Case: Brown v. Deleeuw

1:26-cv-01249 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: April 14, 2026

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On April 14, 2026, Alvin Brown filed a petition for a writ of quo warranto in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, challenging John DeLeeuw's appointment to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) by President Trump. Brown alleged that he was the rightfully appointed NTSB member, having been unanimously confirmed by the U.S. Senate on March 8, 2024, to serve a term expiring December 31, 2026. According to the complaint, President Trump directed Brown's removal from the …

On April 14, 2026, Alvin Brown filed a petition for a writ of quo warranto in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, challenging John DeLeeuw's appointment to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) by President Trump. Brown alleged that he was the rightfully appointed NTSB member, having been unanimously confirmed by the U.S. Senate on March 8, 2024, to serve a term expiring December 31, 2026. According to the complaint, President Trump directed Brown's removal from the NTSB on May 5, 2025, without providing any cause, despite federal law requiring that NTSB members can only be removed "for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office". Brown alleged his removal was racially motivated, as he was the only Black member of the NTSB and the only Democratic member terminated by President Trump at that time, in violation of the Equal Protection Clause. Subsequently, President Trump nominated John DeLeeuw to fill Brown's seat on January 13, 2026, and DeLeeuw was confirmed by the Senate and took the oath of office on March 16, 2026. Brown argued that because he was never lawfully removed, DeLeeuw was unlawfully usurping his office within the meaning of D.C. Code § 16-3501. The petition sought leave to issue a writ of quo warranto, requesting that the court determine that Brown was the rightful NTSB member, oust DeLeeuw from the position, and reinstate Brown to his NTSB seat.

As of April 22, 2026, this case is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Ashley Hamilton (4/22/2026)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73188454/parties/brown-v-deleeuw/


Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Salzman, Joshua M. (District of Columbia)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

1:26-cv-01249

Petition for Leave to Issue Writ of Quo Warranto

April 14, 2026

April 14, 2026

Pleading / Motion / Brief

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73188454/brown-v-deleeuw/

Last updated Aug. 31, 2026, 3:18 a.m.

Docket for: BROWN v. DELEEUW
ECF Number Date Description Link
1 April 14, 2026

COMPLAINT against John DeLeeuw with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-12359639) filed by ALVIN BROWN. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons)(Salzman, Joshua) (Entered: 04/14/2026)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

2 Summons

View on PACER

Clearinghouse
2 April 14, 2026

NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by ALVIN BROWN. Case related to Case No. 1:25-cv-01764. (Salzman, Joshua) (Entered: 04/14/2026)

RECAP
3 April 15, 2026

SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to JOHN DELEEUW. (Attachments: # 1 Notice and Consent)(gsk) (Entered: 04/15/2026)

RECAP
4 April 15, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Jon M. Greenbaum on behalf of ALVIN BROWN (Greenbaum, Jon) (Entered: 04/15/2026)

RECAP
5 April 15, 2026

STANDARD ORDER for Civil Cases. See text for details. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on April 15, 2026. (lcdlf3) (Entered: 04/15/2026)

RECAP
6 April 15, 2026

REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by ALVIN BROWN. Related document: 1 Complaint, filed by ALVIN BROWN. (Attachments: # 1 Summons)(Salzman, Joshua) (Entered: 04/15/2026)

RECAP
April 15, 2026

Case Assigned to Judge Dabney L. Friedrich. (gsk)

April 15, 2026

Notice of Error- New Case

April 15, 2026

Case Assigned/Reassigned

April 15, 2026

NOTICE OF NEW CASE ERROR regarding 1 Complaint,. The following error(s) need correction: Missing summonses- U.S. government. When naming a U.S. government agent or agency as a defendant, you must supply a summons for each defendant & two additional summonses for the U.S. Attorney & U.S. Attorney General. Please submit using the event Request for Summons to Issue. (gsk)

7 April 16, 2026

SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: # 1 Notice and Consent)(znmw) (Entered: 04/16/2026)

RECAP
8 April 28, 2026

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 4/20/2026. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 6/19/2026. (Salzman, Joshua) (Entered: 04/28/2026)

RECAP
9 April 28, 2026

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 4/20/2026. (Salzman, Joshua) (Entered: 04/28/2026)

RECAP
10 April 28, 2026

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. JOHN DELEEUW served on 4/20/2026, answer due 5/11/2026 (Salzman, Joshua) (Entered: 04/28/2026)

RECAP
11 June 11, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Jeremy Samuel Bloch Newman on behalf of JOHN DELEEUW (Newman, Jeremy) (Entered: 06/11/2026)

RECAP
12 June 11, 2026

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, by JOHN DELEEUW. (Newman, Jeremy) (Entered: 06/11/2026)

RECAP
June 14, 2026

MINUTE ORDER granting the respondent's unopposed 12 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Petition. The respondent shall respond to the 1 Petition on or before 21 days after the Supreme Court issues an opinion in Trump v. Slaughter, 25-332 (U.S.). So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on June 14, 2026. (lcdlf3)

June 14, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer

13 July 2, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Cynthia Liao on behalf of ALVIN BROWN (Liao, Cynthia) (Entered: 07/02/2026)

RECAP
14 July 2, 2026

Joint STATUS REPORT by ALVIN BROWN. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Liao, Cynthia) (Entered: 07/02/2026)

RECAP
July 3, 2026

.Order

July 3, 2026

MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of the parties' 14 Joint Status Report, it is ORDERED that the following schedule shall govern further proceedings in Brown v. Trump, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-01764-DLF (Brown I) and Brown v. Deleeuw, Case No. 1:26-cv-01249-DLF (Brown II): the plaintiff/petitioner shall file a partial motion for summary judgment in Brown I of no more than 30 pages on or before July 15, 2026; the defendants/respondent shall file a combined motion to dismiss in Brown I and Brown II and opposition to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in Brown I of no more than 50 pages on or before July 29, 2026; the plaintiff/respondent shall file a combined motion for summary judgment reply in Brown I and motion to dismiss opposition in Brown I and Brown II of no more than 50 pages on or before August 12, 2026; and the defendants/respondent shall file a combined motion to dismiss reply in Brown I and Brown II of no more than 30 pages on or before August 26, 2026. So Ordered by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on July 3, 2026. (lcdlf3)

15 July 29, 2026

Dismiss AND Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction

1 Memorandum in Support

View on RECAP

2 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

RECAP
16 Aug. 12, 2026

Leave to File Amicus Brief

RECAP
17 Aug. 12, 2026

Memorandum in opposition to motion

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

RECAP
18 Aug. 25, 2026

Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance

RECAP
19 Aug. 26, 2026

Reply to opposition to motion

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

District of Columbia

Case Type(s):

Presidential/Gubernatorial Authority

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 14, 2026

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

An individual that was formerly a member of the National Transportation Safety Board

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

Democracy Forward

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Case Details

Causes of Action:

State law

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Due Process: Substantive Due Process

Other Dockets:

District of District of Columbia 1:26-cv-01249

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Relief Sought:

Declaratory judgment

Relief Granted:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Content/viewpoint discrimination

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Disparate Impact

Disparate Treatment

Discrimination Basis:

Race discrimination

Affected Race(s):

Black

Recommended Citation