Case: The Satanic Temple v. Rokita

1:22-cv-01859 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana

Filed Date: Sept. 21, 2022

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case is about the Satanic Temple challenge to Indiana's abortion ban under the Indiana Religious Freedom Restoration Act. On November 21, 2022, The Satanic Temple (“TST”), represented by private counsel, sued the Governor of Indiana and the Attorney General of Indiana (collectively, “GAG”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. TST, a religious organization, alleged that Indiana’s abortion ban violated the rights of The Satanic Temple’s members who were “…

This case is about the Satanic Temple challenge to Indiana's abortion ban under the Indiana Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

On November 21, 2022, The Satanic Temple (“TST”), represented by private counsel, sued the Governor of Indiana and the Attorney General of Indiana (collectively, “GAG”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. TST, a religious organization, alleged that Indiana’s abortion ban violated the rights of The Satanic Temple’s members who were “involuntary pregnant women”. The ban prohibited abortion except in the case of serious health risk to the mother, to protect the life of the mother, a lethal fetal anomaly, or pregnancy as the result of rape or incest. 

The Satanic Temple challenged Indiana’s abortion ban as unconstitutionally (1) deprived the property without just compensation of involuntarily pregnant women, (2) subjected involuntarily pregnant women to involuntary servitude (3) discriminated against women who have become pregnant by accident as opposed through rape or incest, (4) discriminated between women who became pregnant on accident versus through in vitro fertilization, and (5) violated the Indiana Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”) by restricting TST from providing mail-order abortion medication which is part of their religious beliefs. TST sought permanent injunctive relief. This case was assigned to District Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson and Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia.

On March 3, 2023, GAG filed a motion to dismiss, arguing TST had no standing and had failed to state any claim for which relief may be granted. Further, the Governor argued that all claims against him were barred by sovereign immunity.  

On March 23, 2023, TST filed an amended complaint. In it, TST brought this suit against the Attorney General of Indiana and the Marion County Prosecutor, (collectively, “AGP”). TST did not change their first four claims, but changed the last one into (5) making TST’s delivery of medicated abortions a violation of RFRA, and (5) violating RFRA by imposing substantial burdens on TST in the pursuit of providing medicated abortions.

On March 20, 2023, the court denied GAG’s motion to dismiss as moot because TST filed an amended complaint.

On May 22, 2023, AGP filed a motion to dismiss. AGP argued TST did not have standing, it did not state any claim for which relief may be granted and claims (4) and (5) were barred by sovereign immunity. 

On October 25, 2023, the court granted AGP’s motion to dismiss. While TST had argued that of their 11,000 nation-wide membership, statistically some of them would be pregnant women located in Indiana, and that some of those women would be involuntarily pregnant, the court nonetheless found that TST had failed to prove there were actual or potential Indiana patients who were TST members. Accordingly, Judge Magnus-Stinson found that TST did not have standing on behalf of its members. Additionally, Judge Magnus-Stinson found that the TST’s allegations did not demonstrate injury in fact from the threat of prosecution, the cost of compliance, or the diversion of resources because TWT did not, and did not plan to have, an abortion clinic in Indiana. Lastly, TST’s argument that this abortion ban frustrated their Satanic Tenets and the Satanic Abortion Ritual did not show injury in fact. Because TST failed to demonstrate injury in fact, TST failed to show it had individual standing to bring the suit. 

On November 22, 2023, TST appealed this judgment to the Seventh Circuit of Appeals. 

This case is ongoing as of March 30, 2025.

