Case: Farrell v. United States Department of Defense

3:23-cv-04013 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: Aug. 8, 2023

Closed Date: March 15, 2025

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This is a case about veteran discharge status following the repeal of the “don’t ask, don’t tell” (DADT) policy. DADT was a military policy repealed in 2010 that permitted members of the LGBTQ+ community to serve in the military as long as they kept their sexual orientation a secret. On August 8, 2023, a group of LGBTQ+ veterans who were discharged because of their sexual orientation filed this putative class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Pla…

This is a case about veteran discharge status following the repeal of the “don’t ask, don’t tell” (DADT) policy. DADT was a military policy repealed in 2010 that permitted members of the LGBTQ+ community to serve in the military as long as they kept their sexual orientation a secret.

On August 8, 2023, a group of LGBTQ+ veterans who were discharged because of their sexual orientation filed this putative class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Plaintiffs sued officials in the Department of Defense (DOD), the U.S. Army, the U.S. Navy, and the U.S. Air Force under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Represented by Legal Aid and the Impact Fund, as well as private counsel, plaintiffs claimed that defendants' failure to update their records after DADT was repealed violated their constitutional rights to equal protection, informational privacy, property, and due process protected by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Specifically, they argued that the defendants must update discharge papers to clarify that their discharges were honorable, and to remove any references to their sexual orientation. Continuing to carry indicators of their sexual orientation on their discharge paperwork subjected plaintiffs to stigma and discrimination, they alleged, and to rectify this harm, they were required to navigate a burdensome record correction process. Plaintiffs sought a declaratory judgment that the defendants’ failure to update discharge paperwork violated the law, an injunction requiring defendants to review all discharges processed pursuant to DADT and update the discharge paperwork, and attorney’s fees. The case was assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. 

Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on October 26, 2023, adding more information about the burdensome process for correcting discharge paperwork. They also submitted a motion for class certification on October 31, 2023, seeking to certify two classes: the Sexual Orientation Indicator class (SOI) and the Discharge Upgrade Subclass. The Sexual Orientation Indicator Class included veterans from all U.S. Armed Forces branches with a discharge form indicating sexual orientation as a reason for discharge. The Discharge Upgrade Subclass was composed of members of the Sexual Orientation Indicator Class who did not receive an Honorable discharge.

The defendants filed a motion to dismiss on November 17, 2023. They argued that the plaintiffs’ claims were untimely because of a 6-year statute of limitations, and the latest discharged plaintiff was discharged in 2008. The defendants further alleged that the plaintiffs did not have standing to challenge the Military Correction Boards' procedures because they had not actually filed for corrections of their discharges with those boards, and that the plaintiffs lacked standing for their privacy claims because they had not alleged involuntary disclosure of private information. Finally, defendants argued that all of the plaintiffs’ claims should be dismissed because they failed to plausibly allege constitutional claims of equal protection and substantive or procedural due process. In an order issued on the same date, the court decided to wait to resolve plaintiffs' motion for class certification pending a hearing on defendants’ motion to dismiss. 

The plaintiffs filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss on December 8, 2023. They argued that their claims were timely under the continuing violation doctrine or, alternatively, under the doctrine of equitable tolling. They also argued that they had standing because 1) they were "able and ready" to apply for corrections of their discharges and therefore could be imminently subject to the challenged process from the Military Correction Boards, and 2) one of the plaintiffs had already submitted for correction to the board. They also argued that any failure to exhaust administrative remedies should be excused here. As to the privacy claim, the plaintiffs contended that they had sufficiently alleged harm to have standing. Finally, the plaintiffs argued that they had adequately alleged violation of their rights to equal protection, substantive due process and procedural due process.

The parties participated in alternative dispute resolution in January 2024, but were unable to resolve the case. 

The court denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss on June 20, 2024. The court held that the plaintiffs had adequately pled their equal protection, substantive due process, and procedural due process claims. It also held that the plaintiffs had standing to bring the case because they were "able and ready" to engage in the Boards’ process to remediate the discharges, and that they did not need to further exhaust the Boards' procedures. The court also held that the plaintiffs had standing to bring their privacy claim because they alleged sufficient harm. The court further found that the claims were not untimely because the violations were continuing as long as the plaintiffs continued to be unable to access veteran’s benefits or to be required to disclose their sexual orientation in order to access those benefits. 2024 WL 3090854.

