Case: Doe v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

1:26-cv-01336 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: April 20, 2026

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

(This summary is temporary while we research the case.) A 39-year-old Mexican citizen and Houston resident, who is a domestic violence survivor with immigration relief under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) and sole caregiver to her eight-year-old U.S. citizen daughter, filed suit against U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and other federal defendants on April 20, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The plaintiff challenged an Interim Final Rule (I…

(This summary is temporary while we research the case.)

A 39-year-old Mexican citizen and Houston resident, who is a domestic violence survivor with immigration relief under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) and sole caregiver to her eight-year-old U.S. citizen daughter, filed suit against U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and other federal defendants on April 20, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The plaintiff challenged an Interim Final Rule (IFR) issued by USCIS on October 30, 2025, that eliminated automatic work permit extensions for Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) without providing alternative mechanisms to prevent lapses in work authorization. The complaint alleged that this change significantly increased the risk that hundreds of thousands of people would lose work authorization due to USCIS's persistent processing backlogs. Under two counts alleging violations of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), the plaintiff argued that defendants failed to provide required notice and comment procedures and acted arbitrarily and capriciously in issuing the rule. The plaintiff sought injunctive relief staying the IFR's effective date, a declaration that the rule was unlawful, vacatur of the rule, and attorney's fees.

This case is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Jonah Miller (7/6/2026)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73214674/parties/doe-v-us-citizenship-immigration-services/


Judge(s)

Nichols, Carl John (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Garlock, Stephanie (District of Columbia)

Zieve, Allison Marcy (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Defendant

Oni, Bisola (District of Columbia)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

1:26-cv-01336

Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

April 20, 2026

April 20, 2026

Complaint

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73214674/doe-v-us-citizenship-immigration-services/

Last updated July 22, 2026, 3:18 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 April 20, 2026

COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-12370441) filed by JANE DOE. (Attachments: # 1 Summons (USCIS), # 2 Summons (Edlow), # 3 Summons (DHS), # 4 Summons (Mullin), # 5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Garlock, Stephanie) (Entered: 04/20/2026)

1 Summons (USCIS)

View on PACER

2 Summons (Edlow)

View on PACER

3 Summons (DHS)

View on PACER

4 Summons (Mullin)

View on PACER

5 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

Clearinghouse
2 April 20, 2026

SEALED MOTION to Proceed Under Pseudonym filed by JANE DOE (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Declaration, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Garlock, Stephanie) (Entered: 04/20/2026)

RECAP
3 May 13, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Allison Marcy Zieve on behalf of JANE DOE (Zieve, Allison) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

RECAP
4 May 13, 2026

REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by JANE DOE. Related document: 1 Complaint, filed by JANE DOE. (Attachments: # 1 Summons)(Garlock, Stephanie) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

1 Summons

View on RECAP

RECAP
5 May 13, 2026

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Jessica R. Hanson, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-12419511. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by JANE DOE. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Text of Proposed Order)(Garlock, Stephanie) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

1 Declaration

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing

View on RECAP

3 Exhibit C

View on RECAP

4 Text of Proposed Order

View on RECAP

RECAP
6 May 13, 2026

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Juan E. Bedoya, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-12419536. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by JANE DOE. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Garlock, Stephanie) (Entered: 05/13/2026)

1 Declaration

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing

View on RECAP

3 Text of Proposed Order

View on RECAP

RECAP
7 May 15, 2026

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court ORDERS that: (1) Plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonym is GRANTED, subject to any further consideration by the United States District Judge to whom this case is randomly assigned; (2) All parti es shall use the pseudonyms listed in the Complaint in all documents filed in this action; and (3) Within fourteen days of this Order, Plaintiff shall file a pseudonymous version of her 2 Motion on the public docket and a sealed declaration containing her real name and residential address. Signed by Chief Judge James E. Boasberg on May 15, 2026. (lcjeb2).

