Case: EEOC v. THE PACESETTER CORPORATION

1:01-cv-00464 | U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado

Filed Date: March 14, 2001

Closed Date: July 26, 2001

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The Denver office of the EEOC brought this action in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, against The Pacesetter Corporation. The complaint was filed in March 2001 and in July 2001 the parties settled and the case was dismissed. The only document that we have for this case is the docket.

Summary Authors

Elizabeth Glassman (7/20/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/59301606/parties/anderson-v-helix-technologies-inc/


Judge(s)

Crews, Shane Kato (Colorado)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Acocelli, Richard Adam (Colorado)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:01-cv-00464

Docket (PACER)

EEOC v. Pacesetter Corp

July 26, 2001

July 26, 2001

Docket

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/59301606/anderson-v-helix-technologies-inc/

Last updated April 5, 2025, 10:54 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
7

MINUTE ORDER : by Magistrate Judge O. E. Schlatter granting motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint (filed 5/18/01( to 6/11/01 [3-1] (cc: all counsel) ; entry date : 5/30/01 (dlb) (Entered: 05/30/2001)

May 29, 2001

May 29, 2001

8

NOTICE by plaintiff's Counsel re: Waiver for executed service [2-1] (dlb) (Entered: 06/11/2001)

June 8, 2001

June 8, 2001

9

Unopposed MOTION by defendant Pacesetter Corp to extend time to answer Pla's complaint (dlb) (Entered: 06/12/2001)

June 11, 2001

June 11, 2001

10

MEMORANDUM by Judge Walker D. Miller referring to Magistrate Judge O. E. Schlatter the motion to extend time to answer Pla's complaint [9-1] (dlb) (Entered: 06/13/2001)

June 12, 2001

June 12, 2001

11

MINUTE ORDER : by Magistrate Judge O. E. Schlatter granting motion to extend time to answer Pla's complaint [9-1] (cc: all counsel) to 6/29/01 entry date : 6/14/01 (dlb) (Entered: 06/14/2001)

June 13, 2001

June 13, 2001

12

MOTION by defendant Pacesetter Corp to extend time to 7/13/01 to attempt stl or in the alternative to extend time to answer Pla's cmp (dlb) (Entered: 07/02/2001)

June 29, 2001

June 29, 2001

13

MINUTE ORDER : by Judge Walker D. Miller granting motion to extend time to 7/13/01 to attempt stl [12-1], granting motion to extend time to answer Pla's cmp [12-2] to 7/13/01 (cc: all counsel) ; entry date : 7/3/01 (dlb) (Entered: 07/03/2001)

July 2, 2001

July 2, 2001

14

Unopposed MOTION by defendant Pacesetter Corp to extend time to finalize settl docs or to extend time to answer (dlb) (Entered: 07/16/2001)

July 13, 2001

July 13, 2001

15

MEMORANDUM by Judge Walker D. Miller referring to Magistrate Judge O. E. Schlatter the Dft's motion to extend time to finalize settl docs [14-1] or in the alternative motion to extend time to answer [14-2] (dlb) (Entered: 07/17/2001)

July 16, 2001

July 16, 2001

17

Stipulation (MOTION) by plaintiff and defendant to dismiss w/prej (dlb) (Entered: 07/25/2001)

July 23, 2001

July 23, 2001

18

Settlement (SUPPLEMENT) by EEOC, Pacesetter Corp to motion to dismiss w/prej [17-1] (dlb) (Entered: 07/25/2001)

July 23, 2001

July 23, 2001

19

ORDER by Judge Walker D. Miller granting motion to dismiss w/prej [17-1] dismissing case w/prej each party to pay own costs/fees (cc: all counsel) entry date : 7/26/01 (dlb) (Entered: 07/26/2001)

July 26, 2001

July 26, 2001

1

COMPLAINT against Helix Technologies, Inc., Paul E. Hodges, Steve Janjic, Satyavrat Joshi, Scott Ogur, Andrew Schweibold, Garvis W. Toler III, Zachary L. Venegas (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number 1082-7721068)Attorney Richard Adam Acocelli added to party Bryan Anderson(pty:pla), filed by Bryan Anderson. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Acocelli, Richard) (Entered: 02/17/2021)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

Feb. 17, 2021

Feb. 17, 2021

RECAP
2

NOTICE OF CASE ASSOCIATION by Richard Adam Acocelli on behalf of Bryan Anderson (Acocelli, Richard) (Entered: 02/17/2021)

Feb. 17, 2021

Feb. 17, 2021

PACER
3

Case assigned to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) (Entered: 02/17/2021)

Feb. 17, 2021

Feb. 17, 2021

PACER
4

Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. NO SUMMONS ISSUED. (jtorr, ) (Entered: 02/17/2021)

Feb. 17, 2021

Feb. 17, 2021

PACER
5

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Case by Plaintiff Bryan Anderson (Acocelli, Richard) (Entered: 10/25/2021)

Oct. 25, 2021

Oct. 25, 2021

RECAP
6

Civil Case Terminated pursuant to the notice of dismissal or stipulation to dismiss 5 filed in this case on 10/25/2021. Text Only Entry (csarr, ) (Entered: 10/26/2021)

Oct. 25, 2021

Oct. 25, 2021

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: Colorado

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 14, 2001

Closing Date: July 26, 2001

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

The Pacesetter Corporation , Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Voluntary Dismissal

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits