Filed Date: Sept. 3, 2025
Case Ongoing
Clearinghouse coding in progress
(This summary is temporary, while we research the case.)
On September 3, 2025, the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU), representing nearly 160,000 federal employees across 37 agencies, sued President Trump as well as the Director of OPM and the Acting Director of PTO to challenge EO 14343 (Further Exclusions Order, August 28, 2025). The EO relied on statutory authority (5 U.S.C. § 7103(b)(1)) permitting exclusions only where an agency’s “primary function” is intelligence, counterintelligence, investigative, or national security work. Filing in federal court in Washington, D.C., Plaintiffs claimed the EO exceeded the president's statutory authority, and further alleged a violation of congressional intent through the effective nullification of Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute, and First Amendment retaliation as NTEU has been an outspoken critic of the administration's policies. Plaintiffs sought declaratory and injunctive relief.
This case is ongoing.
Summary Authors
Nick Martire (9/19/2025)
National Treasury Employees Union v. Trump, District of District of Columbia (2025)
For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71260779/parties/national-treasury-employees-union-v-trump/
Friedman, Paul L. (District of Columbia)
Giles, Allison Conrey (District of Columbia)
Horne, Jessica (District of Columbia)
Shah, Paras N. (District of Columbia)
Simon, Jeremy S. (District of Columbia)
See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71260779/national-treasury-employees-union-v-trump/
Last updated Oct. 1, 2025, 8:52 a.m.
State / Territory: District of Columbia
Case Type(s):
Presidential/Gubernatorial Authority
Special Collection(s):
Trump Administration 2.0: Litigation and Investigations Involving the Government
Key Dates
Filing Date: Sept. 3, 2025
Case Ongoing: Yes
Plaintiffs
Public Interest Lawyer: Yes
Filed Pro Se: No
Case Details
Available Documents:
Outcome
Prevailing Party: None Yet / None
Nature of Relief:
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief: