Case: Newsguard Technologies v. Federal Trade Commission

1:26-cv-00353 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: Feb. 6, 2026

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

NewsGuard Technologies, Inc., a nonpartisan media organization that rates the reliability of online news sources, filed a lawsuit against the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Chairman Andrew Ferguson on February 6, 2026, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. NewsGuard alleged that it provides nonpartisan ratings of news websites based on disclosed journalistic criteria to help internet users make informed decisions about news reliability. The complaint centered on …

NewsGuard Technologies, Inc., a nonpartisan media organization that rates the reliability of online news sources, filed a lawsuit against the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Chairman Andrew Ferguson on February 6, 2026, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. NewsGuard alleged that it provides nonpartisan ratings of news websites based on disclosed journalistic criteria to help internet users make informed decisions about news reliability. The complaint centered on NewsGuard's assertion that Chairman Ferguson disagrees with its ratings, viewing them as biased against conservative publications, and has weaponized the FTC's regulatory powers to retaliate against the organization. The alleged retaliation took two primary forms: Ferguson issued a sweeping Civil Investigative Demand (CID) requiring NewsGuard to produce virtually all documents since its 2018 founding, and he imposed a condition in the Omnicom-IPG merger approval that prohibits the merged company from using NewsGuard's services.

NewsGuard claimed these actions constituted unconstitutional retaliation for its First Amendment-protected journalistic activities. The complaint raised three causes of action: First Amendment violation for unconstitutional retaliation based on perceived viewpoints, First and Fourth Amendment violations for unjustified and overly burdensome CIDs, and First Amendment violation for unlawful targeting of NewsGuard's activities via intermediaries. NewsGuard sought declaratory relief, preliminary and permanent injunctive relief to stop enforcement of the CID and merger condition, attorneys' fees and costs, and demanded a jury trial. The case was assigned Judge Dabney L. Friedrich.

On February 11, 2026, plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction.

On March 6, 2026, defendants sent notice to the court that they had issued a ruling denying plaintiff’s petition to quash the CID. 

This case is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Jinan Abufarha (2/7/2026)

Maddy Ligon (4/1/2026)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72241686/parties/newsguard-technologies-v-federal-trade-commission/


Judge(s)

Friedrich, Dabney Langhorne (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Corn-Revere, Robert (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Defendant

Beck, Ethan D. (District of Columbia)

Byron, H. Thomas (District of Columbia)

Potapov, Alex (District of Columbia)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

1:26-cv-00353

Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

News guard Technologies, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

Feb. 6, 2026

Feb. 6, 2026

Complaint

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72241686/newsguard-technologies-v-federal-trade-commission/

Last updated July 28, 2026, 4:21 p.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Feb. 6, 2026

COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-12228952) filed by NewsGuard. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons, # 3 Summons, # 4 Summons, # 5 Summons)(Corn-Revere, Robert) (Attachment 1 replaced on 2/6/2026) (zhcn). (Entered: 02/06/2026)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

2 Summons

View on PACER

3 Summons

View on PACER

4 Summons

View on PACER

5 Summons

View on PACER

Clearinghouse
2 Feb. 6, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Corn-Revere on behalf of NewsGuard (Corn-Revere, Robert) (Entered: 02/06/2026)

RECAP
3 Feb. 6, 2026

LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by NewsGuard (Corn-Revere, Robert) (Entered: 02/06/2026)

RECAP
4 Feb. 6, 2026

SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, ANDREW FERGUSON, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: # 1 Notice and Consent)(zhcn) (Entered: 02/06/2026)

RECAP
5 Feb. 6, 2026

LARGE ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENT(S) by NEWSGUARD TECHNOLOGIES 1 Complaint, filed by NEWSGUARD TECHNOLOGIES. (Corn-Revere, Robert) (Entered: 02/06/2026)

RECAP
6 Feb. 6, 2026

STANDARD ORDER for Civil Cases. See text for details. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on February 6, 2026. (lcdlf1) (Entered: 02/06/2026)

RECAP
Feb. 6, 2026

Case Assigned/Reassigned

Feb. 6, 2026

.Order AND ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines

Feb. 6, 2026

Case Assigned to Judge Dabney L. Friedrich. (zhcn)

Feb. 6, 2026

MINUTE ORDER. The plaintiff's 1 Complaint requests that the Court (1) "[p]reliminarily enjoin the FTC, Chairman Ferguson, his officers, agents, servants, and employees from initiating any action to enforce the CID in violation of Plaintiff's constitutional rights"; and (2) "[p]reliminarily enjoin the FTC, Chairman Ferguson, his officers, agents, servants, and employees from initiating any action to enforce the Omnicom-IPG merger condition in violation of Plaintiff's constitutional rights." Compl. 50, Dkt. 1. The Court directs the plaintiff to Local Rule 65.1, which provides that "[a]n application for a preliminary injunction shall be made in a document separate from the complaint." LCvR 65.1(c).Accordingly, it is ORDERED that, to the extent the plaintiff seeks preliminary relief, the plaintiff shall file a motion for such relief on or before February 11, 2026. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on February 6, 2026. (lcdlf1)

7 Feb. 11, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Ethan D. Beck on behalf of All Defendants (Beck, Ethan) (Entered: 02/11/2026)

RECAP
8 Feb. 11, 2026

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, ANDREW FERGUSON. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Beck, Ethan) (Entered: 02/11/2026)

RECAP
9 Feb. 11, 2026

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION served on 2/10/2026 (Corn-Revere, Robert) (Entered: 02/11/2026)

RECAP
10 Feb. 11, 2026

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ANDREW FERGUSON served on 2/10/2026 (Corn-Revere, Robert) (Entered: 02/11/2026)

RECAP
11 Feb. 11, 2026

MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by NEWSGUARD TECHNOLOGIES. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, # 2 Declaration Declaration of Matthew Skibinski in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, # 3 Exhibit Wall Street Journal Nutrition Label from NewsGuard, # 4 Exhibit Newsmax Nutrition Label from NewsGuard, # 5 Exhibit Will Oremus & Naomi Nix article for The Washington Post - This Company Rates News Sites Credibility. The Right Wants It Stopped., # 6 Exhibit Ted Johnson article for Deadline - Attacking the Watchdog: How Media Rating Site NewsGuard Ended Up as a Target for GOP Lawmakers and Regulators, # 7 Exhibit Andrew Ferguson X Post #1, # 8 Exhibit Andrew Ferguson X Post #2, # 9 Exhibit Andrew Ferguson Appearance on "Bannons WarRoom," Show Clip, # 10 Exhibit Letter from FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr, # 11 Exhibit Concurring Statement from FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson re: FTC v. 1661, Inc. d/b/a GOAT, # 12 Exhibit FTC Commissioner Andrew Ferguson Overview for FTC Chairman, # 13 Exhibit NewsGuard Statement in Response to FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr Letter, # 14 Exhibit FTC Request for Public Comment Regarding Technology Platform Censorship, # 15 Exhibit Transcript of Andrew Ferguson Appearance on ProMarket Podcast, # 16 Exhibit Brendan Carr X Post, # 17 Exhibit FTC Civil Investigative Demand Against NewsGuard, # 18 Exhibit NewsGuard Civil Investigative Demand Modification Letter from FTC, # 19 Exhibit FTC Announcement of Proposed Consent Order and that the FTC "Prevents Anticompetitive Coordination in Global Advertising Merger", # 20 Exhibit Statement from FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson "In the Matter of Omnicom Group / The Interpublic Group of Cos.", # 21 Exhibit Newsmax Article Criticizing NewsGuard "Bias" and Omnicom/IPG Merger, # 22 Exhibit Newsmax Public Comment re: "Omnicom Group Inc. and The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.", # 23 Exhibit Newsmax Article Critiquing Omnicom/IPG Merger, # 24 Exhibit Newsmax X Post Opposing FTC Approval of Omnicom/IPG Merger, # 25 Exhibit FTC Final Consent Order for Omnicom/IPG Merger, # 26 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting PI - NewsGuard v. FTC)(Corn-Revere, Robert) (Entered: 02/11/2026)