The parties engaged in further settlement negotiations through September and October 2024. The parties indicated on October 25, 2024, that they had reached a settlement in principle and were negotiating the details.

On January 6, 2025, the plaintiffs filed a motion for conditional class certification for the purposes of effectuating the proposed settlement. They also requested that the court preliminarily approve the parties’ proposed class action settlement agreement. The defendants filed a statement of non-opposition to the plaintiffs’ motion. That same day, the parties stipulated to dismiss one of the plaintiffs that was no longer a member of the proposed class. 

The court conditionally certified the settlement class and preliminarily approved the class action settlement on January 8, 2025. The court also granted the parties’ stipulation to dismiss one of the plaintiffs. 

On February 12, 2025, the plaintiffs moved for an order certifying the class for settlement purposes, granting final approval of the class action settlement, and awarding reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. The settlement agreement established two corrections procedures for class members. First, the defendants agreed to establish an Administrative Change Process to remove sexual orientation indicators from DD-214 discharge documents for class members with Honorable and Uncharacterized/Entry Level discharges. Second, the defendants agreed to create an expedited group discharge upgrade review process for class members with General Under Honorable Conditions or Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharges. The court held a fairness hearing on plaintiffs’ motion on March 12, 2025. 

The court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, final approval of the class action settlement, and reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs on March 12, 2025. The certified class included all Veterans who were administratively separated prior to September 20, 2011, and whose most recent Service separation document shows their basis for discharge was sexual orientation, homosexual conduct, homosexual admission, homosexual marriage, similar language, or a policy title or number signifying separation for sexual orientation. Additionally, the court granted final approval of the parties’ settlement, finding that the proposed settlement was fair, reasonable, and adequate. Finally, the court awarded $350,000 in attorneys' fees and costs, which was the amount set forth in the parties’ agreement. 2025 WL 1070753.

Due to the approved settlement, the court dismissed the case with prejudice on March 15, 2025. 

Summary Authors

Simran Takhar (11/19/2023)

Samantha Houghton (11/14/2024)

Skylar Parpan (3/24/2026)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67676599/parties/farrell-v-united-states-department-of-defense/


Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

3:23-cv-04013

Class Action Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

Aug. 8, 2023

Aug. 8, 2023

Complaint
43

3:23-cv-04013

First Amended Class Action Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

Oct. 26, 2023

Oct. 26, 2023

Complaint
67

3:23-cv-04013

Order Denying Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint and Setting Further Case Management Conference

June 20, 2024

June 20, 2024

Order/Opinion

2024 WL 3090854

82

3:23-cv-04013

Plaintiffs’ Notice Of Motion And Motion For Condititonal Class Certification, Preliminary Approval Of Class Action Settlement, And Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees And Costs, And Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support

Farrell et al. v. United States Department of Defense et al.

Jan. 6, 2025

Jan. 6, 2025

Pleading / Motion / Brief
85

3:23-cv-04013

Order Granting Motion For Conditional Class Certification, Preliminary Approval Of Class Action Settlement, And Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees And Costs

Farrell et al. v. United States Department of Defense

Jan. 8, 2025

Jan. 8, 2025

Order/Opinion
88

3:23-cv-04013

Plaintiffs’ Notice Of Motion And Motion For Class Certification, Final Approval Of Class Action Settlement, And Award Of Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees And Costs, And Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support

Farrell et al. v. United States Department of Defense et al.

Feb. 12, 2025

Feb. 12, 2025

Pleading / Motion / Brief
94

3:23-cv-04013

Order Granting Motion For Final Approval Of Class Action Settlement And Awarding Reasonable Attorneys' Fees And Costs

Farrell et al. v. United States Department of Defense et al.

March 12, 2025

March 12, 2025

Order/Opinion

2025 WL 1070753

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67676599/farrell-v-united-states-department-of-defense/

Last updated July 28, 2026, 8:27 p.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Aug. 8, 2023

COMPLAINT against Lloyd J Austin III, Carlos Del Toro, Frank Kendall, United States Department of Defense, Christine Wormuth ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-18526531.). Filed byJames Gonzales, Steven Egland, Sherrill Farrell, Julianne Sohn, Stephan Steffanides. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Larkin, Jocelyn) (Filed on 8/8/2023) (Entered: 08/08/2023)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on RECAP

Clearinghouse
2 Aug. 8, 2023

Proposed Summons. (Larkin, Jocelyn) (Filed on 8/8/2023) (Entered: 08/08/2023)

RECAP
3 Aug. 8, 2023

Proposed Summons. (Larkin, Jocelyn) (Filed on 8/8/2023) (Entered: 08/08/2023)

RECAP
4 Aug. 8, 2023

Proposed Summons. (Larkin, Jocelyn) (Filed on 8/8/2023) (Entered: 08/08/2023)

RECAP
5 Aug. 8, 2023

Proposed Summons. (Larkin, Jocelyn) (Filed on 8/8/2023) (Entered: 08/08/2023)

RECAP
6 Aug. 8, 2023

Proposed Summons. (Larkin, Jocelyn) (Filed on 8/8/2023) (Entered: 08/08/2023)

RECAP
7 Aug. 8, 2023

Corporate Disclosure Statement by Steven Egland, Sherrill Farrell, James Gonzales, Julianne Sohn, Stephan Steffanides re 4 Proposed Summons, 3 Proposed Summons, 2 Proposed Summons, 6 Proposed Summons, 1 Complaint, 5 Proposed Summons (Larkin, Jocelyn) (Filed on 8/8/2023) (Entered: 08/08/2023)

RECAP
8 Aug. 8, 2023

Certificate of Interested Entities by Steven Egland, Sherrill Farrell, James Gonzales, Julianne Sohn, Stephan Steffanides re 7 Certificate of Interested Entities, 2 Proposed Summons, 5 Proposed Summons, 3 Proposed Summons, 4 Proposed Summons, 6 Proposed Summons, 1 Complaint, (Larkin, Jocelyn) (Filed on 8/8/2023) (Entered: 08/08/2023)

RECAP
9 Aug. 8, 2023

NOTICE of Appearance by Jocelyn Dion Larkin (Larkin, Jocelyn) (Filed on 8/8/2023) (Entered: 08/08/2023)

RECAP
10 Aug. 8, 2023

NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Kristen (Kristen, Elizabeth) (Filed on 8/8/2023) (Entered: 08/08/2023)

RECAP
11 Aug. 8, 2023

NOTICE of Appearance by Lindsay Polastri Nako (Nako, Lindsay) (Filed on 8/8/2023) (Entered: 08/08/2023)

RECAP
12 Aug. 8, 2023

NOTICE of Appearance by Fawn Jade Korr (Korr, Fawn) (Filed on 8/8/2023) (Entered: 08/08/2023)

RECAP
13 Aug. 8, 2023

NOTICE of Appearance by Meredith Dixon (Dixon, Meredith) (Filed on 8/8/2023) (Entered: 08/08/2023)

RECAP
14 Aug. 8, 2023

NOTICE of Appearance by Lynnette Miner (Miner, Lynnette) (Filed on 8/8/2023) (Entered: 08/08/2023)

RECAP
15 Aug. 8, 2023

NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel T Yeung (Yeung, Rachel) (Filed on 8/8/2023) (Entered: 08/08/2023)

RECAP
16 Aug. 8, 2023

NOTICE of Appearance by David Karl Willingham (Willingham, David) (Filed on 8/8/2023) (Entered: 08/08/2023)

RECAP
17 Aug. 8, 2023

MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-18526677.) filed by Steven Egland, Sherrill Farrell, James Gonzales, Julianne Sohn, Stephan Steffanides. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing - NY, # 2 Certificate of Good Standing - North Carolina)(Corey, Chelsea) (Filed on 8/8/2023) (Entered: 08/08/2023)

RECAP
18 Aug. 8, 2023

MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-18526686.) filed by Steven Egland, Sherrill Farrell, James Gonzales, Julianne Sohn, Stephan Steffanides. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing - Georgia)(Manthe, Radha) (Filed on 8/8/2023) (Entered: 08/08/2023)

RECAP
19 Aug. 8, 2023

Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/22/2023. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2023) (Entered: 08/09/2023)

