Case: Flinn v. City of Evanston

1:24-cv-04269 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: May 23, 2024

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This is a lawsuit challenging an Evanston, Illinois program that offers reparations to Black Americans for past housing discrimination.  On May 23, 2024, six individuals filed this putative class action lawsuit against the City of Evanston in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. They challenged the city's Restorative Housing Program, an initiative to compensate Black residents for housing discrimination they or their ancestors faced between 1919 and 1969 via $25,000 pa…

This is a lawsuit challenging an Evanston, Illinois program that offers reparations to Black Americans for past housing discrimination. 

On May 23, 2024, six individuals filed this putative class action lawsuit against the City of Evanston in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. They challenged the city's Restorative Housing Program, an initiative to compensate Black residents for housing discrimination they or their ancestors faced between 1919 and 1969 via $25,000 payments to eligible applicants. Plaintiffs were all direct descendants of people who lived in Evanston between 1919 and 1969, and neither they nor their ancestors identified as Black. They claimed that the race-based eligibility requirement for compensation under the Restorative Housing Program violated the Equal Protection Clause by excluding non-Black people. Plaintiffs, represented by Judicial Watch and private counsel, sought to represent a class of all individuals able and ready to apply for the Program but for the its race-based eligibility requirement. They requested declaratory relief, an injunction prohibiting the use of race as an eligibility requirement, award payments under the Program, and fees and costs. The case was assigned to U.S. District Judge John F. Kness. 

The City filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit on July 22, 2024.  It argued that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the Program because they did not apply to participate, and the application period closed in 2021. Moreover, plaintiffs did not allege that they had property in Evanston. Therefore, they were ineligible to participate in the program and had not suffered the "concrete and particularized injury" necessary to support standing.  The City sought jurisdictional discovery to confirm that the plaintiffs were not eligible to participate in the program. It also argued that the complaint was untimely and barred by the statute of limitations because it had not been filed until more than two and a half years from the time the application period for the Program ended.   

As of October 2024, the motion to dismiss remains pending.

Summary Authors

Tessa Bialek (10/31/2024)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68559571/parties/flinn-v-city-of-evanston/


Attorney for Plaintiff

Bekesha, Michael (Illinois)

Orfanedes, Paul J (Illinois)

Attorney for Defendant

Brody, Michael Timothy (Illinois)

Grandfield, Cynthia Sara (Illinois)

Jacobs-Perry, Precious S. (Illinois)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

1:24-cv-04269

Class Action Complaint

May 23, 2024

May 23, 2024

Complaint
13

1:24-cv-04269

Defendants Motion to Dismiss

July 22, 2024

July 22, 2024

Pleading / Motion / Brief

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68559571/flinn-v-city-of-evanston/

Last updated Oct. 31, 2024, 10:14 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT filed by Stephen Weiland, Barbara Regard, Margot Flinn, Stasys Neimanas, Carol Johnson, Henry Regard; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22006789. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Svenson, Alice) (Entered: 05/23/2024)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

May 23, 2024

May 23, 2024

Clearinghouse

case assigned

May 23, 2024

May 23, 2024

PACER
2

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Margot Flinn, Carol Johnson, Stasys Neimanas, Barbara Regard, Henry Regard, Stephen Weiland by Alice Christine Svenson (Svenson, Alice) (Entered: 05/23/2024)

May 23, 2024

May 23, 2024

PACER

clerk's notice

May 23, 2024

May 23, 2024

PACER
3

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Margot Flinn, Carol Johnson, Stasys Neimanas, Barbara Regard, Henry Regard, Stephen Weiland by Michael Bekesha (Bekesha, Michael) (Entered: 05/23/2024)

May 23, 2024

May 23, 2024

PACER

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category Two). (lw, )

May 23, 2024

May 23, 2024

PACER

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lw, )

May 23, 2024

May 23, 2024

PACER

summons issued

May 28, 2024

May 28, 2024

PACER

SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant City of Evanston (lm, )

May 28, 2024

May 28, 2024

PACER
4

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stephen Weiland, Barbara Regard, Margot Flinn, Stasys Neimanas, Carol Johnson, Henry Regard as to City of Evanston on 5/31/2024, answer due 6/21/2024. (Svenson, Alice) (Entered: 06/05/2024)

June 5, 2024

June 5, 2024

PACER
5

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Evanston by Michael Timothy Brody (Brody, Michael) (Entered: 06/12/2024)

June 12, 2024

June 12, 2024

PACER
6

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Evanston by Precious S. Jacobs-Perry (Jacobs-Perry, Precious) (Entered: 06/12/2024)

June 12, 2024

June 12, 2024

PACER
7

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Evanston by Jeffrey P. Salvadore (Salvadore, Jeffrey) (Entered: 06/12/2024)