1 Memorandum in Support Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Preli

View on PACER

2 Declaration Declaration of Matthew Skibinski in Support of Plaintiff's Moti

View on PACER

3 Exhibit Wall Street Journal Nutrition Label from NewsGuard

View on PACER

4 Exhibit Newsmax Nutrition Label from NewsGuard

View on PACER

5 Exhibit Will Oremus & Naomi Nix article for The Washington Post - This Company R

View on PACER

6 Exhibit Ted Johnson article for Deadline - Attacking the Watchdog: How Media Rat

View on PACER

7 Exhibit Andrew Ferguson X Post #1

View on PACER

8 Exhibit Andrew Ferguson X Post #2

View on PACER

9 Exhibit Andrew Ferguson Appearance on "Bannons WarRoom," Show Clip

View on PACER

10 Exhibit Letter from FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr

View on PACER

11 Exhibit Concurring Statement from FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson re: FTC v. 1661,

View on PACER

12 Exhibit FTC Commissioner Andrew Ferguson Overview for FTC Chairman

View on PACER

13 Exhibit NewsGuard Statement in Response to FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr Letter

View on PACER

14 Exhibit FTC Request for Public Comment Regarding Technology Platform Censorship

View on PACER

15 Exhibit Transcript of Andrew Ferguson Appearance on ProMarket Podcast

View on PACER

16 Exhibit Brendan Carr X Post

View on PACER

17 Exhibit FTC Civil Investigative Demand Against NewsGuard

View on RECAP

18 Exhibit NewsGuard Civil Investigative Demand Modification Letter from FTC

View on PACER

19 Exhibit FTC Announcement of Proposed Consent Order and that the FTC "Preven

View on PACER

20 Exhibit Statement from FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson "In the Matter of Omnic

View on PACER

21 Exhibit Newsmax Article Criticizing NewsGuard "Bias" and Omnicom/IPG M

View on PACER

22 Exhibit Newsmax Public Comment re: "Omnicom Group Inc. and The Interpublic

View on PACER

23 Exhibit Newsmax Article Critiquing Omnicom/IPG Merger

View on PACER

24 Exhibit Newsmax X Post Opposing FTC Approval of Omnicom/IPG Merger

View on PACER

25 Exhibit FTC Final Consent Order for Omnicom/IPG Merger

View on PACER

26 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting PI - NewsGuard v. FTC

View on PACER

RECAP
12 Feb. 12, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by H. Thomas Byron, III on behalf of All Defendants (Byron, H.) (Entered: 02/12/2026)

RECAP
13 Feb. 12, 2026

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 2/12/2026. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 4/13/2026. (Corn-Revere, Robert) (Entered: 02/12/2026)

RECAP
Feb. 12, 2026

Notice of Hearing

Feb. 12, 2026

NOTICE of Hearing: The parties are to appear for a Telephonic Scheduling Conference at 12:00 PM on February 13, 2026 before Judge Dabney L. Friedrich, to discuss the briefing schedule for the plaintiff's 11 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (smc)

14 Feb. 13, 2026

RESPONSE re 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by NEWSGUARD TECHNOLOGIES. (Corn-Revere, Robert) (Entered: 02/13/2026)

RECAP
15 Feb. 13, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Alex Potapov on behalf of FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, ANDREW FERGUSON (Potapov, Alex) (Entered: 02/13/2026)

RECAP
16 Feb. 13, 2026

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Samuel Rudovsky, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-12243959. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by NEWSGUARD TECHNOLOGIES. (Corn-Revere, Robert) (Entered: 02/13/2026)

RECAP
17 Feb. 13, 2026

ERRATA by NEWSGUARD TECHNOLOGIES re 16 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Corn-Revere, Robert) (Entered: 02/13/2026)

RECAP
Feb. 13, 2026

Scheduling Conference AND ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings

Feb. 13, 2026

.Order AND ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines

Feb. 13, 2026

Notice of Error

Feb. 13, 2026

Minute Entry for Telephonic Scheduling Conference held on 2/13/2026 before Judge Dabney L. Friedrich: Joint Status Report due by 5pm on 2/16/2026. Defendant's Opposition due by Noon on 2/23/2026. Plaintiff's Reply due by Noon on 2/27/2026. Motion Hearing set for 3/4/2026 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 24A (In Person) before Judge Dabney L. Friedrich. Court Reporter: Sara Wick. (smc)

Feb. 13, 2026

MINUTE ORDER. In accordance with today's telephonic scheduling conference, a hearing on the plaintiff's 11 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is scheduled for 2 p.m. on March 4, 2026, in Courtroom 24A. It is further ORDERED that the following schedule shall govern further proceedings: the defendants shall file an opposition to the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction at or before 12 p.m. on February 23, 2026; and the plaintiff shall file any reply at or before 12 p.m. on February 27, 2026. Finally, it is ORDERED that, at or before 5 p.m. on February 16, 2026, the parties shall file a joint status report indicating whether the parties consent to and propose an alternative briefing and hearing schedule. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on February 13, 2026. (lcdlf1)

Feb. 13, 2026

NOTICE OF ERROR regarding 16 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Samuel Rudovsky, 17 Errata. The following error(s) need correction: No Motion included. Motion compliant with LCvR 83.2 and signed by the sponsoring attorney is required. Also, Pro Hac Vice motion must be accompanied by a Certificate of Good Standing issued within the last 30 days (LCvR 83.2(c)(2)). Please file file both documents as an Errata. (znmw)

18 Feb. 15, 2026

Joint STATUS REPORT by NEWSGUARD TECHNOLOGIES. (Corn-Revere, Robert) (Entered: 02/15/2026)

RECAP
19 Feb. 20, 2026

ERRATA by NEWSGUARD TECHNOLOGIES re 16 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Attachments: # 1 Errata Revised Declaration of Samuel Rudovsky for PHV Admission, # 2 Errata Updated Certificate of Good Standing for Samuel Rudovsky)(Corn-Revere, Robert) (Entered: 02/20/2026)

1 Errata Revised Declaration of Samuel Rudovsky for PHV Admission

View on PACER

2 Errata Updated Certificate of Good Standing for Samuel Rudovsky

View on PACER

RECAP
20 Feb. 23, 2026

Memorandum in opposition to re 11 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, ANDREW FERGUSON. (Beck, Ethan) (Entered: 02/23/2026)

RECAP
21 Feb. 27, 2026

REPLY to opposition to motion re 11 Motion for Preliminary Injunction,,,,,,,,, filed by NEWSGUARD TECHNOLOGIES. (Corn-Revere, Robert) (Entered: 02/27/2026)

RECAP
22 Feb. 27, 2026

Second MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Samuel Rudovsky, Fee Status: No Fee Paid. by NEWSGUARD TECHNOLOGIES. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Samuel Rudovsky, # 2 Certificate of Good Standing)(Corn-Revere, Robert) (Entered: 02/27/2026)

RECAP
Feb. 27, 2026

Order on Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice

Feb. 27, 2026

MINUTE ORDER denying the plaintiff's 16 19 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Although the declaration of the non-member attorney lists a business address located in the District of Columbia, the declarant has not completed questions 8 and 9 of the declaration. See LCvR 83.2(c)(2) (stating that, if the declarant "engages in the practice of law from any office located in the District of Columbia," the declaration must set forth whether the attorney "is a member of the District of Columbia Bar or has an application for membership pending"). The plaintiff may file a new motion accompanied by a revised declaration and the required certificate of good standing. The plaintiff need not re-pay the $100 fee. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on February 27, 2026. (lcdlf1)

23 March 3, 2026

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- James C. Grant, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-12277463. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by NEWSGUARD TECHNOLOGIES. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of James C. Grant, # 2 Supplement Certificate of Good Standing)(Corn-Revere, Robert) (Attachment 1 replaced on 3/4/2026) (znmw). (Entered: 03/03/2026)

RECAP
March 3, 2026

Order on Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice

March 3, 2026

MINUTE ORDER granting the plaintiff's 22 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a). Click for instructions. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on March 3, 2026. (lcdlf1)

24 March 4, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Samuel Rudovsky on behalf of NEWSGUARD TECHNOLOGIES (Rudovsky, Samuel) (Main Document 24 replaced on 3/5/2026) (znmw). (Entered: 03/04/2026)

RECAP
25 March 4, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Robert E. Zuver, Jr on behalf of All Defendants (Zuver, Robert) (Main Document 25 replaced on 3/5/2026) (znmw). (Entered: 03/04/2026)