RECAP
8 May 18, 2026

NOTICE of Filing of Redacted Motion by JANE DOE (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit - Redacted Motion to file under pseudonym)(Zieve, Allison) (Entered: 05/18/2026)

RECAP
9 May 19, 2026

MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Stay under 5 USC 705 by JANE DOE. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Declaration of Jane Doe, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Zieve, Allison) (Entered: 05/19/2026)

1 Memorandum in Support

View on RECAP

2 Declaration of Jane Doe

View on RECAP

3 Text of Proposed Order

View on RECAP

RECAP
10 May 20, 2026

SUMMONS (6) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: # 1 Notice and Consent)(zmtm) (Entered: 05/20/2026)

RECAP
May 20, 2026

Case Assigned/Reassigned

May 20, 2026

Status Report Order

May 20, 2026

Case Assigned to Judge Carl J. Nichols. (zmtm)

May 20, 2026

MINUTE ORDER. In light of Plaintiff's 9 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, it is hereby ORDERED that by 12:00 pm EDT on May 22, 2026, the Parties shall meet, confer, and file a Joint Status Report addressing the following issues: (1) a proposed briefing schedule for the 9 Motion; (2) a statement addressing whether a hearing on the 9 Motion is necessary, and if so, a proposed date and time for such a hearing; and (3) a statement addressing whether the Parties anticipate factual disputes between affiants. The Parties may also address any other issues that they believe will be helpful to the Court. Any disagreements should be noted in the Joint Status Report. Plaintiff shall notify counsel for Defendants of the contents of this Minute Order. So ORDERED by Judge Carl J. Nichols on 05/20/2026. (lccjn2)

11 May 21, 2026

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 5/20/2026. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 7/19/2026. (Zieve, Allison) (Entered: 05/21/2026)

RECAP
12 May 21, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Bisola Oni on behalf of All Defendants (Oni, Bisola) (Entered: 05/21/2026)

RECAP
13 May 21, 2026

Joint STATUS REPORT by JANE DOE. (Zieve, Allison) (Entered: 05/21/2026)

RECAP
14 May 22, 2026

STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on 05/22/2026. (lccjn2) (Entered: 05/22/2026)

RECAP
May 22, 2026

MINUTE ORDER. The Court having considered the 5 and 6 Motions for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice, and it appearing to the Court that the attorneys referenced therein meet the requirements for pro hac vice admission under Local Civil Rule 83.2(c), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motions are GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the attorneys referenced in the Motions are hereby ADMITTED to practice before the Court pro hac vice. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a) Click for instructions. So ORDERED by Judge Carl J. Nichols on 05/22/2026. (lccjn2)

May 22, 2026

Scheduling Order

May 22, 2026

Order on Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice AND Order on Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice

May 22, 2026

MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of the 13 Joint Status Report, it is ORDERED that the government shall file its opposition to the 9 Motion for Preliminary Injunction on or before June 4, 2026, and Plaintiff shall file her reply on or before June 9, 2026. If the Court determines that a hearing is necessary, it will promptly notify the Parties. So ORDERED by Judge Carl J. Nichols on 05/22/2026. (lccjn2)

15 May 27, 2026

SEALED DOCUMENT filed by JANE DOE re 7 Order,,, Memorandum & Opinion,, (This document is SEALED and only available to authorized persons.)(Garlock, Stephanie) (Entered: 05/27/2026)

RECAP
16 June 2, 2026

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by JANE DOE (Garlock, Stephanie) (Entered: 06/02/2026)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

District of Columbia

Case Type(s):

Immigration and/or the Border

Labor Rights

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 20, 2026

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

A non-citizen survivor of domestic violence granted immigration relief under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) and the sole caregiver for her U.S.-citizen minor child, who holds work authorization through EADs (Employment Authorization Documents)

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Federal

Department of Homeland Security

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

Other Dockets:

District of District of Columbia 1:26-cv-01336

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Relief Sought:

Attorneys fees

Declaratory judgment

Injunction

Stay of government action

Relief Granted:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

Immigration/Border:

Employment

Work authorization - procedures

Recommended Citation