June 12, 2024

June 12, 2024

PACER
8

MOTION by Defendant City of Evanston for extension of time to file answer to Complaint (Unopposed) (Jacobs-Perry, Precious) (Entered: 06/12/2024)

June 12, 2024

June 12, 2024

PACER
9

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Defendant's Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint 8 is granted. Defendant must answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's complaint on or before 7/22/2024. Mailed notice. (exr, ) (Entered: 06/14/2024)

June 14, 2024

June 14, 2024

PACER
10

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Evanston by Alexandra Brien MacKey Ruggie (Ruggie, Alexandra) (Entered: 06/20/2024)

June 20, 2024

June 20, 2024

PACER
11

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Evanston by Matthew Slodowy (Slodowy, Matthew) (Entered: 06/28/2024)

June 28, 2024

June 28, 2024

PACER
12

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Margot Flinn, Carol Johnson, Stasys Neimanas, Barbara Regard, Henry Regard, Stephen Weiland by Paul J Orfanedes (Orfanedes, Paul) (Entered: 07/22/2024)

July 22, 2024

July 22, 2024

PACER
13

MOTION by Defendant City of Evanston to dismiss / Defendant City of Evanston's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(B)(1) and 12(B)(6) and For Leave to Take Jurisdictional Discovery (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Audrey Thompson, # 2 Exhibit 2 - Proposed Jurisdictional Interrogatories)(Brody, Michael) (Entered: 07/22/2024)

1 Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Audrey Thompson

View on PACER

2 Exhibit 2 - Proposed Jurisdictional Interrogatories

View on PACER

July 22, 2024

July 22, 2024

Clearinghouse
14

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: The Court sets the following briefing schedule on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and for Leave to Take Jurisdictional Discovery 13 : Plaintiff's response is due on or before 8/19/2024 and Defendant's reply, if any, is due on or before 9/3/2024. Mailed notice. (exr, ) (Entered: 07/29/2024)

July 29, 2024

July 29, 2024

PACER
15

MOTION by Plaintiffs Margot Flinn, Carol Johnson, Stasys Neimanas, Barbara Regard, Henry Regard, Stephen Weiland for extension of time to file response/reply as to motion to dismiss, 13 (unopposed) (Bekesha, Michael) (Entered: 08/05/2024)

Aug. 5, 2024

Aug. 5, 2024

PACER
16

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiffs' motion 15 for an extension of time to respond to Defendant City of Evanston's motion to dismiss 13 is granted. Plaintiffs' response must be filed on or before 9/18/2024. Any reply by Defendant City of Evanston must be filed on or before 10/2/2024. Mailed notice (jfk) (Entered: 08/19/2024)

Aug. 19, 2024

Aug. 19, 2024

PACER
17

REQUEST for Clerk of Court to refund filing fee in the amount of 405.00, receipt no. AILNDC-22006728, regarding complaint 1 (Svenson, Alice) (Entered: 08/20/2024)

Aug. 20, 2024

Aug. 20, 2024

RECAP
18

REFUND PROCESSED re REQUEST for Clerk of Court to refund filing fee in the amount of $405.00, receipt no. AILNDC-22006728. (lw, ) (Entered: 09/09/2024)

Aug. 21, 2024

Aug. 21, 2024

PACER
19

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Evanston by Cynthia Sara Grandfield (Grandfield, Cynthia) (Entered: 09/17/2024)

Sept. 17, 2024

Sept. 17, 2024

PACER
20

MEMORANDUM by Margot Flinn, Carol Johnson, Stasys Neimanas, Barbara Regard, Henry Regard, Stephen Weiland in Opposition to motion to dismiss, 13 (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Michael Bekesha with Exhibits)(Bekesha, Michael) (Entered: 09/18/2024)

Sept. 18, 2024

Sept. 18, 2024

PACER
21

AFFIDAVIT of Michael Bekesha regarding memorandum in opposition to motion 20 (with Exhibits) (Bekesha, Michael) (Entered: 09/18/2024)

Sept. 18, 2024

Sept. 18, 2024

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: Illinois

Case Type(s):

Public Benefits/Government Services

Reparations

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 23, 2024

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Six non-Black descendants of residents of the City of Evanston, Illinois between 1919-1969, seeking to represent a class of all individuals who were able and ready to apply for the City's reparations program but for its race-based eligibility requirement.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Pending

Defendants

City of Evanston (Evanston, Cook), City

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Ex parte Young (federal or state officials)

Constitutional Clause(s):

Equal Protection

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Nature of Relief:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

General/Misc.:

Reparations

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

Discrimination Basis:

Race discrimination

Affected Race(s):

White