Case: Disability Advocates, Inc. [DAI] v. New York State Office of Mental Health

1:02-cv-04002 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Filed Date: May 28, 2002

Closed Date: Aug. 8, 2017

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On May 28, 2002, Disability Advocates, Inc., along with other public interest groups, filed a civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of state prisoners with mental illness. The complaint alleged that the New York State Office of Mental Health [OMH] and the New York State Department of Correctional Services [DOCS] were deliberately indifferent to the serious mental health needs of state prisoners with mental i…

On May 28, 2002, Disability Advocates, Inc., along with other public interest groups, filed a civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of state prisoners with mental illness. The complaint alleged that the New York State Office of Mental Health [OMH] and the New York State Department of Correctional Services [DOCS] were deliberately indifferent to the serious mental health needs of state prisoners with mental illness, in violation of the Eighth Amendment, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act. Specifically, plaintiff alleged that a cycle of torment existed within the New York state prison system: a lack of adequate mental health care resulted in the placement of prisoners with mental illness in isolated confinement, which in turn caused greater psychiatric harm to those prisoners. Plaintiff sought declaratory and injunctive relief.

Defendants filed a motion to transfer the case which was denied by the District Court (Judge Gerard E. Lynch) on October 31, 2002. Thereafter, the parties conducted discovery through 2006.

In April 2007, the parties reached a settlement, which Judge Lynch approved on April 27, 2007. The settlement requires that prisoners with serious mental illness confined in Special Housing Units ("SHU") will now receive a minimum of 2 hours per day of out of cell treatment and that prisoners in the RMHU receive as many as 4 hours, in addition to an hour of recreation.

The settlement also provides:

  • Multiple reviews of disciplinary sentences for prisoners with mental illness for the purpose of removing prisoners with serious mental illness from isolated confinement.

  • Residential programs for 405 prisoners with serious mental illness.

  • 215 Transitional Intermediate Care Program beds for prisoners with mental illness in general population.

  • 90 additional Intermediate Care Program beds for prisoners with mental illness who cannot tolerate the prison general population.

  • A 100 bed Residential Mental Health Unit ("RMHU") which will provide 4 hours per day of out-of-cell programming for prisoners with serious mental illness who would otherwise be in SHU.

  • The above are in addition to 310 residential mental health programs beds which the state instituted after the litigation commenced.

  • An additional 20 psychiatric hospital beds for prisoners in need of acute care.

  • Universal and improved mental health screening of all prisoners at admission to prison.

  • Improved suicide prevention assessments, now required upon admission to SHU.

  • Improved treatment and conditions for prisoners in psychiatric crisis in observation cells.

  • Limits on the use of observation cells, where prisoners in psychiatric crisis are deprived of most possessions and clothing.

  • Limits on punishment of prisoners with mental illness who hurt themselves because of their illness.

  • Limits on the use of the punitive 'restricted diet' (a loaf made from bread and cabbage) as a punishment for misconduct by prisoners with serious mental illness.

  • Elimination of isolated confinement of prisoners with serious mental illness in cells that have solid steel doors that severely isolate and restrict communication.
The new state budget provides monies to carry out the State's commitments in the settlement agreement. These funds approximate over $50 million in capital construction costs; $2 million for additional OMH staffing for the 2007-2008 year to grow to $9 million when construction is complete; and nearly $2 million for additional DOCS staffing for the 2007-2008 fiscal year.

Summary Authors

Dan Dalton (4/18/2007)

Andrew Junker (10/22/2014)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/12210819/parties/disability-advocates-v-nys-office-of-mental/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Benkard, James W.B (New York)

Boston, John (New York)

Attorney for Defendant

Adlerstein, Lee A. (New York)

Brewster, Richard W. (New York)

Cohen, Leonard Arthur (New York)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:02-cv-04002

Docket (PACER)

Disability Advocates, Inc. v. New York State Office of Mental Health

Oct. 5, 2007

Oct. 5, 2007

Docket
1

1:02-cv-04002

Complaint

Disability Advocates, Inc. v. New York State Office of Mental Health

May 28, 2002

May 28, 2002

Complaint

1:02-cv-04002

Report of Plaintiffs' Expert, Dr. Terry Kupers, MD (PART II; PART I PRECEDES THIS)

Disability Advocates Inc. v. New York State Office of Mental Health

June 1, 2005

June 1, 2005

Monitor/Expert/Receiver Report

1:02-cv-04002

Report of Plaintiff’s Expert Steve J. Martin

Disability Advocates Inc. v. New York State Office of Mental Health

June 1, 2005

June 1, 2005

Monitor/Expert/Receiver Report

1:02-cv-04002

Report of Plaintiffs' Expert, Dr. Terry Kupers, MD (PART I; PART II FOLLOWS)

Disability Advocates Inc. v. New York State Office of Mental Health

June 1, 2005

June 1, 2005

Monitor/Expert/Receiver Report
94

1:02-cv-04002

Private Settlement Agreement

Disability Advocates v. New York State Office of Mental Health

April 25, 2007

April 25, 2007

Settlement Agreement

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/12210819/disability-advocates-v-nys-office-of-mental/

Last updated Dec. 26, 2024, 11:31 p.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
99

Letter

Aug. 8, 2017

Aug. 8, 2017

PACER

Request for Copies/Transcripts/Docket Sheet - Received

Aug. 8, 2017

Aug. 8, 2017

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: New York

Case Type(s):

Prison Conditions

Disability Rights

Special Collection(s):

Solitary confinement

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 28, 2002

Closing Date: Aug. 8, 2017

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

A New York protection and advocacy agency suing on behalf of prisoners with mental illness in New York State

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

Prisoners' Legal Services of New York (PLSNY)

Legal Services/Legal Aid

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

New York State Office of Mental Health, State

New York State Dept. of Correctional Services, State

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Corrections

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.

Section 504 (Rehabilitation Act), 29 U.S.C. § 701

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Equal Protection

Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Order Duration: 2007 - 2017

Issues

General/Misc.:

Conditions of confinement

Disciplinary procedures

Disability and Disability Rights:

Mental Illness, Unspecified

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

Male

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Disciplinary segregation

Solitary confinement/Supermax (conditions or process)

Medical/Mental Health Care:

Mental health care, general

Self-injurious behaviors