Case: Doe v. Fashion Institute of Technology

1:25-cv-00950 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Filed Date: Jan. 31, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case challenged the Fashion Institute of Technology (FIT) for allegedly conducting a biased misconduct proceeding against a Jewish student, suspending her after a flyer-related incident while ignoring purported anti-semitic threats and policy violations by others. Other cases involving universities’ responses to speech and activity concerning Israel and Palestine, including matters involving antisemitism and/or anti-Palestinian expression, can be found here. On January 31, 2025, a Jewish s…

This case challenged the Fashion Institute of Technology (FIT) for allegedly conducting a biased misconduct proceeding against a Jewish student, suspending her after a flyer-related incident while ignoring purported anti-semitic threats and policy violations by others. Other cases involving universities’ responses to speech and activity concerning Israel and Palestine, including matters involving antisemitism and/or anti-Palestinian expression, can be found here.

On January 31, 2025, a Jewish student at FIT filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against the institution. The plaintiff asserted claims under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, New York Executive Law § 296 et seq., New York Civil Rights Law § 40 et seq., N.Y.C. Administrative Code § 8-107, breach of contract, due process, and retaliation. The plaintiff sought injunctive relief, damages, expungement of her disciplinary record, and attorneys’ fees. The case was assigned to Judge John P. Cronan.

In the complaint, the plaintiff alleged FIT violated Title VI by intentionally discriminating against her as a Jewish student, suspending her for responding to anti-semitic, anti-Israel flyers, while failing to discipline other students or address threats against her. She contended that FIT’s deliberate indifference and uneven enforcement of university policies created a hostile educational environment and denied her equal access to educational benefits. The complaint also brought state law discrimination claims, citing FIT’s alleged failure to prevent or address anti-semitic harassment. Additionally, it asserted breach of contract for FIT’s failure to follow its own policies and to provide fair disciplinary procedures, a Fourteenth Amendment due process claim arising from her immediate suspension without sufficient notice or opportunity to be heard, and a retaliation claim for suspending her in response to her complaints about anti-semitic harassment.

On February 1, 2025, the plaintiff filed a motion seeking permission to proceed under the pseudonym “Jane Doe.” The court granted the motion on February 4, 2025, but indicated it might revisit the issue after FIT appeared in the action.

The plaintiff filed an amended complaint on February 21, 2025. The revised complaint added claims for retaliation under Title VI, New York Executive Law § 296, New York City Human Rights Law § 8-107(7), and the FIT Code of Conduct, as well as claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED) and negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED). The amended complaint also substantially expanded the existing due process claims, including detailed allegations regarding procedural violations and comparative treatment of students. It also explicitly incorporated Section 1983 claims against FIT as a government actor.

On April 3, 2025, the court denied the plaintiff’s motion to appear anonymously and ordered her to file an amended complaint using her real name (2025 WL 1000927). The plaintiff moved for reconsideration on April 17, 2025, but the court denied this request on July 11, 2025, finding she had not identified any controlling law or facts overlooked in the original decision (2025 WL 1920065). The plaintiff appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. On August 19, 2025, she requested a stay pending appeal, which the court denied on November 6, 2025, concluding there was no reason to believe its refusal to permit anonymous litigation would likely be overturned (2025 WL 3102351). However, on December 12, 2025, the court of appeals ordered that, to the extent the appellant requested a temporary stay pending review by a three-judge panel, the motion was granted and was referred to the panel on an expedited basis.

Separately, on May 23, 2025, FIT filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that all claims were, in substance, challenges to her suspension and therefore could only be brought in an Article 78 proceeding, which was then barred by the statute of limitations. FIT further contended that the plaintiff failed to plausibly allege discrimination or retaliation under Title VI or relevant state laws, arguing she was suspended for violating the Code of Conduct, not because of her Jewish identity. FIT also argued that the breach of contract, due process, and emotional distress claims failed because no specific contractual process was breached, because post-deprivation remedies were available, and because the alleged conduct was not extreme or outrageous.

This case is ongoing. 

Summary Authors

Dahlia Gottlieb (3/16/2026)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69602943/parties/doe-v-fashion-institute-of-technology/


Judge(s)

Cronan, John Peter (New York)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Israelovitch, Lauren (New York)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

1:25-cv-00950

Complaint and Jury Demand

Jan. 31, 2025

Jan. 31, 2025

Complaint
15

1:25-cv-00950

First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand

Feb. 21, 2025

Feb. 21, 2025

Complaint
44

1:25-cv-00950

Opinion and Order

July 11, 2025

July 11, 2025

Order/Opinion

2025 WL 1920065

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69602943/doe-v-fashion-institute-of-technology/

Last updated Nov. 3, 2026, 4:53 a.m.

Docket for: Doe v. Fashion Institute of Technology
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Jan. 31, 2025

COMPLAINT against Fashion Institute of Technology. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-30550447)Document filed by Jane Doe. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A).(Israelovitch, Lauren) (Entered: 02/01/2025)

1 Exhibit Exhibit A

View on PACER

Clearinghouse
2 Feb. 1, 2025

CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Israelovitch, Lauren) (Entered: 02/01/2025)

RECAP
3 Feb. 1, 2025

FILING ERROR - SUMMONS REQUEST PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Fashion Institute of Technology, re: 1 Complaint. Document filed by Jane Doe..(Israelovitch, Lauren) Modified on 2/4/2025 (jgo). (Entered: 02/01/2025)

RECAP
4 Feb. 1, 2025

MOTION to file as Jane Doe . Document filed by Jane Doe..(Israelovitch, Lauren) (Entered: 02/01/2025)

RECAP
5 Feb. 3, 2025

FIRST MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 4 MOTION to file as Jane Doe . . Document filed by Jane Doe..(Israelovitch, Lauren) (Entered: 02/03/2025)

RECAP
6 Feb. 3, 2025

FILING ERROR - WRONG EVENT TYPE SELECTED FROM MENU - PROPOSED ORDER. Document filed by Jane Doe..(Israelovitch, Lauren) Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Modified on 2/3/2025 (tp). (Entered: 02/03/2025)

RECAP
7 Feb. 3, 2025

PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Document filed by Jane Doe..(Israelovitch, Lauren) (Entered: 02/03/2025)

RECAP
Feb. 3, 2025

Notice to Attorney Regarding Deficient Proposed Order

Feb. 3, 2025

Case Opening Initial Assignment Notice

Feb. 3, 2025

***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PROPOSED ORDER. Notice to attorney Lauren Israelovitch to RE-FILE Document No. 6 Proposed Order. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the wrong event type was used to file the proposed order. Re-file the document using the event type Proposed Protective Order found under the event list Proposed Orders - select the correct filer/filers - attach the correct signed (scanned signature image) and dated PDF. (tp)

Feb. 3, 2025

Case Designation

Feb. 3, 2025

CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge John P. Cronan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo)

Feb. 3, 2025

Case Designated ECF

Feb. 3, 2025

Magistrate Judge Jennifer Willis is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo)

Feb. 3, 2025

Case Designated ECF. (jgo)

8 Feb. 4, 2025

ORDER granting 4 MOTION to file as Jane Doe. In sum, after weighing the factors outlined in Sealed Plaintiff, the Court grants Plaintiff's motion, but with more limited relief than sought in her proposed protective order. The Court concludes that Plaintiff may proceed at this stage under the pseudonym "Jane Doe," but intends to revisit the issue after FIT appears in this action. In particular, this Order permitting Plaintiff to proceed anonymously shall remain in effect only until the later of (1) thirty days following service of the Complaint or (2) the Court's ruling on any timely renewed motion to proceed anonymously. Any renewed motion must be filed within thirty days after service of the Complaint. In the absence of a timely motion, the Court shall order the name of the Plaintiff be disclosed. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion pending at Docket Number 4 and to issue the requested summons. Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on FIT along with the summons and Complaint. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 2/4/2025) (jca) Transmission to Civil Case Openings Clerk for processing. (Entered: 02/04/2025)