RECAP
20 Aug. 9, 2023

Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/8/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/15/2023 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2023) (Entered: 08/09/2023)

RECAP
21 Aug. 9, 2023

Summons Issued as to Frank Kendall, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2023) (Entered: 08/09/2023)

RECAP
22 Aug. 9, 2023

Summons Issued as to Christine Wormuth, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2023) (Entered: 08/09/2023)

RECAP
23 Aug. 9, 2023

Summons Issued as to Lloyd J Austin III, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2023) (Entered: 08/09/2023)

RECAP
24 Aug. 9, 2023

Summons Issued as to United States Department of Defense, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2023) (Entered: 08/09/2023)

RECAP
25 Aug. 9, 2023

Summons Issued as to Carlos Del Toro, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2023) (Entered: 08/09/2023)

RECAP
Aug. 9, 2023

~Util - Case Assigned by Intake

26 Aug. 10, 2023

Order of Recusal. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 8/10/2023. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2023) (Entered: 08/10/2023)

RECAP
27 Aug. 10, 2023

ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero for all further proceedings. Chief Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case. Signed by The Clerk on 8/10/2023. (bar, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2023) (Entered: 08/10/2023)

RECAP
28 Aug. 11, 2023

ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 8/11/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/17/2023 02:00 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jcs Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names and emails must be sent to the CRD at jcscrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than 11/15/2023 by 3:00 PM.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. Case Management Statement due by 11/10/2023. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2023) (Entered: 08/11/2023)

RECAP
29 Aug. 11, 2023

Order. Signed 8/11/2023 by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting 17 Motion for Pro Hac Vice - Chelsea Corey.(klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2023) (Entered: 08/11/2023)

RECAP
30 Aug. 11, 2023

ORDER. Signed 8/11/2023 by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting 18 Motion for Pro Hac Vice for Radha Manthe. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2023) (Entered: 08/11/2023)

RECAP
31 Aug. 28, 2023

CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 9/11/2023. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2023) (Entered: 08/28/2023)

RECAP
32 Aug. 28, 2023

SUMMONS Returned Executed by James Gonzales, Steven Egland, Sherrill Farrell, Julianne Sohn, Stephan Steffanides. United States Department of Defense served on 8/10/2023, answer due 10/10/2023. (Willingham, David) (Filed on 8/28/2023) (Entered: 08/28/2023)

RECAP
33 Aug. 28, 2023

SUMMONS Returned Executed by James Gonzales, Steven Egland, Sherrill Farrell, Julianne Sohn, Stephan Steffanides. Frank Kendall served on 8/14/2023, answer due 10/13/2023. (Willingham, David) (Filed on 8/28/2023) (Entered: 08/28/2023)

RECAP
34 Aug. 28, 2023

SUMMONS Returned Executed by James Gonzales, Steven Egland, Sherrill Farrell, Julianne Sohn, Stephan Steffanides. Lloyd J Austin III served on 8/16/2023, answer due 10/16/2023. (Willingham, David) (Filed on 8/28/2023) (Entered: 08/28/2023)

RECAP
35 Aug. 28, 2023

SUMMONS Returned Executed by James Gonzales, Steven Egland, Sherrill Farrell, Julianne Sohn, Stephan Steffanides. Christine Wormuth served on 8/11/2023, answer due 10/10/2023. (Willingham, David) (Filed on 8/28/2023) (Entered: 08/28/2023)

RECAP
36 Aug. 29, 2023

CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Steven Egland, Sherrill Farrell, James Gonzales, Julianne Sohn, Stephan Steffanides.. (Larkin, Jocelyn) (Filed on 8/29/2023) (Entered: 08/29/2023)

RECAP
37 Sept. 7, 2023

SUMMONS Returned Executed by James Gonzales, Steven Egland, Sherrill Farrell, Julianne Sohn, Stephan Steffanides. Carlos Del Toro served on 8/16/2023, answer due 10/16/2023. (Willingham, David) (Filed on 9/7/2023) (Entered: 09/07/2023)

RECAP
38 Sept. 29, 2023

NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Evan Carmichael (Carmichael, Andrew) (Filed on 9/29/2023) (Entered: 09/29/2023)

RECAP
39 Oct. 2, 2023

CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 10/16/2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2023) (Entered: 10/02/2023)

