Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citations

Citation 1

Citation 2

Citation 3

Search for:
2453 cases, 9166 documents
Ordered by
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
CODING IN PROCESS
EEOC, Hodgson, and U.S. v. AT&T

2:73-00149 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Filed Date: 1973

Closed Date: 1979

. 
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Walmart

6:20-cv-00163 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky

Filed Date: Aug. 3, 2020

Case Ongoing

On August 3, 2020, the EEOC brought a class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky against Walmart alleging sex discrimination. Specifically, the complaint alleges that Walmart subjected two named plaintiffs and a class of female grocery workers to a physical ability test that disproportionately impacted female applications by denying them employment opportunities on the basis of their sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The l…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. UMB Bank Financial Corporation

4:04-cv-01084 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri

Filed Date: Dec. 1, 2004

Closed Date: May 5, 2009

On December 1, 2004 the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed this lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. EEOC sued UMB Financial Corporation (UMB) under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991. With the assistance of private counsel, the complainant intervened in the lawsuit shortly after the EEOC filed this lawsuit and sought declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as puniti…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Sharp Manufacturing Company of America

2:06-cv-02611 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee

Filed Date: Sept. 16, 2006

Closed Date: 2010

On September 16, 2006, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) brought this lawsuit against Sharp Manufacturing Company in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee. The complaint alleged that Sharp violated the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) by failing to provide the complainant with reasonable accommodation and then discharging her because of her disability. The EEOC sought injunctive and monetary relief against the defendant. Judge Daniel Breen was assig…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. ZALE CORPORATION

2:01-cv-01541 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York

Filed Date: March 13, 2001

Closed Date: 2002

In March 2001, the New York District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Zale Corporation and Zale Delaware, Inc. (d/b/a Bailey, Banks & Biddle Fine Jewelers) in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The only document publicly available regarding this case is the docket; therefore, the exact allegations involved are unknown. However, it appears from the docket that the allegations involved sexual harassment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of …
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Sonic Drive-In

6:01-cv-00074 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky

Filed Date: March 1, 2001

Closed Date: 2002

In March 2001, the Louisville (and Indianapolis) office of the EEOC brought this suit against Sonic Drive-In et al. in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. In May 2002, Sonic Drive-In filed a cross claim against Barry Fergueson. Fergueson filed motions to dismiss both claims against himself in June 2002. The court denied Fergueson's motions for summary judgment against the EEOC and granted in part and denied in part Fergueson's motion to dismiss the cross claim. The…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

6:01-cv-00339 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky

Filed Date: Sept. 1, 2001

Closed Date: 2015

On August 24, 2001, the Louisville Area Office of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) brought this lawsuit against Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, London Division, alleging disparate treatment of female employees, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, and seeking relief for a class of similarly situated female applicants who had been adversely affected. Specifically, Pla…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. LARRY H. MILLER CORPORATION

1:01-cv-00301 | U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho

Filed Date: March 1, 2001

Closed Date: 2002

The EEOC's Seattle district office sued the Larry H. Miller Corporation on June 29, 2001, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho. The EEOC's complaint alleged that the defendant violated Title VII when it discriminated based on sex (female) by creating a hostile work environment, leading to the constructive discharge of the complainant. The parties entered into a consent decree on May 21, 2002, which stipulated that the defendant would pay the complainant $30,000 in damages, exp…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Shelbyville Mixing Center

3:00-cv-00066 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky

Filed Date: Sept. 1, 2000

Closed Date: 2003

The EEOC's St. Louis district office sued Shelbyville Mixing Center, Inc., International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union 89, and General Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local Union No. 89, on September 22, 2000 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. The EEOC alleged that the defendant violated Title VII when it discriminated based on sex (female) by failing to hire qualified female employees over their male counterparts. The EEOC filed a motion for partial summ…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. DEB SHOPS INC

1:98-cv-01321 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois

Filed Date: Sept. 1, 1998

Closed Date: Jan. 22, 2001

In September 1998, the Chicago Office of the EEOC filed this lawsuit against Deb of Illinois Inc., doing business as Deb Shops Inc., in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois. We do not have a copy of the complaint; therefore, the exact allegations involved are unknown. After some discovery and several conferences, the parties settled the lawsuit through a consent decree. The parties filed a motion for the entry of consent decree which was accepted on January 19, 2001.Th…