Summary Authors

Danica Fong (3/30/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/65364722/parties/the-satanic-temple-inc-v-rokita/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff
Attorney for Defendant

Anderson, Christopher Michael (Indiana)

Barta, James A. (Indiana)

Durham, Rebekah (Indiana)

Erickson, Blake Thomas (Indiana)

Garn, Jefferson S. (Indiana)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

23-3247

[Untitled]

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Nov. 22, 2023

Nov. 22, 2023

Docket
1

1:22-cv-01859

Complaint

The Satanic Temple v. Holcomb

Sept. 21, 2022

Sept. 21, 2022

Complaint
17

1:22-cv-01859

Motion to Dismiss

The Satanic Temple v. Holcomb

March 2, 2023

March 2, 2023

Pleading / Motion / Brief
21

1:22-cv-01859

First Amended Complaint

March 23, 2023

March 23, 2023

Complaint
36

1:22-cv-01859

Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint

May 22, 2023

May 22, 2023

Pleading / Motion / Brief
66

1:22-cv-01859

Order

Oct. 25, 2023

Oct. 25, 2023

Order/Opinion

2023 WL 7016211

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/65364722/the-satanic-temple-inc-v-rokita/

Last updated Sept. 5, 2025, 2:06 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by THE SATANIC TEMPLE. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7288973) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-The Satanic Abortion Ritual, # 2 Proposed Summons, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mac Naughton, William) (Entered: 09/21/2022)

1 Exhibit A-The Satanic Abortion Ritual

View on RECAP

2 Proposed Summons

View on RECAP

3 Civil Cover Sheet

View on RECAP

Sept. 21, 2022

Sept. 21, 2022

Clearinghouse
2

PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (JSR) (Entered: 09/26/2022)

Sept. 26, 2022

Sept. 26, 2022

RECAP
3

MOTION for Attorney(s) W. James Mac Naughton to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number AINSDC-7293613), filed by Plaintiff THE SATANIC TEMPLE. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mac Naughton, William) (Entered: 09/26/2022)

Sept. 26, 2022

Sept. 26, 2022

RECAP
4

MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) (Entered: 09/26/2022)

Sept. 26, 2022

Sept. 26, 2022

RECAP
5

ORDER granting 3 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney William James Mac Naughton for THE SATANIC TEMPLE added. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 9/27/2022. (CBU) (Entered: 09/27/2022)

Sept. 27, 2022

Sept. 27, 2022

RECAP
6

Summons Issued as to ERIC HOLCOMB, TODD ROKITA. (JSR) (Entered: 10/04/2022)

Oct. 4, 2022

Oct. 4, 2022

RECAP
7

NOTICE of Appearance by William James Mac Naughton on behalf of Plaintiff THE SATANIC TEMPLE. (Mac Naughton, William) (Entered: 10/08/2022)

Oct. 8, 2022

Oct. 8, 2022

RECAP
8

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by THE SATANIC TEMPLE. All Defendants. (Mac Naughton, William) (Entered: 12/10/2022)

Dec. 10, 2022

Dec. 10, 2022

RECAP
10

NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re, filed by Defendants ERIC HOLCOMB, TODD ROKITA. (Garn, Jefferson) (Entered: 01/23/2023)

Jan. 23, 2023

Jan. 23, 2023

RECAP
9

NOTICE of Appearance by Jefferson S. Garn on behalf of Defendants ERIC HOLCOMB, TODD ROKITA. (Garn, Jefferson) (Entered: 01/23/2023)

Jan. 23, 2023

Jan. 23, 2023

RECAP
11

SCHEDULING ORDER - Telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference is set for 3/22/2023 10:30 AM (Eastern Time) before Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia. No fewer than seven (7) days before the IPTC, counsel must file a Proposed CMP. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 1/24/2023. (CKM) (Entered: 01/24/2023)

Jan. 24, 2023

Jan. 24, 2023

RECAP
12

NOTICE of Substitution of Appearance by Aaron M. Ridlen replacing Jefferson S. Garn on behalf of ERIC HOLCOMB, TODD ROKITA (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Ridlen, Aaron) (Entered: 02/20/2023)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on RECAP

Feb. 20, 2023

Feb. 20, 2023

RECAP
13

NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Michael Anderson on behalf of Defendants ERIC HOLCOMB, TODD ROKITA. (Anderson, Christopher) (Entered: 02/20/2023)

Feb. 20, 2023

Feb. 20, 2023

RECAP
14

NOTICE of Appearance by Rebekah Durham on behalf of Defendants ERIC HOLCOMB, TODD ROKITA. (Durham, Rebekah) (Entered: 02/20/2023)