RECAP
9 Feb. 4, 2025

REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Fashion Institute of Technology, re: 1 Complaint. Document filed by Jane Doe..(Israelovitch, Lauren) (Entered: 02/04/2025)

RECAP
Feb. 4, 2025

Notice to Attorney Regarding Deficient Request for Issuance of Summons

Feb. 4, 2025

***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Lauren Israelovitch to RE-FILE Document No. 3 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the issuance of summons is not correct; the Court name was not selected on the PDF; the plaintiff/plaintiff's attorney information was omitted. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (jgo)

10 Feb. 5, 2025

ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Fashion Institute of Technology..(jgo) (Main Document 10 replaced on 2/11/2025) (jgo). (Entered: 02/05/2025)

RECAP
11 Feb. 21, 2025

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Christopher Cruz Sierra on behalf of Fashion Institute of Technology..(Cruz Sierra, Christopher) (Entered: 02/21/2025)

RECAP
12 Feb. 21, 2025

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Rebecca Kim Kimura on behalf of Fashion Institute of Technology..(Kimura, Rebecca) (Entered: 02/21/2025)

RECAP
13 Feb. 21, 2025

WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Fashion Institute of Technology waiver sent on 2/4/2025, answer due 4/7/2025. Document filed by Fashion Institute of Technology..(Kimura, Rebecca) (Entered: 02/21/2025)

RECAP
14 Feb. 21, 2025

LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to the Complaint addressed to Judge John P. Cronan from Rebecca K. Kimura dated February 21, 2025. Document filed by Fashion Institute of Technology..(Kimura, Rebecca) (Entered: 02/21/2025)

RECAP
15 Feb. 21, 2025

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT amending 1 Complaint against Fashion Institute of Technology with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Jane Doe. Related document: 1 Complaint. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit FIT Code of Conduct).(Siegel, Abra) (Entered: 02/21/2025)

Clearinghouse
16 Feb. 24, 2025

ORDER granting 14 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. The request is granted. Defendant's time to respond to the First Amended Complaint is extended to April 21, 2025. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 2/24/2025) (tro) (Entered: 02/24/2025)

RECAP
Feb. 24, 2025

Set/Reset Deadlines: Fashion Institute of Technology answer due 4/21/2025. (tro)

17 Feb. 28, 2025

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Complaint served on New York Attorney General on 2/13/25. Service was made by mail. Document filed by Jane Doe..(Siegel, Abra) (Entered: 02/28/2025)

RECAP
18 March 5, 2025

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Complaint served on NYC Human Rights Commission on 2/12/25. Service was made by email. Document filed by Jane Doe..(Siegel, Abra) (Entered: 03/05/2025)

RECAP
19 March 5, 2025

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Complaint served on NYC Corporation Counsel on 2/13/25. Service was made by email. Document filed by Jane Doe..(Siegel, Abra) (Entered: 03/05/2025)

RECAP
20 March 21, 2025

CONSENT MOTION for Protective Order to Proceed Under Pseudonym. Document filed by Jane Doe. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Proceed Under Pseudonym).(Siegel, Abra) (Entered: 03/21/2025)

RECAP
21 March 21, 2025

MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 20 CONSENT MOTION for Protective Order to Proceed Under Pseudonym. . Document filed by Jane Doe..(Siegel, Abra) (Entered: 03/21/2025)

RECAP
22 April 3, 2025

OPINION AND ORDER re: 20 CONSENT MOTION for Protective Order to Proceed Under Pseudonym. filed by Jane Doe., Accordingly, Plaintiff's renewed motion to appear anonymously is denied. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint with her true name within by April 18, 2025. If an amended complaint is not filed by that date, or if that deadline is not extended, the Court will dismiss the Complaint without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close Docket Number 20. SO ORDERED. (Amended Pleadings due by 4/18/2025.) (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 4/3/2025) (jca) (Entered: 04/03/2025)

