Case: Evans v. Fenty

1:76-cv-00293 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: Feb. 23, 1976

Closed Date: 2017

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On February 23, 1976, six residents of Forest Haven, an institution operated by the District of Columbia for developmentally disabled persons, filed this lawsuit against the District's mayor and its Department of Human Resources. The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia under the First, Fourth, Fifth, and Eighth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution; the Developmentally Disabled Assistance and Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. § 6001 et seq.); and 32 D.C.…

On February 23, 1976, six residents of Forest Haven, an institution operated by the District of Columbia for developmentally disabled persons, filed this lawsuit against the District's mayor and its Department of Human Resources. The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia under the First, Fourth, Fifth, and Eighth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution; the Developmentally Disabled Assistance and Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. § 6001 et seq.); and 32 D.C. Code § 601 et seq. The plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, sought declaratory, injunctive, and equitable relief on behalf of past and present residents of Forest Haven who would benefit from individual treatment and educational programs appropriate to their needs. Specifically, the plaintiffs alleged that Forest Haven had not provided a level of habilitation consistent with the Constitution by failing to supply a setting that was the least restrictive of the residents' personal liberty.

Shortly after the filing of the complaint, the United States was granted its motion to intervene as plaintiffs. Evans v. Washington, 459 F. Supp. 483 (D.D.C. 1978). Also, on June 3, 1976, the court (Judge John H. Pratt) granted the plaintiffs' motion for class certification. Evans v. Williams, 139 F. Supp. 2d 79, 84 (D.D.C. 2001).

On June 14, 1978, the court granted the plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment. Evans v. Washington, 459 F. Supp. 483, 484 (D.D.C. 1978). The court held that the District had violated the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, which provided the plaintiff class with a constitutional right to habilitative care and treatment. Id. It then entered a decree governing virtually every aspect of the District's operation of Forest Haven. Id.; see also In re U.S., 925 F.2d 490, 1991 WL 17225, *1 (D.C. Cir. 1991). At its core, the decree required the deinstitutionalization of the residents and their placement in "community living arrangement[s] . . . together with such community-based day programs and services as are necessary to provide the resident[s] with minimally adequate habilitation." Evans v. Washington, 459 F. Supp. 483, 487 (D.D.C. 1978). In other words, for all intents and purposes, the judgment called for the closing of Forest Haven. Id.; see also Evans v. Williams, 206 F.3d 1292, 1293 (D.C. Cir. 2000). The judgment also required that the defendants, inter alia, draft an individualized habilitation plan for each resident as well as create and maintain procedures to monitor the defendant's compliance with the injunction. Evans v. Washington, 459 F. Supp. 483, 484, 486 (D. D.C., 1978). In 1981 and 1983, the district court entered additional consent orders reaffirming its 1978 order and further mandating the placement of all Forest Haven residents in community living arrangements by the end of fiscal year 1988. In re United States, 925 F.2d 490, 1991 WL 17225, *1 (D.C. Cir. 1991).

The Forest Haven facility was permanently closed in the late 1980s, but the case has remained open and continually active, as disputes regarding the execution of the consent orders and the alleged ongoing failure of the District of Columbia to provide adequate care in an integrated, least restrictive setting. On October 11, 1996, the Court appointed a Special Master, Margaret G. Farrell, to monitor and report on the District's compliance and to make recommendations to the court.

On March 14, 1999, The Washington Post ran an article characterizing the District's efforts to provide safe community-integrated group homes in a least-restrictive setting as having "fail[ed] completely." The article describes one of the group homes into which Forest Haven residents had been transferred as "roach-dappled," with broken furniture and doors hanging off their hinges, and where at least one resident known to be a sexual predator was roomed next door to one of his victims. (Washington Post, March 14, 1999).

On January 30, 2001, Clarence J. Sundram was appointed co-Special Master.

On March 30, 2001, the court (Judge Stanley S. Harris), pursuant to the recommendation of the Special Master in her "2001 Plan for Complainance and Conclusion of Evans v. Williams," entered a fourth consent order, in which the defendants agreed to create a nonprofit agency to, inter alia, provide independent monitoring of the services available to individuals with intellectual disabilities and developmental disabilities. The defendants agreed to fund this agency by paying $31.5 million over eleven years, and again made extensive commitments to improve its practices and the services and living conditions available to mentally disabled citizens of the District of Columbia. Evans v. Williams, 139 F.Supp.2d 79, 83 (D. D.C. 2001).

On March 30, 2007, the Court found that there had been "systemic, continuous, and serious noncompliance with many of the Court's Orders," and held the District of Columbia to be in noncompliance. Evans v. Fenty, 480, F.Supp.2d 280, 325 (D.D.C.2007). The court again had the Special Master produce a report, 2009 Special Masters' Report, in which the Special Master also found the District in non-compliance, and recommended the appointment of an "Independent Compliance Administrator," who would bring the District into compliance.

On April 7, 2010, the Court Issued an Memorandum Opinion, detailing extensively the prior history of the litigation and the various consent orders up until that point, and denying a motion by the District of Columbia to have the existing consent orders vacated and to have the case closed. Evans v. Fenty, 701 F.Supp.2d 126 (D.D.C. 2010). This was appealed, and the appeal was dismissed. 2010 WL 3447241 (D.C. Cir. 2010).

On June 1, 2010, the Court adopted the 2009 Special Masters' Report's findings of fact and conclusions of law Evans v. Fenty, 714 F.Supp.2d 116 (D.D.C 2010). As a result of this decision, the Court approved on August 10, 2010, the Special Master's "2010 Revision to the 2001 Plan for Compliance and Conclusion of Evans v. Fenty."

On October 26, 2012, the court issued an order approving and adopting the Special Master's conclusion that the District of Columbia had achieved compliance in several areas, including the safe guarding of class member's person possessions, and some aspects of staff training. Evans v. Gray, 2012 WL 5305790, (D.D.C. 2012).

From 2013-2015, the court approved in full the reports and recommendations of the Special Master regarding various aspects of the consent decrees. These areas included protection from harm, vocational, residential, and day programs, as well as many other areas. See the documents for this case for a complete list.

On March 31, 2015, the court (Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle) approved and adopted in part the Special Master's report and recommendation regarding individualized habilitation plans. The court held that: 1) altering the 90% threshold for “high” compliance was unwarranted; 2) the defendants had complied with the occupational therapy services component of outcome criterion focused on implementation; but 3) the defendants failed to demonstrate compliance with the medical services component of outcome criterion focused on implementation; and 4) the defendants failed to demonstrate compliance with the criteria requiring assessment of residents' needs for services and mandating provision of certain adaptive equipment. 87 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2015)

On May 10, 2017, the court terminated the case after compliance was achieved.

Note: Among the several awards of attorneys' fees and costs to the Plaintiffs was a consent order and judgment, filed on May 16, 2011, wherein the court approved an award of $4,000,000, covering fees and costs from April 1, 2006, to June 30, 2010. Because of the age of the case and because the court docket is incomplete, the Clearinghouse has not attempted to calculate the total amount of attorneys' fees awarded.

Summary Authors

Jordan Rossen (7/1/2011)

Alex Colbert-Taylor (6/17/2013)

Jessica Kincaid (4/8/2016)

Raul Noguera-McElroy (3/22/2019)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4215002/parties/evans-v-fenty/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Andalman, Elliott Denbo (District of Columbia)

Bagby, Kelly Riseden (District of Columbia)

Bailey, Regan (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Defendant

Amato, Maria-Claudia T. (District of Columbia)

Bagenstos, Samuel Robert (District of Columbia)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

1:76-cv-00293

Appellate Docket

Evans v. Williams

U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

May 11, 2000

May 11, 2000

Docket

1:76-cv-00293

Appellate Docket

U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Aug. 27, 2010

Aug. 27, 2010

Docket

1:76-cv-00293

Docket [PACER]

May 10, 2017

May 10, 2017

Docket
1028

1:76-cv-00293

Complaint

Evans v. Washington

Feb. 23, 1976

Feb. 23, 1976

Complaint

1:76-cv-00293

Final Judgment and Order

Evans v. Washington

June 14, 1978

June 14, 1978

Order/Opinion

459 F.Supp. 483

1:76-cv-00293

Order (Denying Plaintiffs' Petition for Immediate Enforcement of Permanent Injunction)

Evans v. Barry

Nov. 28, 1990

Nov. 28, 1990

Order/Opinion

1990 WL 201488

1:76-cv-00293

Order (Denying Petitioner's Writ of Mandamus)

In re United States, Petitioner

U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Feb. 11, 1991

Feb. 11, 1991

Order/Opinion

925 F.2d 490

1:76-cv-00293

Order (Affirming the Judgment of the District Court)

Evans v. Kelly

U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Nov. 16, 1992

Nov. 16, 1992

Order/Opinion

979 F.2d 248

74

1:76-cv-00293

Order Adopting Proposed Findings of Fact of Special Master

Evans v. Barry

Aug. 2, 1996

Aug. 2, 1996

Order/Opinion

1996 WL 451054

220

1:76-cv-00293

Opinion and Order (Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Sanctions, Denying Defendants’ Motion for Modification of the 1983 Consent Order, etc.)

