Case: Jones v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

2024CP4203780 | South Carolina state trial court

Filed Date: Sept. 18, 2024

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On September 18, 2024 four individuals incarcerated at Tyger River Correctional Facility filed suit against South Carolina’s Department of Corrections, alleging breach of contract, breach of contract accompanies by fraud, unjust enrichment, detrimental reliance and violation of South Carolina’s Unfair Trade Practices Act and South Carolina’s Payment of Wages Act. Plaintiffs filed suit in South Carolina’s Court of Common Pleas Seventh Judicial Circuit seeking damages. They were represented by Wi…

On September 18, 2024 four individuals incarcerated at Tyger River Correctional Facility filed suit against South Carolina’s Department of Corrections, alleging breach of contract, breach of contract accompanies by fraud, unjust enrichment, detrimental reliance and violation of South Carolina’s Unfair Trade Practices Act and South Carolina’s Payment of Wages Act. Plaintiffs filed suit in South Carolina’s Court of Common Pleas Seventh Judicial Circuit seeking damages. They were represented by Winslow Law LLC. The case was assigned to Bryan Sterling. 

Plaintiffs participate in South Carolina’s Prison Industry Enhancement Certification Program (“PIECP”) which places incarcerated individuals in realistic work environments, pays them prevailing wages and gives them a chance to develop marketable skills that will increase their potential for rehabilitation and meaningful employment upon release. On March 24, 2021 the South Carolina Supreme Court held that under PIECP, inmates are to be paid prevailing wages, not the minimum wage. However, for their work in the PIECP program, plaintiffs have only been paid minimum wage. They assert that the prevailing wage for their work is much higher. Moreover, plaintiffs assert that the Department of Corrections deducts social security, room and board and voluntary child support from their pay, but any voluntary child support payments were not actually paid to the inmates’ family. 

Plaintiffs also sought to certify a class action for similarly situated individuals. Their motion for class certification was granted on January 13, 2025. 

This case is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Daria Wick (1/27/2025)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2024CP4203780

Docket

Jan. 27, 2025

Jan. 27, 2025

Docket

2024CP4203780

Complaint

Sept. 18, 2024

Sept. 18, 2024

Complaint

2024CP4203780

Order Certifying Class

Nov. 27, 2024

Nov. 27, 2024

Order/Opinion

2024CP4203780

Formal Order Certifying Class

Jan. 13, 2025

Jan. 13, 2025

Order/Opinion

Docket

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link

Complaint

Sept. 18, 2024

Sept. 18, 2024

Order to Certify Class

Nov. 27, 2024

Nov. 27, 2024

Formal Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion to Certify Class

Jan. 13, 2025

Jan. 13, 2025

Case Details

State / Territory: South Carolina

Case Type(s):

Prison Conditions

Labor Rights

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 18, 2024

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Inmates at Manning Correctional Institution

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Pending

Defendants

South Carolina Department of Corrections (Enoree, Spartanburg), State

Defendant Type(s):

Corrections

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Nature of Relief:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Work release or work assignments