Feb. 20, 2023

Feb. 20, 2023

RECAP
15

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to March 2, 2023 in which to 1 Complaint Respond, filed by Defendants ERIC HOLCOMB, TODD ROKITA. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ridlen, Aaron) (Entered: 02/20/2023)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on RECAP

Feb. 20, 2023

Feb. 20, 2023

RECAP
16

ORDER - granting 15 Motion for Extension of Time. IT IS ORDERED that Defendants shall have up to and including March 2, 2023, to file their response to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 2/21/23. (NAD) (Entered: 02/21/2023)

Feb. 21, 2023

Feb. 21, 2023

RECAP
17

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, filed by Defendants ERIC HOLCOMB, TODD ROKITA. (Ridlen, Aaron) (Entered: 03/02/2023)

March 2, 2023

March 2, 2023

Clearinghouse
18

BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re 17 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, filed by Defendants ERIC HOLCOMB, TODD ROKITA. (Ridlen, Aaron) (Entered: 03/02/2023)

March 2, 2023

March 2, 2023

RECAP
19

Consent MOTION to Vacate 11 Scheduling Order, filed by Plaintiff THE SATANIC TEMPLE. (Mac Naughton, William) (Entered: 03/14/2023)

March 14, 2023

March 14, 2023

RECAP
20

ORDER - granting 19 Consent MOTION to Vacate Initial Pretrial Conference. The telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference set for March 22, 2023 is continued to May 2, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. (Est). The parties should be prepared to proceed with setting case management plan dates and deadlines at that time given the age of the case. In the meantime, nothing prevents the parties from informally agreeing to exchange information that might fall under Rule 26's initial disclosures. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 3/17/23.(NAD) (Entered: 03/17/2023)

March 17, 2023

March 17, 2023

RECAP
21

AMENDED COMPLAINT against TODD ROKITA, RYAN MEARS, filed by THE SATANIC TEMPLE, INC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-The Satanic Abortion Ritual)(Mac Naughton, William) Modified on 3/24/2023 - Updated dkt. text (JSR). (Entered: 03/23/2023)

1 Exhibit A-The Satanic Abortion Ritual

View on RECAP

March 23, 2023

March 23, 2023

Clearinghouse
22

NOTICE of Appearance by Aaron M. Ridlen on behalf of Defendant RYAN MEARS. (Ridlen, Aaron) (Entered: 03/24/2023)

March 24, 2023

March 24, 2023

RECAP
23

NOTICE of Appearance by Rebekah Durham on behalf of Defendant RYAN MEARS. (Durham, Rebekah) (Entered: 03/24/2023)

March 24, 2023

March 24, 2023

RECAP
24

NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Michael Anderson on behalf of Defendant RYAN MEARS. (Anderson, Christopher) (Entered: 03/24/2023)

March 24, 2023

March 24, 2023

RECAP
25

NOTICE of Appearance by James A. Barta on behalf of Defendants RYAN MEARS, TODD ROKITA. (Barta, James) (Entered: 03/24/2023)

March 24, 2023

March 24, 2023

RECAP
26

NOTICE of Appearance by Melinda Rebecca Holmes on behalf of Defendants RYAN MEARS, TODD ROKITA. (Holmes, Melinda) (Entered: 03/24/2023)

March 24, 2023

March 24, 2023

RECAP
27

ORDER - Presently pending before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants. [Filing No. 17 .] In response, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint, [Filing No. 21 ], as it was entitled to do pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B). Plaintiff's Amended Complaint now controls this litigation and supersedes the pleading at which Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is directed. The pending Motion to Dismiss, 17, is DENIED AS MOOT. Defendants must answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint as contemplated by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/29/2023. (JSR) (Entered: 03/29/2023)

March 29, 2023

March 29, 2023

RECAP
28

NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas M. Fisher on behalf of Defendants RYAN MEARS, TODD ROKITA. (Fisher, Thomas) (Entered: 03/29/2023)

March 29, 2023

March 29, 2023

RECAP
29

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by RYAN MEARS. RYAN MEARS waiver sent on 3/23/2023. (Ridlen, Aaron) (Entered: 04/04/2023)

April 4, 2023

April 4, 2023

RECAP
31

CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED, filed by Plaintiff THE SATANIC TEMPLE, INC. . (Mac Naughton, William) (Entered: 05/01/2023)

May 1, 2023

May 1, 2023

RECAP
32

MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 5/2/2023. The Court will approve the Case Management Plan, by separate order, with changes discussed during conference. Case Management Plan to be modified so that initial disclosures in section III(B) are now due June 9, 2023. This matter is scheduled for a telephonic status conference on Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 11:00 a.m. (Eastern) to discuss case status. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia. (NAD) (Entered: 05/03/2023)

May 2, 2023

May 2, 2023

RECAP
33

ORDER: CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROVED AS AMENDED - Dispositive Motions due by 3/23/2024. Discovery due by 1/23/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 5/2/2023.(TPS) (Entered: 05/03/2023)

May 2, 2023

May 2, 2023

RECAP
34

First MOTION for Extension of Time to July 6, 2023 in which to 21 Amended Complaint, filed by Defendants RYAN MEARS, TODD ROKITA. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ridlen, Aaron) (Entered: 05/17/2023)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on RECAP

May 17, 2023

May 17, 2023

RECAP
35

RESPONSE in Opposition re 34 First MOTION for Extension of Time to July 6, 2023 in which to 21 Amended Complaint, filed by Plaintiff THE SATANIC TEMPLE, INC.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-Request for Admissions, # 2 Exhibit B-Interrogatories, # 3 Exhibit C-Production of Documents)(Mac Naughton, William) (Entered: 05/18/2023)

1 Exhibit A-Request for Admissions

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit B-Interrogatories

View on RECAP

3 Exhibit C-Production of Documents

View on RECAP

May 18, 2023

May 18, 2023

RECAP
36

First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, filed by Defendants RYAN MEARS, TODD ROKITA. (Ridlen, Aaron) (Entered: 05/22/2023)

May 22, 2023

May 22, 2023

Clearinghouse
37

BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re 36 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, filed by Defendants RYAN MEARS, TODD ROKITA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Combined Discovery Requests, # 2 Exhibit 2 - Satanic Temple Website)(Ridlen, Aaron) (Entered: 05/22/2023)

1 Exhibit 1 - Combined Discovery Requests

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit 2 - Satanic Temple Website

View on RECAP

May 22, 2023

May 22, 2023

RECAP
38

MOTION for Protective Order, filed by Plaintiff THE SATANIC TEMPLE, INC.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mac Naughton, William) (Entered: 05/24/2023)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on RECAP

May 24, 2023

May 24, 2023

RECAP
39

UNIFORM STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - SEE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 5/25/23.(JRB) (Entered: 05/25/2023)

May 25, 2023

May 25, 2023

RECAP
40

ORDER denying as moot 34 Motion for Extension of Time to File Respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint from May 22, 2023 to July 6, 2023. However, on May 22, 2023, before the Court could rule on the Motion for Extension, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint 36 . Court will hold a telephonic status conference to discuss whether Defendants' Motion to Dismiss should be held in abeyance so that the parties may conduct expedited and narrowly tailored discovery on the issue of standing under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1). The Court will issue a separate scheduling order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 5/25/2023. (JDC) (Entered: 05/25/2023)

May 25, 2023

May 25, 2023

RECAP
41

SCHEDULING ORDER - This matter is scheduled for a telephonic status conference on Wednesday, June 7, 2023 at 9:30 a.m. (Eastern) to discuss case status. Counsel shall attend the status conference by calling the designated telephone number, to be provided by the Court via email generated by the Court's ECF system. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 5/25/2023.(JDC) (Entered: 05/25/2023)

May 25, 2023

May 25, 2023

RECAP
43

MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia: Status Conference held on 6/7/2023. Parties discussed the possibility of holding the pending Motion to Dismiss in abeyance, but neither side requested such relief. Plaintiff sought a 7-day extension to file its response to the Motion to Dismiss with no opposition by defendant. Plaintiff's response will be due June 20, 2023, and defendant's reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss due by July 5, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia. (NAD) (Entered: 06/09/2023)

