Support Article

How To Search Guide
Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:

Support Article

How To Search Guide
12,615 cases, 129,261 documents
Ordered by
HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Doe v. Department of Defense

8:25-cv-02947 | U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

Filed Date: Sept. 8, 2025

(This summary is temporary, while we research the case.) This case is about the Department of Defense’s removal of medically necessary gender-affirming care for transgender adolescents and young adults under TRICARE. Said removal was made pursuant to EO 14168. On September 8th, 2025, several anonymous transgender young adults along with their parents filed this suit in the District of Maryland against the Department of Defense and several key officials, challenging the sudden removal of coverag…

Case Is Ongoing

HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Bernier v. Turbocam, Inc.

1:23-cv-00523 | U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire

Filed Date: Nov. 21, 2023

This case is about the categorical exclusion of coverage for treatment of gender dysphoria and gender transition-related care under an employee health benefits plan used by Turbocam, Inc. (Turbocam), and jointly administered by Health Plans, Inc. (HPI) and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care of New England, Inc. (HPC). On November 21, 2023, Plaintiff, a transgender woman employed by Turbocam, filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire against Turbocam, HPI, and HPC.…

Case Is Ongoing

EDUCATION
Arlington School Board v. McMahon

1:25-cv-01434 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia

Filed Date: Aug. 29, 2025

Closed Date: Sept. 5, 2025

(This summary is temporary, while we research the case.) The case is about Title IX rights for transgender students and the limits of federal power in coercing state and local school policies. On August 28, 2025, Arlington School Board (ASB) brought this action under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq. (the APA) and the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201 against the U.S. Department of Education (The Department) and Secretary Linda McMahon. Previously, ASB allowed s…

Judgment for Defendant

SCHOOL DESEGREGATION
United States of America v. State of Mississippi

3:70-cv-04706 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

Filed Date: July 9, 1970

Fifteen years after Brown v. Board of Education (1954), 88% of Mississippi’s black students still attended all-black schools. Ubiquitous “freedom of choice” plans let white children transfer to predominantly white schools. Individual lawsuits and threats of funding cuts from the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare proved unable to effect wholesale desegregation. But in 1969, the Supreme Court ruled that the freedom of choice plan in Holmes County, Mississippi, was unconstitutional and …
POLICING
Central American Refugee Center v. Ryder

613541/2025 | New York state supreme court

(This summary is temporary, while we research the case). On June 24, 2025, the Central American Refugee Center (CARECEN), Haitian American Family of Long Island (HAFALI), the Episcopal Diocese of Long Island, civil rights activist Marc Soto, and an anonymous undocumented resident filed this article 78 petition against Nassau County Police Department (NCPD) and Nassau County challenging NCPD’s March 2025 decision to enter into an agreement with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) purs…

Case Is Ongoing

PRISON CONDITIONS
Bownes v. Washington

2:14-cv-11691 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

Filed Date: April 28, 2014

An incarcerated individual in the custody of the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC) filed this lawsuit on April 28, 2014, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, against the Director of the MDOC and the general dentist of the MDOC (in their official capacities). MDOC policy detailed that a person became eligible for routine dental care only after being incarcerated for two years. The plaintiff claimed that t…
SPEECH AND RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
Richwine v. Matuszak

1:23-cv-00370 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana

Filed Date: Aug. 30, 2023

Closed Date: Aug. 28, 2025

[This summary is temporary while we research the case.] On August 30, 2023, Plaintiffs Lauren Richwine and Death Done Differently LLC filed suit in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana to vindicate their First Amendment rights. The complaint alleges that beginning in 2021, the State of Indiana began investigating Richwine’s business under Indiana’s Embalmers and Funeral Directors Laws. Though Richwine did not hold herself out as a licensed funeral director or engage in the t…

Judgment for Plaintiff

Affirmed

SPEECH AND RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
Los Angeles Press Club v. City of Los Angeles

2:25-cv-05423 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Filed Date: June 16, 2025

(This summary is temporary while we research the case further). In June 2025, the Los Angeles Press Club ("LAPC") sued the City of Los Angeles in federal court. LAPC alleged that the City had violated its members First Amendment rights, as well as state law, by using excessive force against journalists during protests. The case is ongoing.
ELECTION/VOTING RIGHTS
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Griffin-Valade

6:24-cv-01783 | U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

Filed Date: Oct. 23, 2024

[This summary is temporary while we research the case.] On October 23, 2024, Plaintiffs Judicial Watch, Inc., the Constitution Party of Oregon (“Constitution Party”), Suni Danforth, and Hannah Shipman filed this complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief against the Oregon Secretary of State and the State of Oregon (“Defendants”). Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief to compel Defendants to comply with their voter list maintenance obligations under Section 8 of the National Vo…

Case Is Ongoing

HEALTHCARE ACCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISSUES
Womens Life Care Center v. Ellison

0:24-cv-04250 | U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota

Filed Date: Nov. 22, 2024

Closed Date: Aug. 27, 2025

[This summary is temporary while we research the case.] On November 11, 2024, Women’s Life Care Center, on behalf of itself and its patients; National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA), on behalf of it and its member clinics, and Minnesota women who had received abortions filed suit in U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota. These plaintiffs sued a number of Minnesota officials, including the Attorney General and Governor, as well as Planned Parenthood branches, for thei…

Case Dismissed (Involuntary)