RECAP
23 April 9, 2025

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of 2/4/25 court order, complaint and summons served on Fashion Institute of Technology on 2/12/25. Service was made by mail. Document filed by Jane Doe..(Siegel, Abra) (Entered: 04/09/2025)

RECAP
24 April 17, 2025

MOTION for Reconsideration re; 5 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion, 8 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief,,,, 21 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion, 23 Affidavit of Service Other, 22 Memorandum & Opinion,,, Set Deadlines,, 15 Amended Complaint . Document filed by Jane Doe. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Proceed Under Pseudonym).(Siegel, Abra) (Entered: 04/17/2025)

RECAP
25 April 17, 2025

MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 24 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 5 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion, 8 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief,,,, 21 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion, 23 Affidavit of Service Other, 22 Memorandum & Opinion,,, Set Deadline . Document filed by Jane Doe. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Certificate of Abra Siegel, # 2 Exhibit Defendant not opposed to motion to proceed under pseudonym).(Siegel, Abra) (Entered: 04/17/2025)

RECAP
26 April 21, 2025

ORDER In Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in support of her motion for reconsideration, Plaintiff states that "Defendant did not claim prejudice as it did not oppose Plaintiff's renewed motion to proceed under a pseudonym." Dkt. 25 at 5. Plaintiff attached to the Memorandum an email communication from Defendant informing Plaintiff that Defendant "will not oppose [her] renewed motion to proceed under a pseudonym." Dkt. 25-2. By April 28, 2025, Defendant shall submit a letter informing the Court whether, by not opposing Plaintiff's renewed motion, Defendant also intended to disclaim all prejudice that could result from Plaintiff proceeding under a pseudonym in this case. Defendant also should address its view as to whether it would suffer any prejudice-either at this initial stage of the litigation or potentially at a later stage-were Plaintiff to be permitted to proceed by pseudonym. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 4/21/2025) (jca) (Entered: 04/21/2025)

RECAP
27 April 21, 2025

LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Motion to Dismiss addressed to Judge John P. Cronan from Rebecca K. Kimura, Esq., on behalf of the Fashion Institute of Technology dated April 21, 2025. Document filed by Fashion Institute of Technology..(Cruz Sierra, Christopher) (Entered: 04/21/2025)

RECAP
28 April 24, 2025

LETTER RESPONSE to Motion addressed to Judge John P. Cronan from Abra Siegel dated 4/24/25 re: 27 LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Motion to Dismiss addressed to Judge John P. Cronan from Rebecca K. Kimura, Esq., on behalf of the Fashion Institute of Technology dated April 21, 2025. . Document filed by Jane Doe..(Siegel, Abra) (Entered: 04/24/2025)

RECAP
29 April 25, 2025

ORDER granting 27 Letter Motion for Leave to File Document. The request is granted. Defendant may file its motion by May 23, 2025. Any opposition shall be filed by June 20, 2025. And any reply shall be filed by July 7, 2025. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 4/25/2025) (jjc) (Entered: 04/25/2025)

RECAP
April 25, 2025

Set/Reset Deadlines: Motions due by 5/23/2025. Responses due by 6/20/2025 Replies due by 7/7/2025. (jjc)

30 April 28, 2025

RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: 24 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 5 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion, 8 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief,,,, 21 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion, 23 Affidavit of Service Other, 22 Memorandum & Opinion,,, Set Deadline . Document filed by Fashion Institute of Technology. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Affidavit of Corie McCallum).(Cruz Sierra, Christopher) (Entered: 04/28/2025)