June 8, 2023

June 8, 2023

RECAP
44

RESPONSE in Opposition re 36 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, filed by Plaintiff THE SATANIC TEMPLE, INC.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit ERIN HELIAN, # 2 Affidavit DR. J.D.)(Mac Naughton, William) (Entered: 06/20/2023)

1 Affidavit ERIN HELIAN

View on RECAP

2 Affidavit DR. J.D.

View on RECAP

June 20, 2023

June 20, 2023

RECAP
45

RESPONSE in Opposition re 36 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Mac Naughton Declaration w/Exs, filed by Plaintiff THE SATANIC TEMPLE, INC.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-Rokita Brief in ID Supreme Court, # 2 Exhibit B-Rokita Brief in IN Ct Appl, # 3 Exhibit C-Prelimin Inj Order in Anonymous Plaintiff #1 et al v. The Individual Members of The Medical Licensing Board of Indiana, # 4 Exhibit D-Rokita Letter to Walgreens, # 5 Exhibit E-DOJ Opinion re Comstock Act, # 6 Exhibit F- Order in Dr. Caitlin Bernard et al v. Todd Rokita)(Mac Naughton, William) (Entered: 06/20/2023)

1 Exhibit A-Rokita Brief in ID Supreme Court

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit B-Rokita Brief in IN Ct Appl

View on RECAP

3 Exhibit C-Prelimin Inj Order in Anonymous Plaintiff #1 et al v. The Individ

View on RECAP

4 Exhibit D-Rokita Letter to Walgreens

View on RECAP

5 Exhibit E-DOJ Opinion re Comstock Act

View on RECAP

6 Exhibit F- Order in Dr. Caitlin Bernard et al v. Todd Rokita

View on RECAP

June 20, 2023

June 20, 2023

RECAP
46

SEALED Declaration of Dr. J.D., re 44 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Plaintiff THE SATANIC TEMPLE, INC.. (Mac Naughton, William) (Entered: 06/20/2023)

June 20, 2023

June 20, 2023

PACER
47

MOTION to Maintain Document Under Seal 46 SEALED Document (Case Participants - doc), filed by Plaintiff THE SATANIC TEMPLE, INC.. (Attachments: # 1 LR 5.11(d) Statement, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Mac Naughton, William) (Entered: 06/20/2023)

1 LR 5.11(d) Statement

View on RECAP

2 Text of Proposed Order

View on RECAP

June 20, 2023

June 20, 2023

RECAP
48

ORDER denying 47 MOTION to Maintain Document Under Seal - The denial is WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiff to resubmit a motion to seal that complies fully with S.D. Ind. L.R. 5-11 within 7 days of this Order. In the meantime, the Clerk is DIRECTED to maintain 46 under Seal until further order of this Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 6/27/2023. (JRB) (Entered: 06/27/2023)

June 27, 2023

June 27, 2023

RECAP
49

Second MOTION to Maintain Document Under Seal 46 SEALED Document (Case Participants - doc), filed by Plaintiff THE SATANIC TEMPLE, INC.. (Attachments: # 1 LR 5-11(d) Statement, # 2 Mac Naughton Declaration, # 3 Memorandum of Law, # 4 Redacted Declaration of Dr. J.D., # 5 Text of Proposed Order)(Mac Naughton, William) (Entered: 06/29/2023)

1 LR 5-11(d) Statement

View on RECAP

2 Mac Naughton Declaration

View on RECAP

3 Memorandum of Law

View on RECAP

4 Redacted Declaration of Dr. J.D.

View on RECAP

5 Text of Proposed Order

View on RECAP

June 29, 2023

June 29, 2023

RECAP
50

Appendix of Exhibits in Support of Reply in Support of Motion re 36 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, filed by Defendants RYAN MEARS, TODD ROKITA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Plaintiffs Response to Defendants First Set of Requests for Admission, # 2 Exhibit B - Plaintiffs Non-Confidential Response to Defendants First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff)(Ridlen, Aaron) (Entered: 07/05/2023)

1 Exhibit A - Plaintiffs Response to Defendants First Set of Requests for Admissio

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit B - Plaintiffs Non-Confidential Response to Defendants First Set of Inte

View on RECAP

July 5, 2023

July 5, 2023

RECAP
51

REPLY in Support of Motion re 36 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, filed by Defendants RYAN MEARS, TODD ROKITA. (Ridlen, Aaron) (Entered: 07/05/2023)

July 5, 2023

July 5, 2023

RECAP
52

ORDER granting 49 Second MOTION to Maintain Document Under Seal 46 SEALED Document. (SEE ORDER.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 7/11/2023. (TPS) Modified on 7/13/2023 - Updated dkt text (JSR). (Entered: 07/12/2023)

July 11, 2023

July 11, 2023

PACER
53

ORDER - The Court ORDERS additional briefing from the parties as follows: Defendants shall have until August 8, 2023 to address the Supreme Court's recent standing guidance. Defendants' brief is limited to no more than 10 pages. No issues outside the scope of this Order may be raised, and any extraneous material may be struck. The Satanic Temple shall have until August 22, 2023 and no more than 10pages to respond. Defendants shall have until August 29, 2023 and no more than 5 pages to reply. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, 36, REMAINS PENDING. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/26/2023.(JRB) (Entered: 07/26/2023)

July 26, 2023

July 26, 2023

RECAP
54

Witness List Preliminary, filed by Defendants RYAN MEARS, TODD ROKITA, Exhibit List Preliminary, filed by Defendants RYAN MEARS, TODD ROKITA. (Ridlen, Aaron) (Entered: 08/04/2023)

Aug. 4, 2023

Aug. 4, 2023

RECAP
55

Witness and Exhibit List (Preliminary), filed by Plaintiff THE SATANIC TEMPLE, INC.. (Mac Naughton, William) Modified on 8/9/2023 - Updated dkt text (JSR). (Entered: 08/08/2023)

Aug. 8, 2023

Aug. 8, 2023

RECAP
56

BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re 36 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, filed by Defendants RYAN MEARS, TODD ROKITA. (Ridlen, Aaron) (Entered: 08/08/2023)

Aug. 8, 2023

Aug. 8, 2023

RECAP
57

RESPONSE in Opposition re 36 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, filed by Plaintiff THE SATANIC TEMPLE, INC.. (Mac Naughton, William) (Entered: 08/21/2023)

Aug. 21, 2023

Aug. 21, 2023

RECAP
59

MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia: Status Conference held on 8/24/2023. This matter is scheduled for a telephonic status conference on Wednesday, November 29, 2023 at 11:30 a.m. (Eastern) to discuss case status. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia. (NAD) (Entered: 08/29/2023)

Aug. 28, 2023

Aug. 28, 2023

RECAP
60

REPLY in Support of Motion re 36 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Supplemental Briefing Reply Brief, filed by Defendants RYAN MEARS, TODD ROKITA. (Ridlen, Aaron) (Entered: 08/29/2023)

Aug. 29, 2023

Aug. 29, 2023

RECAP
61

***STRICKEN PER ORDER 66 *** RESPONSE in Opposition re 36 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, filed by Plaintiff THE SATANIC TEMPLE, INC.. (Mac Naughton, William) Modified on 10/25/2023 (JSR). (Entered: 08/31/2023)

Aug. 31, 2023

Aug. 31, 2023

RECAP
62

MOTION for Leave to File Response, filed by Defendants RYAN MEARS, TODD ROKITA. (Ridlen, Aaron) (Entered: 09/06/2023)

Sept. 6, 2023

Sept. 6, 2023

RECAP
63

MOTION to Withdraw Attorney Appearance of Thomas M. Fisher, filed by Defendants RYAN MEARS, TODD ROKITA. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion to Withdraw)(Fisher, Thomas) (Entered: 09/08/2023)

1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion to Withdraw

View on RECAP

Sept. 8, 2023

Sept. 8, 2023

PACER
64

ORDER granting 63 Motion to Withdraw Attorney Appearance. Attorney Thomas M. Fisher withdrawn. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 9/11/2023. (SWM) (Entered: 09/11/2023)

