Filed Date: April 16, 2007
Closed Date: 2009
Clearinghouse coding complete
On April 16, 2007, Plaintiff, represented by private attorney Mark E. Merin, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California in order to challenge the Sheriff's policies and practices concerning the use of strip and visual body cavity searches in Solano County Jail. Plaintiff, who was arrested on minor criminal charges, complained that he was subsequently strip searched in a group with ten other persons pursuant to a policy under which officers routinely subjected custodial detainees to strip and visual body cavity searches prior to arraignment and in the absence of any reasonable suspicion that the detainees possessed contraband or weapons.
Plaintiff claimed that such a policy violated the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution as well as California state law. To remedy the alleged violations, Plaintiff sought declaratory and injunctive relief, monetary damages, and class certification.
On July 29, 2008, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint to add four new plaintiffs. The hearing and motions regarding class certification were then repeatedly pushed back as the parties continued discovery and settlement negotiations.
On September 25, 2009, the parties presented their settlement to the court. The settlement was approved 4 days later. Parties agreed that class certification was inappropriate because defendants had revised their policy on November 20, 2003 and again in 2007 to comply with federal law. To remedy the individual violations that had occurred in spite of the policy revisions, the defendants agreed to pay $12,500 to each plaintiff, $100,000 in attorney fees, and $750-$1000 to each person who contacted plaintiff's attorney alleging that they fell within the allegations in the complaint. The defendants paid a total of $210,000, and on September 29, 2009, the case was dismissed with prejudice.
Summary Authors
Timothy Shoffner (6/17/2012)
Maurice Youkanna (7/2/2014)
For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5777568/parties/todd-v-solano/
Brennan, Edmund F. (California)
Damrell, Frank C. Jr. (California)
Merin, Mark E. (California)
Cassidy, Terence J (California)
See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5777568/todd-v-solano/
Last updated April 6, 2025, 10:13 a.m.
State / Territory: California
Case Type(s):
Special Collection(s):
Key Dates
Filing Date: April 16, 2007
Closing Date: 2009
Case Ongoing: No
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Description:
CA residents arrested from 04/16/2005 through 04/16/2007 who were subjected to strip / cavity searches at the Solano County Jail prior to being arraigned and without reasonable suspicion.
Plaintiff Type(s):
Public Interest Lawyer: No
Filed Pro Se: No
Class Action Sought: Yes
Class Action Outcome: Mooted before ruling
Defendants
Solano County (Solano), County
Defendant Type(s):
Facility Type(s):
Case Details
Causes of Action:
Constitutional Clause(s):
Unreasonable search and seizure
Available Documents:
Outcome
Prevailing Party: Plaintiff
Nature of Relief:
Source of Relief:
Form of Settlement:
Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Amount Defendant Pays: $210,000
Issues
General/Misc.:
Affected Sex/Gender(s):
Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions: