Case: Rhode Island Latino Arts v. National Endowment for the Arts

1:25-cv-00079 | U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island

Filed Date: March 6, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case challenged the prohibition on federal funding of art programs that promoted “gender ideology” and required all funding applicants to certify their understanding that “federal funds shall not be used to promote gender ideology.” On March 6, 2025, four nonprofit arts organizations—Rhode Island Latino Arts, National Queer Theater, The Theater Offensive, and Theatre Communications Group—filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island against the Nation…

This case challenged the prohibition on federal funding of art programs that promoted “gender ideology” and required all funding applicants to certify their understanding that “federal funds shall not be used to promote gender ideology.” On March 6, 2025, four nonprofit arts organizations—Rhode Island Latino Arts, National Queer Theater, The Theater Offensive, and Theatre Communications Group—filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island against the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) and its acting chair, Mary Anne Carter. The case was assigned to Senior Judge William Smith. Represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and cooperating private counsel, the plaintiffs challenged the new NEA requirements and argued they were unconstitutional under the First and the Fifth Amendments, and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The lawsuit sought declaratory and injunctive relief to overturn the policy, as well as attorneys’ fees and costs.

On January 20, 2025, President Donald J. Trump issued Executive Order 14168, titled “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government.” The order directed all federal agencies, including the NEA, to ensure that “federal funds shall not be used to promote gender ideology.” It defined “gender ideology” as the “false claim” that gender identity can be separate from biological sex and that there is a spectrum of genders. The executive order required agencies to revise their grant conditions accordingly. Following this directive, the NEA amended its Assurance of Compliance on February 6, 2025, requiring all grant applicants to affirm they would not use federal funding to “promote gender ideology.” This new requirement effectively barred funding for projects that depicted or affirmed transgender and nonbinary identities, even if they otherwise met the statutory criteria of “artistic excellence and artistic merit” under 20 U.S.C. § 954(d)(1).

The plaintiffs had previously received NEA funding and intended to apply for new grants in 2025. They argued the new funding restriction rendered them ineligible for grants solely because their work affirmed transgender and nonbinary identities. The lawsuit asserted that the restriction violated the First Amendment by imposing viewpoint-based discrimination on artistic expression. It further claimed the policy violated the Fifth Amendment on due process grounds, as the term “gender ideology” was unconstitutionally vague. The plaintiffs also contended the NEA’s implementation of the executive order violated the Administrative Procedure Act by exceeding the agency’s statutory authority, being arbitrary and capricious, and contradicting constitutional rights.

The plaintiffs filed their complaint on March 6, 2025, and on the same day filed motion for a temporary restraining order and/or a preliminary injunction against the implementation of EO 14168, or any other action preventing the defendants from fulfilling their statutory duty to judge grant applicants according to the “artistic excellence and artistic merit” standard. Defendants filed a response in opposition to the preliminary injunction on March 21, arguing the plaintiffs' claims were not justiciable or ripe. Plaintiffs filed a reply on March 25, challenging the defendants' assertion that their claims were not ripe. The court held a hearing on the motion for temporary restraining order on March 27, 2025.

The Court denied the TRO and/or preliminary injunction motion on April 3, 2025. The Court determined that because the defendants rescinded their implementation of the EO for this grant cycle, the plaintiff's claims regarding the certification requirement were moot. Notably, the court still found that the plaintiffs showed a likelihood of success and irreparable harm. That alone, however, was not enough to persuade the court on the necessity of a TRO and/or preliminary injunction. 

On May 12, 2025, the Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint that explicitly stated the lawsuit is challenging the prohibition. A motion for preliminary relief was attached to the amended complaint. The amended complaint includes a new section that detailed changes to the policies of the NEA following the filing of the lawsuit including the review of applications to ensure they do not promote gender ideology. The harm to plaintiffs section was also updated to include a section that reflects harms that occurred after in the original filing in light of the NEA policy changes including the chilling and outright barring of applications.

Defendants filed a motion for a protective order to preclude extra-record discovery on May 19, 2025. They argued that compelling discovery would be impracticable, as the review materials guiding the Executive Order do not yet exist. Secondly, in Administrative Procedure Act (APA) actions, discovery is presumptively prohibited and judicial review is generally limited to the administrative record. Third, only a showing of bad faith or improper behavior can justify extra-record discover. Neither of which, the defendants argued, the plaintiffs had alleged.

On June 4, 2025, the court granted the motion in part and denied it in part. The court allowed limited discovery, finding that the defendants had failed to adequately explain the administrative actions, thereby frustrating effective judicial review.

The plaintiffs filed their motion for summary judgement on June 30, 2025. The defendants filed a cross motion on July 13.

This case is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Jillian Snyman (3/12/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69710414/parties/rhode-island-latino-arts-v-national-endowment-for-the-arts/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Cole, David (Rhode Island)

Eidelman, Vera (Rhode Island)

Hauss, Brian (Rhode Island)

Kim, Scarlet (Rhode Island)

Attorney for Defendant

Bolan, Kevin (Rhode Island)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
2

1:25-cv-00079

Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, Expedited Hearing, and/or a Temporary Restraining Order

March 6, 2025

March 6, 2025

Pleading / Motion / Brief
1

1:25-cv-00079

Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

March 6, 2025

March 6, 2025

Complaint
12

1:25-cv-00079

Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for a Preliminary Injunction

March 25, 2025

March 25, 2025

Pleading / Motion / Brief
13

1:25-cv-00079

Memorandum and Order

April 3, 2025

April 3, 2025

Order/Opinion

2025 WL 1009026

15

1:25-cv-00079

Complaint

May 12, 2025

May 12, 2025

Complaint
17

1:25-cv-00079

Defendants' Motion for Protective Order Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) to Preclude Extra-Record Discovery

May 19, 2025

May 19, 2025

Pleading / Motion / Brief

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69710414/rhode-island-latino-arts-v-national-endowment-for-the-arts/

Last updated Aug. 22, 2025, 12:08 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT ( filing fee paid $ 405.00, receipt number ARIDC-2106349 ), filed by Theatre Communications Group, Rhode Island Latino Arts, The Theater Offensive, National Queer Theater. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Labinger, Lynette) (Entered: 03/06/2025)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

March 6, 2025

March 6, 2025

Clearinghouse
2

MOTION for Preliminary Injunction ( Responses due by 3/20/2025.), MOTION to Expedite ( Responses due by 3/20/2025.), MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Supporting Memorandum memorandum of law, # 2 Affidavit Declaration of Vera Eidelman with exhibits, # 3 Affidavit Declaration of Marta V. Martinez, # 4 Affidavit Declaration of Adam Odsess-Rubin with exhibit, # 5 Affidavit Declaration of Giselle Byrd, # 6 Affidavit Declaration of Emilya Cachapero)(Labinger, Lynette) (Entered: 03/06/2025)

1 Supporting Memorandum memorandum of law

View on RECAP

2 Affidavit Declaration of Vera Eidelman with exhibits

View on PACER

3 Affidavit Declaration of Marta V. Martinez

View on RECAP

4 Affidavit Declaration of Adam Odsess-Rubin with exhibit

View on PACER

5 Affidavit Declaration of Giselle Byrd

View on PACER

6 Affidavit Declaration of Emilya Cachapero

View on PACER

March 6, 2025

March 6, 2025

Clearinghouse
3

CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (Hill, Cherelle) (Entered: 03/06/2025)

March 6, 2025

March 6, 2025

PACER
4

Corporate Disclosure Statement by Rhode Island Latino Arts, National Queer Theater, The Theater Offensive, Theatre Communications Group. (Labinger, Lynette) (Entered: 03/06/2025)

March 6, 2025

March 6, 2025

PACER
5

MOTION for Vera Eidelman to Appear Pro Hac Vice for all plaintiffs ( filing fee paid $ 100.00, receipt number ARIDC-2106480 ) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Labinger, Lynette) (Entered: 03/06/2025)

March 6, 2025

March 6, 2025

PACER
6

MOTION for Lauren Yu to Appear Pro Hac Vice for all plaintiffs ( filing fee paid $ 100.00, receipt number ARIDC-2106482 ) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Labinger, Lynette) (Entered: 03/06/2025)

March 6, 2025

March 6, 2025

PACER
7

MOTION for Scarlet Kim to Appear Pro Hac Vice for all plaintiffs ( filing fee paid $ 100.00, receipt number ARIDC-2106484 ) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Labinger, Lynette) (Entered: 03/06/2025)

March 6, 2025

March 6, 2025

PACER
8

MOTION for David Cole to Appear Pro Hac Vice for all plaintiffs ( filing fee paid $ 100.00, receipt number ARIDC-2106486 ) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Labinger, Lynette) (Entered: 03/06/2025)

March 6, 2025

March 6, 2025

PACER
9

MOTION for Brian Hauss to Appear Pro Hac Vice for all plaintiffs ( filing fee paid $ 100.00, receipt number ARIDC-2106609 ) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Labinger, Lynette) (Entered: 03/06/2025)

March 6, 2025

March 6, 2025

PACER

Case Assigned/Reassigned

March 6, 2025

March 6, 2025

PACER

Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice

March 6, 2025

March 6, 2025

PACER

Case assigned to Senior District Judge William E Smith and Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan. (Hill, Cherelle)

March 6, 2025

March 6, 2025

PACER

TEXT ORDER granting 5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Vera Eidelman. So Ordered by Senior District Judge William E Smith on 3/6/2025. (Hill, Cherelle)

March 6, 2025

March 6, 2025

PACER

TEXT ORDER granting 6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Lauren Yu. So Ordered by Senior District Judge William E Smith on 3/6/2025. (Hill, Cherelle)

March 6, 2025

March 6, 2025

PACER

TEXT ORDER granting 7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Scarlet Kim. So Ordered by Senior District Judge William E Smith on 3/6/2025. (Hill, Cherelle)

March 6, 2025

March 6, 2025

PACER

TEXT ORDER granting 8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of David Cole. So Ordered by Senior District Judge William E Smith on 3/6/2025. (Hill, Cherelle)

March 6, 2025

March 6, 2025

PACER

TEXT ORDER granting 9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Brian Hauss. So Ordered by Senior District Judge William E Smith on 3/6/2025. (Hill, Cherelle)

March 6, 2025

March 6, 2025

PACER

Notice of Hearing (Form Attached)

March 7, 2025

March 7, 2025

PACER

NOTICE of Hearing: Zoom Video Conference set for 3/7/2025 at 04:30 PM before Senior District Judge William E Smith. (Simoncelli, Michael)

March 7, 2025

March 7, 2025

PACER

NOTICE of Hearing: Zoom Video Conference set for 3/7/2025 at 04:30 PM before Senior District Judge William E Smith. This is an attorneys only conference. (Simoncelli, Michael)

March 7, 2025

March 7, 2025

PACER

Order AND ~Util - Set Deadlines

March 7, 2025

March 7, 2025

PACER

In Chambers Conference

March 7, 2025

March 7, 2025

PACER

Notice of Hearing on Motion

March 7, 2025

March 7, 2025

PACER

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Senior District Judge William E Smith: Zoom Chambers Conference held on 3/7/2025. Participants: V. Eidelman, B. Hauss, D. Cole, L. Yu, S. Kim, and L. Labinger for the Plaintiffs; B. Wong for the Defendants. (Simoncelli, Michael)

March 7, 2025

March 7, 2025

PACER

TEXT ORDER re 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, MOTION to Expedite, MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order. Defendants shall file their response by 3/14/2025, and Plaintiffs shall file their reply by 3/17/25. So Ordered by Senior District Judge William E Smith on 3/7/2025. (Simoncelli, Michael)

March 7, 2025

March 7, 2025

PACER

NOTICE of Hearing on 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction: Motion Hearing set for 3/18/2025 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 3 before Senior District Judge William E Smith. (Simoncelli, Michael)

March 7, 2025

March 7, 2025

PACER
10

DECLARATION of Ann Eilers by All Defendants. (Bolan, Kevin) (Entered: 03/10/2025)

March 10, 2025

March 10, 2025

RECAP

Notice of Hearing on Motion

March 11, 2025

March 11, 2025

PACER

Order

March 11, 2025

March 11, 2025

PACER

TEXT ORDER re 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, MOTION to Expedite, MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order. Defendants shall file their response by 2:00 PM on 3/21/2025, and Plaintiffs shall file their reply by 3/25/25. So Ordered by Senior District Judge William E Smith on 3/11/2025. (Simoncelli, Michael)

March 11, 2025

March 11, 2025

PACER

NOTICE of Hearing on Motion 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction: Motion Hearing reset for 3/27/2025 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 before Senior District Judge William E Smith. (Simoncelli, Michael)

March 11, 2025

March 11, 2025

PACER

Notice of Hearing (Form Attached)

March 17, 2025

March 17, 2025

PACER

NOTICE of Hearing: Video Chambers Conference set for 3/18/2025 at 11:00 AM before Senior District Judge William E. Smith. (Zoom Meeting ID/Passcode provided to counsel of record by email.) (Simoncelli, Michael)

March 17, 2025

March 17, 2025

PACER

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Senior District Judge William E Smith: Zoom Chambers Conference held on 3/18/2025. Participants: V. Eidelman, S. Kim, and L. Yu for Plaintiffs; K. Bolan for the Defendants. (Zoom Video Conference at 11:05 AM.) (Simoncelli, Michael)

March 18, 2025

March 18, 2025

PACER

In Chambers Conference

March 18, 2025

March 18, 2025

PACER
11

RESPONSE In Opposition to 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction MOTION to Expedite MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by All Defendants. Replies due by 3/28/2025. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Bolan Decl. (and Exs. A-C))(Bolan, Kevin) (Entered: 03/21/2025)

1 Exhibit Bolan Decl. (and Exs. A-C)

View on RECAP

March 21, 2025

March 21, 2025

Clearinghouse
12

REPLY to Response re 11 Response to Motion, in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF MARTA V. MARTNEZ, # 2 Affidavit SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF EMILYA CACHAPERO)(Labinger, Lynette) (Entered: 03/25/2025)

1 Affidavit SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF MARTA V. MARTNEZ

View on RECAP

2 Affidavit SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF EMILYA CACHAPERO

View on PACER

March 25, 2025

March 25, 2025

Clearinghouse

Motion Hearing

March 27, 2025

March 27, 2025

PACER

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Senior District Judge William E Smith: Motion Hearing held on 3/27/2025 re 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Counsel present: V. Eidelman, S. Kim, L. Yu, and L. Labinger for Plaintiffs; K. Bolan for Defendants. V. Eidelman and S. Kim argue their Motion for Preliminary Injunction; Court questions counsel throughout; K. Bolan argues objection to Motion; Court questions counsel throughout; V. Eidelman and S. Kim present rebuttal; Court questions counsel throughout. Court takes motion under advisement. Recess. (Court Reporter D. Veitch in Courtroom 3 at 10:05 AM.) (Simoncelli, Michael)

March 27, 2025

March 27, 2025

PACER
13

MEMORANDUM and ORDER denying 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 2 Motion to Expedite; denying 2 Motion for TRO. So Ordered by Senior District Judge William E Smith on 4/3/2025. (Entered: 04/03/2025)

April 3, 2025

April 3, 2025

Clearinghouse

Notice of Hearing (Form Attached)

April 8, 2025

April 8, 2025

PACER

NOTICE of Hearing: Zoom Chambers Conference set for 4/17/2025 before Senior District Judge William E Smith. Zoom meeting ID/passcode provided to counsel of record by email. (Simoncelli, Michael)

April 8, 2025

April 8, 2025

PACER
14

STIPULATION Accepting Service of the Summons and Complaint filed by All Plaintiffs. (Eidelman, Vera) (Entered: 04/09/2025)

April 9, 2025

April 9, 2025

RECAP

Notice of Hearing (Form Attached)

April 9, 2025

April 9, 2025

PACER

NOTICE of Hearing: Zoom Chambers Conference rescheduled to 4/23/2025 at 02:00 PM before Senior District Judge William E Smith. Zoom Meeting ID/Passcode provided to counsel of record by email. (Simoncelli, Michael)

April 9, 2025

April 9, 2025

PACER

Notice of Hearing (Form Attached)

April 23, 2025

April 23, 2025

PACER

Status Conference

April 23, 2025

April 23, 2025

PACER

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Senior Judge William E Smith: Zoom Status Conference held on 4/23/2025. Participants: S. Kim, L. Yu, D. Cole, and L. Labinger for Plaintiffs; K. Bolan for Defendants. (Zoom Video Conference at 2:00 PM.) (Simoncelli, Michael)

April 23, 2025

April 23, 2025

PACER

NOTICE of Hearing:Zoom Status Conference set for 5/5/2025 at 02:00 PM before Senior Judge William E Smith. This is an attorneys-only conference, and Zoom ID/Passcode provided to counsel of record by email. (Simoncelli, Michael)

April 23, 2025

April 23, 2025

PACER

Order

May 5, 2025

May 5, 2025

PACER

Status Conference

May 5, 2025

May 5, 2025

PACER

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Senior Judge William E. Smith: Status Conference held on 5/5/2025. Participants: V. Eidelman, S. Kim, L. Yu, and L. Labinger for Plaintiffs; K. Bolan for Defendants. Court to issue schedule re: filing of amended complaint and answer, discovery requests, and cross-motions for summary judgment. (Zoom Video Conference at 2:00 PM) (Simoncelli, Michael)

May 5, 2025

May 5, 2025

PACER

TEXT ORDER: Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint by May 12, 2025, and Defendants to file their answer, along with the complete administrative record, by May 27, 2025. Plaintiffs to issue discovery requests to the Defendants by May 12, 2025; Defendants to file their objections to the discovery requests by May 19, 2025; and Plaintiffs to respond to Defendants' objections by May 27, 2025. The objections and responses shall be no longer than 5 pages. Plaintiffs to file their cross-motion for summary judgment by June 30, 2025; Defendants to file their cross-motion for summary judgment and their response to Plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment by July 18, 2025; Plaintiffs to file their reply in support of their cross-motion for summary judgment and response to Defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment by August 1, 2025; and Defendants to file their reply in support of their cross-motion for summary judgment by August 8, 2025. So Ordered by Senior Judge William E. Smith on 5/5/2025. (Simoncelli, Michael)

May 5, 2025

May 5, 2025

PACER
15

AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Theatre Communications Group, Rhode Island Latino Arts, The Theater Offensive, National Queer Theater. (Attachments: # 1 Amended Complaint in Redline)(Eidelman, Vera) (Entered: 05/12/2025)

1 Amended Complaint in Redline

View on RECAP

May 12, 2025

May 12, 2025

Clearinghouse
16

NOTICE by National Queer Theater, Rhode Island Latino Arts, The Theater Offensive, Theatre Communications Group of Discovery Request (Eidelman, Vera) (Entered: 05/12/2025)

May 12, 2025

May 12, 2025

RECAP
17

MOTION for Protective Order to Preclude Extra-Record Discovery filed by All Defendants. Responses due by 6/2/2025. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Bolan, Kevin) (Entered: 05/19/2025)

May 19, 2025

May 19, 2025

Clearinghouse
18

RESPONSE In Opposition to 17 MOTION for Protective Order to Preclude Extra-Record Discovery filed by All Plaintiffs. Replies due by 6/3/2025. (Eidelman, Vera) (Entered: 05/27/2025)

May 27, 2025

May 27, 2025

PACER
19

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by Mary Anne Carter, National Endowment for the Arts NOTICE: In order to view this document, you must first log in using your CMECF Filer login.. (Bolan, Kevin) (Entered: 05/27/2025)

May 27, 2025

May 27, 2025

PACER
20

ANSWER to 15 Amended Complaint by Mary Anne Carter, National Endowment for the Arts.(Bolan, Kevin) (Entered: 05/27/2025)

May 27, 2025

May 27, 2025

RECAP

Order on Motion for Protective Order

June 4, 2025

June 4, 2025

PACER

TEXT ORDER denying in part and granting in part Defendants' Motion for Protective Order, Dkt. No. 17. The NEA's "explanation of its intended action to implement EO 14168," see generally, id. Ex. 1, Dkt. No. 17-1, suggests the Chair will treat a grant application's perceived promotion of "gender ideology," as defined by the EO, as either a disqualifying factor or a factor weighing against approval during the final stage of the application review process. That conclusion is not free from doubt, however, given some (potentially intentional) ambiguity. To address this, the Court will permit the limited discovery reflected in Plaintiffs' three requests for admission, and thus Defendants' Motion for Protective Order is denied in that respect. Although the Court recognizes there is a presumption against discovery in Administrative Procedure Act ("APA") cases, "supplementation of the record may be permissible where there is a 'failure to explain administrative action as to frustrate effective judicial review.'" Olsen v. United States, 414 F.3d 144, 155-56 (1st Cir. 2005) (quoting Camp v. Pitts, 411 U.S. 138, 142-43 (1973)). Answers to the three simple questions posed by Plaintiffs in their requests for admission will facilitate effective judicial review. Answers to Plaintiffs' interrogatories, on the other hand, are not necessary for effective judicial review at this time. Defendants' Motion for Protective Order is therefore granted as to the interrogatories; however, if Defendants' answers to Plaintiffs' requests for admission fail to clarify matters, the Court may revisit this issue. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion for Protective Order, Dkt. No. 17, is DENIED as to Plaintiffs' requests for admission and GRANTED as to Plaintiffs' interrogatories. Answers to the requests for admission must be filed by June 11, 2025, at 5:00 pm. So Ordered by Senior Judge William E. Smith on 6/4/2025. (Simoncelli, Michael)

June 4, 2025

June 4, 2025

PACER
21

NOTICE by Mary Anne Carter, National Endowment for the Arts -- Resps. to Pls.' RFAs (Bolan, Kevin) (Entered: 06/11/2025)

June 11, 2025

June 11, 2025

RECAP
22

MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by All Plaintiffs. Responses due by 7/14/2025. (Attachments: # 1 Supporting Memorandum Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Summary Judgement, # 2 Affidavit Supplemental Declaration of Vera Eidelman, # 3 Affidavit Second Supplemental Declaration of TCG, # 4 Affidavit Supplemental Declaration of NQT, # 5 Affidavit Supplemental Declaration of TTO, # 6 Affidavit Second Supplemental Declaration of RILA)(Eidelman, Vera) (Entered: 06/30/2025)

1 Supporting Memorandum Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Summary Judgeme

View on RECAP

2 Affidavit Supplemental Declaration of Vera Eidelman

View on PACER

3 Affidavit Second Supplemental Declaration of TCG

View on PACER

4 Affidavit Supplemental Declaration of NQT

View on PACER

5 Affidavit Supplemental Declaration of TTO

View on PACER

6 Affidavit Second Supplemental Declaration of RILA

View on PACER

June 30, 2025

June 30, 2025

PACER
23

STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS by All Plaintiffs re 22 MOTION for Summary Judgment . (Eidelman, Vera) (Entered: 06/30/2025)

June 30, 2025

June 30, 2025

PACER
24

Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Plaintiffs' Summary-Judgment Motion filed by All Defendants. Responses due by 7/30/2025. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Bolan Decl. and Exs. A to D)(Bolan, Kevin) (Entered: 07/16/2025)

1 Exhibit Bolan Decl. and Exs. A to D

View on PACER

July 16, 2025

July 16, 2025

RECAP
25

STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS and Response to Plaintiffs' Statement of Facts by All Defendants re 24 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Plaintiffs' Summary-Judgment Motion. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Beattie Decl. and Exs. A & B)(Bolan, Kevin) (Entered: 07/16/2025)

July 16, 2025

July 16, 2025

PACER
26

RESPONSE In Opposition to 22 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by All Defendants. Replies due by 7/23/2025. (Hill, Cherelle) (Entered: 07/18/2025)

July 16, 2025

July 16, 2025

PACER
27

RESPONSE In Opposition to 22 MOTION for Summary Judgment Statement of Facts and Their Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts filed by All Defendants. Replies due by 7/25/2025. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Beattie Decl. with Exs. A and B)(Bolan, Kevin) (Entered: 07/18/2025)

1 Exhibit Beattie Decl. with Exs. A and B

View on RECAP

July 18, 2025

July 18, 2025

RECAP
28

RESPONSE In Opposition to 24 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Plaintiffs' Summary-Judgment Motion filed by All Plaintiffs. Replies due by 8/8/2025. (Eidelman, Vera) (Entered: 08/01/2025)

Aug. 1, 2025

Aug. 1, 2025

PACER
29

RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION by National Queer Theater, Rhode Island Latino Arts, The Theater Offensive, Theatre Communications Group re 25 Statement of Undisputed Facts, . (Eidelman, Vera) (Entered: 08/01/2025)

Aug. 1, 2025

Aug. 1, 2025

PACER
30

STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS (Additional) by All Plaintiffs re 28 Response to Motion. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Second Supplemental Declaration of Vera Eidelman with Exs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5)(Eidelman, Vera) (Entered: 08/01/2025)

1 Affidavit Second Supplemental Declaration of Vera Eidelman with Exs. 1, 2, 3, 4,

View on PACER

Aug. 1, 2025

Aug. 1, 2025

PACER
31

REPLY to Response re 26 Response to Motion for Summary Judgement filed by All Plaintiffs. (Eidelman, Vera) (Entered: 08/01/2025)

Aug. 1, 2025

Aug. 1, 2025

PACER
32

REPLY to Response re 28 Response to Motion for Summary Judgment filed by All Defendants. (Bolan, Kevin) (Entered: 08/08/2025)

Aug. 8, 2025

Aug. 8, 2025

PACER
33

STATEMENT OF DISPUTED FACTS by All Defendants re 29 Response in Opposition, 30 Statement of Undisputed Facts. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Suppl. Decl. of Daniel Beattie with Exs. A & B)(Bolan, Kevin) (Entered: 08/08/2025)

Aug. 8, 2025

Aug. 8, 2025

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: Rhode Island

Case Type(s):

Speech and Religious Freedom

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government (Transgender Rights)

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 6, 2025

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Four nonprofit organizations dedicated to supporting the arts, including transgender and nonbinary artists.

Attorney Organizations:

ACLU National (all projects)

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

National Endowment for the Arts, Federal

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Ex Parte Young (Federal) or Bivens

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Ex parte Young (federal or state officials)

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Due Process: Substantive Due Process

Freedom of speech/association

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Nature of Relief:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Content of Injunction:

Preliminary relief denied

Issues

General/Misc.:

Funding

Discrimination Basis:

Gender identity

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Transgender

LGBTQ+:

LGBTQ+