Case: Doe 1 v. Patel
1:26-cv-00959 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia
Filed Date: March 19, 2026
Case Ongoing
Clearinghouse coding complete
Case Summary
This case challenges the Trump administration's employment termination of Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents who participated in the investigation that led to the federal prosecution of Donald Trump for efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
Two former FBI Special Agents, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2, filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on March 19, 2026, alleging that they were terminated in retaliation for their involvement in Arctic Frost, an FBI investigation into efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election that ultimately led to the 2023 indictment of then-former President Donald J. Trump. Both plaintiffs, who had received exemplary performance ratings and had no disciplinary history, had played support and administrative roles in the Arctic Frost investigation; they were fired in late 2025: Doe 1 on October 31 and Doe 2 on November 4. According to the complaint, FBI Director Kash P. Patel terminated them without notice, investigation, or an opportunity to respond, citing alleged "poor judgment" and participation in the "political weaponization of the government," while agency records listed only "Removal under Article 2 USC" as the basis for their dismissal. The plaintiffs alleged that defendants, including Patel, Attorney General Pam J. Bondi, the FBI, and the Department of Justice, targeted Arctic Frost personnel based on perceived political opposition to President Trump, in violation of the First Amendment, and deprived them of protected property and liberty interests without due process, in violation of the Fifth Amendment. They are seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, reinstatement, correction of personnel records, attorneys' fees, and a name-clearing hearing.
The U.S. has requested a briefing schedule on its intended motion to dismiss the case that would conclude in mid-August 2026.
Summary Authors
Benjamin Glicksman (6/12/2026)
Jinan Abufarha (3/21/2026)
People
For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72515336/parties/doe-1-v-patel/
Donovan, Margaret (District of Columbia)
Hanke, Brittany (District of Columbia)
Tulis, Elizabeth Murray (District of Columbia)
Documents in the Clearinghouse
Docket
See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72515336/doe-1-v-patel/
Last updated July 22, 2026, 3:25 a.m.
Case Details
State / Territory:
Case Type(s):
Presidential/Gubernatorial Authority
Special Collection(s):
Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government
Trump Administration 2.0: Litigation and Investigations Involving the Government
Key Dates
Filing Date: March 19, 2026
Case Ongoing: Yes
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Description:
Two former FBI agents who were fired for investigating then-former President Trump
Public Interest Lawyer: No
Filed Pro Se: No
Class Action Sought: No
Class Action Outcome: Not sought
Defendants
Federal
Federal Bureau of Investigation
U.S. Department of Justice
Defendant Type(s):
Case Details
Causes of Action:
Ex Parte Young (Federal) or Bivens
Ex parte Young (federal or state officials)
Constitutional Clause(s):
Due Process: Substantive Due Process
Other Dockets:
District of District of Columbia 1:26-cv-00959
Available Documents:
Outcome
Prevailing Party: None Yet / None
Relief Sought:
Relief Granted:
Source of Relief:
Issues
General/Misc.:
Discrimination Area:
Content/viewpoint discrimination
Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff
Presidential/Gubernatorial Authority:
Case Summary of Doe 1 v. Patel, Civil Rights Litig. Clearinghouse, https://clearinghouse.net/case/47946/ (last updated 3/21/2026).