Case: National Treasury Employees Union v. Office of Personnel Management

1:25-cv-03948 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: Nov. 14, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case was filed to determine which federal employees would have their status changed from career civil service to political appointee, making it easier for the Administration to fire them, after President Trump issued Executive Order 14003. This EO is President Trump's effort to implement his "Schedule F" plan for the civil service that he previously tried to accomplish in his first administration by issuing EO 13857, which was rendered moot when President Biden withdrew it. On November 14,…

This case was filed to determine which federal employees would have their status changed from career civil service to political appointee, making it easier for the Administration to fire them, after President Trump issued Executive Order 14003. This EO is President Trump's effort to implement his "Schedule F" plan for the civil service that he previously tried to accomplish in his first administration by issuing EO 13857, which was rendered moot when President Biden withdrew it.

On November 14, 2025, the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) - a union representing about 160,000 federal employees - filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the United States Office of Personnel Management (OPM). Filing under FOIA, Plaintiffs sought the release of records responsive to an August 2025 FOIA request filed to evaluate petitions that certain federal agencies have submitted to OPM as required by Executive Order 13957. These petitions contain the federal agency's plans for which employees would be changed from career civil service to political appointees. NTEU filed suit under FOIA because OPM failed to respond to NTEU's FOIA request within the 20 working day deadline.

This case was assigned to U.S. District Judge John D. Bates.

This case is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Nick Martire (11/30/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71913415/parties/national-treasury-employees-union-v-office-of-personnel-management/


Attorney for Plaintiff

Giles, Allison Conrey (District of Columbia)

Shah, Paras N. (District of Columbia)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

1:25-cv-03948

Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

Nov. 14, 2025

Nov. 14, 2025

Complaint

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71913415/national-treasury-employees-union-v-office-of-personnel-management/

Last updated Aug. 30, 2026, 3:36 a.m.

Docket for: NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Nov. 14, 2025

COMPLAINT against OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-12079788) filed by NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons, # 3 Summons, # 4 Summons)(Giles, Allison) (Entered: 11/14/2025)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

2 Summons

View on PACER

3 Summons

View on PACER

4 Summons

View on PACER

Clearinghouse
2 Nov. 14, 2025

NOTICE of Appearance by Allison Conrey Giles on behalf of NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION (Giles, Allison) (Entered: 11/14/2025)

RECAP
3 Nov. 14, 2025

NOTICE of Appearance by Paras N. Shah on behalf of NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION (Shah, Paras) (Entered: 11/14/2025)

RECAP
4 Nov. 14, 2025

LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION (Giles, Allison) (Entered: 11/14/2025)

RECAP
5 Nov. 17, 2025

SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: # 1 Notice and Consent)(znmw) (Entered: 11/17/2025)

1 Notice and Consent

View on RECAP

RECAP
Nov. 17, 2025

Case Assigned to Judge John D. Bates. (znmw)

Nov. 17, 2025

Case Assigned/Reassigned

6 Nov. 19, 2025

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 11/17/2025. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 12/17/2025. (Giles, Allison) (Entered: 11/19/2025)

RECAP
7 Dec. 1, 2025

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 11/26/2025. (Giles, Allison) (Entered: 12/01/2025)

RECAP
8 Dec. 1, 2025

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT served on 11/25/2025 (Giles, Allison) (Entered: 12/01/2025)

RECAP
9 Dec. 15, 2025

NOTICE of Appearance by James D. Todd, Jr on behalf of All Defendants (Todd, James) (Entered: 12/15/2025)

RECAP
10 Dec. 15, 2025

ANSWER to Complaint by OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT.(Todd, James) (Entered: 12/15/2025)

RECAP
11 Dec. 17, 2025

SCHEDULING ORDER. See Order for details. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 12/17/2025. (lcjdb2) (Entered: 12/17/2025)

RECAP
12 Dec. 22, 2025

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Proposed Schedule for Production and/or Briefing by OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Todd, James) (Entered: 12/22/2025)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on RECAP

RECAP
Dec. 22, 2025

MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of 12 the unopposed motion for extension, and the entire record herein, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the parties shall submit a proposed schedule for the processing and release of responsive records and/or a briefing schedule for the filing of dispositive motions to resolve this matter by not later than January 16, 2026. SO ORDERED.

13 Jan. 15, 2026

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Proposed Schedule for Production and/or Briefing by OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Todd, James) (Entered: 01/15/2026)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

RECAP
Jan. 16, 2026

MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of 13 the unopposed motion for extension of time, and the entire record herein, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the parties shall submit a proposed schedule for the processing and release of responsive records and/or a briefing schedule for the filing of dispositive motions to resolve this matter by not later than January 23, 2026. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 1/16/2026. (lcjdb2)

Jan. 16, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to AND Set/Reset Deadlines

14 Jan. 23, 2026

PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE re Order on Motion for Extension of Time to,, Set/Reset Deadlines, Order on Motion for Extension of Time to,, Set/Reset Deadlines, 11 Order Setting Schedule for Processing of Plaintiff's FOIA request by OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Todd, James) (Entered: 01/23/2026)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on RECAP

RECAP
15 Jan. 23, 2026

SCHEDULING ORDER: Upon consideration of 14 the joint proposed schedule, and the entire record herein, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant complete processing of relevant records no later than February 27, 2026. See text of Order for details. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 1/23/2026. (lcjdb2) (Entered: 01/23/2026)

RECAP
16 March 27, 2026

Joint MOTION for Briefing Schedule by NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION. (Giles, Allison) (Entered: 03/27/2026)

RECAP
17 March 27, 2026

ORDER granting 16 Motion for Briefing Schedule. See text for details. Plaintiff shall file its Amended Complaint by 4/1/2026; Defendant shall file its Motion for Summary Judgment by 4/29/2026; Plaintiff shall file its Response to Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross-motion for Summary Judgment by 5/27/2026; Defendant shall file its Reply in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment and Response to Plaintiffs' Cross-Motion by 7/2/2026; Plaintiff shall file its Reply in support of its Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment by 7/22/2026. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 3/27/2026. (lcjdb2). (Entered: 03/27/2026)

RECAP
18 April 1, 2026

AMENDED COMPLAINT against OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT filed by NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION.(Giles, Allison) (Entered: 04/01/2026)

RECAP
19 April 13, 2026

ANSWER to 18 Amended Complaint by OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT.(Todd, James) (Entered: 04/13/2026)

RECAP
20 April 27, 2026

MOTION for Extension of Time to Order Setting Briefing Schedule by OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Todd, James) (Entered: 04/27/2026)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

RECAP
April 27, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to AND Set/Reset Deadlines

April 27, 2026

MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of 20 the motion for an extension of time, and the entire record herein, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant will complete its search and file its motion for summary judgment by May 13, 2026; Plaintiff will file its response to Defendants motion for summary judgment and cross-motion for summary judgment by June 10, 2026; Defendant will file its response to Plaintiffs motion and reply in support of its motion by July 16, 2026; and Plaintiff will file its reply in support of its motion by August 5, 2026. SO ORDERED.

21 May 13, 2026

MOTION for Summary Judgment by OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Facts, # 2 Exhibit 1: Declaration of Tonya Carrington, # 3 Exhibit A: OPM Vaughn Index, # 4 Exhibit 2: Email from Pl.'s Counsel to Def.'s Counsel re: Exemption 6, # 5 Text of Proposed Order)(Todd, James) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

1 Statement of Facts

View on PACER

2 Exhibit 1: Declaration of Tonya Carrington

View on RECAP

3 Exhibit A: OPM Vaughn Index

View on PACER

4 Exhibit 2: Email from Pl.'s Counsel to Def.'s Counsel re: Exemption 6

View on PACER

5 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

RECAP
May 18, 2026

NOTICE OF ERROR regarding 21 MOTION for Summary Judgment . The following error(s) need correction: Invalid attorney signature- signature on document must match PACER login. Please file an Errata. (zjm)

May 18, 2026

Notice of Error

22 May 19, 2026

ERRATA correcting attorney signature by OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT re 21 Motion for Summary Judgment,. (Todd, James) (Entered: 05/19/2026)

RECAP
23 June 3, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Thaxton Blaise Springfield on behalf of NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION (Springfield, Thaxton) (Entered: 06/03/2026)

RECAP
24 June 10, 2026

Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment filed by NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Statement of Facts, # 3 Plaintiff's Statement of Facts, # 4 Text of Proposed Order)(Springfield, Thaxton) (Entered: 06/10/2026)

1 Memorandum in Support

View on RECAP

2 Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Statement of Facts

View on PACER

3 Plaintiff's Statement of Facts

View on PACER

4 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

RECAP
25 June 10, 2026

Memorandum in opposition to re 21 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Cross Motion for Summary Judgment filed by NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Statement of Facts, # 3 Plaintiff's Statement of Facts, # 4 Text of Proposed Order)(Springfield, Thaxton) (Entered: 06/10/2026)

1 Memorandum in Support

View on RECAP

2 Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Statement of Facts

View on PACER

3 Plaintiff's Statement of Facts

View on PACER

4 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

RECAP
28 Aug. 5, 2026

REPLY to opposition to motion re 24 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION. (Springfield, Thaxton) (Entered: 08/05/2026)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

District of Columbia

Case Type(s):

Presidential/Gubernatorial Authority

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government

Key Dates

Filing Date: Nov. 14, 2025

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Plaintiffs are the National Treasury Employees Union, which represents about 160,000 federal employees.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Non-profit NON-religious organization

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Federal

Office of Personnel Management

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

FOIA (Freedom of Information Act), 5 U.S.C. § 552

Other Dockets:

District of District of Columbia 1:25-cv-03948

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Relief Sought:

Attorneys fees

Declaratory judgment

Document/Information

Relief Granted:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

General/Misc.:

Records Disclosure

Recommended Citation