Evans v. Williams

Feb. 10, 1999

Feb. 10, 1999

Order/Opinion

35 F.Supp.2d 88

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4215002/evans-v-fenty/

Last updated Aug. 24, 2026, 6:26 p.m.

Docket for: EVANS v. FENTY
ECF Number Date Description Link
1028 Feb. 23, 1976

COMPLAINT against DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,et al. filed by JOY EVANS, VENITA FELTON, CHRISTINE EXTON, JOSEPH SCATES, WILLIAM BROWN.(jeb, ) (Entered: 10/23/2008)

RECAP
1 May 5, 1995

NOTICE OF FILING by intervenor-plaintiff USA of report to the court; Exhibits(2) (ted) (Entered: 05/12/1995)

RECAP
2 May 9, 1995

OPPOSITIONS by defendant MARION BARRY, defendant DC to entry of orders of civil contempt and appointment of a special master and reply to the report to the court of USA; Exhibits(2) (ted) (Entered: 05/12/1995)

RECAP
3 May 26, 1995

FINDINGS OF FACT and Conclusions of Law filed by plaintiffs . (ted) (Entered: 05/30/1995)

RECAP
5 June 5, 1995

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM (SECOND) by defendants in opposition to the appointment of a special master and objections to the proposed order of reference. (ted) (Entered: 06/06/1995)

RECAP
6 June 5, 1995

OBJECTIONS by defendant MARION BARRY, defendant DC to findings of fact [3-1] (ted) (Entered: 06/06/1995)

RECAP
4 June 6, 1995

ORDER by Judge John H. Pratt : status hearing set for 9:00 6/9/95; directing that Vernon Hawkins, the Interim Director of the Dept. of Human Services shall appear to explain why the actions promised in his sworn affidavit of 5/9/95, have not been fully implemented; directing the U.S. Marshal to serve a copy of this order to Mr. Hawkins. ; (N) (bjl) (Entered: 06/06/1995)

RECAP
9 June 9, 1995

TRANSCRIPT filed for date(s) of 5/12/95. Reporter: Christi Macri (bjl) (Entered: 06/16/1995)

RECAP
7 June 13, 1995

ORDER by Judge Oliver Gasch for John H. Pratt : allowing District of Columbia 10 days to file with the Court certain information regarding vendors; if Monitor's list differs from District's lists of vendors, District will make explanation therefor; opposing parties should respond the District's pleadings within 10 days of filing. (N) (N) (bjl) (Entered: 06/15/1995)

RECAP
8 June 13, 1995

MONITOR'S REPORT (bjl) (Entered: 06/15/1995)

RECAP
10 June 16, 1995

TRANSCRIPT of hearing before Judge Oliver Gasch filed for date of 6/13/95. Reporter: Laura M. Beasley. (tth) (Entered: 06/19/1995)

RECAP
11 June 23, 1995

NOTICE OF FILING by defendant DC of submission to the court; Attachments(3) (ted) (Entered: 06/28/1995)

RECAP
12 June 29, 1995

TRANSCRIPT filed for date(s) of 4/20/95. Reporter: Santa Zizzo (ted) (Entered: 06/30/1995)

RECAP
13 July 10, 1995

ORDER by Judge John H. Pratt : that the parties to this action shall have 20 days within which to meet independently with Ms. Farrell and that Ms. Farrell shall provide the parties with copies of her curriculum vitae, and make herself available for said interviews and the parties shall file any comments concerning Ms. Farrell's intended appointment with the Court by 7/31/95. The Court will then make a final decision concerning the appointment. (N) (adc) (Entered: 07/10/1995)

RECAP
14 July 31, 1995

NOTICE OF FILING by intervenor-plaintiff USA of response to appointment of Margaret G. Farrell as special master. (ted) (Entered: 08/01/1995)

RECAP
15 July 31, 1995

NOTICE OF FILING by defendant MARION BARRY, defendant DC of report to court regarding appointment of special master. (ted) (Entered: 08/01/1995)

RECAP
16 Sept. 21, 1995

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Joseph B. Tulman representing plaintiffs. New address: District of Columbia School of Law, Building 48, Room 7105, 4250 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20008, (202) 274-7317. (mlp) (Entered: 09/22/1995)

RECAP
17 Oct. 11, 1995

FINDINGS OF FACT and Conclusions of Law . (fle) (Entered: 10/13/1995)

RECAP
18 Oct. 11, 1995

ORDER OF REFERENCE by Judge Stanley S. Harris: advising that Margaret G. Farrell is appointed as Special Master. The Special Master shall hear, consider, and make recommended findings of fact and conclusions of law. The Special Master shall possess and exercise all powers conferred upon Special Masters. The Special Master shall submit her report within 90 days. The Special Master shall receive compensation not to exceed 100.00 per hour plus all reasonable expenses. The Special Master may employ an associate lawyer in the capacity of a law clerk, whose services shall be charged at an hourly rate. The Special Master's fee shall be assessed or apportioned as justice may require. Other costs incurred by the Special Master shall be equally borne by the parties. Advising the parties that faith shall be exercised in all negotiations between the parties. The power to enforce the Court's Orders and to punish defendants for noncompliance is vested solely in the Court. Directing defendants to deposit the sum of $50,000.00 with the Clerk of the Court as interim payment of costs, within 28 days. (N) (mlp) Modified on 02/08/1996 (Entered: 02/08/1996)

RECAP
19 Oct. 20, 1995

MOTION filed by movant WE CARE PROJECTS,INC to intervene as a plaintiff, EXHIBITS: Motion for Preliminary injuncation and temporary restraining order (lpp) (Entered: 10/25/1995)

RECAP
20 Oct. 26, 1995

MOTION filed by intervenor-plaintiff USA to remedy defendants' ongoing comtempt, and for emergency injunctive relief ; Attachments (4) (blj) (Entered: 10/27/1995)

RECAP
21 Oct. 30, 1995

TRANSCRIPT of motions hearing before Judge Harris filed for date of 10/20/95. Reporter: Robert M. Weber (bjsp) (Entered: 10/31/1995)

RECAP
23 Nov. 2, 1995

MOTION filed by defendant MARION BARRY, defendant DC to extend time to 11/14/95 to respond to United States' motion to remedy defendants' ongoing contempt, and for injunctive relief (tw) (Entered: 11/06/1995)

RECAP
22 Nov. 3, 1995

MOTION filed by plaintiffs to remedy defendants' continuing contempt (ks) (Entered: 11/06/1995)

RECAP
24 Nov. 7, 1995

ORDER by Judge Stanley S. Harris : granting motion to extend time to 11/14/95 to respond to United States' motion to remedy defendants' ongoing contempt [23-1] by DC, MARION BARRY (N) (emh) (Entered: 11/08/1995)

RECAP
25 Nov. 14, 1995

MOTION filed by defendant MARION BARRY, defendant DC to extend time to 11/28/95 to respond to US' motion to remedy defendants; ongoing contempt, and for emergency injunctive relief (cjp) (Entered: 11/16/1995)

RECAP
26 Nov. 14, 1995

RESPONSE by defendant MARION BARRY, defendant DC in opposition to US's and plaintiffs motions to remedy defendants' continuing contempt [22-1] and for injunctive relief [23-2] [20-1] (cjp) (Entered: 11/17/1995)

RECAP
27 Nov. 22, 1995

RESPONSE by intervenor-plaintiff USA in opposition to motion to extend time to 11/28/95 to respond to US' motion to remedy defendants; ongoing contempt [25-1] by DC, MARION BARRY . (ks) (Entered: 11/24/1995)

RECAP
28 Nov. 22, 1995

REPLY by intervenor-plaintiff USA to response to motion to remedy defendants' ongoing comtempt [20-1], and for emergency injunctive relief [20-2] by USA; Attachments (5) (ks) (Entered: 11/24/1995)

RECAP
29 Nov. 28, 1995

RESPONSE (FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL) by defendant MARION BARRY, defendant DC in opposition to motion to remedy defendants' ongoing comtempt [20-1] by USA, motion for emergency injunctive relief [20-2] by USA . (bjsp) (Entered: 11/29/1995)

RECAP
30 Nov. 30, 1995

ORDER by Judge Stanley S. Harris : denying as moot, without prejudice motion to remedy defendants' continuing contempt [22-1] by plaintiffs; directing the parties within 21 days to submit briefing to the Court on the legality, feasibility, and desireability of the creation of an escrow fund. (N) (emh) (Entered: 12/06/1995)

RECAP
31 Dec. 7, 1995

TRANSCRIPT filed for hearing before Judge Harris for date of 11/24/95. Reporter: Robert M. Weber (mlp) (Entered: 12/07/1995)

RECAP
32 Dec. 7, 1995

TRANSCRIPT filed for hearing before Judge Harris for date of 11/28/95. Reporter: Robert M. Weber (mlp) (Entered: 12/07/1995)

RECAP
33 Dec. 20, 1995

RESPONSE by intervenor-plaintiff USA to order dated 11/30/95 [30-1] requiring analysis of use of an escrow account to ensure compliance with Court Order relating to timely payment of private providers for services to class members (mlp) (Entered: 12/21/1995)

RECAP
34 Dec. 21, 1995

MOTION filed by defendant MARION BARRY, defendant DC to extend time to 12/29/95 to file memorandum on the legality, feasibility and desirability of the creation of an escrow account (mlp) (Entered: 12/22/1995)

RECAP
35 Dec. 21, 1995

RESPONSE by plaintiffs to order dated 11/30/95 [30-1] regarding the legality, feasibility, and desirability of creating an escrow fund to ensure defendants' compliance with Court orders requiring timely payment to service providers (mlp) (Entered: 12/22/1995)

RECAP
36 Dec. 22, 1995

ORDER by Judge Stanley S. Harris : granting nunc pro tunc motion to extend time to 12/29/95 to file memorandum on the legality, feasibility and desirability of the creation of an escrow account [34-1] by DC, MARION BARRY (N) (emh) (Entered: 01/02/1996)

RECAP
38 Dec. 29, 1995

MOTION filed by defendant MARION BARRY, defendant DC to extend time to 1/5/96 to file memorandum on the legality, feasibility and desirability of the creation of an escrow account (mlp) (Entered: 01/02/1996)

RECAP
37 Jan. 2, 1996

ORDER by Judge Stanley S. Harris : directing the Clerk of the Court to disburse from the court's registry, from the escrow account in CA.76-293 the sum of $7,180.74 to Margaret G. Farrell for services rendered and expenses incurred. (N) (emh) (Entered: 01/02/1996)

RECAP
39 Jan. 5, 1996

RESPONSE by defendant MARION BARRY, defendant DC to order [30-1] on the use of an escrow account to pay vendors (mlp) (Entered: 01/11/1996)

RECAP
40 Jan. 11, 1996

ORDER by Judge Stanley S. Harris : granting motion to extend time to 1/5/96 to file memorandum on the legality, feasibility and desirability of the creation of an escrow account [38-1] by DC, MARION BARRY (N) (emh) (Entered: 01/17/1996)

RECAP
41 Jan. 19, 1996

ORDER by Judge Stanley S. Harris : directing the Clerk of the Court to disburse from the Court's Registry, the sum of $4,852.01, to Margaret G. Farrell, for services rendered and expenses incurred. (N) (emh) (Entered: 01/23/1996)

RECAP
42 Jan. 19, 1996

ORDER by Judge Stanley S. Harris : allowing the Special Master until 1/25/96, to file the parties proposed remedial plan. (N) (emh) (Entered: 01/23/1996)

RECAP
45 Jan. 22, 1996

REQUEST by Special Master to extend time to 1/22/96 to file recommendations for a 1996 remedial plan "Let this be filed." Harris, J. (fiat) (mlp) (Entered: 02/08/1996)

RECAP
46 Jan. 23, 1996

STATUS REPORT by Special Master of activities and expenses for October, 1995. "Let this be filed, 1/23/96" Harris, J. (fiat) (mlp) (Entered: 02/08/1996)

RECAP
47 Jan. 23, 1996

STATUS REPORT by Special Master MARGARET G. FARRELL of activities and expenses for November, 1995 and notice of intention to hire expert; attachments. "Let this be filed." Harris, J. (fiat) (mlp) (Entered: 02/08/1996)

RECAP
48 Jan. 23, 1996

STATUS REPORT by Special Master MARGARET G. FARRELL of activities and expenses for December, 1995. "Let this be filed" Harris, J. (fiat) (mlp) (Entered: 02/08/1996)

RECAP
43 Jan. 24, 1996

MOTION filed by intervenor-plaintiff USA for hearing on defendants' continuing non-compliance ; attachment (mlp) (Entered: 01/25/1996)

RECAP
44 Feb. 1, 1996

ORDER by Judge Stanley S. Harris : that before 5:00pm on Friday, February 9, 1996, defendants shall submit to the Court, counsel for plaintiffs, the Special Master, and the Pratt Monitor, a list of Evans class care providers who receive Medicaid and/or MRDDA payments within the preceding 2 weeks; directing the defendants before 5:00pm on Friday, 2/16/96 to submit to the above, a comprehensive list of all Evans class care providers and a comprehensive breakdown of all payments more than 30 days overdue to all providers. (N) (emh) (Entered: 02/07/1996)

RECAP
50 Feb. 8, 1996

RESPONSE by intervenor-plaintiff USA to special master order of findings and recommendations [49-2] (mlp) (Entered: 02/12/1996)

RECAP
51 Feb. 8, 1996

MOTION filed by defendant MARION BARRY, defendant DC to extend time to 2/15/96 to file a memorandum containing comments and objections to the Special Master's January, 1996 Report (mlp) (Entered: 02/12/1996)