RECAP
March 4, 2026

.Order

March 4, 2026

MINUTE ORDER: The court will provide access for the public to telephonically attend the hearing scheduled for today, March 4, 2026, at 2:00 PM. The hearing can be accessed by dialing the Toll-Free Number: 833-990-9400 (Meeting ID: 117076001). It is hereby ORDERED that the attendees using the public access telephone line shall adhere to the following: persons remotely accessing court proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting any court proceedings (including those held by telephone or videoconference). Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court-issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the presiding Judge. The public is advised that in the event of technical issues, the public line will be terminated and will not be restored. Given that Court will be actively in session, listeners should not contact chambers should that occur. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on March 4, 2026 (smc)

March 4, 2026

Order on Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice

March 4, 2026

Motion Hearing

March 4, 2026

MINUTE ORDER granting the plaintiff's 23 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a). Click for instructions. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on March 4, 2026. (lcdlf1)

March 4, 2026

Minute Entry for Motion Hearing held on 3/4/2026 before Judge Dabney L. Friedrich: re 11 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Oral arguments heard and TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. Court Reporter: Sara Wick. (smc)

26 March 6, 2026

NOTICE of the Commission's Order regarding the Petition to Quash by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, ANDREW FERGUSON (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Commission Order, # 2 Exhibit B - Petition to Quash)(Beck, Ethan) (Entered: 03/06/2026)

1 Exhibit A - Commission Order

View on PACER

2 Exhibit B - Petition to Quash

View on PACER

RECAP
27 March 25, 2026

TRANSCRIPT OF MOTION HEARING before Judge Dabney L. Friedrich held on 3/4/2026. Page Numbers: 1-64. Date of Issuance: 3/25/2026. Court Reporter: Sara Wick, telephone number 202-354-3284. Transcripts may be ordered by submitting the Transcript Order FormFor the first 90 days after this filing date, the transcript may be viewed at the courthouse at a public terminal or purchased from the court reporter referenced above. After 90 days, the transcript may be accessed via PACER. Other transcript formats, (multi-page, condensed, CD or ASCII) may be purchased from the court reporter.NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: The parties have twenty-one days to file with the court and the court reporter any request to redact personal identifiers from this transcript. If no such requests are filed, the transcript will be made available to the public via PACER without redaction after 90 days. The policy, which includes the five personal identifiers specifically covered, is located on our website at www.dcd.uscourts.gov. Redaction Request due 4/15/2026. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/25/2026. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/23/2026.(Wick, Sara) (Entered: 03/25/2026)

RECAP
28 March 25, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Alan William Bakowski on behalf of All Defendants (Bakowski, Alan) (Entered: 03/25/2026)

RECAP
29 March 25, 2026

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, ANDREW FERGUSON. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bakowski, Alan) (Entered: 03/25/2026)

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

RECAP
March 26, 2026

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice the defendants' 29 Motion to Extend Deadline to Answer or Move to Dismiss. The defendants may renew their motion after the Court rules on the plaintiff's 11 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on March 26, 2026. (lcdlf1)

March 26, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer

30 March 31, 2026

NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY by NEWSGUARD TECHNOLOGIES (Attachments: # 1 X Corp. v. World Federation of Advertisers et al.)(Corn-Revere, Robert) (Entered: 03/31/2026)

RECAP
31 April 1, 2026

RESPONSE re 30 NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY filed by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, ANDREW FERGUSON. (Beck, Ethan) (Entered: 04/01/2026)

RECAP
32 April 7, 2026

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or motion to dismiss until further order, Unopposed MOTION Suspend deadline until further order by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, ANDREW FERGUSON. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed order)(Byron, H.) (Entered: 04/07/2026)

1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed order

View on PACER

RECAP
April 8, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer AND Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief

April 8, 2026

MINUTE ORDER granting the defendants' 32 Unopposed Motion to Suspend Deadline. It is ORDERED that the defendants' deadline to respond to the plaintiff's 1 Complaint is suspended until further order of this Court. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on April 8, 2026. (lcdlf1)

April 15, 2026

Notice of Hearing

April 15, 2026

NOTICE of Hearing: Telephonic Oral Ruling set for 4/22/2026 at 2:00 PM before Judge Dabney L. Friedrich. (smc)

33 April 17, 2026

NOTICE of Withdrawal of Civil Investigative Demand and Notice of Related Litigation by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, ANDREW FERGUSON (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - FTC v. Dentsu Complaint, # 2 Exhibit 2 - Dentsu Stipulated Order, # 3 Exhibit 3 - WPP Stipulated Order, # 4 Exhibit 4 - Publicis Stipulated Order, # 5 Exhibit 5 - Letter Withdrawing CID)(Bakowski, Alan) (Entered: 04/17/2026)

1 Exhibit 1 - FTC v. Dentsu Complaint

View on PACER

2 Exhibit 2 - Dentsu Stipulated Order

View on PACER

3 Exhibit 3 - WPP Stipulated Order

View on PACER

4 Exhibit 4 - Publicis Stipulated Order

View on RECAP

5 Exhibit 5 - Letter Withdrawing CID

View on RECAP

RECAP
34 April 21, 2026

RESPONSE re 33 Notice (Other), filed by NEWSGUARD TECHNOLOGIES. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - June 2025 letter to the FTC)(Rudovsky, Samuel) (Entered: 04/21/2026)

1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - June 2025 letter to the FTC

View on RECAP

RECAP
35 April 22, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by James C. Grant on behalf of NEWSGUARD TECHNOLOGIES (Grant, James) (Entered: 04/22/2026)

RECAP
36 April 22, 2026

ORDER denying the plaintiff's 11 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. See text for details. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on April 22, 2026. (lcdlf1) (Entered: 04/22/2026)

RECAP
37 April 22, 2026

NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL TO DC CIRCUIT COURT as to 36 Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction by NEWSGUARD TECHNOLOGIES. Filing fee $ 605, receipt number ADCDC-12377554. Fee Status: Fee Paid. (Corn-Revere, Robert) Modified event on 4/23/2026 (znmw). (Entered: 04/22/2026)

RECAP
April 22, 2026

Status Conference AND ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines

April 22, 2026

.Order AND ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines

April 22, 2026

Minute Entry for Telephonic Oral Ruling held on 4/22/2026 before Judge Dabney L. Friedrich: For reasons stated on the record, the Court denied without prejudice 11 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Proposed schedule for further proceedings due by 4/29/2026. Court Reporter: Sara Wick. (smc)

April 22, 2026

MINUTE ORDER. It is ORDERED that the parties shall file, on or before April 29, 2026, a joint status report proposing a schedule for further proceedings. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on April 22, 2026. (lcdlf1)

38 April 23, 2026

Transmission of the Notice of Appeal, Order Appealed (Memorandum Opinion), and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals fee was paid re 37 Notice of Appeal to DC Circuit Court. (znmw) (Entered: 04/23/2026)

RECAP
April 28, 2026

USCA Case Number

April 28, 2026

USCA Case Number 26-5138 for 37 Notice of Appeal to DC Circuit Court, filed by NEWSGUARD TECHNOLOGIES. (znmw)

39 April 29, 2026

Joint STATUS REPORT by NEWSGUARD TECHNOLOGIES. (Corn-Revere, Robert) (Entered: 04/29/2026)

RECAP
April 30, 2026

.Order AND ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines

April 30, 2026

MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of the parties' 39 Joint Status Report, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff shall file any motion for abeyance on or before May 15, 2026; the defendants shall file their response to any such motion on or before May 29, 2026; and the plaintiff shall file any reply on or before June 5, 2026. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on April 30, 2026. (lcdlf1)

40 May 15, 2026

MOTION to Hold in Abeyance Pending Interlocutory Appeal by NEWSGUARD TECHNOLOGIES. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Corn-Revere, Robert) (Entered: 05/15/2026)

1

View on RECAP

RECAP
41 May 29, 2026

RESPONSE re 40 MOTION to Hold in Abeyance Pending Interlocutory Appeal filed by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, ANDREW FERGUSON. (Beck, Ethan) (Entered: 05/29/2026)

RECAP
42 June 3, 2026

TRANSCRIPT OF ORAL RULING before Judge Dabney L. Friedrich held on 04/22/2026. Page Numbers: 1-11. Date of Issuance: 06/03/2026. Court Reporter: Sara Wick, telephone number 202-354-3284. Transcripts may be ordered by submitting the Transcript Order FormFor the first 90 days after this filing date, the transcript may be viewed at the courthouse at a public terminal or purchased from the court reporter referenced above. After 90 days, the transcript may be accessed via PACER. Other transcript formats, (multi-page, condensed, CD or ASCII) may be purchased from the court reporter.NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: The parties have twenty-one days to file with the court and the court reporter any request to redact personal identifiers from this transcript. If no such requests are filed, the transcript will be made available to the public via PACER without redaction after 90 days. The policy, which includes the five personal identifiers specifically covered, is located on our website at www.dcd.uscourts.gov. Redaction Request due 6/24/2026. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/4/2026. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/1/2026.(Wick, Sara) (Entered: 06/03/2026)

RECAP
43 June 5, 2026

REPLY to opposition to motion re 40 Motion to Hold in Abeyance Pending Interlocutory Appeal filed by NEWSGUARD TECHNOLOGIES. (Corn-Revere, Robert) (Entered: 06/05/2026)

RECAP
June 24, 2026

Order on Motion to Hold in Abeyance

June 24, 2026

MINUTE ORDER granting the plaintiff's 40 Motion to Hold Proceedings in Abeyance Pending Interlocutory Appeal. "The power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants." Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. Miller, 523 U.S. 866, 879 n.6 (1998) (citation modified). The decision whether to stay proceedings is thus an "exercise of judgment" that requires the Court to "weigh competing interests and maintain an even balance." Id. (citation modified).The Court concludes that a stay of proceedings pending resolution of the plaintiff's interlocutory appeal is warranted here. "Although courts should strive to decide cases alleging ongoing First Amendment violations expeditiously, here, it is the plaintiff that seeks to slow things down pending appeal." Ready to Win v. FEC, No. 22-cv-3282, 2023 WL 10512144, at *2 (D.D.C. July 28, 2023). Furthermore, the defendants have not identified any harm that they are likely to suffer from a delay. See id. Contrast, e.g., Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 255 (1936) ("[T]he suppliant for a stay must make out a clear case of hardship or inequity in being required to go forward, if there is even a fair possibility that the stay for which he prays will work damage to some one else."). Finally, should the D.C. Circuit disagree with this Court's irreparable harm analysis, the interlocutory appeal is likely to resolve critical legal questions in this case. Compare, e.g., Wrenn v. District of Columbia, 179 F. Supp. 3d 135, 139 (D.D.C. 2016) (stay not appropriate where there was considerable uncertainty whether D.C. Circuit's resolution of interlocutory appeal would impact discovery proceedings before the district court), with Minute Order, Wrenn v. District of Columbia, No. 15-cv-162 (Jan. 17, 2017) ("[N]ow that the discovery period has concluded and the necessary records will be on hand, the Court finds it prudent to stay this matter until the Court receives a mandate from the D.C. Circuit, which will obviate the parties' need to potentially rebrief or supplement their motions for summary judgment in light of the D.C. Circuit's ruling."). Thus, "if this matter were permitted to proceed at this time, it seems likely that the parties would need to amend or supplement their pleadings, which inevitably would waste both the litigants' and the Court's resources." United States ex rel. Vt. Nat'l Tel. Co. v. Northstar Wireless, L.L.C., No. 15-cv-728, 2017 WL 11898169, at *3 (D.D.C. Mar. 2, 2017).Accordingly, it is ORDERED that proceedings before this Court are STAYED pending further order of this Court. It is further ORDERED that, within 14 days of the D.C. Circuit's issuance of a decision resolving the pending interlocutory appeal, the parties shall file a joint status report proposing a schedule to govern further proceedings. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on June 24, 2026. (lcdlf1)

June 25, 2026

Case Stayed

June 25, 2026

Case Stayed. (smc)

Case Details

State / Territory:

District of Columbia

Case Type(s):

Speech and Religious Freedom

Key Dates

Filing Date: Feb. 6, 2026

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

NewsGuard Technologies, Inc., a nonpartisan media organization that rates the reliability of online news sources.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Public (for-profit) corporation

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Federal

ANDREW FERGUSON

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Constitutional Clause(s):

Freedom of speech/association

Other Dockets:

District of District of Columbia 1:26-cv-00353

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Relief Sought:

Attorneys fees

Declaratory judgment

Injunction

Relief Granted:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

General/Misc.:

Retaliation

Recommended Citation