Fact discovery shall close on 7/28/2023, except that discovery as to any Monell claims shall be bifurcated and stayed. Discovery supervision and scheduling and all discovery motions and discovery disputes, including requests for and entry of any protective orders, are referred to the magistrate judge without authority to extend the above fact discovery deadlines. The matter is also referred to the magistrate judge for any settlement proceedings or conferences. Mailed notice. (kp, ) (Entered: 01/26/2023)

Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of Honorable Young B. Kim for the purpose of holding proceedings related to and all discovery disputes without authority to extend the discovery cutoff date. The referral to the magistrate judge shall also include authority to conduct a settlement conference if deemed appropriate. Mailed notice. (kp, ) (Entered: 01/26/2023)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Parties are to proceed with fact discovery (except on Monell claims) despite the pending motions to dismiss. Parties are ordered to adhere to the following written discovery schedule: (1) exchange Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures by February 10, 2023; (2) serve written discovery requests by February 17, 2023 (requests to admit may be timely served before the end of fact discovery); (3) serve answers to written discovery requests by March 17, 2023; (4) confer about the adequacy of the discovery responses by March 31, 2023; and (5) file a joint status report identifying each side's written discovery issues (must identify the specific interrogatories and requests to produce), along with the relevant written discovery responses as exhibits, by April 7, 2023. The court will not consider general objections to written discovery requests if the court must address and rule on written discovery disputes. If the parties do not have any disputed written discovery issues, a status report is not required. Pursuant to Rule of Evidence 502(d), this court orders that inadvertent disclosures of attorney-client privileged and attorney work materials will not constitute a waiver of the associated privilege. The court further orders that upon written notification (including emails) from the opposing side that an inadvertent disclosure has occurred, the party shall return and/or destroy the materials at issue or file a motion for a determination on the claimed privilege within seven calendar days of the written notification. Mailed notice (ec) (Entered: 01/26/2023)

MOTION by Defendants David O'Neal Brown, City Of Chicago to clarify Court's January 26, 2023 Minute Order (Sheehan, Michael) (Entered: 02/02/2023)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Eduardo Almanza, Salvatore Aloisio, Theodore Andrews, Jr, Scott Brownley, Robert Costello, Nestor De Jesus, Michael Dougherty, Nicholas Evangelides, Sarah Keckley, Michael Kociolek, Mark LaPadula, Fidel Legorreta, David Magana, Carol Maresso, Michael Matias, Joseph Merkel, Juan Perez, Dale Potter, Jr, Harsimran Powar, Scott Reiff, Brian Roney by Ashley Brody (Brody, Ashley) (Entered: 02/02/2023)

MOTION by Plaintiffs Lucy Parsons Labs, Daniel Ortiz, Derick Scruggs, Michael Williams to clarify the Court's January 26, 2023, Minute Order and Response to the City's Motion to Clarify (Manes, Jonathan) (Entered: 02/03/2023)

RESPONSE by Lucy Parsons Labs, Daniel Ortiz, Derick Scruggs, Michael Williamsin Opposition to MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants David O'Neal Brown, City Of Chicago 51 RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF STANDING PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(1) (Manes, Jonathan) (Entered: 02/06/2023)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman: The parties' motions to clarify the Court's minute entry of January 26, 2023 60 62 are granted as follows: Plaintiffs' "underst[anding]" that the Court's order staying Monell discovery "appl[ies] only to the individual Monell claims for damages against the City Defendants" is incorrect. The Court clarifies that its order stayed, for the time being, discovery as to all claims under a Monell theory, no matter what relief is sought; all discovery as to Plaintiffs' ICRA claim also shall be stayed. Mailed notice. (kp, ) (Entered: 02/08/2023)

RESPONSE by Daniel Ortiz, Derick Scruggs, Michael Williamsin Opposition to MOTION by Defendants Juan Perez, Eduardo Almanza, Dale Potter, Jr, Theodore Andrews, Jr, Salvatore Aloisio, Harsimran Powar, Robert Costello, Michael Matias, Scott Brownley, Nestor De Jesus, Nicholas Evangelides, Sarah Keckley, Scott Reiff, Mark LaPadul 54 PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE INDIVIDUAL OFFICER DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (Manes, Jonathan) (Entered: 02/13/2023)

REPLY by Defendant City Of Chicago to response in opposition to motion, 63, Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 51 (Sheehan, Michael) (Entered: 02/24/2023)

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: GENERAL ORDER 23-0010: Pursuant that to the Executive Committee Order entered on February 23, 2023, the civil cases on the attached list have been selected for reassignment to form the initial calendar of the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins; therefore IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the attached list of 281 cases be reassigned to the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all parties affected by this Order must review the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins' webpage on the Court's website for the purpose of reviewing instructions regarding scheduling and case management procedures; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any civil case that has been reassigned pursuant to this Order will not be randomly reassigned to create the initial calendar of a new district judge for twelve months from the date of this Order; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to add the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins to the Court's civil case assignment system during the next business day, so that she shall receive a full share of such cases; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to add the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins to the Court's criminal case assignment system ninety (90) days so that Judge Jenkins shall thereafter receive a full share of such cases. Case reassigned to the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins for all further proceedings. Honorable Ronald A. Guzman no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 2/27/2023.(tg, ) (Entered: 02/27/2023)

MOTION by Defendants Eduardo Almanza, Salvatore Aloisio, Theodore Andrews, Jr, Scott Brownley, Robert Costello, Nestor De Jesus, Michael Dougherty, Nicholas Evangelides, Sarah Keckley, Michael Kociolek, Mark LaPadula, Fidel Legorreta, David Magana, Carol Maresso, Michael Matias, Joseph Merkel, Juan Perez, Dale Potter, Jr, Harsimran Powar, Scott Reiff, Brian Roney for extension of time to file response/reply INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR 7 DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS (Locke, Neha) (Entered: 03/03/2023)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Motion for extension of time 68 is granted as unopposed. Defendants' reply shall be filed on or before 3/13/2023. Mailed notice. (kl, ) (Entered: 03/06/2023)

REPLY by Defendants Eduardo Almanza, Salvatore Aloisio, Theodore Andrews, Jr, Scott Brownley, Robert Costello, Nestor De Jesus, Michael Dougherty, Nicholas Evangelides, Sarah Keckley, Michael Kociolek, Mark LaPadula, Fidel Legorreta, David Magana, Carol Maresso, Michael Matias, Joseph Merkel, Juan Perez, Dale Potter, Jr, Harsimran Powar, Scott Reiff, Brian Roney to motion to dismiss, 54 INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS (Locke, Neha) (Entered: 03/13/2023)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins:This case has been reassigned to Judge Jenkins. By 8/4/2023, the parties shall file a joint initial status report using the form for reassigned cases on Judge Jenkins's web page on this District's website. The parties must follow all the standing orders for Judge Jenkins and all Local Rules, which can be found at the same web page. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 03/20/2023)

MOTION by Plaintiffs Lucy Parsons Labs, Daniel Ortiz, Derick Scruggs, Michael Williams for order FOR ENTRY OF A QUALIFIED HIPAA ORDER, (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Mazur, Elizabeth) (Entered: 03/24/2023)

1 Exhibit A

View on PACER

NOTICE of Motion by Elizabeth N. Mazur for presentment of (Mazur, Elizabeth) (Entered: 03/24/2023)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Plaintiffs' unopposed motion for entry of a protective order 72 is granted. Appearance on April 3, 2023, is not required to present this motion. Enter Agreed Qualified HIPAA and MHDDCA Protective Order. Mailed notice. (pk, ) (Entered: 03/27/2023)

AGREED QUALIFIED HIPAA and MHDDCA PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Young B. Kim on 3/27/2023. Mailed notice. (pk, ) (Entered: 03/27/2023)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: On January 6, 2023, Judge Guzman denied Defendants' motion for an excess page filing. As such, the filing Defendants made at 51 is stricken as moot. The Court has taken the Motion to dismiss filed on January 13, 2023 54, under advisement. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 04/05/2023)

STATUS Report on status of discovery (joint) by Derick Scruggs (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Williams Interrogatories, # 2 Exhibit 2 - Williams RFPs, # 3 Exhibit 3 - Scruggs Interrogatories, # 4 Exhibit 4 - Scruggs RFPs, # 5 Exhibit 5 - Ortiz Interrogatories, # 6 Exhibit 6 - Ortiz RFPs, # 7 Exhibit 7 - Evangelides Williams Responses, # 8 Exhibit 8 - City Williams RFP Responses, # 9 Exhibit 9 - Andrews Scruggs Responses, # 10 Exhibit 10 - City Scruggs RFP Responses, # 11 Exhibit 11 - Powar Ortiz Responses, # 12 Exhibit 12 - City Ortiz RFP Responses, # 13 Exhibit 13 - Williams Interrogatory Responses, # 14 Exhibit 14 - Ortiz Interrogatory Responses, # 15 Exhibit 15 - Scruggs Interrogatory Responses)(Massoglia, Daniel) (Entered: 04/07/2023)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The motion to dismiss 51 was erroneously stricken. The court mistakenly believed that motion was duplicative of the motion filed by the individual defendants 54 . The court takes both motions 51 and 54 under advisement. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 04/12/2023)

MOTION by Plaintiffs Lucy Parsons Labs, Daniel Ortiz, Derick Scruggs, Michael Williams for protective order - Model Confidentiality Order with Modifications (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Plaintiffs' Proposed Confidentiality Order, # 2 Exhibit B - Redline Comparison with Model Confidentiality Order)(Manes, Jonathan) (Entered: 04/18/2023)

NOTICE of Motion by Jonathan Matthew Manes for presentment of motion for protective order, 79 before Honorable Young B. Kim on 4/27/2023 at 11:00 AM. (Manes, Jonathan) (Entered: 04/18/2023)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Plaintiff's motion for protective order 79 is entered and continued. Appearance on April 27, 2023, is not required to present this motion. Defendants are to file a response to the motion and attach its proposed protective order and email the same to "proposed_order_kim@ilnd.uscourts.gov" by May 3, 2023. Mailed notice (ec) (Entered: 04/19/2023)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: A status hearing is scheduled for May 9, 2023, at 2:00 p.m. in courtroom 1019. The purpose of the hearing is to discuss outstanding discovery issues. Parties are to allow at least 90 minutes for the hearing. Mailed notice (ec) (Entered: 04/24/2023)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Lucy Parsons Labs, Daniel Ortiz, Derick Scruggs, Michael Williams by Joseph Patrick DiCola of First Defense Legal Aid. (DiCola, Joseph) (Entered: 04/27/2023)

RESPONSE by City Of Chicago to MOTION by Plaintiffs Lucy Parsons Labs, Daniel Ortiz, Derick Scruggs, Michael Williams for protective order - Model Confidentiality Order with Modifications 79 City of Chicago's Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of the Model Confidentiality Order with Modifications (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Sheehan, Michael) (Entered: 05/03/2023)

MOTION by Plaintiffs Lucy Parsons Labs, Daniel Ortiz, Derick Scruggs, Michael Williams for extension of time to complete discovery (JOINT MOTION) Presented before Presiding Judge (Mazur, Elizabeth) (Entered: 05/08/2023)

ENTERED IN ERROR. Modified on 5/9/2023 (ec ). (Entered: 05/09/2023)

NOTICE of Correction regarding 86 . (ec, ) (Entered: 05/09/2023)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Status hearing held and continued to May 17, 2023, at 2:00 p.m. by in courtroom 1019. The court made several rulings on discovery issues included in the parties' joint status report (R. 77) during today's hearing and will complete the discussion of the issues raised therein at the next status hearing. Plaintiff's motion for entry of the model confidentiality order with modifications 79 is granted, but the court adopts Defendants' version of the order. The court will enter the appropriate version later this week. Parties' joint motion for extension of time to complete discovery 85 is granted. Having conferred with the assigned District Judge, this court will be responsible for setting a new deadline. For now, the July 28, 2023 fact discovery deadline is stricken. This court will set a new deadline once the written discovery issues have been resolved. Plaintiffs are to file their motion for leave to issue additional discovery requests on Defendant City and to compel the City to supplement certain interrogatory answers by May 12, 2023. Parties should be prepared to discuss this motion on May 17, 2023. Mailed notice (ec) (Entered: 05/09/2023)

CONFIDENTIALITY PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Young B. Kim on 5/10/2023. Mailed notice (ec) (Entered: 05/10/2023)

MOTION by Plaintiff Michael Williams to compel a Response to Certain Interrogatories and for Leave to Serve Supplemental Requests for Production Presented before Magistrate Judge (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff Williams' Interrogatories to Defendants, # 2 Exhibit B - Plaintiff Scruggs' Interrogatories to Defendants, # 3 Exhibit C - Plaintiff Ortiz's Interrogatories to Defendants, # 4 Exhibit D - Defendant City of Chicago's Answers to Williams Interrogatories, # 5 Exhibit E - Defendant City of Chicago's Answers to Scruggs Interrogatories, # 6 Exhibit F - Defendant City of Chicago's Answers to Ortiz Interrogatories, # 7 Exhibit G - Plaintiff Williams Request for Production, # 8 Exhibit H - Plaintiff Scruggs' Requests for Production, # 9 Exhibit I - Plaintiff Ortiz's Requests for Production, # 10 Exhibit J - Defendant City of Chicago's Responses to Williams Requests for Production, # 11 Exhibit K - Defendant City of Chicago's Responses to Scruggs' Requests for Production, # 12 Exhibit L - Defendant City of Chicago's Responses to Ortiz's Requests for Production, # 13 Exhibit M - Plaintiff's Proposed Supplemental Requests for Production)(DiCola, Joseph) (Entered: 05/12/2023)

1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff Williams' Interrogatories to Defendants

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit B - Plaintiff Scruggs' Interrogatories to Defendants

View on PACER

3 Exhibit C - Plaintiff Ortiz's Interrogatories to Defendants

View on PACER

4 Exhibit D - Defendant City of Chicago's Answers to Williams Interrogatories

View on PACER

5 Exhibit E - Defendant City of Chicago's Answers to Scruggs Interrogatories

View on PACER

6 Exhibit F - Defendant City of Chicago's Answers to Ortiz Interrogatories

View on PACER

7 Exhibit G - Plaintiff Williams Request for Production

View on RECAP

8 Exhibit H - Plaintiff Scruggs' Requests for Production

View on PACER

9 Exhibit I - Plaintiff Ortiz's Requests for Production

View on PACER

10 Exhibit J - Defendant City of Chicago's Responses to Williams Requests for

View on PACER

11 Exhibit K - Defendant City of Chicago's Responses to Scruggs' Requests

View on PACER

12 Exhibit L - Defendant City of Chicago's Responses to Ortiz's Requests

View on PACER

13 Exhibit M - Plaintiff's Proposed Supplemental Requests for Production

View on PACER