Case: United States v. United Parks & Resorts Inc.

6:26-cv-00655 | U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida

Filed Date: March 26, 2026

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This is a case challenging United Parks and Resorts Inc.’s (UPR) policies that allegedly discriminate against individuals with disabilities.  UPR is a global theme park and entertainment company that owns, leases, or operates twelve theme parks and experiences in the U.S. under the brands SeaWorld, Busch Gardens, Discovery Cove, Sesame Place, Aquatica, Adventure Island, and Water Country USA. On March 26, 2026, the United States filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Middle Distr…

This is a case challenging United Parks and Resorts Inc.’s (UPR) policies that allegedly discriminate against individuals with disabilities. 

UPR is a global theme park and entertainment company that owns, leases, or operates twelve theme parks and experiences in the U.S. under the brands SeaWorld, Busch Gardens, Discovery Cove, Sesame Place, Aquatica, Adventure Island, and Water Country USA.

On March 26, 2026, the United States filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida in the Orlando Division. The U.S. sued UPR and several affiliates for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The complaint alleged that UPR banned individuals with mobility disabilities from using manually powered mobility aids in any areas open to pedestrian use, imposed surcharges on guests with disabilities who used wheeled walkers with seats, and failed to make reasonable accommodations for them. The U.S. sought declaratory relief, injunctive relief barring UPR from discriminating against individuals with disabilities and failing to comply with the ADA, monetary damages, a civil penalty against UPR, and an order requiring UPR to modify its policies and provide ADA training to its employees. The case was assigned to District Judge Julie S. Sneed.

On May 26, 2026, UPR filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. It argued that the government’s complaint made conclusory and vague allegations that failed to provide UPR with notice of what claims to respond to, that the government had failed to allege facts sufficient to plausibly establish that the modifications it sought were reasonable and necessary to provide park access, that UPR’s policies were necessary for safe operations, and that injunctions demanding nothing more than obedience to the law are impermissible in the Eleventh Circuit. 

This case is ongoing. 

Summary Authors

Alexis Gil (7/18/2026)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72989587/parties/united-states-v-united-parks-resorts-inc/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Gardner, David (Florida)

Karahalios, Alexandra Nicole (Florida)

Attorney for Defendant

Amundson, Corey (Florida)

Handberg, Roger (Florida)

Hur, Robert K. (Florida)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

6:26-cv-00655

Complaint

March 26, 2026

March 26, 2026

Complaint
9

6:26-cv-00655

UPR's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint

United States of America v. United Parks & Resorts Inc. et al.

May 26, 2026

May 26, 2026

Pleading / Motion / Brief

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72989587/united-states-v-united-parks-resorts-inc/

Last updated July 22, 2026, 3:23 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 March 26, 2026

COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by United States of America. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Karahalios, Alexandra) (Entered: 03/26/2026)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

Clearinghouse
2 March 26, 2026

NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Julie S. Sneed and Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price. New case number: 6:26-cv-00655-JSS-LHP. (JOS) (Entered: 03/26/2026)

RECAP
3 March 26, 2026

Notice of a Related Action

RECAP
4 March 26, 2026

Disclosure Statement - LR 3.03 and FRCP 7.1

RECAP
5 March 26, 2026

Waiver of service executed

RECAP
7 March 26, 2026

Notice of Lead Counsel Designation

RECAP
March 26, 2026

Case Assigned/Reassigned

March 26, 2026

Notice to Counsel of Local Rule

8 March 30, 2026

Order

Clearinghouse
9 May 26, 2026

Dismiss

Clearinghouse
10 May 26, 2026

Notice of Lead Counsel Designation

RECAP
11 June 1, 2026

Notice of appearance

RECAP
12 June 2, 2026

Appear Pro Hac Vice

RECAP
13 June 2, 2026

Appear Pro Hac Vice

RECAP
14 June 2, 2026

Appear Pro Hac Vice

RECAP
15 June 2, 2026

Appear Pro Hac Vice

RECAP
16 June 3, 2026

Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice AND Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice AND Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice AND Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice

RECAP
June 3, 2026

Pay Fee

June 5, 2026

Fees Paid - Pro Hac Vice

17 June 9, 2026

Disclosure Statement - LR 3.03 and FRCP 7.1

RECAP
18 June 9, 2026

Notice of a Related Action

RECAP
19 June 16, 2026

Response in Opposition to Motion

RECAP
20 June 23, 2026

Leave to File Document

RECAP
21 June 24, 2026

ENDORSED ORDER denying Defendants' motion for leave to file a reply (Dkt. 20) regarding their motion to dismiss (Dkt. 9) Plaintiff's complaint (Dkt. 1). Because Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. 9) and Plaintiff's response thereto (Dkt. 19) adequately brief the issues, the court does not deem a reply necessary. Signed by Judge Julie S. Sneed on 6/24/2026. (AJL) (Entered: 06/24/2026)

RECAP
June 24, 2026

Order on Motion for Leave to File Document

22 July 6, 2026

Case Management Report

RECAP
23 July 8, 2026

Extension of Time to File

RECAP
24 July 9, 2026

Order Referring Motion

RECAP
July 9, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File

26 July 17, 2026

Case Management Scheduling Order

RECAP
27 July 17, 2026

Standing Order

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Florida

Case Type(s):

Disability Rights

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Litigation and Investigations Involving the Government

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 26, 2026

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

The plaintiff is the United States.

Plaintiff Type(s):

U.S. Dept of Justice plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

U.S. Dept. of Justice Civil Rights Division

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

United Parks & Resorts Inc.

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Movie Theater or Other Entertainment facility

Facility Type(s):

Non-government for-profit

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.

Other Dockets:

Middle District of Florida 6:26-cv-00655

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Relief Sought:

Damages

Declaratory judgment

Injunction

Relief Granted:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

Disability and Disability Rights:

Disability, unspecified

Integrated setting

Mobility impairment

Reasonable Accommodations

Discrimination Area:

Accommodation / Leave

Discrimination Basis:

Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)

Recommended Citation