1 Affidavit Affidavit of Corie McCallum

View on PACER

RECAP
31 April 30, 2025

REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 24 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 5 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion, 8 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief,,,, 21 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion, 23 Affidavit of Service Other, 22 Memorandum & Opinion,,, Set Deadline . Document filed by Jane Doe..(Siegel, Abra) (Entered: 04/30/2025)

RECAP
32 May 1, 2025

AFFIRMATION of Abra Siegel in Support re: 24 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 5 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion, 8 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief,,,, 21 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion, 23 Affidavit of Service Other, 22 Memorandum & Opinion,,, Set Deadline. Document filed by Jane Doe. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex A Email to Rebecca Kimura, # 2 Exhibit Ex B photo, # 3 Exhibit Ex C photo).(Siegel, Abra) (Entered: 05/01/2025)

RECAP
33 May 1, 2025

LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument addressed to Judge John P. Cronan from Abra Siegel dated 4/30/25. Document filed by Jane Doe..(Siegel, Abra) (Entered: 05/01/2025)

RECAP
34 May 23, 2025

FIRST MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint of Plaintiff, filed on February 21, 2025 (ECF Doc. No. 15). Document filed by Fashion Institute of Technology. Responses due by 6/20/2025.(Cruz Sierra, Christopher) (Entered: 05/23/2025)

RECAP
35 May 23, 2025

MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 34 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint of Plaintiff, filed on February 21, 2025 (ECF Doc. No. 15). . Document filed by Fashion Institute of Technology..(Cruz Sierra, Christopher) (Entered: 05/23/2025)

RECAP
36 May 23, 2025

AFFIDAVIT of Corie McCallum in Support re: 34 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint of Plaintiff, filed on February 21, 2025 (ECF Doc. No. 15).. Document filed by Fashion Institute of Technology. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Notice of Charge, # 2 Exhibit Decision Letter, # 3 Exhibit Appeal Decision Letter).(Cruz Sierra, Christopher) (Entered: 05/23/2025)

1 Exhibit Notice of Charge

View on PACER

2 Exhibit Decision Letter

View on PACER

3 Exhibit Appeal Decision Letter

View on PACER

RECAP
37 June 18, 2025

LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Sealed and Redacted Affidavit of Corie McCallum (ECF No. 36) addressed to Judge John P. Cronan from Attorney Rebecca K. Kimura dated June 18, 2025. Document filed by Fashion Institute of Technology. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Email Correspondence, # 2 Exhibit Proposed Redacted Affidavit and its Accompanying Exhibits).(Cruz Sierra, Christopher) (Entered: 06/18/2025)

RECAP
38 June 19, 2025

ORDER granting 37 Letter Motion for Leave to File Document. The request is granted. The Court finds that continued sealing of Docket Number 36 is warranted under Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 120 (2d Cir. 2006), at least until the Court decides the pending motion for reconsideration. Defendant may file a redacted version of the McCallum Affidavit. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 6/19/2025) (ar) (Entered: 06/20/2025)

RECAP
39 June 20, 2025

REDACTION to 36 Affidavit in Support of Motion, by Fashion Institute of Technology (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A- Notice of Charge, # 2 Exhibit B- Decision Letter, # 3 Exhibit C - Appeal Decision Letter).(Cruz Sierra, Christopher) (Entered: 06/20/2025)

RECAP
40 June 20, 2025

MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: 34 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint of Plaintiff, filed on February 21, 2025 (ECF Doc. No. 15). . Document filed by Jane Doe..(Siegel, Abra) (Entered: 06/20/2025)

RECAP
41 June 26, 2025

LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Motion to Amend First Amended Complaint addressed to Judge John P. Cronan from Abra Siegel dated 6/26/25. Document filed by Jane Doe..(Siegel, Abra) (Entered: 06/26/2025)

RECAP
42 July 1, 2025

LETTER RESPONSE to Motion addressed to Judge John P. Cronan from Christopher Cruz-Sierra on behalf of the Fashion Institute of Technology dated July 1, 2025 re: 41 LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Motion to Amend First Amended Complaint addressed to Judge John P. Cronan from Abra Siegel dated 6/26/25. . Document filed by Fashion Institute of Technology..(Cruz Sierra, Christopher) (Entered: 07/01/2025)

RECAP
43 July 2, 2025

ORDER granting 41 Letter Motion for Leave to File Document. The request is granted. Plaintiff may file her anticipated motion to amend by July 28, 2025. Any opposition shall be filed by August 18, 2025, and any reply shall be filed by August 28, 2025. Defendant's deadline to file a reply brief in support of its motion to dismiss is adjourned to seven days after the resolution of Plaintiff's motion. Should Plaintiff's motion be granted, the Court will grant Corie McCallum leave to move to dismiss any claims asserted against her in the amended complaint, and would be amenable to treating FIT's motion to dismiss as against the amended complaint with respect to Plaintiff's claims against FIT. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 07/02/2025) (gfc) (Entered: 07/02/2025)

RECAP
44 July 11, 2025

OPINION AND ORDER re: 24 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 5 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion, 8 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief 21 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion, 23 Affidavit of Service Other, 22 Memorandum & Opinion,,, Set Deadline filed by Jane Doe, 33 LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument addressed to Judge John P. Cronan from Abra Siegel dated 4/30/25. filed by Jane Doe., In all, Plaintiff has failed to identify "controlling decisions or data that the court overlooked." Shrader, 70 F.3d at 257. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is accordingly denied. Plaintiff's request for oral argument, Dkt. 33, is denied as moot. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint under her true name by July 18, 2025. If an amended complaint is not filed by that date, or if that deadline is not extended, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions pending at Docket Numbers 24 and 33. SO ORDERED. (Amended Pleadings due by 7/18/2025.) (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 7/11/2025) (jca) (Entered: 07/11/2025)

Clearinghouse
45 July 18, 2025

NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL from 44 Memorandum & Opinion,,,,, Set Deadlines,,,,. Document filed by Jane Doe. Filing fee $ 605.00, receipt number ANYSDC-31401906. Form C and Form D are due within 14 days to the Court of Appeals, Second Circuit..(Siegel, Abra) (Entered: 07/18/2025)

RECAP
July 18, 2025

Appeal Record Sent to USCA - Electronic File

July 18, 2025

Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to USCA

July 18, 2025

Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re: 45 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal,..(nd)

July 18, 2025

Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Appeal Electronic Files for 45 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal, filed by Jane Doe were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals..(nd)

46 July 24, 2025

LETTER MOTION to Stay re: 45 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal, addressed to Judge John P. Cronan from Abra Siegel dated 7/24/25. Document filed by Jane Doe..(Siegel, Abra) (Entered: 07/24/2025)

RECAP
47 July 28, 2025

LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge John P. Cronan from Rebecca Kimura dated July 28, 2025 re: 46 LETTER MOTION to Stay re: 45 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal, addressed to Judge John P. Cronan from Abra Siegel dated 7/24/25. . Document filed by Fashion Institute of Technology..(Kimura, Rebecca) (Entered: 07/28/2025)

RECAP
48 July 29, 2025

ORDER with respect to 46 Letter Motion to Stay. The request is granted. Plaintiff may file the anticipated motion by August 19, 2025. Any opposition shall be filed by September 15, 2025, and any reply shall be filed by September 22, 2025. Plaintiff's deadline to file an amended complaint is adjourned to seven days following the resolution of the anticipated motion for a stay. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 7/29/2025) (jca) (Entered: 07/29/2025)

RECAP
July 29, 2025

Set/Reset Deadlines: Motions due by 8/19/2025. Responses due by 9/15/2025 Replies due by 9/22/2025. (jca)