RECAP
49 Feb. 9, 1996

ORDER filed by Special Master Margaret G. Farrell, Esq.: issuing findings of fact and conclusions of law ; exhibits (8). "Let this be filed, 2/9/96" Harris, J. (fiat) (N) (mlp) (Entered: 02/12/1996)

RECAP
53 Feb. 9, 1996

RESPONSE by defendant MARION BARRY, defendant DC to order dated 2/1/96 [44-1]; attachments (2) (mlp) (Entered: 02/12/1996)

RECAP
52 Feb. 12, 1996

ORDER by Judge Stanley S. Harris : granting motion to extend time to 2/15/96 to file a memorandum containing comments and objections to the Special Master's January, 1996 Report [51-1] by DC, MARION BARRY response to motion(s) due by 2/15/96 ; (N) (lpp) (Entered: 02/12/1996)

RECAP
54 Feb. 13, 1996

ORDER by Judge Stanley S. Harris : directing the Clerk of the Court to disburse from the Court's Registry, from the escrow account to Margaret G. Farrell, Esq., for services rendered. (N) (emh) (Entered: 02/15/1996)

RECAP
55 Feb. 15, 1996

OBJECTIONS by defendant MARION BARRY, defendant DC to special master's January, 1996 Report [49-2]; attachments (mlp) (Entered: 02/16/1996)

RECAP
56 Feb. 16, 1996

RESPONSE by defendant MARION BARRY, defendant DC to order [44-1]; attachments (5) (mlp) (Entered: 02/20/1996)

RECAP
58 March 5, 1996

LETTER from Joseph V. Brady to Margaret Farrell, copy sent to Judge Harris, fiat 3/11/96 (lpp) (Entered: 03/19/1996)

RECAP
57 March 11, 1996

ORDER by Judge Stanley S. Harris : directing the Clerk of the Court to disburse from the Court's Registry, from the escrow account the sum of $912.34 to Margaret G. Farrell, Esq., and the sum of $500.00 to Robin E. Cooper, each for services rendered. (N) (emh) (Entered: 03/15/1996)

RECAP
59 March 11, 1996

LETTER from Karen Clay, Court Monitor, to Judge Harris, dated 3/5/96, Re: Continued Payment Issues, Exhibit (2) (lpp) (Entered: 03/19/1996)

RECAP
60 March 11, 1996

STATUS REPORT by special master: Activities and Expenses for February 1996, attachments, fiat (lpp) (Entered: 03/19/1996)

RECAP
61 April 15, 1996

STATUS REPORT by special master Margaret G. Farrell of activities and expenses for March, 1996; (fiat) Harris,J. (emh) (Entered: 04/16/1996)

RECAP
62 April 15, 1996

ORDER by Judge Stanley S. Harris : directing the Clerk to disburse from the Court's Registry, the sum of $1,926.00 to Margaret Farrell, Esq., Special Master, for services rendered and expenses incurred. (N) (emh) (Entered: 04/16/1996)

RECAP
63 May 9, 1996

ORDER by Judge Stanley S. Harris: directing Clerk of the Court to disburse from the Court's Registry, from the escrow acount in C.A. 76-293: $1,622.00 to Special Master Margaret G. Farrell, Esq., 4719 Cumberland Avenue, Chevy Chase, MD 20815, for services rendered and expenses incurred. (N) (mlp) Modified on 05/20/1996 (Entered: 05/20/1996)

RECAP
64 May 13, 1996

NOTICE OF FILING by special master Margaret G. Farrell of activities and expenses for April 1996, fiat (lpp) (Entered: 05/16/1996)

RECAP
65 May 15, 1996

LETTER to Anthony Williams dated 5/10/96 from Richard C. Birkel, PH.D, Kennedy Institute in re: payments to be made; (fiat) Harris,J. (emh) (Entered: 05/20/1996)

RECAP
66 May 21, 1996

LETTER to Mr. Williams dated 5/16/96 from Richard C. Birkel in re: no payments received yet;(fiat) (emh) (Entered: 05/23/1996)

RECAP
67 June 17, 1996

NOTICE OF FILING by special master Margaret G. Farrell of Activities and Expenses for May, 1996;(fiat)Harris,J. (emh) (Entered: 06/18/1996)

RECAP
68 June 17, 1996

ORDER by Judge Stanley S. Harris : directing the Clerk to disburse from the Court's Registry, the amount of $1,574.54 to Margaret G. Farrell for services rendered and expenses incurred. (N) (emh) (Entered: 06/18/1996)

RECAP
69 June 21, 1996

LETTER dated 5/30/96 to Mr. Williams in re: payment of money;(fiat) Harris,J. (emh) (Entered: 06/24/1996)

RECAP
71 July 2, 1996

OBJECTIONS by defendant MARION BARRY, defendant DC to the special master's supplemental report of June, 1996 (st) (Entered: 07/17/1996)

RECAP
70 July 12, 1996

RESPONSE (OPPOSITIONS) by intervenor-plaintiff USA to to file notice [67-1] by Margaret G. Farrell, attachments (7) (lpp) (Entered: 07/15/1996)

RECAP
72 July 17, 1996

NOTICE by special master Margaret G. Farrell of activities and expenses for June 1996; (fiat) Harris,J. (emh) (Entered: 07/18/1996)

RECAP
73 July 17, 1996

ORDER by Judge Stanley S. Harris : directing the Clerk to disburse from the Court's Registry to Margaret Farrell the sum of $1,212.73, for services rendered and expenses incurred. (N) (emh) (Entered: 07/18/1996)

RECAP
74 Aug. 2, 1996

ORDER by Judge Stanley S. Harris : adopting proposed findings of fact of special master. (N) (emh) (Entered: 08/07/1996)

RECAP
75 Aug. 2, 1996

ORDER by Judge Stanley S. Harris : directing that the REMEDIAL PLAN be filed in this case and setting forth the terms and conditions of said plan. (N) (N) (emh) (Entered: 08/07/1996)

RECAP
76 Aug. 20, 1996

ORDER by Judge Stanley S. Harris : directing the Clerk to disburse from the Court's registry the amount of $1,056.29 to Margaret G. Farrell, Esq., for services rendered and expenses incurred. (N) (emh) (Entered: 08/20/1996)

RECAP
77 Aug. 21, 1996

NOTICE by special master Margaret G. Farrell of activities and expenses for July, 1996;(fiat)Harris,J. (emh) (Entered: 08/23/1996)

RECAP
78 Sept. 30, 1996

RESPONSE by defendant MARION BARRY, defendant DC to order in re submission to the Court. [75-1] (st) (Entered: 10/01/1996)

RECAP
79 Oct. 1, 1996

NOTICE OF FILING by defendant MARION BARRY, defendant DC submitting a list of each case manager employed by or under contract with MRDDA and list of clients assigned to each case manager as part of the Remedial Plan entered by the Court 8/2/96 (st) (Entered: 10/02/1996)

RECAP
80 Oct. 8, 1996

ORDER by Judge Stanley S. Harris : Directing disbursal of $1,732.00 to Margaret G. Farrell, Esq., Special Master by the Clerk of the Court from the escrow account in this case. (N) (mon) (Entered: 10/08/1996)

RECAP
81 Oct. 23, 1996

NOTICE OF FILING by special master Margaret G. Farrell of Activities and Expenses for September 1996; (fiat)Harris,J. (emh) (Entered: 10/24/1996)

RECAP
82 Oct. 23, 1996

ORDER by Judge Stanley S. Harris : directing the Clerk of the Court to disburse from the Court's registry, from the escrow account the sum of $802.00 to Margaret G. Farrell for services rendered and expenses incurred. (N) (emh) (Entered: 10/24/1996)

RECAP
83 Oct. 25, 1996

SUBMISSION TO THE COURT by defendant MARION BARRY, defendant DC in accordance with the Remedial plan entered by the Court 8/2/96 (st) (Entered: 10/28/1996)

RECAP
84 Oct. 29, 1996

NOTICE OF FILING by defendants of a attachment inadvertently ommitted from Exhibit "B", Affidavit of Deloras Shepherd, in their Submission to the Court; Attachment (1). (ks) (Entered: 10/30/1996)

RECAP
85 Oct. 31, 1996

NOTICE OF FILING by defendants of their submission to the Court of Exhibits "A" and "B"; Exhibits (2). (ks) (Entered: 11/01/1996)

RECAP
86 Oct. 31, 1996

JOINT MOTION by plaintiffs, defendants to extend time to 11/15/96 to submit their proposed order for the purposes of attempting to resolve the outstanding issues and concerns. (ks) (Entered: 11/01/1996)

RECAP
87 Nov. 5, 1996

ORDER by Judge Stanley S. Harris : granting joint motion to extend time to 11/15/96 to submit their proposed order for the purposes of attempting to resolve the outstanding issues and concerns. [86-1] by defendants, plaintiff (N) (emh) (Entered: 11/06/1996)

RECAP
98 Nov. 8, 1996

REPORT by defendant DC (st) (Entered: 01/10/1997)

RECAP
88 Nov. 12, 1996

NOTICE by special master Margaret G. Farrell of activities and expenses for October, 1996;(fiat) Harris,J. (emh) (Entered: 11/13/1996)

RECAP
89 Nov. 12, 1996

ORDER by Judge Stanley S. Harris : directing the clerk of the Court to disburse from the Court's registry the sum of $2,519.42 to Margaret G. Farrell, special master, for services rendered and expenses incurred. (N) (emh) (Entered: 11/13/1996)

RECAP
90 Nov. 19, 1996

MOTION filed by plaintiff, intervenor-plaintiff, defendant, movant, special master to extend time to 12/13/96 to submit to the Court, the proposed order for the purposes of attempting to resolve the outstanding issues and concerns (st) (Entered: 11/20/1996)

RECAP
91 Nov. 25, 1996

STATUS REPORT by defendant MARION BARRY, defendant DC (st) (Entered: 11/27/1996)

RECAP
92 Nov. 26, 1996

ORDER by Judge Stanley S. Harris : granting motion to extend time to 12/13/96 to submit to the Court, the proposed order for the purposes of attempting to resolve the outstanding issues and concerns [90-1] by special master, movant, defendant, intervenor-plaint, plaintiff (N) (emh) (Entered: 11/27/1996)

RECAP
93 Dec. 19, 1996

JOINT MOTION (THIRD) by plaintiff, intervenor-plaintiff, defendant, movant, to extend time to 1/13/97 to submit to the Court a " proposed order for the timely, predictable and full payment of Evans care providers" (st) (Entered: 12/20/1996)

RECAP
94 Dec. 20, 1996

ORDER by Judge Stanley S. Harris : granting joint motion to extend time to 1/13/97 to submit to the Court a " proposed order for the timely, predictable and full payment of Evans care providers" [93-1] by special master, movant, defendant, intervenor-plaint, plaintiff (N) (fle) (Entered: 12/23/1996)

RECAP
95 Dec. 23, 1996

SUBMISSION TO THE COURT by defendant MARION BARRY, defendant DC (st) (Entered: 12/24/1996)

RECAP
96 Jan. 6, 1997

NOTICE OF FILING by special master Margaret G. Farrell of Activities and Expenses for November, 1996; (fiat)(n)Harris,J. (emh) (Entered: 01/08/1997)

RECAP
97 Jan. 6, 1997

ORDER by Judge Stanley S. Harris : directing the Clerk to disburse from the Court's registry the sum of $2,955 to Margaret G. Farrell, Esq., for services rendered and expenses incurred. (N) (emh) (Entered: 01/08/1997)

RECAP
99 Jan. 23, 1997

NOTICE OF FILING by special master Margaret G. Farrell of activities and expenses for December, 1996;(fiat)Harris,J. (emh) (Entered: 01/28/1997)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

District of Columbia

Case Type(s):

Intellectual Disability (Facility)

Special Collection(s):

Court-ordered receiverships

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Olmstead Cases

Key Dates

Filing Date: Feb. 23, 1976

Closing Date: 2017

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

All residents of Forest Haven who were institutionalized based upon mental retardation and who could benefit from individual treatment and educational programs appropriate to their needs.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

U.S. Dept of Justice plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

City

District of Columbia

Defendant Type(s):

Hospital/Health Department

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 15001 et seq.

State law

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Other Dockets:

District of District of Columbia 1:76-cv-00293

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Sought:

Receivership

Relief Granted:

Attorneys fees

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Receivership

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Develop anti-discrimination policy

Discrimination Prohibition

Goals (e.g., for hiring, admissions)

Monitoring

Monitor/Master

Provide antidiscrimination training

Reasonable Accommodation

Receivership

Recordkeeping

Reporting

Order Duration: 1978 - 2017

Issues

General/Misc.:

Bathing and hygiene

Classification / placement

Conditions of confinement

Education

Food service / nutrition / hydration

Incident/accident reporting & investigations

Individualized planning

Loss or damage to property

Parents (visitation, involvement)

Reassessment and care planning

Sanitation / living conditions

School/University Facilities

School/University policies

Staff (number, training, qualifications, wages)

Disability and Disability Rights:

Integrated setting

Intellectual/developmental disability, unspecified

Least restrictive environment

Mental impairment

Reasonable Accommodations

Reasonable Modifications

Special education

Discrimination Basis:

Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Assault/abuse by non-staff (facilities)

Assault/abuse by staff (facilities)

Deinstitutionalization/decarceration

Habilitation (training/treatment)

Recreation / Exercise

Restraints (chemical)

Restraints (physical)

Sexual abuse by residents/inmates

Visiting

LGBTQ+:

LGBTQ+

Medical/Mental Health Care:

Dental care

Medical care, general

Medication, administration of

Mental health care, general

Reproductive rights:

Sterilization/sexual rights

Recommended Citation