Support Article

How To Search Guide
Search for:
clear search

Docket Number

Key Dates

Filing Date

Settlement / Judgment Date

Terminating Date

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Case Details

Outcome

Issues

MORE▾

Document Details

Document Filing Date

MORE▾

Document Citation (Choose One)

Use this for most court reporters

S.Ct. reporter and WL only

LEXIS and L.Ed. only

Search for:

Support Article

How To Search Guide
1,372 cases
Ordered by
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. iTutorGroup, Inc.

1:22-cv-02565 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York

Filed Date: May 5, 2022

This case concerns age discrimination in artificial intelligence (AI)-aided application software. A woman over the age of 55 applied for a job posted by iTutorGroup, Inc. as an English-language tutor for students in China. When she applied using her actual birth date, her application was automatically rejected. However, when she refiled her application using a later birth date, she received an interview. This software was allegedly programmed to instantly reject women over age 55 and men over a…

Case Is Ongoing

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. DTG Las Vegas, LLC

2:23-cv-00510 | U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada

Filed Date: April 6, 2023

This case concerns discrimination and retaliation against casino employees with disabilities who requested reasonable accommodations. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed the suit on April 6, 2023, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada on behalf of a class of employees of the Downtown Grand Hotel & Casino. The complaint (2023 WL 9118832) alleged violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act, and T…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Walmart

6:20-cv-00163 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky

Filed Date: Aug. 3, 2020

On August 3, 2020, the EEOC brought a class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky against Walmart alleging sex discrimination. Specifically, the complaint alleges that Walmart subjected two named plaintiffs and a class of female grocery workers to a physical ability test that disproportionately impacted female applications by denying them employment opportunities on the basis of their sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The law…
ELECTION/VOTING RIGHTS
Weltner v. Raffensperger

1:20-cv-01407 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

Filed Date: March 31, 2020

Closed Date: July 21, 2020

This is a case challenging the state of Georgia’s cancellation of a Supreme Court seat election.  Associate Justice Keith R. Blackwell of the Supreme Court of Georgia served a term scheduled to end on December 31, 2020.  On February 26, 2020, Blackwell tendered his resignation effective November 18, 2020.  On March 1, 2020, Governor Brian Kemp of Georgia notified Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger that he intended to fill Justice Blackwell's office by appointment on the grounds that Justice …
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Grimes v. Conectiv

2:05-cv-03389 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Filed Date: July 1, 2005

Closed Date: 2012

On July 1, 2005, several employees who worked at ConectIv and three sub-contractors filed a class-action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Plaintiffs sued ConectIv, Dellovade, Steel Suppliers and Bogan/Hake, collectively known as the Defendant Employers, under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII, and the Civil Rights Act of 1991. Plaintiffs represented by private attorneys sought monetary damages and injunctive relief to redress their raci…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
Davis v. Eastman Kodak

6:04-cv-06098 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York

Filed Date: March 10, 2004

Closed Date: 2014

On November 12, 2003, an African American employee of Eastman Kodak Company filed a pro se complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging that Kodak had discriminated against her on account of her race. On March 10, 2004, the case was transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of New York and on April 28, 2004, based on the parties' prior consent to jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate, the case was assigned to U.S. Magi…
DISABILITY RIGHTS
DOJ Investigation of Alabama Medicaid

No Court

This investigation and subsequent settlement agreement involved discrimination against individuals with Hepatitis C (HCV) and substance abuse disorder (SUD) due to non-medically indicated sobriety restrictions for HCV treatment. On December 5, 2022, the Special Litigation section of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division (DOJ) announced that it had secured a settlement agreement with the state of Alabama’s Medicaid Agency to ensure that Alabama’s Medicaid recipients with HCV who…
IMMIGRATION AND/OR THE BORDER
DOJ Investigation of Giant Food

No Court

This is an out of court matter initiated by the United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Division (DOJ). The DOJ initiated an investigation into Giant Food, a Pennsylvania-based grocery store chain with locations in various states, on December 8, 2021, following a charge of unfair documentary practices. A worker who was denied work for failing to provide a permanent resident card when demanded filed a charge with the DOJ, prompting the investigation.  Following the conclusion of the inv…
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
EEOC v. Go Daddy Software Inc

2:04-cv-02062 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: Sept. 30, 2004

Closed Date: Dec. 30, 2011

In September 2004, the EEOC district office of Phoenix, Arizona brought this suit against Go Daddy Software, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. The EEOC claimed that a Muslim male, born in Morocco, was unlawfully discriminated against because of his national origin and religion in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991. Specifically, the EEOC claimed that Go Daddy retaliated against the plaintiff for reporting…
LABOR RIGHTS
Kerwin v. Starbucks Corporation

2:22-cv-12761 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

Filed Date: Nov. 15, 2022

The Regional Director of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) (“Petitioner”) filed this petition for a preliminary injunction under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), along with a labor union representing Starbucks' employees, against Starbucks in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan on November 15, 2022. The case was assigned to U.S. District Judge Mark Goldsmith.  Petitioner claimed that Starbucks engaged in unfair labor practices within the…