Sept. 11, 2023

Sept. 11, 2023

PACER
65

NOTICE of Substitution of Appearance by Blake Thomas Erickson replacing Christopher M. Anderson on behalf of All Defendants (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Erickson, Blake) (Entered: 09/29/2023)

Sept. 29, 2023

Sept. 29, 2023

PACER
66

ORDER - Based on the foregoing, the Court: GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, 36 ; DISMISSES the Satanic Temple's First Amended Complaint for lack of jurisdiction without leave to amend, 21 ; STRIKES the S atanic Temple's letter, 61 ; and DENIES Defendants' Motion for Leave to Respond to the Satanic Temple's letter as moot, 62 . Final judgment will enter accordingly. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/25/2023. (JSR)

Oct. 25, 2023

Oct. 25, 2023

Clearinghouse
67

FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. PRO. 58 - Pursuant to the Order granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint on October 25, 2023, the Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff such that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants are DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction without leave to amend, and Plaintiff shall take nothing by way of its First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/25/2023. (JSR) (Entered: 10/25/2023)

Oct. 25, 2023

Oct. 25, 2023

RECAP
68

NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 66 Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a ClaimOrder on Motion for Leave to File, 67 Closed Judgment, filed by Plaintiff THE SATANIC TEMPLE, INC.. (Filing fee $505, receipt number AINSDC-7913304) (Mac Naughton, William) (Entered: 11/22/2023)

Nov. 22, 2023

Nov. 22, 2023

RECAP
69

DOCKETING STATEMENT by THE SATANIC TEMPLE, INC. re 68 Notice of Appeal (Mac Naughton, William) (Entered: 11/22/2023)

Nov. 22, 2023

Nov. 22, 2023

RECAP
70

PARTIES' SHORT RECORD re 68 Notice of Appeal - Instructions for Attorneys/Parties attached. (KAA) (Entered: 11/22/2023)

Nov. 22, 2023

Nov. 22, 2023

RECAP
71

Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re 68 Notice of Appeal. - for Court of Appeals Use Only. (KAA) (Entered: 11/22/2023)

Nov. 22, 2023

Nov. 22, 2023

PACER
72

USCA Case Number 23-3247 for 68 Notice of Appeal filed by THE SATANIC TEMPLE, INC.. (KAA) (Entered: 11/27/2023)

Nov. 27, 2023

Nov. 27, 2023

RECAP
73

MOTION to Withdraw Attorney Appearance Melinda R. Holmes, filed by Defendants RYAN MEARS, TODD ROKITA. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Holmes, Melinda) (Entered: 03/25/2024)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

March 25, 2024

March 25, 2024

PACER
74

ORDER granting 73 Motion to Withdraw Attorney Appearance. Attorney Melinda Rebecca Holmes withdrawn. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 3/27/2024. (SWM) (Entered: 03/28/2024)

March 27, 2024

March 27, 2024

PACER
75

Notice of Change of Attorney Information

Nov. 26, 2024

Nov. 26, 2024

PACER
76

Withdraw Attorney Appearance

Jan. 2, 2025

Jan. 2, 2025

PACER
77

Order on Motion to Withdraw Attorney Appearance

Jan. 3, 2025

Jan. 3, 2025

PACER
78

Withdraw Attorney Appearance

Jan. 6, 2025

Jan. 6, 2025

PACER
79

Order on Motion to Withdraw Attorney Appearance

Jan. 7, 2025

Jan. 7, 2025

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: Indiana

Case Type(s):

Healthcare Access and Reproductive Issues

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 21, 2022

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

The Satanic Temple

Plaintiff Type(s):

Non-profit religious organization

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Attorney General of Indiana, State

Marion County Prosecutor, County

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Ex parte Young (federal or state officials)

Constitutional Clause(s):

Slavery/Involuntary servitude

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Nature of Relief:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

General/Misc.:

Religious programs / policies

Discrimination Basis:

Pregnancy discrimination

Religion discrimination

Reproductive rights:

Abortion

Medication abortion

Reproductive health care (including birth control, abortion, and others)

Undue Burden