RECAP
Oct. 2, 2023

Clerk's Notice re: Consent or Declination

40 Oct. 13, 2023

CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Lloyd J Austin III, Carlos Del Toro, Frank Kendall, United States Department of Defense, Christine Wormuth.. (Carmichael, Andrew) (Filed on 10/13/2023) (Entered: 10/13/2023)

RECAP
41 Oct. 25, 2023

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 28 Order,,,,,, Set Deadlines/Hearings,,,,,, Util - Teleconference Zoom,,,,, filed by Lloyd J Austin III, Carlos Del Toro, Frank Kendall, United States Department of Defense, Christine Wormuth. (Carmichael, Andrew) (Filed on 10/25/2023) (Entered: 10/25/2023)

RECAP
42 Oct. 25, 2023

Order.Signed 10/25/2023 by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting 41 Stipulation to Reschedule Case Management Conference and Related Deadlines.(klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2023) (Entered: 10/25/2023)

RECAP
Oct. 25, 2023

Set Deadlines/Hearings AND ~Util - Teleconference Zoom

Oct. 25, 2023

See Order 42 Set Deadlines/Hearings: Case Management Statement due by 1/19/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/26/2024 02:00 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jcs General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2023) Modified on 10/25/2023 (klh, COURT STAFF).

43 Oct. 26, 2023

AMENDED COMPLAINT FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against All Defendants. Filed by James Gonzales, Steven Egland, Sherrill Farrell, Julianne Sohn, Stephan Steffanides. (Larkin, Jocelyn) (Filed on 10/26/2023) (Entered: 10/26/2023)

Clearinghouse
44 Oct. 27, 2023

CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: The newly added Plaintiff Hayden Powell shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 11/13/2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2023) (Entered: 10/27/2023)

RECAP
Oct. 27, 2023

Clerk's Notice re: Consent or Declination

45 Oct. 31, 2023

MOTION to Certify Class "NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND APPOINTMENT OF CLASS COUNSEL; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES" filed by Sherrill Farrell, James Gonzales, Hayden Powell, Julianne Sohn, Stephan Steffanides. Motion to Certify Class Hearing set for 3/22/2024 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom D, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Responses due by 11/14/2023. Replies due by 11/21/2023. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Motion for Class Certification, # 2 Declaration of Sherrill Farrell, # 3 Exhibit A to Farrell Declaration, # 4 Exhibit B to Farrell Declaration, # 5 Exhibit C to Farrell Declaration, # 6 Declaration of James Gonzales, # 7 Exhibit A to Gonzales Declaration, # 8 Exhibit B to Gonzales Declaration, # 9 Declaration of Hayden Powell, # 10 Exhibit A to Powell Declaration, # 11 Declaration of Jules Sohn, # 12 Declaration of Lilly Steffanides, # 13 Exhibit A to Steffanides Declaration, # 14 Declaration of Jocelyn Larkin, # 15 Declaration of Elizabeth Kristen, # 16 Exhibit A to Kristen Declaration, # 17 Exhibit of David Willingham)(Larkin, Jocelyn) (Filed on 10/31/2023) (Entered: 10/31/2023)

13

View on RECAP

RECAP
46 Nov. 2, 2023

CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Hayden Powell.. (Larkin, Jocelyn) (Filed on 11/2/2023) (Entered: 11/02/2023)

RECAP
47 Nov. 3, 2023

CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Hayden Powell.. (Larkin, Jocelyn) (Filed on 11/3/2023) (Entered: 11/03/2023)

RECAP
Nov. 3, 2023

Electronic Filing Error

Nov. 3, 2023

Electronic filing error. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office.Please re-file in its entirety. Re: 46 Consent/Declination to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge filed by Hayden Powell. The Counsel For section is blank. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2023)

48 Nov. 10, 2023

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Lloyd J Austin III, Carlos Del Toro, Frank Kendall, United States Department of Defense, Christine Wormuth. (Carmichael, Andrew) (Filed on 11/10/2023) (Entered: 11/10/2023)

RECAP
49 Nov. 14, 2023

**PLEASE DISREGARD. INCORRECT DOCUMENT ATTACHED. DOCUMENT NOT SIGNED** Order. Signed on 11/14/2023 by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting as modified 48 Stipulation to Set Briefing Schedule for Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification is DENIED without prejudice to re-filing after a ruling on the Motion to Dismiss.See Modifications in Bold(klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2023) Modified on 11/17/2023 (klh, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 11/14/2023)

RECAP
Nov. 14, 2023

Set/Reset Hearings

Nov. 14, 2023

Set Deadlines/Hearings AND ~Util - Teleconference Zoom

Nov. 14, 2023

See Order 49 Set Deadlines/Hearings: Case Management Statement due by 1/12/2024. Motion to Dismiss due by 11/17/2023. Responses/Opposition due by 12/8/2023. Replies due by 12/22/2023. Initial Case Management Conference and Motion to Dismiss Hearing set for 1/19/2024 09:30 AM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jcs Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names and emails must be sent to the CRD at jcscrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than 1/17/2024 by 3:00 PM.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2023)

Nov. 14, 2023

Set/Reset Hearing Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/19/2024 09:30 AM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. Corrected to fix the year. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2023)

50 Nov. 17, 2023

MOTION to Dismiss filed by Lloyd J Austin III, Carlos Del Toro, Frank Kendall, United States Department of Defense, Christine Wormuth. Motion to Dismiss Hearing set for 1/19/2024 09:30 AM. Responses due by 12/8/2023. Replies due by 12/22/2023. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Proposed Order)(Carmichael, Andrew) (Filed on 11/17/2023) (Entered: 11/17/2023)

RECAP
51 Nov. 17, 2023

ORDER. Signed on 11/14/2023 by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting as modified 48 STIPULATION to Set Briefing Schedule for Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification is DENIED without prejudice to re-filing after a ruling on the Motion to Dismiss.See Modifications in Bold. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2023) (Entered: 11/17/2023)

RECAP
Nov. 17, 2023

Electronic Filing Error

Nov. 17, 2023

Electronic filing error. Incorrect PDF attached. [err201]Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: 49 Order on Stipulation. See Order 51 . (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2023)

52 Dec. 8, 2023

OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re 50 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed bySherrill Farrell, James Gonzales, Hayden Powell, Julianne Sohn, Stephan Steffanides. (Larkin, Jocelyn) (Filed on 12/8/2023) (Entered: 12/08/2023)

RECAP
53 Dec. 21, 2023

REPLY (re 50 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed byLloyd J Austin III, Carlos Del Toro, Frank Kendall, United States Department of Defense, Christine Wormuth. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Carmichael, Andrew) (Filed on 12/21/2023) (Entered: 12/21/2023)

RECAP
54 Jan. 4, 2024

Certificate of Interested Entities by Hayden Powell (Larkin, Jocelyn) (Filed on 1/4/2024) (Entered: 01/04/2024)

RECAP
55 Jan. 10, 2024

ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options for Plaintiff Sherrill Farrell (Larkin, Jocelyn) (Filed on 1/10/2024) (Entered: 01/10/2024)

RECAP
56 Jan. 10, 2024

ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options for Plaintiff James Gonzales (Larkin, Jocelyn) (Filed on 1/10/2024) (Entered: 01/10/2024)

RECAP
57 Jan. 10, 2024

ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options for Plaintiff Hayden Powell (Larkin, Jocelyn) (Filed on 1/10/2024) (Entered: 01/10/2024)

RECAP
58 Jan. 10, 2024

ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options for Plaintiff Jules Sohn (Larkin, Jocelyn) (Filed on 1/10/2024) (Entered: 01/10/2024)

RECAP
59 Jan. 10, 2024

ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options for Plaintiff Lilly Steffanides (Larkin, Jocelyn) (Filed on 1/10/2024) (Entered: 01/10/2024)

RECAP
60 Jan. 12, 2024

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Sherrill Farrell. (Larkin, Jocelyn) (Filed on 1/12/2024) (Entered: 01/12/2024)

RECAP
61 Jan. 18, 2024

CLERKS NOTICE CONTINUING HEARING AND ZOOM NOTICE. Initial Case Management Conference and Motion Hearing as to 50 MOTION to Dismiss set for 1/19/2024 is continued to 2/2/2024 09:30 AM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jcs General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2024) (Entered: 01/18/2024)

RECAP
Jan. 18, 2024

Clerk's Notice Setting Zoom Hearing AND ~Util - Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings

62 Feb. 2, 2024

Minute Entry for ZOOM proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero: Motion Hearing held on 2/2/2024 re 50 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Frank Kendall, United States Department of Defense, Carlos Del Toro, Lloyd J Austin III, Christine Wormuth and Initial Case Management Conference held on 2/2/2024. Motion submitted. Total Time in Court: 1 H 25 M. Court Reporter: Marla Knox. Attorney for Plaintiff: Elizabeth Kristen, Chelsea Corey.Attorney for Defendant: Andrew Carmichael.(klh, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 2/2/2024) (Entered: 02/02/2024)

RECAP
63 Feb. 8, 2024

TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on February 2, 2024 before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero by Steven Egland, Sherrill Farrell, James Gonzales, Hayden Powell, Julianne Sohn, Stephan Steffanides, for Court Reporter Marla Knox. (Corey, Chelsea) (Filed on 2/8/2024) (Entered: 02/08/2024)

RECAP
64 March 13, 2024

TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on 2/2/24 before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero for Court Reporter Marla Knox (Iskander) (mfk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2024) (Entered: 03/13/2024)

RECAP
65 March 15, 2024

Transcript of Videoconference Proceedings held on February 2, 2024, before Judge Joseph C. Spero. Court Reporter, Marla F. Knox, RPR, CRR, RMR, telephone number (602) 391-6990/email marla_knox@cand.uscourts.gov. Per General Order No. 59 and Judicial Conference policy, this transcript may be viewed only at the Clerk's Office public terminal or may be purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber until the deadline for the Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Any Notice of Intent to Request Redaction, if required, is due no later than 5 business days from date of this filing. (Re 63 Transcript Order, ) Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/13/2024. (Related documents(s) 63 ) (mfk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2024) (Entered: 03/15/2024)

RECAP
66 March 18, 2024

NOTICE of Appearance by Lori Rifkin (Rifkin, Lori) (Filed on 3/18/2024) (Entered: 03/18/2024)

RECAP
67 June 20, 2024

ORDER by Judge Joseph C. Spero denying 50 Motion to Dismiss. A Further Case Management Conference will be held on July 17, 2024 at 2:00 p.m. via Zoom, id. 161 926 0804, password 050855. The parties joint case management statement shall be filed by July 10, 2024. (jcslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2024) (Entered: 06/20/2024)

Clearinghouse
June 20, 2024

See Order 67 Set Deadlines/Hearings: Case Management Statement due by 7/10/2024. Further Case Management Conference set for 7/17/2024* 02:00 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jcs Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names and emails must be sent to the CRD at jcscrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than 7/15/2024 by 3:00 PM.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. *Effective July 1, 2024, Judge Spero's law and motion calendar will be held on Wednesdays. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2024)

68 June 28, 2024

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re Set Deadlines/Hearings,,,,,, Util - Teleconference Zoom,,,,, filed by Lloyd J Austin III, Carlos Del Toro, Frank Kendall, United States Department of Defense, Christine Wormuth. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration)(Carmichael, Andrew) (Filed on 6/28/2024) (Entered: 06/28/2024)

RECAP
69 June 28, 2024

Order. Signed 6/28/2024 by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting 68 Stipulation to Extend Time within which to Answer Complaint, Request to Continue Case Management Conference.(klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2024) (Entered: 06/28/2024)

RECAP
June 28, 2024

Set Deadlines/Hearings AND ~Util - Teleconference Zoom

June 28, 2024

See Order 69 Set Deadlines/Hearings: Case Management Statement due by 7/24/2024. Further Case Management Conference set for 7/31/2024 02:00 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jcs Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A joint list of names and emails must be sent to the CRD at jcscrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than 7/29/2024 by 3:00 PM. General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2024)

70 July 19, 2024

ANSWER to Amended Complaint by Lloyd J Austin III, Carlos Del Toro, Frank Kendall, United States Department of Defense, Christine Wormuth. (Carmichael, Andrew) (Filed on 7/19/2024) (Entered: 07/19/2024)

RECAP
71 July 22, 2024

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re Set Deadlines/Hearings,,,,,, Util - Teleconference Zoom,,,,, filed by Lloyd J Austin III, Carlos Del Toro, Frank Kendall, United States Department of Defense, Christine Wormuth. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration)(Carmichael, Andrew) (Filed on 7/22/2024) (Entered: 07/22/2024)

RECAP
72 July 23, 2024

Order.. Signed 7/23/2024 by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting 71 Stipulation to Continue Case Mgmt Conference.(klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2024) (Entered: 07/23/2024)

RECAP
July 23, 2024

Set Deadlines/Hearings AND ~Util - Teleconference Zoom

July 23, 2024

See Order 72 Set Deadlines/Hearings: Case Management Statement due by 10/9/2024. Status Report due by 9/25/2024. Further Case Management Conference re-set for 10/16/2024 02:00 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jcs Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A joint list of names and emails must be sent to the CRD at jcscrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than 10/14/2024 by 3:00 PM.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2024)

73 Sept. 18, 2024

NOTICE of Appearance filed by Liam Christopher Holland on behalf of Lloyd J Austin III, Carlos Del Toro, Frank Kendall, United States Department of Defense, Christine Wormuth (Holland, Liam) (Filed on 9/18/2024) (Entered: 09/18/2024)

RECAP
Sept. 18, 2024

Notice of Appearance/Substitution/Change/Withdrawal of Attorney

74 Sept. 25, 2024

Joint Status Report and Request to Continue Case Management Conference and [Proposed] Order filed by Lloyd J Austin III, Carlos Del Toro, Frank Kendall, United States Department of Defense, Christine Wormuth. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration)(Holland, Liam) (Filed on 9/25/2024) Modified text on 9/26/2024 (dhm, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 09/25/2024)

RECAP
75 Sept. 26, 2024

Order. Signed 9/26/2024 by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting 74 Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference.(klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2024) (Entered: 09/26/2024)

RECAP
Sept. 26, 2024

Set Deadlines/Hearings AND ~Util - Teleconference Zoom

Sept. 26, 2024

See Order 75 Set Deadlines/Hearings: Case Management Statement due by 11/13/2024. Status Report due by 10/25/2024. Further Case Management Conference set for 11/20/2024 02:00 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jcs General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2024)

76 Oct. 25, 2024

STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report and Request to Vacate Case Management Conference and Stipulated [Proposed] Order by Lloyd J Austin III, Carlos Del Toro, Frank Kendall, United States Department of Defense, Christine Wormuth. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration)(Holland, Liam) (Filed on 10/25/2024) (Entered: 10/25/2024)

1 Declaration

View on PACER

RECAP
77 Oct. 29, 2024

ORDER. Signed as modified on 10/29/2024 by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero GRANTING re 76 Status Report and Request to Vacate Case Management Conference filed by Frank Kendall, United States Department of Defense, Carlos Del Toro, Lloyd J Austin III, Christine Wormuth. Status Report due by 12/13/2024.Case Management Statement due by 1/15/2025. Further Case Management Conference re-set for 1/22/2025 02:00 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jcs Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A joint list of names and emails must be sent to the CRD at jcscrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than 1/17/2025 by 4:00 PM.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/.(klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2024) (Entered: 10/29/2024)

RECAP
78 Dec. 13, 2024

STATUS REPORT (Joint) by Frank Kendall, United States Department of Defense, Lloyd J Austin III, Christine Wormuth, Carlos Del Toro. (Holland, Liam) (Filed on 12/13/2024) (Entered: 12/13/2024)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

California

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Key Dates

Filing Date: Aug. 8, 2023

Closing Date: March 15, 2025

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

A group of LGBTQ veterans who were discharged because of their sexual orientation.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

Impact Fund

Legal Services/Legal Aid

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

Federal

United States Air Force

United States Army

United States Department of Defense

United States Navy

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Ex Parte Young (Federal) or Bivens

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Due Process: Procedural Due Process

Due Process: Substantive Due Process

Equal Protection

Other Dockets:

Northern District of California 3:23-cv-04013

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Sought:

Attorneys fees

Declaratory judgment

Injunction

Relief Granted:

Attorneys fees

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

General/Misc.:

Government services

Record-keeping

Records Disclosure

Discrimination Basis:

Sexual orientation

Recommended Citation