49 Aug. 19, 2025

MOTION to Stay re: 44 Memorandum & Opinion, Set Deadlines,,,,,,,, . Document filed by Jane Doe. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Certificate of Compliance with LR 7.1, # 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Stay, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet Notice of Motion).(Siegel, Abra) (Entered: 08/19/2025)

RECAP
50 Sept. 15, 2025

MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: 49 MOTION to Stay re: 44 Memorandum & Opinion, Set Deadlines,,,,,,,, . . Document filed by Fashion Institute of Technology..(Kimura, Rebecca) (Entered: 09/15/2025)

RECAP
51 Sept. 16, 2025

FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 50 Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion, 49 MOTION to Stay re: 44 Memorandum & Opinion, Set Deadlines,,,,,,,, ., 48 Order on Motion to Stay, addressed to Judge John P. Cronan from Abra Siegel dated 9/16/25. Document filed by Jane Doe..(Siegel, Abra) (Entered: 09/16/2025)

RECAP
52 Sept. 16, 2025

ORDER granting 51 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. The request is granted. Plaintiff's deadline to file a reply is extended until October 6, 2025. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close Dkt. 51. SO ORDERED. Replies due by 10/6/2025.. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 9/16/2025) (jca) (Entered: 09/16/2025)

RECAP
53 Oct. 6, 2025

REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 49 MOTION to Stay re: 44 Memorandum & Opinion, Set Deadlines,,,,,,,, . . Document filed by Jane Doe. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Certificate of Compliance with 7.1).(Siegel, Abra) (Entered: 10/06/2025)

RECAP
54 Oct. 6, 2025

LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument addressed to Judge John P. Cronan from Abra Siegel dated 10/6/25. Document filed by Jane Doe..(Siegel, Abra) (Entered: 10/06/2025)

RECAP
55 Nov. 6, 2025

OPINION AND ORDER re: 49 MOTION to Stay re: 44 Memorandum & Opinion, Set Deadlines, . filed by Jane Doe, 54 LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument addressed to Judge John P. Cronan from Abra Siegel dated 10/6/25. filed by Jane Doe. Because Plaintiff offers no reason to conclude that the Courts refusal to permit her to proceed anonymously is likely to be overturned, the Court need not consider the other stay factors identified above. See Uniformed Fire Officers Assn, 973 F.3d at 49. The motion for a stay pending interlocutory appeal therefore is denied. Plaintiffs request for oral argument, Dkt. 54, is denied as moot. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint under her true name within seven days of this Opinion and Order. If an amended complaint is not filed by that date, or if that deadline is not extended, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions pending at Docket Numbers 49 and 54. (And as further set forth herein.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 11/6/2025) (jca) (Entered: 11/06/2025)

RECAP
56 Nov. 7, 2025

FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time To File Amended Complaint Under True Name addressed to Judge John P. Cronan from Abra Siegel dated 11/7/25. Document filed by Jane Doe..(Siegel, Abra) (Entered: 11/07/2025)

RECAP
57 Nov. 10, 2025

ORDER granting 56 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. The request is granted. Plaintiff's deadline to file an Amended Complaint is extended until December 8, 2025. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close Dkt. 56. Amended Pleadings due by 12/8/2025. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 11/10/2025) (rro) (Entered: 11/10/2025)

RECAP
58 Dec. 5, 2025

ORDER of USCA (Certified Copy) as to 45 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal, filed by Jane Doe USCA Case Number 25-1761. Appellant moves to stay the district courts order directing her to file an amended complaint using her true name. Appellee opposes the motion. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, to the extent that Appellant requests a temporary stay pending review by a three-Judge panel, the motion is GRANTED. The motion is REFERRED to a three-Judge panel on an expedited basis. Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk USCA for the Second Circuit. Certified: 12/5/2025.(km) (Entered: 12/05/2025)

RECAP
59 March 4, 2026

ORDER of USCA (Certified Copy) as to 45 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal, filed by Jane Doe USCA Case Number 25-1761. Appellant moves for a stay, pending appeal, of the district court's orders denying her motion to proceed anonymously and requiring the filing of an amended complaint using her true name. Upon due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 43435 (2009). Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk USCA for the Second Circuit. Certified: 3/3/2026. (tp) (Entered: 03/04/2026)

RECAP
60 June 1, 2026

MOTION for Christopher Cruz-Sierra to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Fashion Institute of Technology..(Kimura, Rebecca) (Entered: 06/01/2026)

RECAP
61 June 10, 2026

ORDER of USCA (Certified Copy) as to 45 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal, filed by Jane Doe USCA Case Number 25-1761-cv. The parties have entered a stipulation to withdraw the above-captioned appeal without prejudice and without costs or attorneys' fees pursuant to Local Rule 42.1. The stipulation also provides that Plaintiff-Appellant may reinstate the appeal by filing a written notice with the Clerk of Court and serving such notice upon Defendant-Appellee by July 15, 2026. The stipulation is hereby SO ORDERED and the appeal is DISMISSED. Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk USCA for the Second Circuit. Certified: 6/9/2026. (tp) (Entered: 06/10/2026)

RECAP
62 June 25, 2026

MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting 60 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. Attorney Christopher Cruz Sierra terminated. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 6/25/2026) (jca) (Entered: 06/25/2026)

RECAP
63 July 16, 2026

ORDER of USCA (Certified Copy) as to 45 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal, filed by Jane Doe. USCA Case Number 25-1761. This appeal was withdrawn subject to reinstatement upon terms agreed to by the parties. Counsel for the appellant has submitted a timely notice of reinstatement. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is reinstated. Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk USCA for the Second Circuit. Certified: 7/15/2026..(nd) (Entered: 07/16/2026)

RECAP
64 July 19, 2026

ORDER: By July 24, 2026, the parties must submit a joint letter on the status of the pending appeal, settlement discussions, and whether they request a referral to the Honorable Jennifer Willis for a settlement conference. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 7/19/2026) (rro) (Entered: 07/20/2026)

RECAP
65 July 24, 2026

JOINT LETTER addressed to Judge John P. Cronan from Abra Siegel & Rebecca Kimura dated 7/24/26 re: Status. Document filed by Jane Doe..(Siegel, Abra) (Entered: 07/24/2026)

RECAP
66 July 24, 2026

MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 65 Letter filed by Jane Doe. ENDORSEMENT: The Court thanks the parties for their update. The parties should submit a further status letter by August 18, 2026, if a stipulation of dismissal is not filed by that date. Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 7/24/2026) (rro) (Entered: 07/27/2026)

RECAP
67 Aug. 4, 2026

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Fashion Institute of Technology. Document filed by Jane Doe. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Siegel, Abra) (Entered: 08/04/2026)

RECAP
68 Aug. 5, 2026

MANDATE of USCA (Certified Copy) as to 45 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal, filed by Jane Doe USCA Case Number 25-1761.The parties in the above-referenced case have filed a stipulation withdrawing this appealpursuant to FRAP 42.The stipulation is hereby "So Ordered". Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk USCA for the Second Circuit. Issued As Mandate: 8/5/2026.(km) (Entered: 08/05/2026)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

New York

Case Type(s):

Education

Speech and Religious Freedom

Special Collection(s):

Title VI Anti-Palestinian/Antisemitism cases

Key Dates

Filing Date: Jan. 31, 2025

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

A Jewish student at the Fashion Institute of Technology (FIT).

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

State

Fashion Institute of Technology

Defendant Type(s):

College/University

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

State law

Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.

Other Dockets:

Southern District of New York 1:25-cv-00950

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 25-01761

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Relief Sought:

Attorneys fees

Damages

Injunction

Relief Granted:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

General/Misc.:

Disciplinary procedures

Education

Retaliation

School/University policies

Discrimination Area:

Discipline

Disparate Treatment

Discrimination Basis:

Religion discrimination

Affected Religion(s):

Judaism

Recommended Citation